At least there's one long time debenture, Carson, that's collaborating with QMC to give them some breathing room.

Granted 18% is a nice return on investment.

If you read the language in both again, at least from what you posted, the Q list revenue from equipment, $3.5. The shareholder update $7-10 includes equipment, training, and other services.

Another display manufacturer in Japan joining the qdot display industry, IO Data.

https://news.mynavi.jp/article/20190213-771196/

I don’t think they need to redo their SWAT. They already passed on the remote phosphor approach. I saw it in an interview that Nanosys did. They directly commented on it not be something of value to them. Whether or not that becomes as risk to their operations will be determined, but their focus is jumping ahead to electroluminescent QLED.

Laughable that anyone thinks Nanosys product offering is dead. Clearly they have revenue and partnership for future product applications. They are the leader in Qd displays.

I think they are nearly setup for an IPO. I think we’ll see an IPO by late summer this year. That could help QMC if they land additional streams of revenue this year as the market will have a benchmark for valuation.

So if it took 3 years to close on the India deal and we've been hearing about them working product development for over 3 years, I believe they could land a deal for display's at anytime for film type.

The new prototype being showed is a QDLED type (remote phosphor). Of course, they don't likely have a deal in the works yet, but apparently they have interested parties in seeing this new adaption for QD use.

I would think 6-12 months for completion.

QMC has slated milestones to support the facility there including starting to fabricate reactors. These milestones are part of the $7-10 million Squires projected for revenue in 2019. They’ve announced no additional deals to date, but it sounds like they are close in multiple areas based on what Squires said in shareholder update.

10Q is due at EOB Thursday, 2/14.

Should see $1 million in receivables for last quarter.

Hopefully we get update that confirms receipt of $1 million revenue as a subsequent event.

Lol! Nice

Any number of reason. As people have said before, plenty of reasons to sell, very few reasons to buy.

We apparently still need further validation to get new buyers to overcome the sellers.

There are a number of debentures and shares issued for services that could be selling just because they need the capital right now.

Actually, the selling started to increase upon the shareholder update. We doubled or more our daily volume after the update.

The average volume has not changed since 1/31 has passed. Lack of confirmation of $1 million payment, isn't likely the reason for the selling at reduced share price.

It's kind of obvious that someone decided to sell upon news of projected revenues. Volume on average increased since the shareholder letter on 1/16, but clearly the sellers don't care at what price they sell to get out.

This trend is very contrary to what most stocks would do upon revenue projections for new business deals. Welcome to the world of the OTC where small dollars amounts can drive a trend.

Agree on 5% requirement. Regardless, the point being, we would know and I think volume would be much higher as well as share price.

I believe it would be a hostile takeover which isn’t insider trading.

Lol! True enough!

Except we’ve not seen volume enough to indicate someone is trying to buy us out. They’re not doing it at less than $60,000 or 2 million shares a day.

It’s not even a partner in Assam. I think someone found this awhile back. Looks like maybe Amtronics started to try and work with them, but likely didn’t finalize anything.

And a solar manufacturer as well. Now I’m seeing why the licensing deal in this park. Possible collaboration to bring more qdot products to market.

We all hope we get a PR. Most of us think the validation is required to remove the negative perception that failed deals in China and the Freschfield deal left.

Don’t take this personally, the market could care less about your or my opinion.

About $90,000 traded is all!

Yes. Quantum dots, being semiconductors, are being researched in a multitude of applications: displays, batteries, lighting, security inks, solar, medical imaging and drug delivery, mechanical strain indication, and more.

It looked like we were close to break out to above 4 cents today. There was 1 MM below 4.5 cents multiple times today. We just didn’t have any buying today. The big seller that was here the other day looks to be nearly out of the 1.3 million shares.

Engineers develop novel strategy for designing tiny semiconductor particles for wide-ranging applications
MoS2 quantum dots synthesized with the new approach can potentially generate cancer-killing properties

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/01/190125094233.htm

It should how accounts receivable or something to that effect since the deal was done in the last quarter.

How about you check the numbers before telling others to do so. Trust me I know my investment pretty much inside and out.

From 10K, operating activities = $1,090,821

Agreed! It’s ridiculous!

If not mistaken, $1 million could cover 1 year of operations at their current rate.

Cash flow should help spread the word to new investors and those on the side lines waiting for that confirmation may jump in.


Funny how we ran all the way to $0.45 on news that they’d proven there reactor tech with the 250 kg reactor, but when they’ve proven they have willing licensing partners and revenue, we are still hanging out at 3 cents.

We just don’t have enough new investors. Buying has so surpass selling for us to go up.

He may not have signed, but may have witnessed the transfer of information to K&L Gates that should have disqualified them from representing L2 and SBI.

The frequent news letter makes me think an IPO is forth coming. Investors are being educated.

Interesting, I wonder what was in the Affidavit from Craig that warrants it being stricken.

Have you ever watch progression of new markets. First actors have the advantage and lead either the entire life cycle or the early years. As we’ve all seen, market acceptance of this tech has been slow. It’s reaching a critical escalation phase in my opinion. Either Nanosys will continue to supply their current customers or they will lose some footing to new competitors, hopefully one of them is QMC.

Did everyone catch this interview with Squires from the end of November?

https://upticknewswire.com/featured-interview-ceo-stephen-squires-of-quantum-materials-corp-otcqb-qtmm/

The quantum dot performance is comparable. Per the latest performance improvements announced by QMC, QMC's could be better at this point.

Nanosys is private company and outside of trade shows and technical conferences, we don't have much info on their final display product performance. Some display industry analyst have done some reports on various display products from the various OEMs using Nanosys.

The Samsung models have been measured at less than 80% of the REC 2020.

Nanosys's quality must be adequate in order be in so many products. They were early industry leader with significant venture capitalist financing.

Another possible path for $500,000:

Just noticed that Nanosys revamped their website and it looks very eye catching. With all the buzz over them in so many products at CES and in commercial products, I expect they may be getting ready for that IPO that they wanted to do 15 years ago. They are likely more positioned to have a successful IPO at this time with more growing consumer knowledge of quantum dots in displays.

https://www.nanosysinc.com/

For the last item: