Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I can't believe the Hispanic commentator talking about it as a gateway drug. I thought we were past that.
Where do they get these people?
Yes senderos and personally I cannot.
But there are plenty who can. And it doesn't matter how much it cost when you are able to control what just happened. Besides these aren't long shorts. Very short term.
The manipulation game was played perfectly last time. They went short across a sector that was overbought. Get buddies writing articles, sending out tweets about an attack, penny pumpers call for sell and bam. Do I like it? Heck no. I hate shorts. They can be very manipulative and can destroy a good company trying to make it. Especially naked shorts. And the SEC is inept to stop it.
As of right now I'm not a flipper of TRTC. I might flip some but I hold a core.
I wasn't a flipper of pho? either until the DD from my original investment changed.
To the people that think you can't short a penny stock. Or that this stock won't be shorted because someone thinks it's such a great company. Has nothing to do with it.
In addition. Just because the information is beneath you doesn't mean it's not helpful to someone else.
No need to attack.
Just an understanding that it will be shorted and in the short term it will whip the price around. It helps to understand this if your long as you see it's not the fundamentals of the company at work here. Just daily MM games.
What matters is higher highs and higher lows.
"5 acre facility at maximum capacity is capable of doing $10,000,000"
"TRTC has licensed Edible Garden out to over 40+ Acres of Land! 4 Growing Operations in 3 states"
I'm guessing the licensing deal aren't as lucrative as their owned 5 acre facility? I'm sure there is less overhead to the license deals but if it's 2M an acre wouldn't that put the 40 license deals at 80M and the owned 5 acre at 10m. For a total of 90M? I'm sure TRTC doesn't see the full 80M from those licenses.
What do they get?
Just trying to understand the math.
Thanks in advance.
In regards to the 1/9 smack down. Daily short interest wasn't out of the ordinary for PHOT that day.
Of course long short interest could have started up then with a target of .09.
2014-01-17 27%
2014-01-16 39%
2014-01-15 36%
2014-01-14 33%
2014-01-13 32%
2014-01-10 23%
2014-01-09 32%
2014-01-08 28%
They all get shorted. At least short term.
News catalyst will pop it and volume will dry up and in come the shorts.
If you want to get rid of shorts and day flippers. Then steady rises with very small dips will send them elsewhere. Popping or parabolic will make the stock drop just as fast. And sometimes more.
Daily short interest. http://shortanalytics.com/
Date Symbol Name Short Volume Long Volume Total Volume Short%
2014-01-17 TRTC Terra Tech Corp 2688176 4901601 7589777 35
2014-01-16 TRTC Terra Tech Corp 2143205 7365992 9509197 23
2014-01-15 TRTC Terra Tech Corp 513345 1045292 1558637 33
2014-01-14 TRTC Terra Tech Corp 4779107 5692929 10472036 46
2014-01-13 TRTC Terra Tech Corp 3921286 5285612 9206898 43
2014-01-10 TRTC Terra Tech Corp 4280756 12086220 16366976 26
2014-01-09 TRTC Terra Tech Corp 8733920 20200889 28934809 30
2014-01-08 TRTC Terra Tech Corp 12718869 12987234 25706103 49
2014-01-07 TRTC Terra Tech Corp 7094683 7482323 14577006 49
2014-01-06 TRTC Terra Tech Corp 1828297 2301799 4130096 44
2014-01-03 TRTC Terra Tech Corp 2442112 7231954 9674066 25
2014-01-02 TRTC Terra Tech Corp 4278176 6553561 10831737 39
2013-12-31 TRTC Terra Tech Corp 3207470 3830995 7038465 46
2013-12-30 TRTC Terra Tech Corp 2067775 2443191 4510966 46
Ex DEA Jumps jobs.
http://news.yahoo.com/u-ex-dea-agent-unlikely-role-pot-investment-120446978--finance.html
Investment company.
http://www.privateerholdings.com/index.html
I don't see anything wrong with what he wrote. You can't really argue with what he is stating. Seems factually correct. At least it's written better than that SA hack.
For Smith I wouldn't consider those small blocks. Many times I see tons of 100 share buys and sells. Probably the most of any stock I follow. So if you see a 1 that equals 100 shares on L2.
I read it as they did own stock at one time.
"Chet cashed a check for $118, 000 from Quantum, thereby agreeing to the rescission, and returning Quantum stock to Quantum."
At any rate. If that's the only complaint. Then I don't see a problem.
Sorry. I don't see the point here.
A complaint from 2010 for not updating their web site?
This year or next will still crush the share price. R/S always does. But if your long it shouldn't matter.
I would never hold into a r/s but that's just me.
The price will recover and most likely phot will be better off for it.
Yes I realize it will be awhile for uplist. But that should be the eventual goal. If your long so what?
Anyway. Bigger fish to fry for phot right now.
You can't have over 1B O/S without considering a R/S at some point.
They will never get up listed unless they do.
tarson I think it's a good investment but agree with you. Too much pumping. Scares away potential investor IMO.
I know when I first looked here I thought....."hmmmmm pump & dump".
But as I did my research I saw huge potential on the EG side of the business.
GLTY
Yes they will and they are. But until federal classification changes to remove the barrier we will grow with EG.
Personally I'm not excited right now about TRTC hooking it's wagon to MJ. I'm sure they can pull the trigger when the time is right. Which I believe is a long way off. My focus is the EG side of the business. Which will provide steady growth. And that business alone makes this stock undervalued.
When they can legally grow MJ as a public company, that's when the roof get's blown off.
All my opinion of course.
Except.
"But when it comes to federal law, marijuana remains a schedule 1 controlled substance - a drug with high potential for abuse but no accepted medical use - and the White House has said that Obama doesn’t support changing that status."
That's my average .0089. Bought today.
Company is fine and no one knows anything inside.
Since the train was hooked to MJ we rise and fall with MJ.
They aren't taking into consideration EG. Fine by me. Sooner or later they will.
No I'm not.
I would never suggest depleting their remain A/S. Sorry if I wasn't clear but they can still raise the A/S in a vote (300M-500M arbitrary number on my part). Which means they could use the 270M to fund gift and then some. And still have 300-500 left in the A/S. Also remember this deal isn't for getting all the 40M up front. It's incremental so the piece meal statement really doesn't fly.
And no they can't just dump 270M on the market. But if they were to do a deal with someone today would you think .033 is a good number to use? At the very least they could have already raised the money for the first deals on the open market at todays price and possibly the most recent high without batting an eye.
If our share price was at .06 or so when they did the deal I would be all for it. But it's not. At least for now.
We do have an option. We can vote no and if it doesn't pass they can either renegotiate the deal or kick it to the curb. Announce a new shareholder meeting to raise the A/S to a much smaller amount. My guess it would pass with flying colors.
MONEY NOT BEING IN ISN'T ABOUT THE LLC'S. WHICH YOU SEEM SO CONCERNED ABOUT.
No it's not and stop with this. The LLC's don't mean squat.
It was a JV created for this deal with big money investors. That's all. Don't read anything more into it.
"at what pick your own price is that at and
what good would it do to be out of capital
which is what this scenario describes as the
end result"
I agree you can't keep moving the price target. They made the deal with what they knew at the time. But if everyone votes no the deal has to be re negotiated.
The thing is they can raise more money right now without CANEX and still raise the A/S if they want. To something more like 300M-500M. Not 2B more.
I love that he addressed that Stinking Alpo article.
"That's why we have received no guidance
or future projections."
No guidance because the business is changing so rapidly that they can't put a finger on it. Would rather they not give guidance. At least at this time.
But you could be right about record earnings. Hate to say though.
Do you speak for Derek now?
Anyway this is the PHOT board.
But it could.
I so hope they merge.
Not one person. But if we get news tomorrow I would be more than happy to say you were right. But I see those trades almost every day. Sometimes red. Sometimes green.
See my t trade reply.
Info for AH T trades
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=29002051
No after hour trading in penny land. Those are all settled trades from the day.
It's a settled trade from the day. Not one buyer.
Lower. IMO
I like the business, I like the idea of GIFT and Kiosks, I don't like the CANEX deal at the current PPS.
That's before everyone realized we are going to 3B A/S.
.22 doesn't make sense if that happens. Voted no.
Regardless of GIFT news or buy out or merger or whatever.
They do know what's best.
But they can't come right out and tell you to vote no.;)
So they won't sell equipment in the future?
Did he say it was a rumor?
It's all speculation. The industry will consolidate. Who knows right now. Phot & TRTC could become bed fellows. I would think discussions like this are welcome here without getting defensive.
Or is it just bold letters and ra ra ra.
No. #1 Clarity
and the whole sector is getting attacked.
I think it would be the best thing to happen to PHOT.