Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Hearsay for you, but not for the known investors of inwith. Lol
I’m not going to bother asking them. A basic understanding of mathematics/economics can answer that question.
$InWith Corp. sets initial share price at $50.00 per share in private offering effective upon conversion of the $EPGL shareholders to $InWith Corp. The authorized shares of $InWith Corp. shall be set at 10 million.
This was tweeted WEEKS after the date of filing on your Delaware report. It’s clear that things have changed.
Regardless, clarification for those who need it will be provided shortly. Stay tuned.
It’s 10 million.
$InWith Corp. sets initial share price at $50.00 per share in private offering effective upon conversion of the $EPGL shareholders to $InWith Corp. The authorized shares of $InWith Corp. shall be set at 10 million.
Those are your current shares WITH the gifted. Gifted shares are 600. Current shares are 2000. 2000+600=2600.
NOT 4600.
Divide by 500, then multiply by 1.3.
Most? That’s a laugh.
Now THAT is a complete spin. Any reasonable DD can refute those claims.
Working with WSGR to get off the pink sheets to IPO on a major exchange is failing? Lol
At no point did I say every company that starts with a few will succeed. I am saying that EPGL did start with a few, is succeeding, and has the support of experts at WSGR to realize their goals.
EPGL will be inwith. Inwith has a BoD, a president, CEO, etc.
EVERY company starts with only a few. Microsoft. Apple. These are the biggest in the world, but only had a few employees at one point in time.
Luckily we were give a 25/30% free equity bonus. This allows for shares to be issued without having as large an impact on shareholders. Not only that, but with a current market cap of 50 million, and an expected one of 5 billion, if you do the math on what’s needed JUST to break even, then you’ll see we can take a MASSIVE hit. So massive that it actually seems illogical to ever occur to that extent
MOST investors believed this then, and MOST believe it now.
To clarify: EPGL remaining undervalued on the otc is a large part of the reason to go private. An IPO will profit everyone.
Exactly! Those that purchased the millions of dollars WDCO sold are the investors who know what’s happening. Inwith is the future.
Over the course of years? Whoop Di Do. Lots of MMs buy/sell millions of dollars of shares over the course of years. Such a broad time frame. Lol. Over the course of years... haha.
Yes, I do.
Fact: Inwith has a value that is leaps and bounds higher than the otc market has given. WSGR has said said they are worth $100s of millions.
Fact: WDCO has been said to be selling nonstop. Any research into monthly buys/sells will refute this.
The entity that is giving up a portion of equity has already been disclosed. That is known. It is easily verifiable with some basic DD.
Luckily we’ve all been given 25-30% free equity. Even if my holding are reduced my 90%, in the end, I still make a profit. Good times ahead.
They plan to go public through an IPO. Also, they will have a platform set up to buy/sell shares through private investors.
I’m stating a fact. You’re disagreeing with a fact. Lol.
Optimism? All I said was that “many believe that” and that is a true statement. I define “many” as more than a few in that context. Although in this case it’s many, many more than a few.
Many believe that.
Both sides can NOT be discussed equally here.
Working out pretty well. Progress continues.
EPGL changed their focus later on that year. Moving away from that market entirely. A new opportunity presented itself using Dr. David Markus’s DARPA experience, and knowledge of smart contact lenses.
Its amazing that every tweet and PR lead to more sells, but the price went from .0007/share up to .10/share, give or take. Logical, to say the least.
This has been discussed. Not a concern.
Michael Hayes clarified that. Email him for the answer. Like everyone else.
Market cap is equal to share price multiplied by OUTSTANDING shares. Unissued shares have no value until issued. When they are issued it’s called dilution.
Disagree?
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/basics/03/031703.asp
It’s more logical to be based on O/S.
They said that equity will remain the same, then added a 25% bonus! Isn’t that all that matters?
Onci tweeted:
Capoli group to feature BsafeMobile at miami auto parts trade show in Late Jan
$onci
Isn’t Neca doing bsafemobile app?
What about that is reason for more news?
The tweet directly after that includes a contingency that says this offer depends on financing. 9.8 isn’t guaranteed.
“EPGL vote to approve + capital raise contingency is included.”
Why would this go up? We’re current. Nothing more. Lol.
The public investors will own 12.5% of InWith. So if there’s an ipo, then the float will be at least 12.5% of InWith.