Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Getting more difficult to understand posts here lately............
Thanks, Belgium!
BMAK moving down to sell their daily share amount.....
Edit: And someone took out their ask just now
We can't assume anything until it is inked......
I think it is important for the lawyers to finish wrapping up our settlement with MBGS, and then getting the 5 million dollar deal with NAK completed.
Belgium, where did you find that? Thanks!
So 22 million shares added......
Secondly, the need for partners could be hard to find since the processes to open a mine in Arizona is very difficult and similar to Pebble when factoring in the red tape. The EPA has their finger on the red-tape button in Arizona as well.
Hell, if this is the case, if it is going to face the same Firestorm that Pebble has, I need to sell, sell, sell like the wind!
Looking for our neighbor at North Pipes......
Yep. me too! That last one took out BMAK.......selling daily without pushing the price down.
Did Tracy mean "happy man" or "jazzed man"?
This ?
CEMJQ Multi-Millionaire Friday, 03/08/13 12:16:03 PM
Re: Denfish post# 120629
Post # of 138149
MBGS is suing lbsr for big $$$$. Who cares about briscoe's small claim thing, its MBGS VS lbsr that could collapse this turd for good.
Lol!
Lolllllllllll!
What's up with the 200 k share dump in the last 30 seconds of trading?
That picture is a keeper, Eli!
Ha, ha. Exactly!
Weird action, nonetheless....
Somebody thinks it's a great time to sell.......
BMAK back on the lead for the ask....
Yes I have noticed that as well and thought it was one of our loans.......
Yes I have noticed that as well and thought it was one of our loans.......
Yes I have noticed that as well and thought it was one of our loans.......
Nothing to see here, move along please.....
"While we do not have a deal as yet, there is an increasing interest by several funding entities and large companies."
Wow, NAK on sale! .85 cents......
EPA needs to be held accountable.
I thought this was to keep the lights on........not drill.?
LBSR Facebook post:
Liberty Star Uranium & Metals Corp.
"Japan sees reactors in future, uranium investors rejoice" - See more at: article
Japan sees nuclear future; uranium investors rejoice
northernminer.com
It didn’t come as a total surprise but the Japanese government’s pronouncement that nuclear reactors will be part of its future offered uranium miners and investors alike the shot the arm that has been so...
Like · · Share · 44 minutes ago ·
GET OUT, NOW!!!!!!
Lol!
What will you charge, in this new career of yours?
It is intriguing to me that we have not seen evidence of dilution from our most recent loan. Deer Valley would sell very quickly into the market and create some pain. Hmmmm...... Anyone have any thoughts on this?
U Stocks moving nicely today......
And why is it that the US said that they needed 7 years to give Germany's gold back?
Moderators, please remember your role.
About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role
The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards:
To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.
It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.
At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.
It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.
In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.
Great picture, Greg!
Nice paint..........100 shares......EOM
Nice paint..........100 shares......EOM
This explanation makes the most sense. It probably should be communicated to all shareholders. It would make things much clearer.......
2mm, I thought that the SRK is "critical", as I believe Tracy put it, forfinancing? If so, why would JB want any delay with the final geotech report?