http://www.ravenswood-usa.com/html/about.html

http://www.lonestarinternational.com/Management/management.html

http://www.centralsunukraine.com/News/news.html

http://www.microsofttranslator.com/bv.aspx

http://www.ks-rda.gov.ua/news/3121/

That list hasn't been updated in quite some time. A quick search found a handful not listed there either.

3 whole days worth ...

Well ... careful watch you ask for :/

http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10183232

'Sticky' as in applying the same conditions to that entity out of Nevada?

There's certainly an irony here ...

Generally speaking, the NI 43-101's can't be relied upon for US only based companies. Moreover, most of the time there are used for fraudulent purposes down here, so to clamor for them in the first place is, what's the word I'm looking for? Dubious?

Wouldn't these be better suited questions to be applied to that little entity in Nevada? I mean, if were going to dodge the substance of the initial statement of 'fact' ...

To reiterate:

Well said! Strange that I started out as a drummer when Roy Clarke was my idol and seeing Segoiva play at the White House on TV pretty much cemented my infatuation at an early age ...

Man, gotta love youtube :

Love that stuff SS ... Chicken Pickin

Here's a little ditty that was off some sort of compilation years back:

Here's a cleaned up copy

http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=63134422

Proof is in da pudding.

Not agreeing to anything, just bemused by the misapplication of how these securities work.

http://www.dorsey.com/files/tbl_s21publications%5Cpdfupload141%5C304%5C100%20stock%20repurchase%20programs%20020328.pdf

Talking about S forms ...

You can't apply requirements for SEC reporting companies upon non-SEC filers.

Nonetheless, the 'S form' is not an obligation either.

No need to regurgitate the extrapolations again, it doesn't work that way.

The question was regarding an 8K.

Of course he wont, he has no obligation or requirement to do so.
But you knew this ...

And an 8K would be forthcoming because ... ?

It's at best a suggestion, there is no requirement. In fact, it's not even a requirement that Q & A be provided.

It's broader than that, but for the sake of argument where is the regulation that states specifically that it is a violation or a requirement that CC's have to be posted after the fact?

Not ambiguous. If it was a requirement it would say so.

There is no requirement that company CC's have to be provided after the fact. The whole purpose of the stipulations are that they provide adequate advanced notice before hand.

There's no requirement for it to be made available after the fact.

The qualifier, 'If' ...

Availability: If a transcript or re-play of the conference call will be available after it has occurred, for instance via the issuer's website, we encourage issuers to indicate in the notice how, and for how long, such a record will be available to the public. [Aug. 14, 2009]

Section 102. Rule 101: Definitions

Question 102.01

Question: If an issuer wants to make public disclosure of material nonpublic information under Regulation FD by means of a conference call, what information must the issuer provide in the notice and how far in advance should notice be given?

Answer: An adequate advance notice under Regulation FD must include the date, time, subject matter and call-in information for the conference call. Issuers also should consider the following non-exclusive factors in determining what constitutes adequate advance notice of a conference call:
•
Timing: Public notice should be provided a reasonable period of time ahead of the conference call. For example, for a quarterly earnings announcement that the issuer makes on a regular basis, notice of several days would be reasonable. We recognize, however, that the period of notice may be shorter when unexpected events occur and the information is critical or time sensitive.

•
Availability: If a transcript or re-play of the conference call will be available after it has occurred, for instance via the issuer's website, we encourage issuers to indicate in the notice how, and for how long, such a record will be available to the public. [Aug. 14, 2009]

http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/regfd-interp.htm

What SEC violation?

Sweet!

The next innovation in smartphones has got to be getting these mic's to work better. Have a whole bunch of distorted Yngwie videos on my phone, looks great but ... sigh

Lol ... That was great. Love the wrench and anvil ...

Something the kid turned me on to:

Hindsight would have that number somewhere north of 300K ...

lol ... Perhaps another grammarian press release re: 'bashers' will elicit them to come forth ...

Capitulation. Epiphany. Whatever you want to call it, one of the last convos I had over there triggered some synapse in the firing sequence ...

Cold turkey. No more 'story' stocks ... eh, short of this other turd I got caught in. But that's the last time!

Stupid place

How to reproduce brain cells in an imminent fashion: