Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Unobtanium is spiking to new highs.
Indeed they may. These things take weeks / Months though, and in the meantime the Tsunami of Fake News 'analysis' will continue.
"Zinke's recommendations came out today. NO MONUMENTS RESCINDED"
Attribution? Link?
http://www.startribune.com/apnewsbreak-zinke-won-t-eliminate-any-national-monuments/441636413/
"No president has tried to eliminate a monument, but some have reduced or redrawn the boundaries on 18 occasions, according to the National Park Service."
"Take another look. It says nothing about "UNIFORM" distribution of elements."
"The abundance of elements in Earth's crust is shown in tabulated form with the estimated crustal abundance for each chemical element shown as either percentage or parts per million (ppm) by mass (10,000 ppm = 1%).".
In fact, if you total up the Parts Per Million column from the various scholarly scientific efforts (as I have), you will find that they all come in fairly close to One Million.
The data you cited expresses the commonality of elements as if they were distributed uniformly throughout the Earths Crust - One million grams of Crust would, if the elements were distributed uniformly, yield X grams of A, Y grams of B, and so forth.
I don't see how you could interpret it any other way, unless doing so would hurt the sales pitch.
So, the take-away is that the ACTUAL presence or absence of an element in some specific location may be highly anomalous in relation to the expected "background" level. We don't know what the "Expected" concentration is other than a scientifically estimated 'Global Average'. Outside of batting baseballs and gambling, averages are not terribly meaningful.
NR 122 extract:
"2. A surprising presence of rare earth elements (REE) has been defined over a large area. This was completely unexpected and justifies further study. The REEs we assayed for are among the 17 REEs now known, are strongly anomalous, and are scandium, yttrium, lanthanum, and cerium. The other 13 known REEs were not included in our assay process. In due course we will re-assay the samples for these additional REEs. Rare earth elements are critical to various civilian and military hardware and are commercially important. (Wikipedia: “Rare Earth Elements“)
3.The REEs are clearly related to a satellite image anomaly as well as geochemical anomalies of: iron, uranium, thorium, copper, silver, gold, lead, zinc, nickel, gallium, mercury, potassium, manganese and molybdenum. These elements are commonly associated with REE occurrences. This anomaly covers almost 9 square miles.
4. We are not sure of the meaning of the presence of these Rare Earth Elements (REEs) but the association of the elements named in 3 above justifies further studies.
5. We do not believe the REEs are part of the porphyry system because they are separated in a different area for the most part."
I would surmise that what was "surprising" was the magnitude of deviation from the 'expected' result, but I'm not peddling a particular narrative, and will have to wait for (if) assay numbers to have a fact-based discussion.
I would demand that ACME refund - or is that the other guy?
I didn't need to "study" it. The THEORETICAL UNIFORM distribution of elements has Very Little bearing on exploration or extraction in THE REAL WORLD.
Meanwhile, one of the two smartest guys on the board argues "Stupidity" . . . . .with an expert
What's funnier is that the Interstate behind the Single-Wide "Park" has Cobalt and REE's.
I hardly think it is "BS Noise" when time, money (which is limited) and effort is being expended to gather and assay samples that may further understanding of what is hidden underground. I had hoped they would sample and assay for the "other" REE's since the original disclosure of the four(?) that had been encountered.
If there was no field work being done and no samples shipped for assay, you would be making something other than noise yourself.
Please don't beat the dead horse unless you want to make sure you "prevent" Briscoe from taking advantage of someone - I had no idea you were so effective at influencing Market participants!
I imagine that several months beyond the time when people expect assay results to be discussed, assay results will be discussed.
Subtlety of sarcasm is a sign of intellect, the missing of it - not so much.
Saving folks the trouble . . . .
!!! NINE Dollar trade!!!! 0.0018 !!!!! (not including commission)!!!! The DEATHSTAR!!! Approaches!!!!!!
TD Ameritrade feed shows today's low trade as 0.0021 & vol. 0f 1,534,549.
Yawn.
Vanadium is often a significant presence in Uranium bearing deposits, and is being investigated as a component of improved battery technologies.
Not that that has any direct relevance here.
Thanks to you, I now know that the value of an equity is solely determined by the after market session bid.
Amazing.
"That report would be meaningful only if LBSR had copper. All indications from the actions of management is that IT DOES NOT."
A very misleading statement, Sad! What is indicated by the actions of management is that they do not have MONEY.
Meanwhile, a celebration of .0018 bid when earlier in the session we saw .0025 on about twice the volume as when the low bid got hit. Funny how certain people can only see 'heads' and never 'tails'.
"There are some great Gold finds for instance that contain tons of Cobaltite a mineral made of Cobalt, Arsenic and Sulfur."
If you are new to the board, this might go right by you: It would seem that you are suggesting that ACME(tm) isn't the 'Rock-Solid'(tm) School of Geology our resident expert touted it as being.
I'm SHOCKED.
80 million shares chewed up this week and last.
At this point in time it may make sense to, as the great Johnny Most used to say, "Fiddle and Diddle" pending an outcome to the National Monuments designations which IMO could have a very positive impact on the company's immediate 'attractiveness' and change the equation substantially going forward.
No one knows what discussions may have taken place wrt to other targets.
twt
You are, currently, distant second to the proverbial 'Broken Clock' - I suppose 'hope' also springs eternal among those not long?
I'm beginning to suspect that this equity has been conceived for the sole purpose of studying human psychology, normal and abnormal.
At least someone will benefit, regardless of outcome. . . . .
"Then why risk ... making an object of ridicule?"
Oh my God! It's like someone (not you, wink, wink, nudge, nudge) posting about themselves?.
YCMTSU
More predictions, please.
Karma, hilarious. "Predictions are tough, especially about the future" -Yogi Berra
LIFELESS ZOMBIE board.
Hahahaahaah! Textbook Psychology 101.
I read your post the instant I saw the headline in my news feed.
Amazing Fact!
You don't make for good conversation . . . .
..... facts and such preclude it.
Last day for comments on National Monument status review.
https://twitter.com/SecretaryZinke
"A mind is a terrible thing to waste" - United Message Board Poster College Fund
I'm sure GeoTec and JB have no knowledge of these possibilities. I PREDICT the sacrifice of another innocent Horse in the coming days.
The 'Skepticism' is starting to take on a tone of frenzy, perhaps even panic.
Wonder why.
Claims fees paid = Proof of Life.
Why, Tpecj, does this mean . . . . ?
http://makeagif.com/i/_NSIvv click it! Classic!
And an on Topic Note - weren't ASARCO's operations established BEFORE the National Monument? Yes I think they were.
I hope no one on this board is being "Triggered".
I'm sure the "friends" of the Ironwood Forest lean towards 'Watermelon' - Green on the outside, "RED" on the inside.
"Wish he had some prospects of lithium, it's the hottest scam going in mining now"
But we don't. Never even mentioned.
You just undermined your own thesis. LMAO!
Another fine contribution by you. Quality over quantity.
Thanks.
Something of GENERAL INTEREST: Copper, Catalyst: CO2 > Ethanol
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/06/13/pie-in-the-sky-researchers-say-they-found-a-co2-to-fuel-catalyst/
"CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY . . . . "
People who argue with absolutes and all-encompassing generalizations
ought to read Scott Adam's Blog: blog.dilbert.com
Wolf! Wolf!
Your conclusion is based on what, specifically?
The other guy's obsession with REE's? Horse, Dead, Imprint, Dirt. Still at it. Sad.
"And besides, what would JB need other geologists and geophysicists for? Isn't he the expert? "
Puh-leez. If one Geologist with more than MatchBook University credentials was rumored to have found fault with Briscoes work, you would be [color=red]SCREAMING!!!!![/color] about it in bolded red type, day in and day out.
You seem to employ "Shuttle" Logic - derived from whatever direction you wish it to carry you, without any regard for the the other directions it is necessarily able to take.
It makes for extremely weak persuasional rhetoric.
You're entitled to think everyone is stupid, and maybe most are . . . . just not in the ways you imagine them to be.
Sure you did, should be on CNN any minute.
Monetizing E. Silverbell would be a good thing, even if it wasn't a path to financing Hay Mtn.
A fool sees dead ends where others see new horizons.
More celebrations of meaningless after-hours Bids, and predictions of Trip Zeroes . . . .
PLEASE. Whomever it was.
"Let time judge who will be proven right! "
I'm running out of that! LOL