Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What was brought in to the Bk on the effective date is the subordinated debt 10 B claim only. This bk only recognizes the 10B claim for our CT and nothing else.
Let me be specific. This bk court we are in is not recognizing our guarantee. LBHI is not recognizing our guarantee. And Weil is not recognizing our guarantee. It is not an assumption. It's a fact.
The guarantee is actually a contractual agreement. Its stated on the prospectus.
Like I said, you need to dd.
The guaranteed is not recognized, therefore, they can make transactions that violate the guarantee without impunity be cause the guarantee in the eyes of this BK does not exist. That is what is happening. The motions call out the violations and the non enforcement of the guarantee. Lol
Man, toogood Wow. You dont have a clue do you? Lol. WOW.
What do you think all the lawsuits are about? Did you bother reading the hearing transcripts for Waske and Wu. Did you even bother reading any of the waske or Wu motions?
They are asking to ENFORCE the guarantee. If the guarantee is enforced they do not need to file the motions. Weil said it, what you got is a 1.2 billion unsecured subordinated claim in 10b. Our trustee failed to enforce the guarantee. There is no guarantee in front of the court now.
Luckily, they are battling over that bankruptcy code as we speak that can help all of us. Lol. Where have you been?
Whatever, good luck to you. I am not sure if I should feel bad for you or laugh. And you have been here for 10 plus years? The court and LBHI is NOT RECOGNIZING the guarantee.
Nah, my holdings here is minimal. I might add more shares with the stimulus money. I am mooching off the lawsuit. I wont be able to contribute much. All it took was an upload to secure a better position. Good luck to you toogood.
I am not looking for your explanation, I am telling you the truth. LBHI is not recognizing the guarantee. All you are holding is the soon to be discharged preferred shares of a sub debt placed in 10B. That is not pleasant to say on this board but, it's the truth. Ask LBHI, Judge Chapman, Weil, Waske, Wu or Wessoliek.
Good day.
Lol, you got help. It's amazing how much louder you got when you got help with the disclosure statements answer. I will admit I did not know about the disclosure statements disclosing the NOLs. It's okay. Good day and good luck.
I offered to end it. He kept it going. I will end it. There is no purpose for me to continue.
Partially, but what is more important is that you do not qualify for the NOLs or any post bk shares if the bk were to end today. You get nothing.
Edit: The bk court does not recognize our guarantee. I will stop here. Good luck
Would you like me to explain myself? I can take you apart easily on the NOLs. It will just be more humiliation for you. I suggest you just let it go.
Fair enough. Smart move.
Lol. Ok, then I will bust you up some more. What do you have, an opinion or theory on the outcome of LBHI? This is going to be good. Lol
Note: watch that typical fraudster phoney reply, " I am not going to tell you, you have to find out." Lol
I will be nice, you do not have a theory because the only evidence out there about the NOLs is a rebuke from LBHI that there will be no NOLs left after the bk because they will use it all for the discharge.
I offered you an olive branches for you to end this without total humiliation and destruction of your name. After all, you have been here for 10 plus years. You chose to get humiliated. The more you talk the less you will have to stand on.
Now, I am forced to have to tear into your NOL "theory" and leave you with nothing left.
Let's talk NOLS toogood!! say your part and I will knock you out with one Tyson punch. The argument is simple.
Remember, you did this to yourself.
Fair enough. You are entitled to your opinion.
I just found out through my 2020 tax filing that we have to report bitcoin gains. My gains are in 2021, I have more pressing DD to do on taxes now for an offset. I wish I can use some of that LBHI NOLs, if they exist. Good luck.
I will be happy too tone it down. I am simply calling out too good for what he is. Have a good evening.
You can keep your "knowledge" on the CTs. As I pointed out today, you have none. I am just calling you out and exposing you today to the board as a fraud. That's all.
No, I am not anyone of the "FOUR Horsemen". The Wossilek motion is two people. We will chalk that off as another error of yours. Your list of errors just keeps on growing with every post. Lol
Like I said what makes you disgusting is your antics. I never said I knew why LBSF is still open. I brought up the fact that they are open and you cant close the POR with them still open. That's it. You asked me if I knew why? I responded to you to please tell me why and please list details. That is the conversation. I never said I knew but, I have a good idea. My good idea relates to the UK Litigation stuff. I am not sure but, that is my assumption. Dont try to pass yourself as someone who even remotely knows anything about the CTs. It's clear that you dont. Its clear now.
It's okay to learn. I am still learning about the CTs and what is going on. I do my DD and you dont. All you do is rant and attack and try to sell your fantasy scenario. We all dont know everything here. If you dont know something, you ask. And that is what I am doing.
Anymore antics you would like to play so the board can truly see who you are? I rest my case.
You are the one who said the POR can be closed before the distribution. That is your post no? I am the one who told to that you cant close the POR or exit bk without closing LBSF. This is what makes you disgusting is your attempts to spin bogus info.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=162175107
Tell me why LBSF is still open. Please do tell me. And please point to specific transactions that is keeping LBSF open, so, I will know.
I am assuming you are saying the professional fees for LBHI. If you are talking about WWW and they have no fees, then why did you bring up the fees in the first place? You are weird.
toogood: I want to make peace. You have the right to post all your views just like anybody else. All my responses are to your attacks. As you can see, almost every post you posted that pertains to the operations of the BK is wrong. I took the time to respond to your last few posts to prove this point. You need to do some DD.
You think you can take me on but, you really can't because I try to post only facts and I only comment on the facts. I also spoke with Waske, Wu and the Plan Administrator. I have yet to contact the Wossileks but I will at some point. To this day, you don't even understand what any of the motions are about and you try to comment on them like you are an expert.
We are on the same boat but, our views of the outcome are different. Please take the time to understand the BK and the CURRENT LANDSCAPE! V
All professional fees are reserved. I am going to give you a break and not add this to the list.
Last I check LBSF and LBHI are still open. You cant exit bk with LBSF still open. I just want to call you out on all your wrong assertions. I will add that to the list I posted that you requested. I hope I still have time to edit.
Like I said and answered it before. Look at bullet A. Maybe its the CLAWBACK of a distribution that LBHI thought was wrongfully made? The explanation is right there. V
Repost all the posts where I am wrong. Lets see it. Lets start with your list
1. Indemnity claims was confused with waske motion
2. waske is keeping the BK from ending
3. Dont know what the guarantee really is
4. Thinks Our Preferred Ct shares are LBHI preferreds and in class 12. LOL
5. Dont know what the covenants are
EDIT: This one is a beaut. I did a special edit for this one.
6. LBHI PLACED LBHI COMMON SHARES IN OUR TRUST TO GIVE IT VALUE.
7. Think LBHI can close the POR out with LBSF still outstanding
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=162175107
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=162196776
Need I go on?.....quit while you still have one person on here who respects your view okay. I am doing you a favor.
Point? There is no point in talking to you. It's not like you have any LBHI knowledge. You dont have the slightest clue.
See bullet A. V
What is your point on the roughly 200 million?
If Docket #61013 is approved, does that mean that LBHI must certify that none of the sub debt on the UK Litigation that will be distributed to LBHI have to be in compliance with the Important Covenants of LBHI? Thanks.
Shares of my Wamu (Piers shares) which are WAMU CTs were converted and also put on escrow. It shows the same type of Escrow number as you listed. It is in black. I am not sure why the other guy have his Lehman greyed out.
Then you should know about my greatness, good looks and charm with the ladies.
Winning or losing is so close that only a thin line separates the two.
I spent about a little more than a year here. You spent 12 years here and still have no clue what is going on. Now, that is funny.
There is candy for the kids in this neighborhood. But, not every kid will get some candy. Jmho.
Its cumulative. I believe the 20 qtr deferment was moot because of the automatic stay. No dividend was paid. We are entitled to the dividends.
They can defer the dividend but it still accumulates while its deferred right?
The question that matters is what is the route to getting paid? Good day.
Are the interests of dividends for the CT's cumulative? Thanks.
That means you dont understand what is going on. Lol. Good day.
No. You are wrong. LBHI do not own most of LBIE. Do you even understand what is going on?
Lbie, plc, etc.. belongs to their shareholders.