Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
This coming from someone who has been dead_wrong in every single post he has made going back to the start of ihub (and speaking to someone who posted accurate and honest information). This coming from someone who has misled anyone, at every turn, who has been naive and gullible enough to pay credence to him. Can you name one single post of yours that has been accurate and came true? Just one? You have the most lack of self-awareness of anyone that ever lived. Even a bull with chronic diarrhea would be duly impressed with what you spew.
"Your full of shit!"
bull·shit
/'boolSHit/
VULGAR SLANG
noun
stupid or untrue talk or writing; nonsense.
verb
talk nonsense to (someone), typically to be misleading or deceptive.
Surf, the information is all in the filings and official PR's of how this deal went down and how mwwc stands to profit. I am not going to waste my time delving into the accounting techniques involved and how things were classified. To be quite honest, I hope you succeed in creating panic selling and drive the ask back to .0001 in the short term. Good luck. It would be very advantageous to me, for you and others, to accomplish that. I am not disingenuous enough to participate in it myself. But I will sit back and allow it to happen. Again good luck. I hope you, and it is apparent others are working on the same goal, succeed in your mission. I'm very patient, I've done far more investigating than people usually do, and I am following through with my plan regardless of what anyone else thinks, says, or wants to lead others to do.
This coming from someone who has dead wrong in every single post going back to the start of ihub. Can you name one single post of yours that has been accurate and came true? Just one? What happened to following your own advice before advising others?
"Enough of your BS!"
bull·shit
/'boolSHit/
VULGAR SLANG
noun
stupid or untrue talk or writing; nonsense.
verb
talk nonsense to (someone), typically to be misleading or deceptive.
CHARLIESAN
Re: rodman post# 12756
Tuesday, December 19, 2023 12:11:04 PM
Post# 12757 of 13460
"Yes, I am a loser; about 800K in this position; and I own a significant amount of shares; in the 7 digits. You must be braindead to think that this CEO and management team do not deserve criticism in their inability to get a PMA filed. They need prodded; pushed; criticized; by any means necessary to accomplish their duties. So you will stand by another year and watch paint dry? Their communication and actions are a travesty and reek of incompetence. Calling it like it is. If you cannot see this you might look in the mirror before denigrating others."
Lol. The only thing I want to know is, will we be making money before the end of this summer? LOL
"The Bull Shit Detection Rules
No1: Wherever possible there must be INDEPENDENT unbiased confirmation of the “facts.”
That means any research trial published that shows an effect or not needs to be reproduced by another independent party BEFORE we can claim there is or isn’t an effect.
No2: Encourage open honest and substantive debate on the evidence by proponents from ALL sides. This means open, honest, transparent, public debate and discourse is needed by all interested parties regardless of their position or standing, and not only limited to just those with affiliations or connections in closed and private meetings.
No3: Arguments from an authority carry little weight.
Authorities have made mistakes in the past, and they will do so again in the future. There are NO authorities; at most, there are experts, but this still does not make them immune from questioning or challenging.
No4: If there’s something to be explained, think of ALL the different ways in which it could be explained. Think of tests you could do that might systematically DISPROVE the alternatives. What survives among the “multiple hypotheses,” has a much better chance of being the right answer than the first idea that caught your fancy.
No5: Do not to get overly ATTACHED to a hypothesis just because it’s yours.
Ask yourself why you like the idea. Compare it fairly with ALL the alternatives. See if you can find reasons for REJECTING it. If you don’t, others will.
No6: Quantify it.
If whatever it is you’re explaining has some measure, you’ll be much better able to discriminate among competing hypotheses. What is vague and qualitative is open to MANY explanations. Of course there are truths to be sought in qualitative issues, but finding them is more challenging.
No7: Every link in the chain must work (including the premise)
If there is a chain of event or procedures that have to occur to arrive at a result they must all be reproducible, not just most of them. Even if one part of a chain can not be repeated then the result can not be trusted.
No8: Occam’s Razor always applies.
When faced with two hypotheses that explain the data/outcome equally well the SIMPLER one is usually always more correct.
No9: Is the hypothesis FALSIFIABLE?
Ideas and theories that are untestable are not worth much. Others must be given the chance to try and duplicate your experiments to see if they get the same result."
Jackass who literally has never been right about anything he has ever posted going back many, many years accusing someone else of BS. How hilarious in it's hypocrisy.
Enough of your BS!
Money to get scammed out of or invest? There is a big difference. Does being obsessed with finding marks, with money to steal, make you a winner in your twisted world?
You must have lived in the basement for a great amount of your life to be so obsessed with that statement you use it habitually. Maybe you never moved out.
There is no third party you pathological imbecile. Provide a link. You can't because it's all fabricated bullshit. You'll be regurgitating this PMA bullshit again in 2026 or 2027.
Rich is rodman you moron.
"But what is the most alarming to us in the 10/18/19 announcement is that the PR went silent on the very important product safety outcomes. From the UEEC clinical protocol, described on its clinicaltrials.gov page we learned about four secondary study outcomes:
Source: clinicaltrials.gov
While the Primary outcome and the Secondary outcome #1 in the UEEC study protocol are efficacy related, the Secondary #2, #3, and #4 outcomes are all safety outcomes and are of critical importance for FDA approval. The October 18th PR only addresses success of the Primary outcome and Secondary outcome #1. The PR didn't say if the study has shown a non-inferiority or superiority of HemoStyp vs Surgicel in the secondary outcomes #2-4. The history of UEEC only disclosing positive news makes us believe that the omission of results relevant to outcomes #2-4 could have been on purpose, because the clinical study likely showed the inferior performance of HemoStyp vs Surgicel in these outcome measures.
The statistician was very specific to claim non-inferiority and superiority of HemoStyp only in the initial hemostasis after application of HemoStyp to the wound. It is silent on what has happened after the initial hemostasis was achieved.
HemoStyp, according to UEEC, quickly dissolves in an aqueous environment due to its unique degradation properties. We can find this on the company’s website.
From UEEC’s product testing page:
The data obtained during analysis of sample UHP Box of 2” x 2” Pouches indicates the material begins to dissolve in water within one minute. The sample is completely dissolved within 24 hours. Not enough material remains for analysis at the 24 hour time point.
If HemoStyp dissolves too soon, the surgical wound would start bleeding again, and this would be a very serious safety issue.
Imagine a major disaster when bleeding re-occurs after the surgeon has already closed the outmost patient skin layer! The outcomes 2-4 directly address this key safety concern, describing in quantitative terms how well the initially achieved hemostasis is maintained during the surgery. Outcome 4 is about the failure of initial hemostasis, as measured in reoperations, during the one month after surgery. It seems to us that a hemostatic agent that is quick to achieve initial hemostasis, but rapidly dissolves and may frequently fail later resulting in recurrence of bleeding, is a major health hazard. Why would the FDA approve HemoStyp, if it indeed fails to maintain hemostasis, knowing that Surgicel is already a reasonably effective and safe FDA approved product?
From all these observations, we conclude that the clinical study of HemoStyp versus Surgicel was likely a failure. However, if and when its PMA application" gets rejected, we doubt that shareholders will hear about it. We expect it will be just like when UEEC applied for PMA approval for Class III in late 2017, there will just not be any updates, like it never happened.""
I don't know. To be honest I haven't spent much time analyzing this one (although I have followed it for quite some time). It may also be insiders, with a good association with him, dumping. But I'm noticing plenty of new people pouring in daily. They are buying and the price is not going up. That worries me. A lot of money is pouring in now and yet it is simultaneously being pulled out. The biggest red flag, at least to me, is the tweet frequency. That isn't normal. That suggests watching the price is his main concern when it should be the actual business. Is he overextended at the very least? Usually the stock price will take care of itself as the business succeeds. Once a month is plenty of updating.
He says a major PR is coming. Hopefully, the selling was to fund something. On the other hand, he could be more specific. I'm sitting this out. I see too much risk. My mind is made up on that. But I'm hardly certain this is a scam. It just doesn't look too good. The price has, about tripled, and yet the material news always gets delayed. I'm not certain this is a scam. I honestly hope my instincts are wrong and you guys make out.
Rodman, you've got incredibly serious Daddy issues. All you do is keep mentioning parents. And you're an adult still infatuated by parents? This doesn't even begin to touch upon how intellectually challenged you are. Additionally you are sneaky, dishonest, and have zero sense of ethical behavior. I'm sure as a child, going to Grandma's so you could rifle her purse and leave her penniless, gave you a feeling of joy. You are so limited in your self-awareness, you don't even know enough to realize what an embarrassment you are to everyone who has the misfortune of associating with you. You are a basket case of lack of emotional development and maturity. Go ahead keep mentioning the Daddy you can't get out of your head. That, in itself, is obviously a challenge you will never overcome. Now carry on with your tantrum over not stealing enough of other people's money,
Hey, there are several posters here who are real Duesies. I have to go real slow and simple for their sake (not yours) or they get overwhelmed, bewildered and upset.
Good question. All I know is the obvious. Mr. Blagman needed funding. Enter mwwc. Maybe a third party link up? This sounds like Mr. Blagman's cover letter. Maybe he sent it to mwwc:
"I have spent the past 15 years recreating a new media content business model- a revelation of new ideas and quantifiable results based on new heavily researched algorithms for digital and linear media.
I plan to bring these advances to my clients as well as introduce a new global media network based on quantifiable results for advertisers and digital brands.
My full focus is on the future (which is NOW) of media and how to deliver the specific assets that brands, advertisers, sponsors, and ultimately the consumer requires and demand.
Among other tasks, I distribute TV programming globally targeting media bundling within an unparalleled model. I have built an interesting process with key partners and an unwired network of digital portals in 40+ countries that deliver audited views that have crossed the multi-billion mark. I seek solutions to solving the global media puzzle we are surrounded by. A key and vital approach is securing a number of rock-solid revenue streams to support new media, and new concepts, leaving little to chance.
I speak to top execs all around the world and hear the real story. Netflix is NOT the answer to everything. If you live by headlines you will miss the real story.
I have proven and unprecedented experience in North American and International TV Content, airtime acquisition, syndication, and TV commercial sales and buying. I also maintain a massive database of executives throughout the TV and Advertising industries.
After leaving Disney in 1994, I created three TV networks in Eastern Europe. In the late 90’s I took my company public, and purchased the former Williams Media.
In the 2000’s I mastered media buying and programming for online poker. With great clients like Party Poker and Full Tilt Poker, I was able to hit 4000 annual hours of programming throughout the world. Because it was so lucrative to the online poker companies and TV stations and networks all around the world, my relationships only strengthened. Certainly, my biggest hit was Poker After Dark (airing on 20 TV networks globally including NBC in the USA).
I am in a unique position to help you and your company…embracing digital streaming distribution and premiere TV Network clearances, I know how to produce a proper ROI.
Let's take on the world together!"
I'm guessing the guy doing the frequent tweets is dumping. Why else would he tweet so frequently? Otherwise, he'd just wait until he makes an official statement.
"How about 0015 by the end of the day"
Bullshit. There will be one excuse after another as you scam suckers. What is this? The fifth time you clowns have run the PMA bait & switch shell game? Now you are already stretching out this leg of the scam to Halloween. ROTFLMAO. You damn well know there will never be FDA approval of a couple of crates of the cheap Chinese gauze Beplate bought a decade ago. It's hilarious watching a group of adults play pretend this a real company.
I try to be fair and honest. If I am not, I will just screw myself over along with other people. The trouble with bullshitters is eventually they start to believe their own bullshit is reality. I do not want to answer the latter question. Sometimes, and it is very apparent in these volatile penny stocks, people react very emotionally. Incredibly, my PM's are filled with many dozens of threats. People tend to sell and buy and react emotionally. And this can be manipulated. I am very interested in how this will play out. Great emphasis on the word interesting. I only wish I knew the details of how this show will distribute. This show has, as I have said all along, enormous potential for success. Will it achieve that? Will it achieve that out of the gate? Will it achieve that after a slow start? Will it sputter? What it start in all markets simultaneously or roll out in select markets initially? So many questions and so little answers right now. Anything can happen. Stay tuned (pun intended).
jrockents, thanks for these updates you have given us all along. They have been enlightening and provided insight when we would otherwise not have heard anything.
Thanks ITYS. You seem very honest in what you have said and without agenda. I will add this. Marketing Worldwide had been eerily silent. And there are updates they could have given. I am referring to honest material and not pumping bullshit in saying that. Mr. Blagman has been the only source of information for the past year. It almost seems they are purposely not helping the price rise. So I agree except, in this case, Hollywood After Dark is a real entity with potential. What little news there has been, has been real. Something is going to happen here. In a sense, the silence is deafening and getting worse. I am very interested in how this plays out. I would not be involved if HAD were a scam. The filings here are on the up and up anyway. I am not seeing a single sign of illegality in the filings.
I took surf's and angel's suggestions and reached out for information. I do not know any details, let alone the details with any certainty, so I make no suggestion what anyone should do. Sell, buy, or hold at your own discretion. Post anything you want to. The short term price fluctuation will not effect me. I know nothing of what is going on at mwwc other than observation like the rest of you. I responded to ITYS in my previous post about what I thought honestly. Regarding, Hollywood After Dark; it is silent right now. But I will say this with a good degree of certainty. It was filmed. Anyone can contact the Bourbon Room and speak to employees to verify that. It makes no sense to have filmed it and not come out with the show. Put yourself in Mr. Blagman's shoes. Would you go through all that and do anything at all? I have no idea, what fashion it will be distributed. I await that news and details myself. But it will be distributed somehow. To go through the trouble of producing the show, of an entire night, and not do something with it makes no sense. Again, I have no idea of how so I make no further claim than that. Make of that what you will. I actually know a little more than I am saying (not much more) but I will be accused by the negative elements of bullshitting about anything positive and I will be hated by shareholders for anything negative. So I'll largely keep my mouth shut. There are people very close to this, and in a better position to know, that are on standby and silent awaiting details too. Good luck to everyone whatever you decide to do.
He is doing a piss poor job of pumping it, ITYS, if that is the case. Dead silence here from everyone concerned. I'm not seeing much evidence of organized selling. If you are asking me for an honest, educated, guess; I think everyone is trying to figure out what their next move is right now. And I am not getting any indication of what that might be. The price here is as about as low as it gets and no one, at present, is doing anything to move it. That doesn't quite fit the usual mode of a scam. Just my take, but I do not think Ted Ralston is doing anything at present to benefit himself or anyone else. And I could make that statement about anyone involved presently.
"Nobody here is selling"
"You have simply pasted what a simpleton wants to see"
"Imagine a major disaster when bleeding re-occurs after the surgeon has already closed the outmost patient skin layer! "
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4300303-united-health-products-press-releases-cannot-be-taken-face-value
What a foolish scam this is fishing for suckers to lay their money down. What a joke to think the cheapest Chinese bandage money can buy will ever be used as a surgical bandage. Who could be possibly be insipid enough to believe this u-haul dealer in the desert headquartered company is producing a surgical bandage.
Sleezy boiler room fraud about cheap Chinese gauze that is totally non-functional even over the counter. This pathological, sociopathic bullshit you spew does not even belong on ihub.
https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2022/comp25413.pdf
This con artist outfit is such a sham, headquarters, as listed on their website, is a u-haul dealer in the desert.
The CEO of this stock scam is actually a stock broker
https://brokercheck.finra.org/individual/summary/4231884
Evidently he does not even want his clients to know he manipulates this stock scam Ponzi scheme:
https://www.butlercap.com/our-team-2
"But what is the most alarming to us in the 10/18/19 announcement is that the PR went silent on the very important product safety outcomes. From the UEEC clinical protocol, described on its clinicaltrials.gov page we learned about four secondary study outcomes:
Source: clinicaltrials.gov
While the Primary outcome and the Secondary outcome #1 in the UEEC study protocol are efficacy related, the Secondary #2, #3, and #4 outcomes are all safety outcomes and are of critical importance for FDA approval. The October 18th PR only addresses success of the Primary outcome and Secondary outcome #1. The PR didn't say if the study has shown a non-inferiority or superiority of HemoStyp vs Surgicel in the secondary outcomes #2-4. The history of UEEC only disclosing positive news makes us believe that the omission of results relevant to outcomes #2-4 could have been on purpose, because the clinical study likely showed the inferior performance of HemoStyp vs Surgicel in these outcome measures.
The statistician was very specific to claim non-inferiority and superiority of HemoStyp only in the initial hemostasis after application of HemoStyp to the wound. It is silent on what has happened after the initial hemostasis was achieved.
HemoStyp, according to UEEC, quickly dissolves in an aqueous environment due to its unique degradation properties. We can find this on the company’s website.
From UEEC’s product testing page:
The data obtained during analysis of sample UHP Box of 2” x 2” Pouches indicates the material begins to dissolve in water within one minute. The sample is completely dissolved within 24 hours. Not enough material remains for analysis at the 24 hour time point.
If HemoStyp dissolves too soon, the surgical wound would start bleeding again, and this would be a very serious safety issue.
Imagine a major disaster when bleeding re-occurs after the surgeon has already closed the outmost patient skin layer! The outcomes 2-4 directly address this key safety concern, describing in quantitative terms how well the initially achieved hemostasis is maintained during the surgery. Outcome 4 is about the failure of initial hemostasis, as measured in reoperations, during the one month after surgery. It seems to us that a hemostatic agent that is quick to achieve initial hemostasis, but rapidly dissolves and may frequently fail later resulting in recurrence of bleeding, is a major health hazard. Why would the FDA approve HemoStyp, if it indeed fails to maintain hemostasis, knowing that Surgicel is already a reasonably effective and safe FDA approved product?
From all these observations, we conclude that the clinical study of HemoStyp versus Surgicel was likely a failure. However, if and when its PMA application" gets rejected, we doubt that shareholders will hear about it. We expect it will be just like when UEEC applied for PMA approval for Class III in late 2017, there will just not be any updates, like it never happened.""
Sorry. When I put it in comic book form a small portion might penetrate into than cranium (sorry again-big word, let's call it a brain pan) of yours.
You are a paid hack who fabricates petty bullshit. There is no other reason to explain the absurdity of your posts.
"May see 0012-0013 by the end of the day!"
"we doubt that shareholders will hear about it. We expect it will be just like when UEEC applied for PMA approval for Class III in late 2017, there will just not be any updates, like it never happened."
In any event, I doubt he is holding shares. He is more the type who dupes others.
When he has ever posted anything accurate and relevant? Thanking Lamstein, in this instance, was as strong a clue as can be that it would not be both.
Can you state what the actual financial impact will be?
How many weeks has it been put off?
On pure bullshit and hype.
Very telling of an obvious scam when intimidation and insulting attacks are substituted for rational, logical, and thoughtful substance. Who are the clowns and dbags forcefully suckering people out ot their hard earned money?
Repeat this again for the dbags in the back! I thought foreskin sealshin was the biggest dbag but this shoondale may be the biggest clown on the board yet.
Posters with few posts, using expressiveness_and_grammar similar to long term posters are beyond suspect.
Shodburrito
Level Icon
Followers 0
Posts 3
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/12/2023