Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Filing a registration statement with the SEC is the first step a company takes when they wish to list their securities. That's as far as the process went with RCC. The registration statement was rescinded in Jan '06.
Not looking to draw any parallels here...but 2 months later a warrant was issued for the Golden Eagle's arrest for...
MAKING, POSSESSING, UTTERING FICTIOUS INSTRS....lol
NRS 205.100 Making, uttering or possessing with intent to utter fictitious bill, note or check.
Every person who makes, passes, utters or publishes, with an intention to defraud any person or persons, body politic or corporate, either in this state or elsewhere, or with the like intention attempts to pass, utter or publish any fictitious bill, note or check purporting to be the bill, note or check, or other instrument in writing, for the payment of money or property of some bank, corporation, copartnership or individual, when in fact there is no such bank, corporation, copartnership or individual in existence, the person knowing the bill, note, check or instrument in writing for the payment of money or property or any labor claim or claims to be fictitious, is guilty of forgery, and shall be punished as provided in NRS 205.090.
Whenever the note, bill, check or other instrument in writing is drawn upon any bank, proof that the purported drawer had no account at the bank shall be deemed sufficient evidence to sustain the allegation of the nonexistence of the drawer of such instrument
http://www.justanswer.com/questions/13zqh-daughter-warrant-filed-previous#ixzz0JkpB1KJp&D
RCCL was NEVER traded on another exchange. That includes the Pacific Exchange.
RCCL RCC HOLDINGS CORPORATION Pink Sheets
Copyright © 2003 OTC BB Hub. All rights reserved
http://otcbbhub.com/r01.html
NAME/SYMBOL CHANGES
10/18/2006 RCCL RCC Holdings Corporation Common Stock RCCH RCC Holdings Corporation (Colorado) Common Stock
http://www.otcbb.com/asp/dailylist_detail.asp?d=10/17/2006&mkt_ctg=NON-OTCBB
Jug Mountain Ranch
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight, July 31, 2009.
The permittee shall apply for a permit reissuance on or before February 1, 2009,180 days before
the expiration of this permit if the permittee intends to continue operations and discharges at the
facility beyond the term of this permit.
http://yosemite.epa.gov/r10/water.nsf/NPDES+Permits/Current+ID1319/$FILE/ID0028029FP.pdf
No they have not applied for a new permit. There are heavy fines asessed for not complying.
Rulemaking to Allow for the Creation of a Very Small Wastewater
Treatment and Collection System Classification
The Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has initiated this rulemaking to allow for the creation of a combined very small wastewater treatment and collection system classification for communities with 500 connections or less. Operators struggle with obtaining the various licenses currently required for the different aspects of very small facility operation. This difficulty in obtaining more than one license results in there being too few properly licensed operators. This lack of properly licensed operators places the facilities in danger of being out of compliance with the rules that require they use the services of properly licensed operators. Smaller systems, due to their relative simplicity of operation, are good candidates for operation by individuals with combined licenses. Associated with this rulemaking is the need for the Idaho Bureau of Occupational Licenses (IBOL) to establish a very small wastewater system operator license. DEQ is working with IBOL to coordinate rulemaking activities.
Cities, water and sewer districts, homeowner associations, private wastewater contractors, operators, the Association of Idaho Cities, the Idaho Rural Water Association, and the Pacific Northwest Clean Water Association – Idaho Sections (North Idaho, Southeast and Southwest Idaho Operator Sections) may be interested in commenting on this proposed rule. The proposed rule text is in legislative format. Language the agency proposes to add is underlined. Language the agency proposes to delete is struck out. It is these additions and deletions to which public comment should be addressed.
After consideration of public comments, DEQ intends to present the final proposal to the Board of Environmental Quality at the October 2009 Board meeting for adoption as a pending rule. The rule is expected to be final and effective upon the adjournment of the 2010 legislative session if adopted by the Board and approved by the Legislature. This rule was adopted as a temporary rule by the Board in February 2009 and is currently effective.
http://www.deq.idaho.gov/rules/wastewater/58_0116_0802_proposed.cfm
Voice of America Includes RCC/IWS System in EPA Washington Science Forum Video Release
Question is...Is Jerry selling other wastewater manufacturers software products? Or...is that our SCADA system?....
In related news, RCC is pleased to announce the addition of Bill Parrish and Jerry Cinq-Mars to the Advisory
Board of RCC. Residents of North Carolina, their tens of years of experience in wastewater treatment sales and
engineering, and their well known achievements in the Carolinas over the past 30 years will help RCC pursue that
market with true solution providers and expertise. They will take a lead role in that region’s development
and aid and assist in RCC’s national rollout.
==============================================================
Hach WIMS, LIMS, JobCal, LabCal:
Jerry Cinq-Mars
Prosys Sales, Inc.
Charlotte, NC 28270
704-564-1553
jerry@prosys-sales.com
http://www.opssys.com/go.aspx?p=reps.html
HACH WIMS
http://www.opssys.com/go.aspx?p=opssql_ww.html
http://www.opssys.com/instantkb/article.aspx?id=10720&cNode=1J4L2S
http://www.opssys.com/instantkb/attachments/Wastewater-GUID648f1cdcea5346fcaf487b609cd25d0c.pdf
http://www.hach.com/
==============================================================
North Carolina
Prosys Sales, Inc. website
Jerry Cinq-Mars jerry@prosys-sales.com 704/564.1553
Bill Parrish bparrish@lordandcompany.com 704/846.5444
http://www.lakeside-equipment.com/newreps.htm#NorthCarolina
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/5/587/57A
==============================================================
He was most impressed with the Lakeside staff, as he pointed out Lakeside representative Jerry Cinq-Mars. "[He] has been very helpful. Willingly going beyond the call of duty." Hill said he would "absolutely" recommend Lakeside to other plants and operators.
http://www.lakeside-equipment.com/
Lakeside has provided extremely reliable equipment
supplemented by knowledgeable, friendly service staff, says
Hill. (Lakeside representative) Mr. Jerry Cinq-Mars has been
very helpful, willingly going beyond the call of duty.
http://www.lakeside-equipment.com/
==============================================================
Lakeside Equipment Corp Bartlett, IL
Manufactures water & sewage treatment equipment Sewage treatment services, Chemical treatment services, Motion sickness bags, Hygienic bags, Hazardous waste container, Trash bags, Waste containers or rigid liners, Smoking urns or accessories, Waste container lids, Urn sand bags, Ash trays, Dredge pumps, Dewatering pumps, Fuel pumps,..
Products: Sewage treatment plants, equipment & systems; engineering services: water treatment & equipment;.
http://www.macraesbluebook.com/search/product_company_list.cfm?Prod_Code=6828150
http://www.lakeside-equipment.com/products/bu1010%20Treatment%20Equipment%20and%20Process%20Solutions%20(06-05).pdf
http://www.lakeside-equipment.com/products/bu1010%20Treatment%20Equipment%20and%20Process%20Solutions%20(06-05).pdf
Where's the guy that posted the volume? Anybody know the total volume since we have been cellar boxed? TIA
How do you account for a rise is SP on such low volume with your "short theory"? TIA
Verifiable DD would put that price closer to $3.50/share as per the Golden Eagle...if you consider statements from the CEO verifiable DD...
I'm thinking Newton pulled the shares from the MM's. any thoughts?
I'm thinking the Eagle may have had to sell off some of those 83 million in assets he claimed back in '06 to cover that bad check he wrote. It would make sense, with a warrant issued for his arrest and all...call me crazy
I agree. The Golden Eagle may be just the man we need at the helm. I'll bet he can change a $9 bill with 3 $3's...lol
nevada...sorry if this is annoying
01C001411001 SOUTHWEST GAS CORP VS STOKES UNDERGROUND CONSULTING BIX
File Date 02/01/2001 Case Status CLOSED Case Status Date 02/01/2001
Case Disposition COLLECTIVE JUDGMENT**CONVERSION ONLY** Case Disposition Date 06/07/2002
Party Information
Party Name Party Alias(es) Party Type Attorney(s) Attorney Phone
SOUTHWEST GAS CORP PLAINTIFF
STOKES UNDERGROUND CONSULTING DEFENDANT
NEWTON AND ASSOC DEFENDANT
NEWTON, GENE DEFENDANT
Docket Entries
Date Text
04/17/2003 CLOSED CASE INFORMATION : CASE FILED :02/01/2001 CASE STATUS :CLOSED CASE CLOSED :04/17/2003
04/17/2003 EVENT INFORMATION : EVENT DATE :04/17/2003 PROCEEDING :SYS CLOSURE JUDGE :SYSTEM GENERATED SCHEDULED DATE :06/07/2002 SCHEDULED PROCEEDING :PEND ACTION ACTION :COMPLETED REASON :EXPARTE ORDER
06/07/2002 JUDGMENT INFORMATION : JUDGMENT DATE :06/07/2002 DISPOSITION :COLLECTIVE JUDG AWARDED TO :PLAINTIFF NAME :SOUTHWEST GAS CORP JUDGMENT AMOUNT :$3598.26 ATTORNEY FEES :$900 COURT COST :$515.3 OTHER FEES :$0 TERMS : :
06/07/2002 EVENT INFORMATION : EVENT DATE :06/07/2002 PROCEEDING :DOCUMENTS FILED JUDGE :- SCHEDULED DATE :09/24/2001 SCHEDULED PROCEEDING :PEND ACTION ACTION :COMPLETED REASON :FILED
06/07/2002 EVENT INFORMATION : EVENT DATE :06/07/2002 PROCEEDING :SIGNED ORDER JUDGE :BIXLER SCHEDULED DATE :06/07/2002 SCHEDULED PROCEEDING :PEND SIGNATURE ACTION :COMPLETED REASON :COLLECT JUDG
09/24/2001 EVENT INFORMATION : EVENT DATE :09/24/2001 PROCEEDING :SIGNED ORDER JUDGE :BIXLER SCHEDULED DATE :02/01/2001 SCHEDULED PROCEEDING :PEND ACTION ACTION :COMPLETED REASON :ORD FOR PUBL
02/01/2001 CASE INFORMATION : REFERENCE CASE # : CASE FILED :02/01/2001 CASE STATUS :CLOSED PLAINTIFF :SOUTHWEST GAS CORP DEFENDANT :STOKES UNDERGROUND CONSULTING SUIT AMOUNT :$3598.26 COURT COST :$108 OTHER FEES :$0 NO SUIT AMOUNT :$
http://cvpa.clarkcountycourts.us/pa/
I'm saying our CEO has had warrants issued for writing bad checks. I wouldn't worry about it...
Let's not stop there...how bout Ventura...always seems to end in tears..and a breach of contract. lol
Case Number Short Case Title Filed Date Case Category Case Type Participant
SC019839 DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK VS A & A PALLET INC 2/9/1998 Civil - Limited Breach of Contract/Warranty NEWTON, VERNON GENE (Defendant)
1
Case Report Case Search
Case Summary
Case Information
Case Number: SC019839
Case Title: DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK VS A & A PALLET INC
Case Category: Civil - Limited Filing Date: 2/9/1998
Case Type: Breach of Contract/Warranty Case Status: Post Judgment
Judicial Officer: Location: Simi Valley
Participants
Name Filing Document Role Attorney Filed By
A & A PALLET INC. Complaint Defendant DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKINC.
DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKINC. Complaint Plaintiff MCNULTY, DENNIS DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKINC.
NEWTON, VERNON Complaint Defendant DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKINC.
http://www.ventura.courts.ca.gov/venturaMasterFrames18.htm
Well, that last post was a criminal case...never thought to check those. lol Here are some of the civil cases filed in San Bernardino County.
Case Number Name Filing Date Charges Next Hearing Jurisdiction
RCVRS066713 NEWTON, GENE 09/26/2002 None Scheduled Rancho
STP15177 NEWTON, GENE 09/24/1999 None Scheduled
SWV36145 NEWTON, GENE 07/23/2002 None Scheduled
SWV44409 NEWTON, GENE 06/04/2004 None Scheduled
RCVRS076296 NEWTON, GENE 10/27/2003 None Scheduled Rancho
SCLSRE21366 NEWTON, GENE 01/08/1992 None Scheduled
SCLSRE22388 NEWTON, GENE 10/14/1992 None Scheduled
CCF07304 NEWTON, GENE 05/29/1998 None Scheduled
SCL95110 NEWTON, GENE 06/01/1995 None Scheduled
CIVCRE21567 NEWTON, GENE 07/01/1992 None Scheduled
SCLSRE22865 NEWTON, GENE 03/31/1993 None Scheduled
RCVRS061995 NEWTON, GENE 03/25/2002 None Scheduled Rancho
SCLSC14129 NEWTON, GENE 10/25/1995 None Scheduled
CWV137343 NEWTON, GENE 04/24/2002 None Scheduled
SCL75858 NEWTON, GENE 12/09/1991 None Scheduled
CIVCRE23311 NEWTON, GENE 03/11/1994 None Scheduled
SCLSRE22378 NEWTON, GENE 10/14/1992 None Scheduled
CIVCRE22543 NEWTON, GENE 07/09/1993 None Scheduled
Case MWV103511 - Defendants
Seq Defendant Next Court Date Status Agency /
DR Number Arrest Date Count 1 Charge Violation Date
1 NEWTON , GENE RA
110509487 06/03/2005 PC M476 06/03/2005
Case MWV103511 Defendant 2287373 NEWTON, GENE - Status
Custody N/A
Filing Type Complaint Filing Date 03/13/2006
Ordered Bail $0.00 Posted Bail $0.00
D.A. Defense
Next Action: Deputy Report #: RA-RC 110509487
Warrant Type Status Issued Affidavit
ARR ISSUED 03/15/2006 N/A
Probation Type Granted Expiration
N/A N/A N/A
Sentence Convicted Date County Jail CTS
N/A N/A N/A
State Prison Max Sentence
N/A N/A
Fine and Penalty Restitution Fine Restitution to Victim
0 N/A
Case MWV103511 Defendant 2287373 NEWTON, GENE - Charges
Arrest Charges
Count Charge Severity Description Violation Date Plea Status
1 PC M476 M MAKING, POSSESSING, UTTERING FICTIOUS INSTRS 06/03/2005
Filed Charges
Count Charge Severity Description Violation Date Plea Status
1 PC M476 M MAKING, POSSESSING, UTTERING FICTIOUS INSTRS 06/03/2005 ACTIVE
Case MWV103511 Defendant 2287373 NEWTON, GENE - Probation
Probation Has Not Been Granted On This Case For This Defendant.
Case MWV103511 Defendant 2287373 NEWTON, GENE - Related Cases On Calendar
Related Cases On Calendar
This Defendant Does Not Have Any Other Cases With Future Hearings Scheduled.
Case MWV103511 Defendant 2287373 NEWTON, GENE - Previously Disposed Cases
Case Number Filed Date Charges Next Hearing Jurisdiction
This Defendant Does Not Have Any Other Reportable Cases.
Case MWV103511 Defendant 2287373 NEWTON, GENE - Actions and Minutes
Action Date Action Text Disposition Hearing Type
07/05/2006 MISCELLANEOUS PAYMENT OF $1.00 RECEIVED.
03/21/2006 WARRANT SENT TO SHERIFF'S OFFICE
03/21/2006 WARRANT ORDERED ON 03/21/2006 AT 16:00
03/15/2006 4:00 PM DEPT. R4 EX PARTE HEARING RE: ARREST WARRANT DISPOSED
Minutes
INGRID A UHLER
CLERK IRENE ROMO
DEFENDANT NOT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF WARRANT OF ARREST FILED.
COURT ORDERS WARRANT OF ARREST ISSUED. BAIL SET AT $10000.00. MAY NOT FORFEIT.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - FUGITIVE
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
03/13/2006 JURISDICTION SET TO RS BY OTS310.
03/13/2006 COMPLAINT FILED BY BPEAR
Case MWV103511 Defendant 2287373 NEWTON, GENE - Fine Information
Date To Pay: N/A First Payment:
Prior NSF: N Payment Amount: $0.00 Last Payment:
Fine Number Fine Type Fine Description Original Amount Paid To Date Current Due
Total: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
http://www.sbcounty.gov/courts/flash.asp
you're probably right. LOL
Breaking a lease and getting stuck with a $40k bill is pretty sad. I thought the dates on that settlement were interesting, May of 08.
As far as what's going on today...don't know. Shareholders should hope that whatever it is...it doesn't make this list:
Eye on America
Granada Research
Broken Lease (Guasti Road)
Raymond Chin
As far as I'm concerned...it's the last great hope this company has.
Mr. Hess will only become a director of IWS if the Proposed
Transaction proceeds and is completed in a manner acceptable to Mr. Hess.
Further announcements will be made in respect of the Proposed Transaction if
RCC succeeds in entering into a merger agreement with a shell company.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?Message_id=35311851&txt2find=hess
FWIW
Effective at the opening, Wednesday, June 24, 2009, the common shares of Pro-Trans Ventures will commence trading on the TSX Venture Exchange and the common shares of CPVC Bromont will be delisted. The company is classified as a capital pool company.
http://www.stockwatch.com/newsit/newsit_newsit.aspx?bid=Z-C:BBB-1618429&symbol=BBB&news_region=C
Case UDRS701031 - Complaints/Parties
Complaint Number: 1
Complaint Type: UD Complaint >$25,000
Filing Date: 07/12/2007
Complaint Status: Judgment Entered 09/19/2007
Party Number Party Type Party Name Attorney Party Status
1 PLAINTIFF RAR2-INLAND EMPIREOFFICES-CA,INC RICHARD L SEIDE Multiple Judgments 05/19/2008
2 DEFENDANT RCC HOLDINGS CORP Unrepresented Multiple Judgments 05/19/2008
3 ALL UNKNOWN OCCUPANTS ALL UNKNOWN OCCUPANTS Pro Per Judgment Against 09/19/2007
Minutes
585 DECLARATION: MONEY JUDGMENT ON UD COMPLAINT >$25,000 OF RAR2-INLAND EMPIREOFFICES-CA,INC GRANTED BY COURT.
JUDGMENT FOR: RAR2-INLAND EMPIREOFFICES-CA,INC
JUDGMENT AGAINST: RCC HOLDINGS CORP
JUDGMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF: PRINCIPAL $6,345.60 INTEREST $0.00 ATTORNEY FEES $2,290.93 COSTS $553.55 AND DAMAGES $30,018.65.
JUDGMENT TOTAL IS: $39,208.73
ACTION DISPO: JUDGMENT
STAGE AT DISPOSITION: ALL OTHER JUDGMENTS BEFORE TRIAL.
JUDGMENT MINUTES CONCLUDED
http://www.sbcounty.gov/courts/flash.asp
================================================================
Rar2 Inland Empire Offices California Inc
3281 East Guasti Road Suite 200
Ontario, CA 91761-7658
http://listings.allpages.com/ca-79H0409552-ontario.html
Chin has already won the case. eom
Case CIVRS703175 - Complaints/Parties
Complaint Number: 1
Complaint Type: COMPLAINT (UNLIMITED)
Filing Date: 07/31/2007
Complaint Status: ACTIVE
Party Number Party Type Party Name Attorney Party Status
1 PLAINTIFF RAYMOND CHIN LAW OFFICES OF MARK R. MCKINNISS First Paper Fee Paid
2 DEFENDANT STEPHEN AUST Pro Per Answer 10/11/2007
3 DEFENDANT PLATINUM CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. Unrepresented Serve Required (WaitS)
4 DEFENDANT GENE NEWTON Unrepresented Served 08/01/2007
5 DEFENDANT RCC HOLDINGS CORPORATION Unrepresented Serve Required (WaitS)
Complaint Number: 2
Complaint Type: COMPLAINT (UNLIMITED)
Filing Date: 10/11/2007
Complaint Status: ACTIVE
Party Number Party Type Party Name Attorney Party Status
2 PLAINTIFF STEPHEN AUST Pro Per First Paper Fee Paid
6 CROSS-COMPLAINANT PLATINUM CAPITAL PARTNERS Pro Per
1 CROSS-DEFENDANT RAYMOND CHIN MARK R MCKINNISS LAW OFFICES OF Answer 01/04/2008
4 CROSS-DEFENDANT GENE NEWTON Unrepresented Serve Required (WaitS)
5 CROSS-DEFENDANT RCC HOLDINGS CORPORATION Unrepresented Serve Required (WaitS)
7 CROSS-DEFENDANT EDWARD PICKENS Unrepresented Serve Required (WaitS)
http://www.sbcounty.gov/courts/flash.asp
HEARING RE: STATUS OF STIPULATED JUDGMENT
06/19/2009 - 9:30 AM DEPT. R12
BEN T KAYASHIMA PRESIDING.
CLERK: LOIS M. PAHIA
COURT REPORTER LAURA MILLSAP LAURA MILLSAP
COURT ATTENDANT DENISE ANDRADE
-
APPEARANCES:
ATTORNEY MARK R MCKINNISS APPEARS BY COURTCALL FOR RAYMOND CHIN.
PARTIES NOT PRESENT: STEPHEN AUST, PLATINUM CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
-
PROCEEDINGS:
PREDISPOSITION HEARING HELD
PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL REPRESENTS THAT PLAINTIFF HAS AGREED TO GIVE DEFENDANT AN ADDITIONAL 30 DAYS
FOR PAYMENT AND REQUESTS THIS MATTER BE CONTINUED.
-
HEARINGS:
CURRENT HEARING CONTINUED TO 07/31/09 AT 09:30 IN DEPARTMENT R12.
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF TO GIVE NOTICE.
ACTION - COMPLETE
=== MINUTE ORDER END ===
Well, FWIW...whether or not IWS is going to be the Qualifying Transaction remains to be seen. Big question mark...IMO
Pro-Trans Ventures Inc.
Jun 19, 2009 19:06 ETPro-Trans Ventures Inc. (formerly named CPVC Bromont Inc.) Announce Closing of Business Combination and Name Change
CALGARY, ALBERTA--(Marketwire - June 19, 2009) - Pro-Trans Ventures Inc. (formerly named CPVC Bromont Inc.) ("New Pro-Trans") and Pro-Trans Ventures Holdings Ltd. (formerly Pro-Trans Ventures Inc.) ("Holdings") (collectively, the "Companies") are pleased to announce that, further to their joint press releases dated April 16, 2009 and May 20, 2009, they have completed their business combination (the "Combination") pursuant to the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange Inc. on June 18, 2009 (the "Exchange").
At a meeting of shareholders of New Pro-Trans on June 16, 2009, the shareholders of New Pro-Trans approved the change of name of "CPVC Bromont Inc." to "Pro-Trans Ventures Inc." In addition, a majority of the minority of the shareholders approved the Combination in accordance with Exchange policies.
Pursuant to the terms of the Combination, 1468729 Alberta Ltd. ("Subco"), a then wholly owned subsidiary of New Pro-Trans, amalgamated with old Pro-Trans Ventures Inc. ("Old Pro-Trans") to form Holdings, and the holders of common shares of Old Pro-Trans collectively received 8,300,000 common shares in the capital of New Pro-Trans ("Common Shares") for the 5,000,000 common shares of Old Pro-Trans they then held. Upon completion of the Combination, Holdings became a wholly-owned subsidiary of New Pro-Trans. New Pro-Trans will continue to be a capital pool company and will continue to identify and evaluate potential transactions to satisfy the conditions for a Qualifying Transaction, as such term is defined in the policies of the Exchange. The primary purpose of the Combination was to aggregate capital so that the resulting issuer may pursue a Qualifying Transaction, with more capital on hand. The Exchange has indicated that New Pro-Trans will have until May 22, 2010 to complete its Qualifying Transaction. Holdings will make application to cease being a reporting issuer.
The Exchange has conditionally approved the Combination, subject to the Companies fulfilling all of the requirements of the Exchange.
Board of Directors and Officers of New Pro-Trans
In connection with the completion of the Combination, and at a meeting of shareholders of New Pro-Trans held on June 16, 2009, Russel Marcoux, David Criddle, Melinda Park, Douglas Davis, Betty-Ann Heggie and Donald Black were appointed to the board of directors of New Pro-Trans. In addition, Russel Marcoux has been appointed Chief Executive Officer, David Criddle has been appointed as Chief Financial Officer and Melinda Park has been appointed as Corporate Secretary of New Pro-Trans. As a condition of the Combination, William L. Hess resigned as President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of New Pro-Trans.
Stock Options
At the closing of the Combination, New Pro-Trans granted options to purchase up to 810,000 Common Shares to the officers and directors of New Pro-Trans at an exercise price of $0.10 per option exercisable for a period of five years from the date of grant. All previous options held by the former directors and officers of New Pro-Trans were cancelled.
Outstanding Share Capital
Upon completion of the Combination, New Pro-Trans has 10,310,000 Common Shares issued and outstanding, of which 5,940,000 Common Shares are subject to escrow. The escrowed Common Shares will be releasable as to 10% thereof following the completion of a Qualifying Transaction by New Pro-Trans and as to 15% on each of the 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36-month anniversaries thereof. The release from escrow of the escrowed Common Shares may be accelerated if the Resulting Issuer is classified as a Tier I issuer on the Exchange.
Early Warning of Securityholders of New Pro-Trans
In connection with the completion of the Combination, Russel Marcoux of 2815 Lorne Avenue, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7J 0S5 has acquired direct ownership over 1,590,000 Common Shares or approximately 15.4% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares, and 175,000 stock options to purchase Common Shares exercisable at a price of $0.10 per option for a period of five years from the date of grant. Pursuant to the Combination, Russel Marcoux received 830,000 Common Shares at a deemed consideration of $0.096 per share in exchange for the 500,000 common shares of Old Pro-Trans that he held immediately prior to the completion of the Combination. In addition, Mr. Marcoux also purchased 760,000 Common Shares for consideration of $0.096 per share from CPVC Financial Corporation in connection with the closing of the Combination.
Russel Marcoux now directly owns 1,590,000 Common Shares and assuming the full exercise of his stock options he will directly own an aggregate of 1,756,000 Common Shares or 16.8% of the then issued and outstanding Common Shares.
New Pro-Trans has been advised by Russel Marcoux that he acquired the Common Shares and stock options for investment purposes, and he may acquire additional securities in New Pro-Trans in the future.
For further information or to obtain a copy of the early warning report filed in connection with the above, please contact Russel Marcoux at 306-664-1413.
Trading
It is anticipated that the Common Shares will resume trading on the Exchange under the symbol "PVI" shortly after the Exchange issues its final approval of the Combination.
The Exchange has in no way passed upon the merits of the Combination and has neither approved nor disapproved the contents of this news release.
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
For more information, please contact
Pro-Trans Ventures Inc.
Russel Marcoux
Chief Executive Officer
(306) 249-5045
or
Pro-Trans Ventures Inc.
David Criddle
President
(306) 249-5045
http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Pro-Trans-Ventures-Inc-1006806.html
good question... Sounds like it got bumped up. Wherre's that Bumpy!!?
hmmm...
Articles of Amendment
filed pursuant to §7-90-301, et seq. and §7-110-106 of the Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.)
ID number: 20091020081
1. Entity name: RCC International Wastewater Systems Inc.
(If changing the name of the corporation, indicate name BEFORE the name change)
2. New Entity name:
(if applicable) International Water Solutions Corporation
http://www.sos.state.co.us/biz/ViewImage.do?masterFileId=20091020081&fileId=20091316368
HEARING RE: STATUS OF STIPULATED JUDGMENT
06/05/2009 - 9:30 AM DEPT. R12
BEN T KAYASHIMA PRESIDING.
CLERK: LOIS M. PAHIA
NOT REPORTED
COURT ATTENDANT SHANNON DURAN
-
APPEARANCES:
ATTORNEY MARK R MCKINNIS VIA TELEPHONIC MESSAGE PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER.
PARTIES NOT PRESENT: STEPHEN AUST, PLATINUM CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
-
PROCEEDINGS:
HEARING CONTINUED AT REQUEST OF PLAINTIFF.
PLAINTIFF TO FILE A STATUS REPORT 5 DAYS PRIOR TO 06/19/09 VIA FAX OR FILE A STIPULATED JUDGMENT.
IF A STIPULATED JUDGMENT IS FILED THE MATTER WILL GO OFF CALENDAR.
-
HEARINGS:
CURRENT HEARING CONTINUED TO 06/19/09 AT 09:30 IN DEPARTMENT R12.
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF TO GIVE NOTICE.
ACTION - COMPLETE
=== MINUTE ORDER END ===
http://170.164.31.10/openaccess/CIVIL/civildetails.asp?casenumber=RS703175&courtcode=X&dsn=&casetype=CIV
=============================================================
Completion of the CPC Combination is subject to a number of conditions, including, but not limited to, the approval by the CPVC shareholders by way of Majority of the Minority Approval (as such term is defined in the policies of the Exchange) and approval of the Pro-Trans shareholders. A management information circular of CPVC dated May 19, 2009 relating to the CPC Combination and the annual and special meeting of the shareholders of CPVC to be held on June 16, 2009 (the “Circular”) will be filed on SEDAR and mailed to shareholders of CPVC this week. Subject to the conditions in the Amalgamation Agreement being met or waived, the CPC Combination is expected to close on or about June 16, 2009.
I can see why you can't stop laughing. This is most certainly hilarious:
RCC Holdings, assets from 2006.
http://web.archive.org/web/20060518080854/www.rccholdings.com/about.html
EPA Announces $19.2 million in Recovery Act Funds for Wastewater Infrastructure Projects in Idaho to Boost Economy, Create Jobs and Protect the Environment
Release date: 05/19/2009
Contact Information: Paula Van Haagen, EPA/Seattle, 206-553-6977, vanhaagen.paula@epa.gov; Mark MacIntyre, EPA/Seattle 206-553-7302, macintyre.mark@epa.gov
(Seattle, Wash – May 19, 2009) In a move that stands to create jobs, boost local economies, improve aging water infrastructure and protect human health and the environment for the people in the State of Idaho, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has awarded over $19.2 million to the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality. This new infusion of money provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 will help the state and local governments finance many of the overdue improvements to wastewater projects that are essential to protecting public health and the environment across the state.
http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/d0cf6618525a9efb85257359003fb69d/865661614f7c59d7852575bb007c7d29!OpenDocument
Upon Further Review: Maybe You Have Something There
Written by Bennette D. Burks
Tuesday, 02 December 2008
Regulators are catching on to the benefits of decentralized wastewater management.
Developers looking to lower project costs while increasing their development options should consider onsite wastewater treatment. Once considered the lowly step-sister of traditional sewers, onsite wastewater treatment—or decentralized wastewater management—is now worth a second look, and regulators are doing just that.
Developers are finding that decentralized wastewater management lowers costs and provides them flexibility in selecting and developing land. Now, the maturation of regulatory practices, treatment technologies, and management systems make this alternative an attractive approach.
http://www.sldtonline.com/content/view/577/102/
No denying...there is huge opportunity right now.
EPA Funding WEBCAST about Clean Water State Revolving Fund - May 14
Funding opportunities for wastewater treatment, water and energy efficiency, and wetland restoration.
EPA Webcast on State Revolving Fund Recovery Act funding for green and innovative projects
MAY 14, 2009, 2-4 PM EST
http://www.californiagreensolutions.com/cgi-bin/gt/tpl.h,content=3092
=============================================================
Executive Summary
Water—One of the Country’s Greatest Challenges
One of the great challenges that the United States faces over the next decade will be ensuring an ample supply of quality water. Even under normal water conditions, water managers in 36 states anticipate water shortages within the next five years. In addition, dramatic infrastructure decay and climate change will make our existing centralized water treatment and delivery even more problematic for the steady supply and quality of water that are essential for human health and for economic activity.
Decentralized water systems are central to the water challenge that the United States is facing. They are a public health challenge today, and yet offer the best solution for specific aspects of the adaptive, resilient water supply infrastructure we will need in the future.
A national recycled water quality standard would create a large-scale unified market, unleashing the unique, powerful market mechanisms that the US has brought to information technology, telephony and consumer products. In addition to the current market for onsite waste water management, a new market of corporations and institutions seeking innovative robust, user-friendly water management products will drive rapid product evolution.
As a nation, we have to focus our national resources on ensuring water supply—if we enact national recycled water standards over the short term, we can bring in untapped economic resources to address the water crisis in the US and throughout the world. We can turn the national water challenge into a new global market opportunity for the country.
Decentralized Water Management—A Public Health Challenge
An estimated 860 billion gallons of untreated or partially treated sewage overflows into US waterways each year as a result of more than 73,000 sewer spills. Over 10% of the onsite systems in the US are non-compliant. The EPA estimates that 40 percent of our nation’s waters are impaired for their most basic uses such as fishing and swimming.
Both the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and environmental organizations attribute significant improvements to water quality in lakes and streams to the construction and operation of centralized wastewater treatment plans. Centralized water management has brought dramatic improvements to safety and reliability in water management in the developed world during the second half of the 20th Century. In the US, water utility managers have focused primarily upon strengthening centralized water and sewage treatment since the Clean Water Act in 1972. The federal government invested more than $72 billion toward centralized systems construction over the last 35 years, but insufficient budget has been dedicated to maintaining existing systems, especially the delivery network from central plants to end users. Federal funds for water infrastructure have plummeted 70 percent since 1980 and almost 50 percent since 2001.
The American Society for Civil Engineers, in their report card issued on January 28, 2009, graded wastewater infrastructure with a D-, which is the lowest grade they gave, but the focus was on a small piece of the infrastructure that serves the densely populated areas of the US.
“New solutions are needed to what amounts to nearly a trillion dollars in critical water and wastewater investments over the next two decades. Not addressing the investments risks reversing the public health, environmental, and economic gains of the last three decades.” Going forward, the “funding gap” for maintaining existing centralized systems will continue to compound rapidly. The EPA estimates that the gap in funding at over $267 B during the 20 year period ending in 2020 (U.S. EPA, 2002), far beyond the resources of governmental authorities.
The EPA has recognized that decentralized approaches are necessary for addressing the toxic brew of oil, fertilizers and trash picked up by rain and snowmelt as the water flows over parking lots, roofs and subdivisions.
The Gap—Moving to Decentralized Systems
As a result, the US EPA has begun a “Green Infrastructure Initiative.” Rather than focusing upon hard, centralized infrastructure, the EPA has begun to promote green infrastructure techniques, technologies, and practices to reduce the amount of water and pollutants that run off a site and cause sewer overflows.
About 70 percent of centralized wastewater treatment and collection facilities serve small communities, comprising only 10 percent (27.2 million people) of the population served by centralized collection (Source: WERF). These populations might be better served by onsite solutions if reliable systems were available. In addition, 25% of the population is served by onsite septic systems, at least 10% of which are non-compliant at any given time.
Making Decentralized Systems Part of the Solution
While decentralized approaches are part of the solution to addressing the water crisis here in the US, the decentralized systems currently available on the market today have historically failed to provide quality water management. More than half of all septic systems are more than 30 years old, and government oversight is limited. When a situation escalates to a true health hazard, fixing systems can cost more than rural annual family income.
Decentralized solutions are already an important part of the country’s water infrastructure. About 25% of all existing households and 37% of new development is served by on-site or decentralized wastewater treatment. Essential for the success of the U.S. EPA green infrastructure initiative will be the development of advanced waste water processing capabilities for onsite water recycling. Only with national water quality standards for recycled water can the necessary solutions emerge from the market.
The Water Challenge Is Already Hitting the Bottom Line for US Business:
Creating Decentralized Infrastructure for Uninhibited Economic Activity
Water scarcity, climate change and infrastructure decay are making water supply an operations issue for commercial businesses and institutions throughout the US. Financial analysts are already beginning to discount the value of corporations based the risk that company operations will be affected by water shortages. Water management is emerging as an element of competitive strategy for large water users, such as semiconductor and beverage manufacturers, as well as real estate concerns and retailers.
Storm water treatment is a legal requirement throughout the US and a significant site development expense. Leveraging the investment in storm water capture and treatment with onsite water management creates a new source of water for a business. However, at present, much of the equipment necessary for optimal water management is only cost effective for the largest industrial water users who use over 500,000 gallons per day.
Economic Opportunity
Building highly-reliable, robust, user-friendly onsite water solutions will emerge as an important new market segment that will foster the development of new innovative designs, advanced water technology and industrial design for new “plug and play” decentralized systems. The current market for water management equipment is estimate at $400 B. When decentralized water infrastructure is added on top of that market, it would grow by several factors of magnitude to trillions of dollars. If standard products for commercial and industrial customers emerged as major new markets, revenue and profitability from water industry equipment would grow dramatically.
Existing capabilities of Americans in industrial design and human interface design gained in a diverse group of unrelated industries such as the vehicle industry and consumer electronics make the US well placed to apply existing skills and create the “water management appliances” of the near future. New solutions could provide the ability for businesses to safely recycle their water onsite, combining storm water, reuse effluent and onsite recycled gray water to supplement the amount of potable water they receive from municipalities.
Conclusion
National recycled water quality standards promise to make one of the country’s greatest challenges into a significant new global industry and a source of economic growth. Benefits would include
• Providing robust tools for saving energy and using water supplies more efficiently
• Improving tools for preserving and improving watershed health
• Alleviating significant source of corporate business risk
• Economic stimulus and new global industries in a diversity of key industries—from industrial design and manufacture to biotech.
U.S. General Accountability Office, Freshwater Supply: States’ Views of How Federal Agencies Could Help Them Meet Challenges of Expected Shortages, GAO-03-514 (July 2003), available at http://www.gao.gov/news.items/d03514.pdf.
An EPA 2004 report to Congress estimated that 850 billion gallons of storm water mixed with raw sewage pour into U.S. waters every year from older, combined sewer systems that were designed to overflow in wet weather. These combined systems, built by cities in the 19th and early 20th centuries, are now considered antiquated and a threat to public health and the environment, according to the EPA and environmental groups.
An additional 3 billion to 10 billion gallons of raw sewage spill accidentally every year from systems designed to carry only sewage, according to the 2004 report. Causes of these spills include improper connections, clogs from debris, construction accidents and cracks in aging pipes. The EPA estimates that as many as 5,500 people get sick every year from direct exposure to sewer overflows near beaches.
Larry Wheeler and Grant Smith, Gannett News Service, Aging systems releasing sewage into rivers, streams, May 8, 2008, Available online: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-05-07-sewers-main_N.htm
Barry Nelson, Monty Schmitt, Ronnie Cohen, Noushin Ketabi, In Hot Water: Water Management Strategies to Weather the Effects of Global Warming, July 2007., p.52.
“Water Infrastructure Now: Clean and Safe Water for the 21st Century” Water Infrastructure Network, January, 2006, p.4-5. Available online at http://www.win-water.org/reports/winow.pdf. For example, Orange County, California recently, experienced its worst sewage spill in nearly a decade, when an aging sewer system spilled more than 500,000 gallons of sewage onto streets and into the ocean.
The Water Infrastructure Network, as well as the EPA and the Congressional Budget Office estimate the 20-year need for clean water infrastructure at approximately $300-$500 billion.
EPA storm water rules are 'failure,' experts warn National Academy of Sciences report urges overhaul to curb pollution, Associated Press, October 18, 2008
“According to the EPA’s Report on Its Green Infrastructure Initiative, Green infrastructure” is a relatively new and flexible term, and it has been used differently in different contexts. Thus, to date, there is no universally established definition of the term. For example, Benedict and McMahon, in their book Green Infrastructure (Island Press, 2006), have defined it broadly as “an interconnected network of natural areas and other open spaces that conserves natural ecosystem values and functions, sustains clean air and water, and provides a wide array of benefits to people and wildlife.” However, for the purposes of our efforts to implement the Green Infrastructure Statement of Intent (discussed below), we intend the term “green infrastructure” to generally refer to systems and practices that use or mimic natural processes to infiltrate, evapotranspirate (the return of water to the atmosphere either through evaporation or by plants), or reuse stormwater or runoff on the site where it is generated. (http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/gi_action_strategy.pdf), http://www.epa.gov/npdes/greeninfrastructure/general
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Manual, February 2002, EPA/625/R-00/008, p. 1-5, available online at http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/pubs/625r00008/625R00008totaldocument.pdf
At the second in a series of 11 public workshops, officials and residents from the Mother Lode last week told state water pollution officials the proposed rules may actually make the problem worse, because low-income mountain residents afraid of big repair bills will simply ignore the rules and avoid contact with government agencies.."In the neighborhoods I'm mentioning, there's not the economic wherewithal to fix them," Calaveras County Supervisor Steve Wilensky said of an area along a fork of the Mokelumne River where leaking septic systems are suspected of causing high E. coli concentrations in it.Wilensky said the average family income in the area is $26,000 a year. State regulators estimate it could cost $45,000 or more, depending on conditions, to replace a failing septic system. Dana M. Nichols, “Lode officials say septic rules tough for poor,” December 18, 2008, San Joaquin Record, San Joaquin California
Ernest Scheyder, Associated Press, JPMorgan: Water supply a key issue, March 31, 2008, available at http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2008/03/31/jpmorgan_water_supply_a_key_issue/
Fiona Harvey, “Supply strains are source of problem,” Financial Times, Published: December 16 2008.
Environmental Protection Agency - Reliability and Life Expectancy of Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems
http://researchfunding.mc.duke.edu/detail.asp?OppID=6460
Actually it was put out very close to within your one month demand. It was put out by
By:
The Scientific Consulting Group, Inc.
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878-1409
in April of 2009. And I don't believe it's been posted here.
As far as the rest of your demands, you have plenty of PR's stating "future meetings" and "potential contracts" lol
Today’s Environmental Technologies—Innovative Solutions
for Regional Issues
U.S. EPA ETV and SBIR Programs Regional Workshop,
October 7–8, 2008, U.S. EPA Region 2,
New York City, New York
Meeting Summary Report
Workshop Participant List
Dave Campbell RCC International Wastewater Systems, Inc
Claude Smith RCC International Wastewater Systems, Inc.
Gene Newton RCC Holdings Corp
http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/std/etv/pubs/600r09043.pdf
LEED GREEN BUILDING COMPATIBLE
CATALYTIC WATER TREATMENT BY EVOLU-TECH
http://aaamobileboiler.com/water_treatment.htm
Well, FWIW...Hess has been consolidating and raising capital. Whether there is a relationship with RCC/IWS remains to be seen.
Source Marketwire
Date 01/26/2009
Time 01:01:58 PM
Company CPVC FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Title CPVC Financial Corporation Enters Into Business Combination Agreement in
Connection With Proposed Going Private Transaction
CDNX Symbol: LHB
Press Release
NEWS RELEASE TRANSMITTED BY MARKETWIRE
FOR: CPVC Financial Corporation
TSX VENTURE SYMBOL: LHB
January 26, 2009
CPVC Financial Corporation Enters Into Business Combination Agreement in
Connection With Proposed Going Private Transaction
MONTREAL, QUEBEC--(Marketwire - Jan. 26, 2009) -
NOT FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CPVC Financial Corporation ("CPVC Financial" or the "Corporation") (TSX
VENTURE:LHB) today announced that it has entered into a business combination
agreement (the "Business Combination Agreement") with 4506791 Canada Inc.
("CanadaCo"), pursuant to which CPVC Financial will be amalgamated with
CanadaCo to form a new company ("Amalco") and taken private, subject to the
receipt of all required shareholder and regulatory approval (the
"Amalgamation"). Pursuant to the terms of the Amalgamation, the shareholders of
CPVC Financial will receive either one common share of Amalco or $0.02 per
share. The Common Shares of CPVC Financial last traded on TSX Venture at $0.015
per share.
About CanadaCo
CanadaCo is a private company incorporated under the laws of Canada. The
principal office of CanadaCo is located in Montreal.
The principal shareholder of CanadaCo is Chahram Bolouri of Montreal, Quebec,
who owns 100% of the outstanding CanadaCo common shares.
CanadaCo is a holding company and its sole asset is cash.
Directors and Officers of CanadaCo
The sole director and officer of CanadaCo is Chahram Bolouri.
Summary of the Proposed Transaction
CPVC Financial has entered into an arm's length business combination agreement
dated January 23, 2009 with CanadaCo, pursuant to which the Corporation and
CanadaCo have agreed to complete the Amalgamation to form Amalco, a new company
to be called CPVC Financial Corporation. The Amalgamation is subject to the
policies of the TSX Venture Exchange Inc. ("TSX Venture").
Pursuant to the terms of the Amalgamation, the holders of the common shares of
CPVC Financial have the option to receive either: (i) one (1) common share of
Amalco (the "Share Consideration"); or (ii) one $0.02 (the "Cash
Consideration") class A preference share of Amalco (the "Amalco Preference
Shares"), for each common share of CPVC Financial owned. The Amalco Preference
Shares will immediately be redeemed by Amalco for $0.02 per share cash on the
effective date of the Amalgamation.
After completion of the Amalgamation, Amalco will forthwith apply to cease to
be a reporting issuer and will no longer meet the requirements and cease to be
listed on TSX Venture Exchange Inc.
The Business Combination will be an-arm's length transaction.
Given the current difficult economic, credit and capital markets and economic
conditions, as well as the illiquid nature of the Corporation's assets, the
Corporation felt the Amalgamation was in the best interest of the shareholders
at this time.
Concurrent with the execution of the Business Combination Agreement, Alain
Lambert, William L. Hess, Robert E. Brown, Ron Keenan and Guy Lever who own or
control approximately 64% of the outstanding common shares of CPVC Financial,
have entered into lock-up agreements with CanadaCo, pursuant to which they have
agreed to vote to approve the Amalgamation, tender to the Amalgamation and have
elected to receive the Share Consideration.
The completion of the Amalgamation is subject to the approval of the TSX
Venture and all other necessary regulatory approval. The completion of the
Amalgamation is also subject to additional conditions precedent, including
shareholder approval of the Corporation, the cancellation of the outstanding
stock options to purchase the common shares of CPVC Financial, and certain
other usual conditions.
As indicated above, completion of the Amalgamation is subject to a number of
conditions, including but not limited to, TSX Venture acceptance and
shareholder approval. The Amalgamation cannot close until the required
shareholder approval is obtained. There can be no assurance that the
Amalgamation will be completed as proposed or at all.
Investors are cautioned that, except as disclosed in the Information Circular
of the Corporation to be prepared in connection with the Amalgamation, any
information released or received with respect to the Amalgamation may not be
accurate or complete and should not be relied upon. Trading in the securities
of the Corporation should be considered highly speculative.
Except for historical information contained herein, this news release contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results
may differ materially. Factors that might cause a difference include, but are
not limited to, market acceptance of principal products, the impact of
competitive products and technologies. Amalco will not update these
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date
hereof. More detailed information about potential factors that could affect
financial results is included in the documents filed from time to time with the
Canadian securities regulatory authorities by Amalco.
- 30 -
CONTACT INFO:
CPVC Financial Corporation
Alain Lambert
President
(514) 395-1191
The TSX Venture Exchange Inc. has in no way passed upon the merits of the
Amalgamation and has neither approved nor disapproved the contents of this
press release.
INDUSTRY: Financial Services - Venture Capital
SUBJECT: TMN - TAKEOVERS/ LETTER of INTENT
===============================================================
CPVC FINANCIAL CORPORATION ("LHB")BULLETIN TYPE: DelistBULLETIN DATE: May 5, 2009TSX Venture Tier 1 CompanyFurther to the news releases dated January 26, 2009, March 31, 2009 andApril 8, 2009, the common shares of CPVC Financial Corporation will bedelisted from TSX Venture Exchange effective at the close of businessMay 5, 2009. The delisting of the Company's shares results from thecompletion of a going-private transaction, as described in the Company'sManagement Proxy Circular dated February 27, 2009
===============================================================
http://infoventure.tsx.com/TSXVenture/TSXVentureHttpController?GetPage=CompanySummary&PO_ID=1023642&HC_FLAG1=on&HC_FLAG2=on
http://infoventure.tsx.com/TSXVenture/TSXVentureHttpController?GetPage=PersonSummary&PO_ID=1093967&HC_FLAG1=on&HC_FLAG2=on