Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No ones offered enough money yet.lol, his day will come I hope.
Unhappyboyrock, Did you even read my post or the post from willie, why the H... are you harping on (Q will never come back) in your post, when I, nor he, ever said it would I NEVER SAID Q WOULD COME BACK GOT IT ??,,, now get that through your THICK HEAD, & I don't need your arrogant demeanor this early in the morning or anytime of day, "GOT IT ???" Geeeez your not to happy are you?? The next time you come off @ me like that I'll be meeting you in the parking lot.
All read,well it seems old Willie Sutton has a brain after all, poor guy just dosen't know how to use it all the time, gotta feel sorry for him though he's still in jail & don't know how to get out,lol, anything will help @ this point. Don't think he is capable of lying time will tell though.
He says he Emailed Fan here was his reply;
Posted by: Willie Sutton -F O
In reply to: None Date:7/18/2006 3:19:26 PM
Post #of 80938
MR LLOYD FAN JUST SENT ME A EMAIL
Q IS COMING BACK AS A HOME SHOPPING NETWORK
PLANS ARE IN THE WORKS TO CREATE A HOME SHOPPING NETWORK
A NEWS RELEASE WILL BE ISSUE IN THE NEAR FUTURE ON THIS MATTER
WAY TO GO L,F.
Rasica, Thank you constructive criticism I can handle. I shall try to be more harmonious. GLTY.
Ranzy Nukka, Jim Carey says you better get with the program pal, you don't have much time left. oh & jimmy says hi to.
bebop12345, thanks for the post that sheds a different light on the subject, I will take that into concideration of my future post.GLTY.
Yeah sparrowman I work for someone with a free account sure pal what are you drinking now?? & you can't short the pwnnies, ok, Oh sporrowman spare me the threats will you.if you refer to my postings you will see that I only respond to who jumped on my back, if you would read & let it go you will see that I would not post the same thing over & over again but you all want to continue the verbage, get real get a life & leave me alone & I won't have any one to respond to. get it, well if you believe all the PR's you have a lot to learn. who said anything about Larry, get a life pal, I'm not trying to be funny this is to seriuos when it comes to money,geeeeze.
strongtower, well then good for you, & no I'm not mad. I just don't trust SANDY or any other CEO get it?
Astrocade,It dosen't matter how many shares I hold but to answer your question I hold as many as I am will to loose, that being said, Don't worry about my free account my post were for the benefit of you and all concerned, take what you want & leave the rest, However my first post was in reply to scarecrow agreeing with him that this was a POS dilution company. If you don't like it too bad pal, &50,000.00 well if there is a R/S which like I said probably won't happen till after the first run then you will loose your shirt, your pants & your wife, if your lucky enough to have one with your arrogant deamenor. don't tell me how to weigh my words I spoke my peice, Thats all you got to know PAL. oh & I will continue to post when I feel it is appropriate. Geeez where do people like you come from you think you intimidate me oh wrongo. you just persuade me to post more, think about it.
gentric, you wrote; nothing could be further from the truth? So what you think there going to stay as a pink or on the OTC-BB forever, to get on the NASDAQ or the AMEX the PPS has to be @ or above $3.00 a share for a consecutive 30 days with 12 billion shares + O/S they would never qualify, so yes I believe a R/S is inevitable just when is the question. call me a basher I don't really care I'm not here to be your freind.lol...
Rasica, Read this & if you still feel the same way then I fear you are just a pumper on a roll & I will be done with this conversation, Oh & I posted this like 6 hours before your post to me. GLTY
http://www.sec.gov/rules/concept/s72499/klaser1.txt
It clearly states that the MM's work hand in hand with the CEO's to further the smoke screen, I don't care what the charts say. Oh & I believe this is walking the walk.
sovereignty42, well to answer your first question, I would say you are inexperianced as you have posted yourself;
Alias Born On: Thursday, June 22, 2006
Posted by: sovereignty42
In reply to: None Date:7/19/2006 10:44:20 AM
Post #of 8840
Got in yesterday! Yeah I'm a newbie...what the hell...at least I can say I was in before it hit $1.00! WHOOHOO!
But thats ok, stick around you will learn the art of & the reasons for flipping. I also feel as you don't know why I posted that remark; well its because the majority of longs on stock boards allways try to brainwash (newbies) how bad it is to be a flipper with the reasoning that it will deplete the PPS well sure it does but only till they buy back in.
You don't think it will go below .03 huh, stick around & watch if no news comes out about the 8.2 million dollar non dilutive loan or any other substancial news it will in my opinion. Time will tell, although I hope the news comes out cause I'm due for another flip,lol.
your you have stated that;-We will buy and sell some shares here and there with it if my family needs some spending money, but will always have more in than sold off.
AmbitiousDrive,PokerVertigo,eviltweety,&all, To all that have replied to my post,I only have one post left so I will have to include all in it, Thanks, any other post I will answer tomorrow morning.
1)AmbitiousDrive Thanks, I know they have a sucessfull company thats why I am still interested,lol. & I know they are in negotiations with comcast but to what degree is the question, & why hasen't it been completed yet? I do know that if any cable tv company wanted to add any network it is just a matter of signing contracts, working out the details & several days to add the receiver to pick up & tweek the Satellite reception, all told could take 2 weeks to accomplish with both parties willing & in compliance, as far as the .0003 if they are diluting it could very well go there, as far as the R/S I believe it will most definetly happen however if you have seen the form 4's filed by Sandy, so I believe it will happen after the first run to the pennies JMO. That could also be a sign of deception geeez he only bought 2 million & he owns 142,000,000,class D & 132,000,000 million class A this is where he could be diluting from IMO now that he's a pink he dosen't have to disclose it even happening, man thats bad but smart I'll but no one has picked up on that. http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/print_filings.jsp?url=%2Fredirect.asp%3Ffilename%3D0001214782%252D05...
2)PokerVertigo, I thought that was the link you were refering too,but Thanks for being honest that is another example of how PR's can deceive the general public, however I hope it was just a customer service error, if someone posted a link of it not being there & BKMP PR'ed as they did, well it it would get real ugly real quick.
3)Rasica, Microsoft is incorporated in the state of washington;
I said Wyoming is where BKMP is incorporated & suspicious... http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/company_profile.jsp?symbol=BKMP why are you trying to label me as a bash-n-dump artist theres no such thing that would be stupid, come on man/woman, get with the program I know you better than that, I will just assume you have to much going on @ the time,I hope,lol, & posting financials has nothing to do with dilution maybe you are loosing it, step back take a break, ok,
http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/company_profile.jsp?symbol=msft
4)eviltweety I understand they are unautided & that should throw up a red flag as well, unaudited, come on what they can't afford an auditor?, I know you have been here long enough to know it could very possible be a smoke screen, with the share buy back, the 8+ billion shares being halted could very well be a farce to get people to buy while they are just starting another bout of dilution, remember I said that Wyoming incorporatons can dilute @ will. & I will try like hell to get a link for that it might take awhile but I won't forget.
Good nite all, GLTA.
cableguy
Eviltweety,I haven't seen that filing as a matter of fact they haven't filed a 10QSB or a 10 QSB/A, since they were ADATOM COM INC. and it was filed on 11/22/2000 & I haven't seen an 8-K since 5/03/2004, if you have a more recent link please post it. thanks. but just the fact that they are licenced in Wyoming sends a red flag up in my court.lol. And you know as well as I do that PR's can be bogus lies, thats all I see as termination of dilution, now if you don't believe that I shall refer you to Fat Azz Frank Olsen PR's, need I say more?
PokerVirtigo, Agreed my post was vague, I will try to add reasoning to them in the future. Also I will add IMO, in my signature,
As far as Cingular & Sprint;
http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/news.jsp?url=fis_story.asp%3Ftextpath%3DCOMTEX%5Ciw%5C2006%5C06%5C27...
On the dilution factor, you are certainly entitled to your opinon, truthfully hope your rite.
mimurray, I understand that but that dosen't mean they are true to their word, I woukld like to refer you to QBID PR's they were mostly BS, I have heard from other posters that Sandy is a shady character,I don't know who it was nor do I care the fact is he is a CEO & he has chosen to incorporate in Wyoming if they wanted to dilute they could very easily do it by rendering so many shares from the A/S to the O/S, thats what scares me, beings they are incorporated in Wyoming sends a red flag in my court. a big red flag.
kv31nmc, thanks I will email them to see if the O/S has increased.
mimurray, actually I didn't like that at all,so I sold it, I don't own GZFX anymore & haven't looked back to buy again,yet. & yes I forgot about it even being posted in my profile, but that dosen't mean it's not a favorite. I just don't buy into dilution, it only depletes your initial investment.
PokerVertigo, first of all I would like to thank you for not refering to me as a basher,I don't bash to lower the PPS I only bash a CEO if it is relevent. As you may or may not know there are many ways to dilute a stock valuation. here is an example; Dilution/Accumulation/Manipulation @ its best.
I don't have any problems with flipping a stock IMO, it is the little guys way of beating the system. its basically all we have.
I hope you & all have a nice day.
http://www.sec.gov/rules/concept/s72499/klaser1.txt
Bid and Ask Volume and how it relates to
Technical Analysis of a Stock
It has become painfully obvious that big money Market Makers have a
stranglehold on the little guy in the OTCBB stock market. I have personally
observed many times more than a 1:2 (bid:ask) volume ratio of the trades
executing at the bid versus the ask, only to be followed by the bid and ask
ticking down in stocks that I own. A discussion of the technical mechanics
of an OTCBB investor's reality is in order here.
A comprehensive study of OTCBB time and sales reports with actual buys and
sells listed proves that certain market participants sell at the ask, and
buy at the bid. These reports were for about a year available to anyone
requesting them free of charge from
https://www.otcbb.com/secure_asp/tradeact_report_request.asp?type=tands,
however, recently a pricing structure was devised that makes these reports
much too expensive for many investors. Nevertheless, these reports, when
combined with other data that report the time and price level of the inside
bid and ask, do establish that some market participants are able to buy at
bid and sell at ask.
Why is this noteworthy?
Because a common technical method of measuring accumulation/distribution of
a stock is to measure the volume of trades at the bid (selling), and compare
it to the volume of trades at the ask (buying), and to note the ratio of the
two. Theoretically speaking a ratio of 1:1 should represent an equilibrium
level where price neither goes up or down, since it shows that buying and
selling activity are roughly equal. If there is more trading volume at the
ask than at the bid, then price should go up, and conversely if there is
more trading volume at the bid, then price should go down.
But in the OTCBB world, it's common knowledge that a ratio of about 1:2.5 or
1:3 (volume at bid to volume at ask) is required to move the price up, and
this up move is often delayed by days and sometimes weeks. On the other
hand, for prices to move down requires only fractionally less than 1:3.
Prices commonly drop when the ratio is 1:2 or less.
Why is the ratio so much greater the theoretical 1:1?
In these instances which happen everyday in most OTCBB stocks there is more
trading occurring at the ask than the bid, yet price falls! Why?
Certain market participants are allowed to routinely buy at the bid and sell
at the ask, and these participants do much more selling at the ask than
buying at the bid, in order too fool the general public that uses technical
analysis in their trading arsenal into believing more buying is taking place
than is actually occurring. Additionally the market participants doing the
majority of the selling at the ask (the Market Makers) are not the same
entities as the market participants doing the buying at the bid. It is my
contention that this is allowed by the SEC to deliberately fool the "little
guy" thereby allowing the Market Makers to conceal sells in the ticker tape
while simultaneously making them appear to be buys because they occur at the
ask. This should be considered Market Maker Manipulation, but unfortunately
under the current rules it is allowed. Has the SEC been implicated in fraud
by allowing this type of unusual buying and selling activity by certain
market specialists while at the same time other market participants, namely
the general public do not receive such favorable prices for similar trades?
Volume Manipulation and the
"Market Maker orchestrated Pump and Dump"
Volume Manipulation is another area where Market Maker's collude to create
the impression that there is more activity, accumulation or distribution,
then there actually is. For example, Market Maker A buys 100K from Market
Maker B, who then sells them to Market Maker C, then Market Maker D buys
them, making it appear as if there is 300K worth of volume, when all that
was happening was a "Churn" game that served to inflate volume for the day.
For a more in depth discussion of how this works, please see The Forbes
article titled "One Day Soon the Music's Going to Stop"
http://www.forbes.com/forbes/072996/5803072a.htm
The core aspect of this manipulation is the structure of NASDAQ's ACT system
itself, and which can be discerned by studying the buys and sells as they
are reported in the OTCBB time and sales reports, and by studying the
reporting as it occurs in the ACT system. The major distinguishing feature
here is that Market Maker to Market Maker transactions are recorded on the
sell side only (same as an investor buy), in contrast, the ACT system
records both buys and sells by Market Makers when the trade is being made
with the general public.
Lets look at a few examples, and please note that the side of the trade is
inverted depending upon the market participants "point of view." When a
Market Maker buys from the general public, it's the same as an investor
sell, it is recorded as an ACT system buy or "B". When a Market Maker sells
to the General public, which is the same as an investor buy, it is recorded
as an ACT system sell or "S". So the Market Makers report both buys and
sells to the general public. Unfortunately here is where the rules change to
the detriment of the average investor: A Market Maker to Market Maker
transaction is recorded solely on the sell side as an "S", not on the buy
"B" side. If a Market Maker buys from another Market Maker, it is not
recorded in the ACT system as a "B", it is only the selling Market Maker
that reports it. This is the core reason that it appears in the real time
price stream for OTCBB stocks that a bid:ask ratio of greater than 1:3 is
often required in order for prices to move up, since a Market Maker to
Market Maker transaction represents no change in the supply demand
equilibrium of a stock. The excess over 1:1 is Market Makers trading with
each other.
All sorts of technical accumulation/distribution models use volume in their
calculations, and this churn game where Market Makers sell to each other can
be used to manipulate the buying and selling of many who use such technical
models in their trading. These types of churn trades are all but impossible
to discern from retail trades and to my knowledge are currently completely
impossible to discern in real-time. The Market Makers combine this "churn"
trading with artificial price walk downs and naked shorting, and you have the
potential of complete Market Maker Manipulation of the whole price and volume
chart. This would be exceedingly profitable to conspirators at critical
technical junctures such as the apex of triangles and quiet, pre-breakout
trading ranges to make it appear that the order flow is going opposite to the
"real" order flow.
Why are MarketMaker's are allowed to report these churn trades (Market Maker
to Market Maker) as volume, since supposedly a Market Maker is only
concerned with "making a market?" There is no legitimate need for volume
figures reported in real time price streams as well as end of day price
reports to include Market Maker to Market Maker transactions. After all, who
is the market being made for? Another Market Maker?
Volume manipulation is a type of "pump and dump" scheme orchestrated by and
for the benefit of the Market Makers themselves. It works like this: The
Market Makers start selling to each other to artificially inflate the volume
figure over a period of days to generate investor interest, but they do not
yet start Naked Shorting. Now after some number of investors have laid down
their hard earned money and there has been some price appreciation, Market
Makers then start to Naked Short the position, effectively capturing the
Investors Money, as price erodes due to the dilution that the creation of
the short positions cause. This capture of investors money occurs in the
event the investor has a stop loss figured into their trading strategy which
mandates them to limit their losses, so they sell due to price erosion
caused by Naked Shorting. Stop loss's are always recommended in beginner's
guides to technical analysis and automated trading strategies.
I wonder why?
In any case these stop loss strategies combined with the flawed reporting
structure of the real time price stream, line the Market Makers pockets with
huge sums of money.
Come on now don't even go there pal, if I were a paid basher don't you think my employer would have signed my up with a subscription,lol,,, I told you I only get 15 post a day, now I am done with you, I didn't even post any derogatory remarks; I just simply agreed with another poster. And you choose to attack me as a basher, oh your good pal.
Dr. Wilson, Please sir if you really are a Doctor, explaine why they would have to file when they are a pink? hint they DON'T... and to make matters worse;
State of Incorporation: Wyoming ,,, (OMG) Oh My God!!!
Don't you know that a company that is incorporated in the state of Wyoming, shoot they don't ever have to file anything, all they have to do is DILUTE from the A/S, its perfectly legal in that state sir, check on it. they don't even need a transfer agent. hence forth; Transfer Agent: Not Available
lookfarward, Oh yes your profits;
Posted by: lookforward
In reply to: tradewell who wrote msg# 86382 Date:6/20/2006 12:41:34 AM
Post #of 110995
On the contrary, I've doubled my money, and hope to many more times.
Posted by: lookforward
In reply to: leemalone2k3 who wrote msg# 110979 Date:7/22/2006 2:36:16 PM
Post #of 110994
I've done exceedingly well on this stock, and plan to do even more, as a long. Flipping has serious risks/costs. If you wish to take those risks, fine.
Now how could you have done exceedingly well on this stock unless you have sold?? Still holding you say? then its not over yet for all you know even the (newbie) slappers could grow weary of this DILUTION & sell till the PPS goes down to .0002 you don't know, but yet you say you have done exceedingly well, that could only mean that you have flipped,oooops did I say that??
Posted by: lookforward
In reply to: shakerzzz who wrote msg# 92057 Date:6/26/2006 9:39:01 AM
Post #of 110995
Ask thinning! Triple zeros soon to be history!!
Oh are they now?
Consternation you say; exactly rite I am fearfull the PPS will be DILUTED down to .0002 and then a R/S occures, yikes not good but then you say you have done well,not.
would say that
Like I said look at the charts the accumulation is going up & the PPS is going down, stocks don't do this unless there diluting. Now if you insist on calling me a basher I will show you what bashing is all about, I don't post much so therfore I don't believe in bashing a stock, but if you insist on calling me a basher I will spend all my 15 post reposting my post # 110988, so don't go there! Oh & have a nice day!
lookforward, thats what you think I don't expect news till dilution stops & then look out for the dreded R/S cause Sandy ain't no dummy, he will want to get on another board, nasdaq, NY exchange so there will be a R/S, if you don't believe there is dilution then why is the accumulation indicator going up & the PPS going down, duh, call me a basher I don't really care, I just know that I won't buy till thee dilution stops & no I don't chase I buy on the dips, oh there will be plenty of those,what are you a pumper trying to get newbies to buy so you can flip & cash in on there 'love & emotion' for the stock.ha,ha,ha,...
Posted by: lookforward
In reply to: lookforward who wrote msg# 108281 Date:7/18/2006 11:18:22 AM
Post #of 110987
The price of admission is going up.
Oh is it now?
Posted by: lookforward
In reply to: None Date:7/18/2006 11:14:12 AM
Post #of 110987
Get the nines while they last. Triple zeros soon to be gone IMO.
Oh is it now?
Posted by: lookforward
In reply to: lookforward who wrote msg# 110499 Date:7/21/2006 10:39:25 AM
Post #of 110987
With a little buying pressure at the Ask, it will thin quickly. Lets get this going!
well with that statement its apparent! you are just a stock pumper!
Oh & then theres this;
Posted by: lookforward
In reply to: ogclip who wrote msg# 106528 Date:7/14/2006 9:29:57 AM
Post #of 110987
It is becoming clear that the FCC is the determing factor as to when we will see things start to move. Once approval is granted carriers will come on board rapidly, IMO.
Oh would they??
I would think that with the Verizon, Cingular, Sprint deals that they have gotten FCC approval,No??, they surely couldn't have been on our (USA,communications) airways without it. Could they? Oh don't get me wrong I'm all for the fight network being on the USA Cable TV carriers, thats just more work for me, remember my screen name? HA,HA,HA, I just don't like lying Azz diluting POS, CEO's. Oh & yes I work for one, I don't like him either,lol.
The best thing you could have done is left my post alone !
Agreed!, diluted POS.eom
Agreed!, diluted POS,eom
scarecrow173,I don't care who they are the majority of shareholders flip even if they say they don't, I don't believe a one of them, sure there may be some that don't but they are the stupid & or inexperianced ones.
Children)you know who you are,can we go the day without the constant barage of name calling & insults, the stocks on its way up now lets be thankfull for that.
Great Karma & IHDR both on ignore.eom
I hear ya sniper wasen't me I didn't have enough shares to drop it this low, everyone is tired of waiting & don't think the deal will go through. GLTY
to tell you the truth I think you are the ship here now I doubt anyone else is holding I had to sell a while ago but will keep an eye on it. GLTY & All
frankie there a pink they don't have to file, but to get the PPS up they better, I'm just wondering why the surge in volume 8,057,000 today JMO.
We close green today, eom.
.0389x4 .039x3 arca bid, etrd on ask
ok, fair enough.eom
well that goes without saying don't ya think, what was not cival about it?
frankie he's a pumper, I don't like pumpers.
I guess thats why you are madmax666, no but I'll give you somthing to hold with your ignorance. &^%$#& *&^%$# !!!
nevermind jabberstox I found it, by the manner in which you posted it I misconstrude it as a bashers post, sorry man,
jababerstox, so where is the 8K to prove that dilution statement you speak of?
they are a BB company they have to file it.