Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Really? Yesterday up 6 cents and there were 129 posts. Today down 7 cents 95 posts. Seems like the other way around.
Yeah, they have had to space it out over 10 years to get retail out. Please.
don't see it happening.Makes no sense.
Well you didn't see Reverse split happening and we all know how that went! Still waiting for the BARDA contract.
What makes it laughable is that mgmt made sure they pointed this out in the filing with statistics no less. If only mgmt and IR/PR was as precise, clear and transparent in their Press Releases!
Yes, some people like to stretch the truth by saying SK chooses options instead of cash. They only report what they want to report. The compensation is truly laughable compared to results. The fact that they had to hire an independent consulting firm to justify it at least shows they know people are watching and they may have to cover their tracks. All imo.
I wonder if they'll do well with them
Doesn't really matter. On a smaller scale they will just get more options at a cheaper price next year. Although unlike mgmt there may be a possibility that they lose their jobs.
Glad to see some people seeing the obvious that mgmt has nothing to lose and actually more to gain the longer this goes on. All imo.
Who cares what price they got in?
Sk has nothing to lose. You can write 50 pages all you want. Mgmt does not care about shareholder or stock price. Sk will collect his paycheck, bonus and options whether the stock goes up or not. He will just make more money if the stock goes down and he collects more options at a lower price and then the stock goes up then he would if the stock goes up. Therefore he has nothing to lose. All imo.
Once again yes he has nothing to lose. I guess you just don't get it. If the stock goes down he loses nothing (not even his job) plus he gets more options at a cheaper price next year all the while still collecting his big paycheck and cash bonuses. if it goes up he wins. As a shareholder if the price goes down you lose money.
Yes he has nothing to lose. Yes if the stock does not go up he does not get compensated this year but he will get more options at a lower price next year while collecting his salary and cash bonuses! He does not care if the stock goes up now, next year or ten years from now. The stock could go down to $1 next year then he will get more options at $1 and then if it goes to $1.50 he makes 50 percent of his money. Not too hard to understand that yes he may not make money but there is no way he loses anything now and actually he may benefit with lower prices and more options if the stock price eventually goes up. If the stock goes down he still collects his paycheck with no fear of losing his job. How much money has he earned in the last 10 years and how much has shareholder value increased. He be replaced in most companies by now.
If the stock does go to $5 now, SK will make more money than he would have in Sept 2012 wouldn't he yet he diluted shareholders by how much? Guess they didn't have the guts to award themselves the options while the CA case was active. Guess they got the green light to keep taking. All imo.
why all the concern over current share price fluctuations
Very simple. When mgmt is and has been selling ATM shares at near all time lows the share price fluctuation does matter.
Just think they were over 36 million shares traded from $2.58 to $3.28 and another 36 million from $2 to $2.8 Mgmt has diluted the shareholders with million of shares in the $1.40's previously. Just think if we find out that mgmt sold millions of ATM shares recently in $1.70 range. The difference in price can be greater than 10 million dollars. We have gone from 50 million outstanding shares to how many now? All imo.
Remember, Sept 2012 changed EVERYTHING
Geez after 18 plus months it is time to stop using that excuse. The data is supposed to be better isn't it?
Wow, that is pretty depressing. The one good I see is that the board has been recently quiet from the long diatribe posters and the "newbie" posters. This to me is good news as there might actually be something going on. It concerns me when they become active. It is almost like mgmt gives the go ahead to try to calm things done. All imo.
Yes more fiction writing. The reality is that the stock is unbelievably in the $1.70's and the "newbie" list is getting shorter as the supposed catalyst's for moving the stock are getting smaller. Lets see we now have to check off the CA lawsuit and the start to the Yervoy trial. It looks painfully obvious that the only thing that will move this stock is a partner, buyout or a real financing deal. I know we should all be thankful that PPHM walked away from the ABBIE deal. Reality is that we were above 5 on the rumour and financing deal and we are at $1.71 now. Doesn't look or feel like shareholders are better off. All imo.
Yep, that should be a sticky along with the Barda contract. Sad part is there are so many to choose from and from so many people.
Don't forget the theories that we already have a deal in place and it was just contingent on the lawsuit being dismissed. Volume and price seem to dispute that theory also. Maybe now that the suit is dismissed mgmt pulled the deal because they now know how much more it is worth. Just like catching a huge break when ABBIE walked away from the deal. All imo.
Many of us here were lectured that the CA trial was an impediment to stock price growth, and that Wall Street was holding back until the trial was settled. Well, the trial is over and all Wall Street did was apparently yawn. They were underwhelmed.
Yes that theory had as much truth to it as the manipulation theories, BP in cahoots with each other, accumulation, the "family". Just one of many excuses as to why stock price is near the bottom. There are people who still think mgmt will get something significant from the CSM lawsuit. Bottom line is that pphm does not blast off until a deal is made if one ever is made. All imo.
it may not make financial sense for him to purchase additional shares of pphm when he has more than enough to make him a wealthy man should pphm hit a home run.
I guess since he has more than enough to make him a wealthy man, than in the interest of shareholders there is no need to grant him additional options. Besides if I am living over my means that means I am not making prudent finacial decisions. Do you really want someone who can't handle his own finances to run a company?
Kind of silly argument anyway. Again if I knew I had a goldmine I would be using any amount of money I had regardless to buy shares from my employee buy back program which I know is in the rules and am receiving a huge discount. If I am desperate for money I can sell my shares at a profit immediately. We already supposedly know we got lucky by not making a bad deal with ABBIE. Hell if I was a nice guy, I would buy them for my ex and my kids. All imo.
Possible but you are only talking a couple of thousand dollars when you can make hundreds. Using that logic means we are not even close to a deal otherwise he would have plenty of money. I look at it the other way. He is going to need a lot of money to propably keep the mistress happy so I would buy more. All imo.
If I was a CEO of a company and I knew I caught a tremendous break with the dose switching since it made ABBIE pull out of a deal and now I know the cost of the deal just went up exponentially then there is no way I would not purchase the maximum amount of shares I could under the plan especially since they are at a huge discount to the market and I know I have already turned down huge partnership deals and I read the message boards and know that my company is worth $100 a share! So why wouldn't I purchase the maximum amount of shares at $1.11 when the share price is at $1.82? All imo.
Corp, You will proabaly see the rest of the filings today after close. The key point you want to take out of this is that SK does not purchase the full amount of shares that he is allowed even with the company discount. All imo.
PS: PPHM was part of the problem. (Remember the - doing our day jobs at night...). That is currently not even much better
Now you know the reasons for SK's divorce too plus it is not much better now! Does SK know a private eye is watching him?
no matter what anyone here says - the longer pphm goes without consummating a partnership or collaboration is NOT a good thing for the company.
Couldn't agree more. With the past history and performance of our mgmt team, how anybody could not agree is beyond me. The only way you don't want a partnership is if you don't really have the goods. If you do, then you would make a deal and save lives. Unless of course you are so greedy you don't care about saving lives and advancing the science. With all the free options they have taken from shareholders, mgmt would be rich at just a $5 sale. How much money does one need? All imo.
If that were true, mgmt would be able to sell ATM shares higher than in the $1.40's when they just sold huge amounts.
Now why would pphm mgmt do that. If they cared about the stock price and the speed of the trials they would have been more transparent with PR's and add members to the board so that the share price would go up while they were and probably still are selling ATM shares near record low levels. All imo.
nothing more than ATM sales probably.
Can't wait to hear the justifications for PL running the ATM in $1.70's and not when 32 million shares were traded from $2.50 to $3.18. Really no reason to be selling any shares at all especially when we are supposed to be worth billions even though hardly any buyers in the $1.70's. All imo.
What about the charts from the last 5 years?
Worsley is coming up on 6 months. Tells me partnering talks prior to him coming on board weren't very mature.
PPHM PR'd Mary Boyd's hiring in July 2007. Yes we are going on 7 years with nothing to show for it. In June will also be 2 years since Zeisbell was hired for mergers and acquisitions. Shareholders are really getting their monies worth aren't they? All imo.
Cotara has fast track and has been on the shelf for over 18 months. No partner, selling ATM shares and a price at $1.82. New data obviously not as golden as what was reported with the tainted data. Still no proof of anything other than an error. All imo.
I suspect the BOD is in it for the money, not for the lives it may prolong
I don't believe there is any argument about that. Carlton Johnson as COB LOL! All imo.
So, now Chris worries about Wall Street?
If Chris and mgmt really cared about mgmt there would not be just three members on the BOD who have shady pasts, have worked for a penny stock company Patriotic Scientific and have been sued before. There is absolutely no reason other than mgmt's preference to not adding two respected people to the BOD. Once and if a partnership is made the board can be adjusted. If they plan on going alone it would be to their extreme benefit to add real BOD members to get rid of the black cloud. They choose not to for their own agenda. All imo.
Well that is if you believe the CW in the lawsuit and of course he is only telling the truth about that part and the other statements about mgmt's ineptitude are false. I personally believe that it is probably true but then you have to ask if the new data is better than how could no other BP step up to the plate with an offer and even if you believe they are low balling pphm there is still no way the share price would be at $1.85 and that mgmt could only sell millions of shares in the $1.40's and could not get anybody to pay more than $3 for preferred shares with $10 percent intererest. You would think people would be killing each other to get stock at anyprice up to $10 if you believe we are worth billions. Something doesn't add up. I know we are being manipulated by every BP and there is no way one BP would go behind another BP's back and steal a valuable company like PPHM with a real offer. All imo.
Steven King said it
If Steven King said it then it must be true!
Hmmm, SK said pphm flows with the ebb of the market. Sk stated we have a china subsidiary. SK stated he hoped to have a commercial product by mid 2012. SK stated the Yervoy trial would start by end of March. SK stated Mary Boyd would hit the ground running. SK stated we are in talks. All imo.
IT's the BLACK CLOUD of the TAINTED 2nd Line NSCLC TRIAL conducted by PPHM!!
Yet our mgmt team and COB Carlton Johnson who stated he would get to the bottom of it has yet to remove the block cloud in over 18 months but investors and/or BP are supposed to believe that this mgmt team can get through a phase III alone? What has mgmt done to date to remove this black cloud? Mgmt alrady consist of board members with shady ties to each other and already ran other penny stocks to the ground. We have open board seats that can be filled immediately to add some credibility to the company and they can easily be removed when/if a partership is actually completed if needed. All imo.
According to our CEO Steven King, pphm tends to flow with the ebb of the market.
After we briefly touched 1.60, the share price has really bounced back quickly in my view. Maybe our next move up will be stronger than some might expect.
On the other hand after we briefly touched $3.18 we are still down over 30% from that point. Market back near all time highs. All imo
Lets go, Worsley. Earn that paycheck.
Why will Worsley be any different than Mary Boyd or Zeisbell? Both imo have not produced what they were hired to do.
Why couldn't it be true that Abbvie found the mistakes and walked away in disgust?
That would certainly explain why we have to sell ATM shares near all time lows and couldn't get better than $3 plus 10% interest on preferred shares and as of now no partner and why mgmt has no choice to go alone and hope the data proves out before they screw it up again. But then again we are lucky to be at $1.66 instead of over $5. More buying opportunities. All imo.
The new submitted data is obviously not the same quality of data that was initially reported and caused a potential partner to be interested.
Kind of peculiar that mgmt can't find a partner with the new revised data.