Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
i didn't mean shares, I meant 4 million dollars worth of shares!!
actually this is him
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1P1ZddKPgVk
4 million dollars!!!!! Do you believe in the past year that David Foley has personally diluted more or less than 4 million in ntek stock?
false...
the convict is not the ceo.....he just owns about 20% of the company and calls all the shots from behind the scenes
pretty sure the (R) shares that come off in April are the ones he paid 3 cents for with 250k
not as in the normal market structure, howver what happens are unreported trades during the day are past posted....
they are called ntek shareholders
Key in article- 100 million broadband homes!!!!!!!
WWE knows streaming is the future
http://www.cnbc.com/id/102452684#.
. Names of Officers, Directors, and Control Persons
Jeffrey A. Foley – Chairman, CEO
Alan D. Stone – Director
Ted Campbell – Director
There are currently no control persons or beneficial owners of more than five percent (5%) of any class of
NanoTech’s equity securities.
Why would anyone believe this? Everyone, and I mean everyone knows David Foley and David Foley alone controls every single move ntek makes... EVERYTHING!!!!! So that makes the above declaration, while legally true, a complete FRAUD in reality!
Curious, why has there never been a booking photo of the NTEK founder posted here? Without the photo it's almost like it never happened.
who else would be controlling it..... he is the puppet-master..
why someone won't buy this up
[url=http://postimg.org/image/wltrfxl1r/][/url]
answer is so easy...any investor with proper DD knows that David Foley, though not technically an officer owns far more than 5% of the company and they know he has been a rapid diluter. We do not know how many of his diluted shares that he may have repurchased at a much smaller number and how apt he may be to repeat the sell. Face the facts, David Controls NTEK and its flow of information except that which may be controlled by Samsung, Sony etc...
So, no investor wants to dive in drive up the price just to watch a "Ghost Owner" sell it off creating an instant loss!!! It is that simple.........
true, however.... looks pretty clear ntek will not stay with new TA and will seek a west coast company...
ntek chart cleary shows that no real trading is taking place on the consumer end...
lol safe harbor does not apply to darks
price was never .17 with np1. was around .07ish when np1 came out ran to .10s and Foley diluted the H__L out of it immediately...
that's bs when you have hvel holders posting here that that already have that information in writing from ir etc
LOL $6100 is a big move?
Message sent to NTEK IR Will there be a 10-1 forward split of the HVEL stock (which was earlier reported here)
Answer: CRICKETS..........
The NEW CEO not past.....
The new CEO phoned me personally to ask/address concerns. That was a very nice gesture. I appreciated the call.
indeed... there is still time for them to do these things. NTEK must get the o/s under 500mm....
Buying it has nothing to do with the laws FEDERAL ones governing such matters... So to "not" buy it..lol would mean free reign is given to publicly traded companies to say whatever they want in press releases so as to completely defraud the unwitting consumer!!!! Is it clearly understood how utterly preposterous that would be?
Te issue at hand is to collect in a civil proceeding, which is basically all you have, wen dealing with a form 15 dark non SEC compliant company like NTEK.... when NTEK changes investor opinion will mature....
answer to all replies =NO if an investor doesn't know this about ntek homework hasn't been done....
Private non equity financing....
However Nanotech just got a $10mm fund to get them started....
No, it absolutely DOES NOT.
Listen closely- AUDITS ARE BEING DONE........ WHEN A COMPANY PR's that or any other specific information that can influence investors it is A) for a reporting company a crime/violation under the SEC or B) a civilly responsible action for a dark form 15 filing non reporting scrub like the current NTEK model... allow me to spell it out for you, if they fail to do what they just pr'd you, me or us, as ShARE HOLDERS can take them to court and sue them!!!!!!!
hope that clears it up for you!
Aaron Hightower will be a guest on tonight's 10-year-anniversary Texas Holdem Radio with Wade Andrews.......
http://www.texasholdemradio.com/
Because they have now legally committed themselves to both completed audits and uplisting..... The legal e's have gone from general concepts to confirmation of actualization.
However, there is a Civil legally binding PR from the CEO stating that they are BEING DONE, not will be done, bot coming next yr, ARE BEING DONE
I ASSume you mean Taylor as Hightower wasn't even on the BOD then....
Not with Apples approval.......... just random Foleying around then he will try to sell them an APP!!!!!!
Actually they have NEVER ever legally said AUDITS were being done until now...... now they have gone on record with THEY ARE BEING DONE... huge difference.
NTEK trading at 5x earnings in the pinky world would be generous....
assuming they can make 50mm w/ no buybacks you are talking .33 to .45 range...............
Ever seen a photo of David Foley with/ Mitch Lowe, Blake Brown etc?
Simple Request- Each NTEK holder here send an email to IR asking why no shareholder vote has ever been needed. That should answer your question.
this is 100% accurate...... Is a shareholder vote ever required for anything, such as acquisitions? Not much over 50% but enough to do whatever their hearts desire....
Powder for NTEK seems evaporated..