Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Again, where is your proof that I support mindless trashing
Was there a post of mindless trashing that I supported?
I think I heard that before
Personally I like to hear what someone who has DD or thoughtful contributions have to say. I'm not much for mindless pumping.
There was no but at the end of my statement. You can add your own thoughts if you like, but keep them as your own. My post still stands.
Tom Sellett writes
"Only the boss could have brought this shell back to sec compliance What a f'n legend $gvsi "
-Are we SEC compliant? No
"$gvsi baby!!!! The trifecta $wnft $srnw all 3 banging all November!!!"
-umm no, gvsi was definitely not banging all November
"All they have to do is buy $gvsi and wait a week ."
-um hmm that was from November 15th..pretty sure a week has passed.
"$cosm no thanks" (6 days ago)
- well he missed out
"$gvsi everyone knows the tsnp/hmbl run is coming here very soon. Pink limited on Monday imho!"
Well we will see. But so far he has only proven to be a mindless pumper.
You absolutely need to be more selective in who you follow.
You will be holding his bag if you believe what he says.
100 percent
Its really not ridiculous. A stock moves much higher faster with less shares available.
Agree 100. If there is nothing to sustain this potential run to however high it goes, it will come down. Fast.
For sure it will not sustain a huge run up for too long unless there is news to substantiate the significant increase in share price.
Does anyone know what significance the tweet actually has?
I agree. If there was good news or good motivation behind the move to terminate custodianship, I dont see why he wouldn't throw us that bone.
Regardless, the fact that he leaves us wondering and guessing...he is not mr. Wonderful for sure.
Looking forward to that too!
How would anyone know that "majority of US traders will.. sold in the past year+. "?
The premise off of which the price prediction is made is not fact at all.
Very likely ;)
Maybe this week
Probably this week ;)
One more day closer
"No new updates "?
There are many new updates to be had.
Why are some assuming the OTC asked for something small-because we haven't been updated for what they did ask.
Why are some assuming GS is waiting on the OTC and not the OTC waiting on GS-because he hasn't updated us.
Why are some detectives calling the OTC to see how busy they are and determining how long it should take for them to review the new info (that they may not even have)-because we haven't been updated.
GS updated us that the OTC asked for more documentation and he can very well update us further. Not all of us want to work off of assumptions.
COULD be. And I wouldn't call those that held for a year and half and are now selling, "weak hands". We can respect their choice to move on from from a "tumultuous relationship."
Got it. You are never selling. Not sure why someone would buy if they don't intend to ever sell.
Uh huh, sure
Looking forward to some news
The assumption seems to be a document request, when it could be an action request that may take longer. Why don't we just wait and let things happen.
I agree that he wants to get this current
This motion to terminate custodianship seems a bit like putting the cart before the horse..wish GS would update us.
Thanks for the update
With time we'll get to where we need to be.
It took about two weeks to ask for more info..shouldn't be more than two weeks to review the new info.
Knowing when GS provides them with the info would be helpful.
Any day now
What does that mean Jmoney..how does someone leave an application? He paid for and submitted it. GS said so, so that is fact, right? So, when one submitts an application, what does walking away from it look like? Did he ask for his money back? Do they give money back? I doubt it.
We know he didn't get access though. How do we know? Because if they have questions NOW, and this is after GS cleaned it up a bit, then they most certainly had the same questions then. Is that a fair statement and conclusion? So to say he left it, could only mean that he decided not to respond to their questions. OR, could not respond with the information they needed without fixing some things and thus decided to go the SEC route. So in other words, he couldn't get access or current in its present state and THEN left to go the SEC route, figuring its more desirable.
Its NOT positive news, which is not to say that it won't get current.
A)The application was not accepted as it was. Which means it is still not a sure thing. Is that positive, no.
B.) Its a further DELAY, is that positive, no.
C.)Did the share price go up on that news? No, it went down. That's not positive.
When the share price moves up, you'll know something positive happened.
Doesn't matter how people try to spin it on here.
Some say that it was expected or typical, thats could be true. Doesnt make it positive.
Strange they would ask for additional documents..don't they know that he got access a while ago..
Can you repost some of that DD? I've looked and couldn't find it
What happened with that reverse merger?
He said he is having it PREPARED in conjunction with the application. Not SUBMITTED in conjunction with the application.
Stick to the facts.
Love how stable and steady this one is.
We are splitting hairs with the shell debate. One side is saying it meets the criteria and can be called a shell and the other side is arguing that its needs official paperwork labeling it a shell, not us calling it a shell, in order to use its shell status. Both are correct.
We meet the criteria and we can call it a shell, but for all intents and purpose it might need paperwork (otcm) and be officially labeling it as such to utilize that status.
similar to a baby, You DO need official paperwork (i.e. birth certificate)to get insurance etc. A cute baby picture to the insurance company won't do, even though yes the baby exists
And yes you can correctly call it a baby.
That is how systems operate to keep order.
Sure, my bet is we'll see it within the immediate hours or days following access to news and disclosure service.
Is Monday part of the week? Hmm let's see what tmrw brings.