Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Neil, what would the spelling of FFGO have to do with the earthbending fact that this company, nor any of it's alter-names "Bouse gold, w/e" hold any verified mining claims with the BLM!
I think that's a much bigger problem, don't you!?
And the same for FFGO, Haha!
I'm sorry, I still can't find a verified BLM listing for any of FFGO's business names.
Can you help me out?
The idea that any institutional trader's are shorting FFGO, and then by moving .0001 they're forced to cover, is complete farce.
I can guarantee FFGO is not on the balance sheet (in any equitible form) of any sizable trading institution.
The only ones who benefit are the ones who control the shell, and the only ones who get wrecked are the people who get duped by it.
When was the last time you contacted anyone at FFGO -- who were they, , when did you make contact, and what did you verify through them?
Also, have you been able to verify through the BLM any of FFGO's supposed mining claims?
I am stating to the contrary, and that your prior statement is 100% unequivocable farce!
Unless you reply with a verified BLM listing -- I'm gonna presume you agree, because there's no other way they could have a real, verified mining claim!
Thank you!
And now he himself has confirmed that the GoldCorp statement was a joke.
Exactly why you don't go running, posting your head off.
That's how you, and others, get stuck in a place you don't belong.
~~Answer to Dub, sorry, out of replies..
If the shareholders are smart enough to file a class action, and if the PR's prove to be completely false, and if they truly have no assets, and if they really defraud people selling shares in such a scam,
Yes.
I wish that made sense ... but ... not quite. Clean it up a bit for me, please :p
Out of replies again! :3
#1- There's surely more than one FFGO pumper. What's the specialty of one? Or importance...?
They lied,
They don't have legitimate claims [See replies to Viana's sticky post "FFGO IS 100% LEGITIMATE"]
They have no legitimate buyer
Everything about this repurchase / buying for investment purposes / dividend is a lie, and for FFGO, one out of the old hat.
--Reply to Rocket Man;
Okay, we'll wait and see. Time will prove one of us right.
And why, by the way, do you "Back him"??
He made a 3 word claim, and you posted a bolded response imploring that Goldcorp must be the only company capable of the purchase?
It borders questionable that you could jump to conclusions so quickly, given NO FACTUAL BASIS, WHATSOEVER.
Well then there's an inconsistency. Either the feasibility of the company's goings-on, or the accuracy of info in the IBox.
[I lean towards #1 ]
Simply put, an established, financially equipped company such as gold corp, would not deal with an unaudited, poorly maintained company as FFGO.
They are not the buyer, and it is impossible. Time will prove me right.
Did he give any proof, or just say "It's gold corp!"
... 'Cause I'm pretty sure he just said "It's gold corp!" with nothing to back it up. At all.
So someone wants to sell a ton at .0002, big deal.
Until the volume is big on the demand side, it's still all BS.
200k at .0002 [$40]
followed by
~1m at .0001 [$50]
Wanna bet on a .0001 close today?
1) What scam against FFGO?
2) Plenty of shares are moving, there is no "Dry bid" -- People's claims that they "Can't get shares" are complete lies, used to entice traders into thinking the liquidity is drying up in a companie's stock. [Whereas, the truth here is, we're DROWNING in liquid shares]
3) Of course it's at .0001 because of massive dilution.
When you own nothing, split it up billions of times, and put it all back together, all you get is a big, fake, nothing
Yet people are still convinced they're going to be paid by the magical $250 million falling out of the sky.
Who's cash is being given in return?
You think naked shorts are a problem for such an in-considerably small company as FFGO?
The true corruption of naked shorts, is the power large investment houses have, IE: JPMorgan's short on the silver market.
The notion that any investment house with money would even waste their time thinking about FFGO, much less use capital or assets to target them, is A JOKE
Just like FFGO
This will never trade out of the trashbin, no matter how many MM's you post trading it at .0001 or .0002.
Fact is, if you paid over .0001, you helped pay for this scam, and if .0001, you're a bagholder!
And what does that mean?
-- Out of replies ;_;
So 10% of the shares were shorted by MMs; what percent were the .0002 shares of today's total volume?
Afaik; you cannot short a .0001?
;;Reply #2
So what is the point? If it was shorted from .0002 and covered at .0001, they're making money taking down what little it has, OR, they're just labeling a certain percent of shares short?
None of this activity really flags to me why FFGO has so many strong supporters.
Not here nor there.
I'm here to debunk a rather binary, clear cut myth.
No! I would sooner purchase volcano insurance than FFGO common equity...
Which it will never do. Time awaits to prove one of us right.
Right about what?
We are all still waiting for a provable BLM listing, or some kind of legitimate audited financial, or atleast financial statements / filings of the established buyer.
Still waiting!
How anyone believes this is beyond me. I would sooner trust a crusty stranger on the street who told me he was a trillionaire and would give me tons of money if I told him where the park was!
The history of these unfulfilled commitments and whatnot are documented. Some people just have the blinders on, I guess...
Explain it?
Look at all the filled orders.
It closed at .0001.... what do you think it's going to do tomorrow?
And has anyone been able to verify the existence or feasible income of this prospective buyer?
Or the $250 Million they supposedly have for this extravagant expenditure?
I mean, everyone these days has $250 Mil in their pocket, I just thought we'd do some kind of homework. Maybe even see if they have a bank account... ?
Someone has posted /today/ saying they purchased at .0001. Just sayin...
Bashers don't take down companies.
Companies being insolvent takes down companies.
Companies diluting bloated, worthless share structures backed by vaporclaims, take down companies.
No broker would touch this!
I side with you pdc -- if anyone here remembers PGYC... feels the same.
Would love to see it happen, but I don't think it will. Not holding any... not worth the risk IMO.
Not knowing what form it would be in (More worthless stock, or cash) -- that kinda makes all the difference, even if this turns out to be legit.
I'm really disappointed it took that long for such a clear cut, obvious answer. [The only one.]
And that someone would treat such an arbitrary observation as something of notional value.
We all know better.... [?]
#105, oh boy. Such fun...
The only entity in this case that has had an opportunity to investigate if all these obstacles can be overcome – within the price tags proposed in the DIP – is the DIP lender. No other party in this case has any informed idea whether the DIP is more likely to result in an increase in the value of the Debtor’s estate or a forfeiture of all the properties of its estate to the DIP lender. Given the Debtor’s track record to date, the latter appears substantially more likely. This Debtor has nearly $60 million of undisputed secured debt, over $14 million of undisputed unsecured claims, and it has raised and expended untold additional sums in equity investments. At best, it has produced just over $1 million in revenues. And currently, the Debtor’s operations are shuttered. Its mineral reserves are unknown. Those reserves are on lands embroiled in ownership disputes. Its mining capacity is iffy. Its former employees are disgruntled. Its woefully inefficient mill is falling into “an irreversible state of disrepair.” Its leaching process is subpar. It is out of compliance under some of its regulatory permits, and yet it expects to qualify for new permits that will need to operate. It proposes to hire an army of experts and lawyers just to probe the feasibility of its business plan.
This Debtor is in no position to provide adequate protection to its secured lenders, and its unsecured creditors are presently slated to receive nothing, not even under the rosiest available analysis. This Debtor presents a profile of a debtor whose bankruptcy case is on the verge of a conversion. If its best-case projection predicts nothing for unsecured creditors, then it is the secured lenders who should be making decisions about how to maximize the value of their collateral. If the Utah Lawsuit results in a judgment that NSRC is the rightful owner of the Properties, then it is NSRC who should be making those decisions. In either event, this Debtor does not present a profile that recommends another $15 million of secured debt, especially when the substantial financial risk of forfeiture is being borne entirely by others.
....
So this is basically every good reason Nevada Star could put on paper against... well, CPRK?
I mean, it's not like it's THAT bad... hahaha ...
Well how about this new finance company we're supposed to secure this 5-7.5m loan for?
Do you know what it is called?
'Cause I could use that information.
Hard? I'd already established that fact. So ... no. Not hard.
Because I'm not a shareholder in those hundreds of others, and I am a shareholder of SYNJ....
Probing for information is never obnoxious, and only someone wanting to hide it would describe it as such.
As for insulting, I think I've taken more rude conduct and insults my way than anything I may have implied here, so I'm going to leave that at that.
I don't know who Putrid is (Undoubtedly a poster you've had a past issue with) so for what that's worth...
As for my quest for justifying this investment -- that's not why I'm here.
Again, I want facts. Provable facts. That will give us some better insight to our future than blind pontification, or blind faith, in some cases.
I've already said I'm a shareholder that's down over 50%, so as far as your quest for proving I have some kind of negative motive -- the only negativity I hold here is in negative equity
Thank you for your thoughts, and from shareholder to shareholder, good luck!
Yes, everything I just posted can be confirmed in the last filed financials.
Unlike your baseless garbage, I back up my info with facts and numbers -- here they are!
http://www.otcmarkets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=29933
Your conduct here really is becoming inappropriate. If you can't be civil, please remove yourself...
Submitted my info. Once again, thank you!