Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I dont remember seeing an 8k, in or around Aug 2017, in regards to PharmItBe. Is it a requirement that shareholders must be informed of such matters in a timely manner?
OTCMarkets.com lists it as 147.7m as of 04/03
Market ready != on the shelf ready
Of course its not over yet. They are just being honest. No one ever thought it was over. Its an open investigation, therefore ANYTHING is possible.
10k out
A/S 20b
O/S 12.8b
As of 04/03
False
Stop spreading misinformation.
Uh ohh BLULLISH is here!
BEAUTIFUL GREEN DAY
Okay, FB is not ‘their website’
I think you are referring to their FB post, correct?
What post are you referring to?
What does the S3 signify?
Even with all the restricted shares being sold, this thing is holding tough!
Someone gonna buy some? Argh
Read the SEC complaint. You will then know he is lying.
That is NOT what it says
Any update from people that live around the clinics?
Whats with the major dumping?
Nice climb commencing
Strong trading
Me likey
Well someone feels confident enough to spend 48,000.00 on RSII.
I LIKE IT!
Love this post!
I read the complaint. What a slimeball.
By definition an RS does NOT affect the actual value of a stock. I cant believe I have to explain this.
Someone just scooped 2m shares
An R/S does not affect the value of your holdings.
Printing new shares DOES.
That was my point.
Omg man
You cant be serious
You may not fully understand how the stock market works.
Research ‘stock dilution’ for one
An article recently states that an original investment of 57,000.00 in CBIS would now be worth 0.10.
Amazing
It is completely unethical, and plain wrong, to spread misinformation.
I couldnt agree more
Here is ONE excerpt (there are more regarding this topic)
Page 15 - ‘On February 3, 2017, OWC’s transfer agent, relying on the information provided by Friedland, removed the restrictive legend from Lane 6552’s OWC stock.’
The previous paragraph discussed the letters (INCLUDING the opinion letter) that was submitted by FRIEDLAND, not OWCP).
EVERYONE SHOULD READ THE SEC COMPLAINT IN FULL
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2018/comp-pr2018-34.pdf
I am reading the actual SEC complaint and iGlow’s claims are false. More to follow....
So you are saying that the SEC failed in their investigation (by not charging OWCP)?
Poor guy dumping at .0176
Awe
Loving this!
WSK never misleaded anyone. I suspect the name change will be very soon.
Betta not wait to hop on board, folks