"I am who I am"-
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
wake up Arizona !
Energy Shortage Challenges Chile’s Copper Outlook
Email Print Reproduction
Wed, May 2, 2012 Copper Articles, Feature Articles
Post by Shihoko Goto, Copper Reporter By Shihoko Goto — Exclusive to Copper Investing News
inShare.0
When it comes to the global copper market, two truths remain constant. First, Chile is the world’s largest producer of the red metal, and second, China is the world’s largest consumer of copper. However, continuing to produce copper at the rate it has until now is proving challenging for Chile due to growing worries about energy supply in addition to concerns about global copper prices and market demand.
The South American nation produces about one-third of the world’s copper supply and holds 28 percent of total global reserves. As a result, the copper industry accounted for about 15 percent of Chile’s GDP, and state-owned Codelco remains the world’s largest copper producer.
Still, the country faces considerable challenges in reaching its goal of producing over seven million tonnes by 2020, such as securing a steady energy supply. At the annual meeting hosted by Chile’s Center for Copper and Mining Studies (CESCO) last month, Codelco CEO Diego Hernandez stated that ensuring a steady supply of energy is the single biggest challenge facing Chile’s mining industry. Of course, infrastructure development has always been a major issue for miners, not just in Chile but in locations worldwide, from Mongolia to Arizona. In Chile, though, analysts estimate that the government will need to increase energy supply by nearly 50 percent over the next eight years in order to keep up with demand from domestic producers as well as international mining giants like BHP Billiton (ASX:BHP) and Rio Tinto (LSE:RIO).
“Chile will have to shelve many of the country’s mining investments due to the high cost and scarcity of electricity,” warned Chile’s Mining Council president, Joaquin Villarino. Indeed, blackouts are not uncommon, and many expect them to become more frequent as energy demand from mining giants increases. The problem is that public opposition to building new power plants is becoming an increasingly large obstacle for lawmakers to overcome.
Instead of waiting for the government to step up investments in infrastructure, some private companies are looking to take matters into their own hands. BHP Billiton, for instance, is considering building a power station in Northern Chile. As for Vancouver-based Teck Resources (NYSE:TCK, TSX:TCK.B), it is looking into possible locations and providers for a power station in the Atacama Desert that would supply its $5.6 billion Quebrada Blanca mine. The site is slated to more than double Teck’s copper production and increase the mine’s life by about 30 years.
Private companies securing energy supplies by building their own power plants or partnering directly with energy providers will nonetheless simply be a temporary solution to the more fundamental problem of whether Chile is willing and able to invest in its energy needs for longer-term growth. According to the National Energy Commission, Chile will need to add about 8,000 megawatts to its 17,000 megawatt power system by 2020; the mining industry accounts for about 20 percent of the nation’s total energy needs. Some analysts believe lack of competition is a key factor in Chile’s energy deficiencies, and have called for greater market competition, especially for renewable energy projects, to be promoted nationwide.
Environmental considerations also at play
Moving forward, environmental considerations will certainly be a major concern for mining groups operating in Chile. Goldcorp (NYSE:GG) found that out the hard way this week when the Supreme Court rejected the construction of its El Morro mine by revoking its environmental permit. The mine is 70 percent held by Goldcorp, while the remaining 30 percent is held by New Gold (AMEX:NGD).
Meanwhile, ownership of the El Morro mine is in dispute. Barrick Gold (NYSE:ABX) has claimed that it had a deal in 2009 to acquire a majority stake in the property from Xstrata (LSE:XTA), but New Gold claimed the right of first refusal as Xstrata’s minority partner. New Gold sold its holding to Goldcorp, but held onto its original 30 percent stake while receiving $50 million in cash from Goldcorp for facilitating the transaction.
There are other challenges to operating in Chile, including adverse weather and labor disputes. The Collahuasi site, which is the world’s third-largest copper mine and is jointly owned by Anglo American (LSE:AAL) and Xstrata, saw output drop ten percent in 2011 as a result of heavy rains and labor disputes. Yet the two companies continue to hash out an expansion plan that may bolster output to over one million tons.
Clearly, Chile is rich in copper, and as David Baril, Teck’s Vice President for copper in Chile, said, “if you want to hunt elephants, you have to go to elephant country.” That indisputable fact should keep copper miners both large and small continuing their operations in the country.
my last post for today i'm wiped
encouraging
no please make your own decisions based on available information
that is PUBLIC
i'm here because AZ looks encouraging but time will tell and lots of bad things could happen could indeed happen
i believe AK will come in 2 years-someone will want that property sometime
in fact NAK may not get permitting until much later this year if at all
it could happen much later for them
and liberty wont make a move until after nak does
so that part of the equation doenst work in the short term for me
but that's just my philosophy
i'm going for the copper
and from what i have discerned it looks like a good deal will get taken up out of the ground from the liberty land claims
have a good day
hawk flying
maybe we will get another update on the lab samples from canada any time soon and the ZTEM testing then you know what !!!! drill plans but that's just my hopefulness
yes i would expect those statements and similar ones to be the same in both 10k's
its the arizona state royality $$$ that i dont remember and truthfully i'm too lazy to go back and reread the 2011 -10k i should with this much money sitting in this stock
your making this harder
thanks alot
risky investment here to say the least
we wait
i dont see .10 at all
i dont see any given price
why not .08 or .15
but here is another part worth a reread IMO and very important
If we do not obtain additional financing, our business will fail and our investors could lose their investment.
We had cash in the amount of $155,869 and negative working capital of $(4,287,593) as of January 31, 2012. We currently do not generate revenues from our operations. Our business plan calls for substantial investment and cost in connection with the acquisition and exploration of our mineral properties currently under lease and option. Any direct acquisition of any of the claims under lease or option is subject to our ability to obtain the financing necessary for us to fund and carry out exploration programs on the subject properties. The requirements are substantial. We do not currently have any arrangements for financing in addition to the Northern Dynasty Secured Convertible Note and the Fairhills Capital financing agreement (as defined and described in Item 5, Part II of this annual report) and private placements of our securities. Our loan from Northern Dynasty could be called at any time on 45 days notice. There is no assurance that we will be able to maintain operations at a level sufficient for an investor to obtain a return on their investment in our common stock. Further, we may continue to be unprofitable. Obtaining additional financing would be subject to a number of factors, including market prices for minerals, investor acceptance of our properties, contractual restrictions on our ability to enter into further financing arrangements, and investor sentiment. These factors may make the timing, amount, terms or conditions of additional financing unavailable to us and our business could fail.
Because there is no assurance that we will generate revenues, we face a high risk of business failure.
We have not earned any revenues as of the date of this filing and have never been profitable. We do not have an interest in any revenue generating properties. We were incorporated on August 20, 2001 and took over our current business on February 5, 2004. To date, we have been involved primarily in organizational and exploration activities. We will incur substantial operating and exploration expenditures without realizing any revenues. We therefore expect to incur significant losses into the foreseeable future. We have limited operating history upon which an evaluation of our future success or failure can be made. Our net loss from inception to January 31, 2012 is $(61,431,261). We recognize that if we are unable to generate significant revenues from our activities, we will not be able to earn profits or continue operations. Based upon current plans, we also expect to incur significant operating losses in the future. We cannot guarantee that we will be successful in raising capital to fund these operating losses or generate revenues in the future. We can provide investors with no assurance that we will generate any operating revenues or ever achieve profitable operations. If we are unsuccessful in addressing these risks, our business will most likely fail and our investors could lose their investment.
Our independent registered public accounting firm’s report states that there is a substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP, state in their audit report attached to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2012 that since we are an exploration stage company, have no established source of revenue and are dependent on our ability to raise capital from shareholders or other sources to sustain operations, there is a substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10
The existence of our mining claims depends on our ability to fund exploratory activity or to pay fees.
Our mining claims, which are the central part of our business, require that we either pay fees, or incur certain minimum development costs annually, or the claims will be forfeited. Due to our current financial situation we may not be able to meet these obligations and we could therefore lose our claims. This would impair our ability to raise capital and would negatively impact the value of our company.
Risks related to our common stock
Because we will likely issue additional shares of our common stock, investment in our company could be subject to substantial dilution.
Investors' interests in our company will be diluted and investors may suffer dilution in their net book value per share when we issue additional shares. Our constating documents previously authorized the issuance of up to 200,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001. At our shareholder meeting held on May 27, 2009 2009, the shareholders voted to increase the number of authorized shares to up to 10,000,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001. We filed a certificate of amendment on June 4, 2009 to increase the number of authorized shares to 5,000,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001. On September 1, 2009 we completed a one for four reverse stock split of our authorized and outstanding common stock resulting in a decrease in authorized shares to 1,250,000,000 with a par value of $0.00001. As of January 31, 2012, there were 635,899,389 of our common shares issued and outstanding. We anticipate that all or at least some of our future funding, if any, will be in the form of equity financing from the sale of our common stock. If we do sell more common stock, investors' investment in our company will likely be diluted. Dilution is the difference between what you pay for your stock and the net tangible book value per share immediately after the additional shares are sold by us. If dilution occurs, any investment in our company's common stock could seriously decline in value.
The sale of our stock under the convertible notes and the common share purchase warrants could encourage short sales by third parties, which could contribute to the future decline of our stock price.
In many circumstances, the provision of financing based on the distribution of equity for companies that are traded on the OTC Bulletin Board has the potential to cause a significant downward pressure on the price of common stock. This is especially the case if the shares being placed into the market exceed the market’s ability to take up the increased stock or if we have not performed in such a manner to show that the equity funds raised will be used to grow our business. Such an event could place further downward pressure on the price of our common stock. Regardless of our activities, the opportunity exists for short sellers and others to contribute to the future decline of our stock price. If there are significant short sales of our common stock, the price decline that would result from this activity will cause the share price to decline more, which may cause other shareholders of the stock to sell their shares, thereby contributing to sales of common stock in the market. If there are many more shares of our common stock on the market for sale than the market will absorb, the price of our common shares will likely decline.
Trading in our common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board is limited and sporadic making it difficult for our shareholders to sell their shares or liquidate their investments.
Our common stock is currently listed for public trading on the OTC Bulletin Board. The trading price of our common stock has been subject to wide fluctuations. Trading prices of our common stock may fluctuate in response to a number of factors, many of which will be beyond our control. The stock market has generally experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies with no current business operation. There can be no assurance that trading prices and price earnings ratios previously experienced by our common stock will be matched or maintained. These broad market and industry factors may adversely affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted. Such litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs for us and a diversion of management's attention and resources.
Our By-laws contain provisions indemnifying our officers and directors against all costs, charges and expenses incurred by them.
Our By-laws contain provisions with respect to the indemnification of our officers and directors against all costs, charges and expenses, including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment, actually and reasonably incurred by our officers and directors, including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment in a civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding to which an officer or director is made a party by reason being or having been one of our directors or officers.
Our By-laws do not contain anti-takeover provisions which could result in a change of our management and directors if there is a take-over of our company.
secrets
come on
no secrets
i hate secrets always did
lol
i dont see that part btw but i do see the part about their need $$$ to go foward
and how things can get bad real easily should they not get $$$
i like the verbage about the state of Az getting royalities--$$
i wont get too excited until something concrete happens there
IMO
i dont remember such a paragraph last year in the 10k
maybe bella 777 can answer that?
thanks
this part too should be reread by all IMO
We are required to pay annual rentals for our Arizona State Land Department (“ASLD”) Mineral Exploration Permits (“AZ MEP”) at our Tombstone Super Project in the State of Arizona. A mineral exploration permit is permission from ASLD to prospect and explore for minerals on State Trust land. Exploration is any activity conducted for the purpose of determining the existence of a valuable mineral deposit, such as: geologic mapping, drilling, geochemical sampling, and geophysical surveys. Prior to exploration, the Plan of Operations must be approved by ASLD. The permitting process for an exploration permit takes a minimum of sixty (60) days. If the application is approved, the initial rent is $2 per acre. If renewed, no additional rents are due for the second year. Rents are set at $1 per acre for years 3 thru 5. Work expenditure requirements are: $10 per acre for years 1-2; and $20 per acre for years 3-5. Removal of any minerals or materials from State Trust land without the appropriate lease or permit is prohibited. The permit is valid for one year from the due date of the rental and bond. If renewal requirements are met, the permit can be renewed annually for up to five years. If discovery of a valuable mineral deposit is made, the permitee must apply for a mineral lease before actual mining activities can begin. A mineral lease permits the mining of minerals discovered under the exploration permit. The approval process takes a minimum of six (6) months. The mineral lease is issued for a term of twenty (20) years. Leases may be renewed for an additional term. Both rents and royalties are determined by appraisal. Royalties may be based on: 1) a fixed rate subject to annual adjustment; or 2) a sliding-scale rate which is linked to a commodity index price and the operation's break-even price. There is a statutory minimum royalty rate of 2% of gross value. These AZ MEPs require a reclamation bond of $3,000 which we currently hold. The first year’s rental has been paid for these MEPs ; and the escalating rental is due on the anniversary of the MEP each year. After the end of the 4th year, the MEPs must transition to a State Mineral Lease upon satisfaction of the State Mineral Inspector that economic indications of a minable deposit exists. After commencement of mining, the State of Arizona shall be paid a minimal net smelter return after taking into consideration any extenuating mining challenges royalty but not less than a 2% gross royalty. In the north eastern part of the Tombstone area approximately 1 mile from the Tombstone business district, the company holds 33 Federal lode mining claims on lease from JABA US Inc., which has held these claims for approximately 30 + years or more. Two of Liberty Star’s directors have an interest in JABA US Inc. These claims cover the Walnut Creek mineral target. Beginning September 1, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Liberty Star started and subsequently completed staking 9 Federal lode mining claims along the east edge of old patented mining claims in the main producing part of the old Tombstone mining area. These new claims are adjacent to the south end of the Walnut Creek TS claim block and are also named the TS claims. These claims occupy fractional land areas open to location by federal lode claim. The rental period begins on September 30 th through the following September 29 th and rental payments are due by the first day of the rental period. We hold AZ MEP permits for 4,126.9 acres at our Tombstone project. We paid initial rental fees from the date of application through September 29, 2012 of $8,254. Required minimum work expenditures for the period ended September 29, 2012 are $41,269. The annual rentals due by September 30, 2012 to maintain the AZ MEP permits are $4,127. There are no royalties associated with the AZ MEP permits.
With respect to the foregoing properties, additional approvals and authorizations may be required from other government agencies, depending upon the nature and scope of the proposed exploration program. The amount of these costs is not known at this time as we do not know the size, quality of any resource or reserve at this time, and it is extremely difficult to assess the impact of any capital expenditures on earnings or our competitive position.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i like this part --worth a reread by all IMO
We will be required to comply with all regulations, rules and directives of governmental authorities and agencies applicable to the exploration of minerals in the States of Arizona and Alaska.
We are required to perform annual assessment work in order to maintain the Big Chunk and Bonanza Hills Alaska State mining claims. If annual assessment work is not performed we must pay the assessment amount in cash in order to maintain the claims. Completion of annual assessment work in the amount of $400 per 1/4 section (160 acre) claim or $100 per 1/16 section (40 acre) claim extends the claims for a one year period. Assessment work performed in excess of the required amount may be carried forward for up to 4 years to reduce future obligations for assessment work. We estimate that the required annual assessments to maintain the claims will be approximately $260,600.
The annual state rentals for the Big Chunk and Bonanza Hills Alaska State mining claims vary from $70 to $280 per mineral claim and escalate with the age of the mining claim. The rental period begins at noon September 1 st through the following September 1 st and annual rental payments are due on November 30 th of each year. Annual rent is due in full within 45 days of staking a new claim and covers the period from staking until the next September 1 st . The rentals of $164,600 to extend the Big Chunk claims through September 1, 2012 were paid in November 2011. The annual rentals of $15,800 to extend the Bonanza Hills claims through September 1, 2012 have not been paid. Our management decided to use rental funds for Bonanza Hills on other projects we believe to have more potential. Alaska State mining claim rentals can be paid in arrears and the claims validated as long as no intervening locator has overstaked our claims. We have not made the decision to make payment in arrears or relinquish our rights to these claims. The estimated state rentals due for the Big Chunk claims by November 30, 2012 for the period from September 1, 2012 through September 1, 2013 are $166,740. Alaska State production royalty is three percent of net income. State law prescribes that after a 3.5 -year exemption from state taxes a metal mine is liable for a 15% state licensing tax on net income from the mine.
Our North Pipes claims are Federal lode mining claims located on U.S. Federal Lands and administered by the Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management. The Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) has prepared an environmental impact statement (“EIS”) addressing potential for contamination of significant amounts of uranium leaking into the Colorado River. The EIS indicated the danger of such contamination insignificant. Regardless, the United States Secretary of the Interior, Kenneth Salazar, through executive order has withdrawn Federal lands from locatable mineral exploration and mining North of the Grand Canyon along the Utah border in Arizona, the so-called “Arizona Strip”. Nearly 1 million acres of land managed by the BLM and the Forest Service were segregated in July 2009 by the Secretary of Interior. The executive order has resulted in the withdrawal of an area of the Arizona Strip from mining in particular, and the moratorium now is instated for the next 20 years. However, the moratorium permits existing claims and mines to continue as before, including our North Pipes lode mining claims.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7
We are required to pay annual rentals to maintain our North Pipes Federal lode mining claims in good standing. The rental period begins at 12:01 PM on September 1 st through the following September 1 st at 12:00 and rental payments are due by the first day of the rental period starting at 12:01 PM. The annual rental is $140 per claim. Additional fees of $45 per claim are due in the first year of filing a Federal lode mining claim along with the first year’s rent. The rentals of $60,340 for the period from September 1, 2011 to September 1, 2012 have been paid. The annual rentals due by September 1, 2012 of $60,340 are required to maintain the North Pipes claims are for the period from September 1, 2012 through September 1, 2013. There is no requirement for annual assessment or exploration work on the Federal lode mining claims, this having been supplanted by the rental fee. There are no royalties associated with the Federal lode mining claims.
We are required to pay annual rentals for our Federal lode mining claims for our East Silver Bell project in the State of Arizona. The rental period begins at noon on September 1 st through the following September 1 st and rental payments are due by the first day of the rental period. The annual rental is $140 per claim. The rentals fees of $3,640 for the period from September 1, 2011 to September 1, 2012 have been paid. The annual rentals due by September 1, 2012 of $3,640 are required to maintain the East Silver Bell claims are for the period from September 1, 2012 through September 1, 2013. There is no requirement for annual assessment or exploration work on the Federal lode mining claims, this having been supplanted by the rental fee. There are no royalties associated with the Federal lode mining claims.
We are required to pay annual rentals for our Federal lode mining claims for our Tombstone project in the State of Arizona. The rental period begins at noon on September 1 st through the following September 1 st and rental payments are due by the first day of the rental period. The annual rental is $140 per claim. Additional fees of $45 per claim are due in the first year of filing a Federal lode mining claim along with the first year’s rent. The rentals and initial filing fees of $17,094 for the period from September 1, 2011 to September 1, 2012 have been paid. The annual rentals due by September 1, 2012 of $13,365 are required to maintain the Tombstone claims are for the period from September 1, 2012 through September 1, 2013. There is no requirement for annual assessment or exploration work on the Federal lode mining claims, this having been supplanted by the rental fee. There are no royalties associated with the Federal lode mining claims.
We are required to pay annual rentals for our Arizona State Land Department (“ASLD”) Mineral Exploration Permits (“AZ MEP”) at our Tombstone Super Project in the State of Arizona. A mineral exploration permit is permission from ASLD to prospect and explore for minerals on State Trust land. Exploration is any activity conducted for the purpose of determining the existence of a valuable mineral deposit, such as: geologic mapping, drilling, geochemical sampling, and geophysical surveys. Prior to exploration, the Plan of Operations must be approved by ASLD. The permitting process for an exploration permit takes a minimum of sixty (60) days. If the application is approved, the initial rent is $2 per acre. If renewed, no additional rents are due for the second year. Rents are set at $1 per acre for years 3 thru 5. Work expenditure requirements are: $10 per acre for years 1-2; and $20 per acre for years 3-5. Removal of any minerals or materials from State Trust land without the appropriate lease or permit is prohibited. The permit is valid for one year from the due date of the rental and bond. If renewal requirements are met, the permit can be renewed annually for up to five years. If discovery of a valuable mineral deposit is made, the permitee must apply for a mineral lease before actual mining activities can begin. A mineral lease permits the mining of minerals discovered under the exploration permit. The approval process takes a minimum of six (6) months. The mineral lease is issued for a term of twenty (20) years. Leases may be renewed for an additional term. Both rents and royalties are determined by appraisal. Royalties may be based on: 1) a fixed rate subject to annual adjustment; or 2) a sliding-scale rate which is linked to a commodity index price and the operation's break-even price. There is a statutory minimum royalty rate of 2% of gross value. These AZ MEPs require a reclamation bond of $3,000 which we currently hold. The first year’s rental has been paid for these MEPs ; and the escalating rental is due on the anniversary of the MEP each year. After the end of the 4th year, the MEPs must transition to a State Mineral Lease upon satisfaction of the State Mineral Inspector that economic indications of a minable deposit exists. After commencement of mining, the State of Arizona shall be paid a minimal net smelter return after taking into consideration any extenuating mining challenges royalty but not less than a 2% gross royalty. In the north eastern part of the Tombstone area approximately 1 mile from the Tombstone business district, the company holds 33 Federal lode mining claims on lease from JABA US Inc., which has held these claims for approximately 30 + years or more. Two of Liberty Star’s directors have an interest in JABA US Inc. These claims cover the Walnut Creek mineral target. Beginning September 1, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Liberty Star started and subsequently completed staking 9 Federal lode mining claims along the east edge of old patented mining claims in the main producing part of the old Tombstone mining area. These new claims are adjacent to the south end of the Walnut Creek TS claim block and are also named the TS claims. These claims occupy fractional land areas open to location by federal lode claim. The rental period begins on September 30 th through the following September 29 th and rental payments are due by the first day of the rental period. We hold AZ MEP permits for 4,126.9 acres at our Tombstone project. We paid initial rental fees from the date of application through September 29, 2012 of $8,254. Required minimum work expenditures for the period ended September 29, 2012 are $41,269. The annual rentals due by September 30, 2012 to maintain the AZ MEP permits are $4,127. There are no royalties associated with the AZ MEP permits.
With respect to the foregoing properties, additional approvals and authorizations may be required from other government agencies, depending upon the nature and scope of the proposed exploration program. The amount of these costs is not known at this time as we do not know the size, quality of any resource or reserve at this time, and it is extremely difficult to assess the impact of any capital expenditures on earnings or our competitive position.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8
Personnel
do the rangers have more than 1 great pitcher now
yipee
that may be but the league leading orioles were beat by the high flying yankees with their new star ex dodger kuroda
watch out AL the yankees have another weapon on the mound
yipee
this volcano is about to explode
within a month or two
if i'm wrong i will admit it dont worry
funny
good
interesting that you believe it's the most comprehensive one to date
thats good
i dont have a problem supporting this company as a shareholder and paying salaries and stock awards if they produce something for me
sometime ????
lots of salaries and stock awards there
now lets see them get the ball rolling
gee no kidding
i think i understood
thanks
i thought that was standard stuff in fact every one of their properties
indiciates that they have not identified ore
lets read on
brisco rents a room in his house
for an office
and they have a warehouse costing them 3k all old stuff we know
so far very boring read
good its out !
oh really the ray beat you 2x's
that may be because you expended all of your energy on the prior series against who??
lol
you told me last week that the angels were not that good
wait until the rangers meet up the Orioles LOL
there you go
thanks
just remember every team runs into a slump
and that may happen to your rangers at some point
we are only in april
do you think big papi on the red sox will bat 40o this season lol
see what i mean?
gee
we are sure confident for april 30
lol
i'm celebrating 10 fun years of marriage this weekend
so nuthing will upset me
lol
go yankees!!!
i like a rod, jeter and granderson
yeah i agree
you are correct
here's one for you Cat
i know the owner of the Rays
and he told me in march that in seasons that he thinks his team is going to win
they lose
and just the opposite
in seasons like last year he did not think his team would do well and
he team does well
well this year unfortunately or not he likes his chances
lol
make what you want of that
i like the rays
but i like the yankees more
wierd that we dont have an update on the lab samples and start of ZTEM testing?
this volcano is ready to blow
are you in ?
again? i did that a few months ago at these prices and look we are back where we were
but i agree if someone wants more shares then this might be a very good time
to make money
what are you worried about?
time is not even close to running out so you are wrong
how about 911 shares at the market at 3;59 that will make this an interesting weekend
you know very well that as soon as new comes out you will be there selling
so stop the circus already
you are clueless buddy stop it already
you are waisting our time
agreed i'm far from worried
but hughes has just been terrible and garcia too
sebathia and nova are consistent and fun to watch
i'm going to a game vs tampa soon
always a fun outing
yankee disaster in texas. some serious pitching thought going on in the girardi clubhouse i'm certain
I know that chasing a stock that went from 02 to 15 is a mistake. Regardless of claims. This stock will be manipulated by a lot of fast traders when the time comes around and if you,think that you can compete then good luck. I don't. I buy and wait while it's low like now. And hope for news to get the pps up
Good night Maryellen, good night john boy
There is a big difference in philosophy between buying a stock that, is basing and chasing a momentum play. And crying about it every day for,hours. He can wait it out or move along. Smart money buys more here to a lower average. But his annoying comments make no sense and are a waste of my time to read
As far as comments directed towArds brisco. They re clearly not backed by intelligent information but rather by emotion
it appears from reading almost every post for the past two years that no one really knows who brisco is but rather will direct their comments based on the fact that they don't have all the facts
I hope you are right about this stock going back to .15.
Apparently a lot of people around here need to exhibit more patience
Hawk
did you really buy this stock at .15
lol
come on you are smarter than that???
it looks like bbep is the winner
thanks
hawk
i'll look at TNK and DHT now
thanks
i just want a stable company with a decent divident for this $$
hawk