researching
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The site sucks. Here's a link that you can open in any player (itunes, etc).
http://www.live365.com/play/329246?from=pls&bitrate=256&AuthType=NORMAL&SaneID=64.252.16...
lol. Who's the guy in the pic?
It's missing a bunch of verbiage. For example:
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit on its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above, present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of <company> Corporation at <date>, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended <date>, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
OTCBB Halt code: S.001 - Stupidity
The SEC may halt the stock out of stupidity. Tongue and cheek, of course, but Rufus has a mess to clean up and fast.
Yes. That was posted before and I posted something similar earlier today. They're missing info and if the OTCBB checks the filing, they may not remove the E. Another company today was flagged as delinquent because of the auditor opinion after filing the 10K.
Sorry. I was using Furia and Fronthaul interchangeably.
I'll explain it for you. There's 2 problems. First is that Furia wasn't included on the 10K when it should've been. Using your logic, it should've been about Furia (Fronthaul) but yet they neglected to include the financials for them.
The second is that the 10K wasn't filed until after the merger. The SEC requires combined financials, just like they require current os information even though the period is prior. They forgot that either way.
If any of this had taken place after the 10K was already filed, then an 8K would be filed since an 8K is notification between filing periods.
And yes, discontinued operations for FHAL would be included on the 10Q, not 10K.
Basically, the 10K is full of mistakes and omissions.
Translation:
SEC: Thank you for calling.
Stanley: Did we file late?
SEC: Company name?
Stanley: Conversion solutions
SEC: Yes
Standley: Okay. Thanks.
In the end, it was just a calendar and simple addition that confused them all. Math seems to be a big problem all around.
It's too bad he didn't wear the black t-shirt with a chevy race car and nascar logo on it.
I wonder if he get's NASCAR and NASDAQ confused at times??? lol
outstanding shares x current price = market cap
The E came from the OTCBB. It just notes that a company is delinquent in their filings. They filed a day late so they're delinquent. Either way, the company has to notify the OTCBB that they filed and it takes a day or two for them to change the symbol back through nasdaq. Symbol changes happen daily but they're not real-time (eg they won't make the change during the day).
I know what Reg D is. I have no idea what you asked when you called them. All OTCBB stocks have to file financials. It's called being a "publicly reporting company".
lol. You don't have a clue what you're talking about.
I just saw a company that filed an un-audited 10K without an auditor opinion and the OTCBB added the E for delinquency.
The 10K is missing a lot of information (fubar is a better term) so if anyone does review it, they might just stay in a delinquent status.
And yes, Horton played it safe.
CFO didn't sign off on the 10k.
ot: Serf, SIGA! Great call on that one. Up 150% in pre-market with massive volume coming in.
Ah, so you see the point that sometimes things are exactly as they may seem. Those aren't "real employees" but are listed as such because they can be. Same with assets that aren't "real assets" but can be listed as such.
Oops. I guessed wrong. Knew it was over 100,000.
No problem. Just posting what I see.
Employees? 120,000
Nope. They listed the date of change already. It's called a "daily list" for a reason. It's daily, not cumulative.
Bud? lol. I forgot about him. He was back in the JJSeabrook, Oilstrike, txprincess, RonnieD, etc, day.
Boyfriend Simon? Ugh, I'm crushed. I thought I was your one and only...
Who knows what that guy's up to.
No. Like I said, it's not dilution of your holdings. It's OS dilution since there are 6 times more shares. More shares has a great significance to those holding them.
Simons favorite word seems to be "ok".
Has anyone asked "Simon" why he registered his domain through an anonymous proxy so he doesn't have to disclose info? Or why he won't take calls from blocked numbers on the caller id? Or why his site shows up on pumper sites?
$500 bucks from that scammer buys you anything. Nice, huh?
Actually, it is dilution. Share dilution and dilution of the eps. It's not PPS dilution, like most of you are accustomed to. But dilution nonetheless.
I forgot Homeland Security and United Nations. eom
I forgot Environment. eom
Isn't that the foundation of what Rufus is spewing? Religion, Family, Civic Duty, Good will towards all, Political support, yada yada yada...
If you'd like to prove me wrong, do so. It's a public forum. It's most likely in your best interest to set people straight. I'll listen (read) :)
Sammy's a pretty cool guy. Oh, I mean sammy "the bull". You see, I'm a bull on most stocks (I don't short) so what other "bull" do you know of?
lol. I'm not conning anyone. It's all a matter of interpretation. If you get it wrong, who do you blame? Yourself.
Yes, shorts are required (since they borrowed stock) to pay any dividends. But the rest of your post is garbage and you don't really understand what you're staying. glty.
lol. I'm not bashing. I'm just posting what I see, from all of the crap I've seen on these OTCBB/Pink stocks. I'm glad to see that everyone and their grandmother bought at $.20 and ran it up to $4. The trouble is that I've been reading this board since July and I know better. So be it.
I'll tell you what. If I thought there was really good news, I'd buy the stock. But that hasn't happened. My buys and sells have been based on knowing other peoples stupidity.
psst. It's "paid" not "payd" by the way..
Uhhh, so what is YOUR definition of a dividend or split...hmmmm???
That's not doom and gloom, it's just how the markets operate.
Trading at $2 down from $4 and no where near $15 sure sucks, imo.
Okay. So then it's a glorified forward split. I didn't know that.