Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
$NSAV LIKE I SAID, will bounce off of .0005 fast
We MAY touch .0005 but it will bounce hard off of that level.
Huh? I don't understand what that has to do with our discussion. You said there is pumping by CEO yet he is not diluting. What's the benefit to him
But why would he pump if there is no dilution? That's been confirmed by transfer agent. What is the benefit to him?!
But how is he making money for his own pocket when he is not diluting?
So do you agree that CEO has not diluted YET??
But do you acknowledge that no dilution has occurred? Thanks
I don't understand what that has to do with your assertion that the CEO is "pumping" the price to dump shares. Transfer agent confirmed no dilution. So why would he be "pumping the price up" if he is not benefiting in any way?
Sorry, maybe I havnt worded my question correctly. You claim he is pumping the price up. But he is not diluting so what is the benefit to him? Transfer agent confirmed no dilution. Please explain thanks
There has been no dilution. That has been confirmed by transfer agent. Why would he pump up the price if he is not diluting. Please explain. Thanks
Again, that was not my question. You said the CEO was "pumping" up the pps. But he is not diluting, so why would he do what you are claiming? Thanks
That wasn't answering my question. You said he is pumping the pps up. Why would he do that if he is not diluting? Thanks in advance for answering
Why would he manipulate the price? He is not diluting? He has no incentive to pump the price up when the company is not diluting, correct?
It was owned and operated by, UNLESS litigation isn't settled then it is null and void. It wasn't settled, so null and void.
The sale of red mansion (Janes company) to CHIF is contingent on pending litigation being settled. It wasn't settled, so chif nor nsav own it. It is strictly janes personal problem now since chif and nsav have no ties to the property. CEO was clear on that and you can verify in the filings.
A simple search will prove it
He's not current. It's common knowledge. I posted link before but got deleted
I'm thinking he wants to get current first, then buy as many as he can at these prices, then drop the news officially. Wouldn't make sense to announce then he buys after
It should be coming this week
I have a hard time believing your argument that no one has shorted this stock (even market makers) since 2015. Just doesn't sound right.
Could it be possible that the naked shorting in the link the previous poster cited is accurate? I mean, no shorting by investors or naked shorting since 2015 doesn't seem reasonable, no? Thanks
Nsav has not been shorted since 2015? What about naked shorting? Do you think market makers have been naked shorting? Maybe that's where the numbers from the first link come from? Thanks
Hmm. Seems odd. The link u sent has not been updated since 2015. The link you sent previously in the other posters link showed zero. So how can I get an accurate number? Seems that the first poster had it right unless you can prove otherwise. I appreciate you trying to explain but seems you got it wrong my friend
That wasn't my question. You said the link is false/fake by the previous poster. And you cited the "correct" link and said to use that. But every otc stock I enter in, I get 0 short position. Can you please explain? Thanks in advance
The link you sent said the total short interest is 0 here. Do you believe that is accurate? Because I also checked 3 other stocks and they all said 0. Please explain thanks :)
Wait, so what are the numbers on there for then?
$NSAV NEW MANAGEMENT, new CEO, share buyback, no reverse split, no dilution, dividends paid this month.. what more can you ask for in an OTC stock? Get in before the June 1 record day for 10% dividend !! This is a once in a lifetime opportunity folks. CEO is transparent, communicates daily with shareholders, and says stop sign removal is top priority. Also should announce major deal with china telecom americas this week!! Non disclosure agreement already signed. All this is only a month or so. Absolutely amazing. Hold on tight and don't have any hesitation. Shares are in safer hands now! $NSAV
Again, NSAV is not liable in any way for the Naomi propert. None. Zip. Zilch. He's addressed this many times.
Already addressed. No liability for NSAV. He's repeated it over and over and over again. None whatsoever.
Absolutely. Anyone selling $NSAV here will have MAJOR sellers remorse !
$NSAV ONLY UP from here brother. If anyone wants in they have to smack the ask.
$NSAV WE have reached the bottom folks. Hold tight for the EPIC bounce!!
BIG NEWS COMING TODAY PER TWeet! $NSAV
Once stop sign lifted these prices will be ancient history ! $NSAV
$NSAV We WILL close GREEN!
Correct
$NSAV anyone selling at these levels will have MAJOR sellers remorse. Big news expected today per CEO TWEET! $NSAV
No. The parcel is 30'acres that use the same address. Its a rural area. The foreclosure is the 10 acres on Naomi village that's still being litigated. No effect on NSAV
He says will have NO EFFECT on nsav! Let's focus on the huge news he is about to release today!
Patient hands will be rewarded! And looks like TODAY $NSAV