Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Hey, there are people that were motivated by what Mark said, I don't doubt that, but to blame the ones who pumped this stock based upon what Mark said is completely uncalled for as well. Darn, I should blame other people too for the sun not coming up right. Lol.
That's right. Can't say that I'm happy Mark doesn't keep to his word but I still invested hoping for better days ahead. But go ahead and let others cry and blame Mark. Pull that trigger to sell and at the same time cry because they lost so much. But hey, it's all Mark's fault.
That's right. I invested even more knowing Mark doesn't keep promises. Who's fault would that be? Hmm, mine. Yep, see I don't blame Mark, I blame myself because I invested knowing good and darn well Mark doesn't keep promises.
Nope. No dreams shattered so long as they knew when to quit. And knowing when to sell is the name of the game. But, of course, let's blame Mark and not the person who invested...that's much better.
I don't believe Mark hates shareholders. Does he need to keep his promises? Yes. But to say Mark hates people is a bit far fetched.
I would agree with you on that. Very good point.
I disagree with that. The only dreams being shattered are those who figured someone would hold their hand while investing. There is NONE of that this far down under! When someone invests, they do it at their own peril. Everyone...EVERYONE does their own DD and if they don't it's their own fault. I really wish that if people are going to blame losing their asses that they look in the mirror. I blame no one but myself if I lose anything.
I beg to differ on that one. This stock has huge potential even if half the stuff Mark has mentioned turns out to be true.
So true. And again, I'm not on Mark's side in anyway. I know he's made many promises he hasn't kept and I think on purpose.
Now THAT'S a different story. Most of what you stated there is fact but the other that was provided was opinion. Let's keep it straight.
That's your opinion but I would much rather believe the company is bought out rather than the NASDAQ idea. We will soon see. And as far as who would buy that baggage? Anyone with enough money to do so. I strongly, strongly believe that Mark is bringing in money...how much is the question.
I do agree that Mark makes promises that he hasn't kept. It's just like saying that he plans on the company going to NASDAQ. Well I guess the question now is he planning on selling the company or is he going to NASDAQ? Good question.
Like I said, believe what you want.
Mark told us differently. He said he had a buyer before but he wanted to wait for a few years before selling and that he wasn’t selling for no less than $10 pps. So, believe what you want.
Again, nothing with facts. How do we know that Mark doesn't have a buyer or buyers? Facts are what we want when it's claimed that there are no buyers.
We don't know everything, now do we. :) But that's alright, go ahead and sell those positions that we once had. And then later blame others for selling.
Yeah, Mark has mentioned that he is looking for a buyer but he said that was a little ways out and the buyout he was looking for would be the $10 pps range.
NOW you're sticking with mostly facts. Most of that I agree with. But please continue on with facts and not something that truly nobody knows. The auditor thing is something no one knows about. The other problem is you mentioned those who don't agree with the company are the ones with the only facts. I have seen many messages here that I would cringe at because they list things as being fact when it's not. So I don't totally agree with that part.
That may be true but I'm not the one saying that Mark doesn't have an auditor. Why if I were to say that people would be swearing I had inside info. At least I try to stick with facts instead telling everyone something that may not be true.
I like the way it's said that Arrayit doesn't have an auditor. Just fill us all in...how is it known that Mark doesn't have an auditor by this time? Have you talked with Mark lately about the auditor issue? Knowing what I know, I doubt it. So please stick with what everyone knows that NO ONE knows if Mark has an auditor yet. Thank you.
Hey, I'm not the one claiming Mark walks on water. I'm ticked off with the man too. Promises made are not promises kept. BUt to claim Mark is a liar all the time in one instant and then to say Mark tells the truth when it comes to the Iconic situation isn't quite living up to the standard one would expect.
So let me get this straight: Mark is a liar or he's not? People believe Mark when he said that Iconic has nothing to do when finanicals come out but yet call him a liar on other issues? Sounds to me like some want to believe Mark when it suits their fancy. Lol. Now THAT cracks me up! And yet I'm the one that's got problems??? I don't think so.
A Caveat Emptor stock is just that -- Buyer Beware. A court would not rule in favor of investors when the sign on the stock says BUYER BEWARE. It in effect tells ANY buyer not to buy this stock because it is very ,very risky. And if you still plan to buy the stock then it's your fault because you knew the risk. And the fact that Mark doesn't always tell the truth is part of that risk.
Even if you sued you wouldn't win. The fact is every investor knows the risk on a Caveat Emptor stock. THe court would say the same thing: BUYER BEWARE!
I really truly don't know if an 8k needs to be produced or not for an auditor. Penny Stock Alert may be able to tell you more about that.
Nobody knows whether Mark has a new auditor yet or not. Just a bunch of talk that Arrayit doesn't have an auditor.
And as far as fooling innocent investors goes, we are ALL big boys and girls on here and no one needs their hand to be held while investing. That is the most ignorant thing I've ever heard. If someone can't handle investing this down under then they need to stick with other stocks higher up in the chain that's more guaranteed to hit but with far less profit potential.
I would MUCH enjoy the nonsense stopping myself but what good would that do. Lol. The FACTS are we are all here for our own agendas.
Let's keep to the facts, shall we? We haven't seen any Form 4 from the SEC and all other ideas are pure speculation.
That's your belief as you wish but all I'm saying is there is no proof - NONE- that Mark or Rene have sold any shares.
Yes, I agree with Alyssa. It's very misleading to others on here to say that Mark and Rene have sold ANY shares. They both would have to file the proper paperwork with the SEC in order to sell their shares and they haven't done this.
I see someone has talked to Mark about whether he's buying the building? Or, is that just speculation? If it's speculation I would back up on that claim that it's "false". Some STRONG language there on a lot of issues that nobody knows truly anything about! After all, we all want the truth here and seek it out intently! No need for false claims. Thank you.
I doubt that. If Mark had intentions of keeping the price down he wouldn't have had the TV interview with Fox News affiliate.
So true, and for those possibly selling for end of year capital gains? It would be their luck that this stock finally takes off and leaves them behind because they had to sell. I surely wouldn't take that chance.
Annnddd, the usual excuses sprang forth. No one wants to pay Mark a visit but yet they'll demean Mark and company with no problem. Like I said before and I'll say it again, I'm not 100% on Mark either because promises made have turned out not to be promises kept, but I at least did visit Mark along with a number of others on here.
Not quite, but oh well. The BIG difference is we got that claim of "harassment" directly from Mark so if you have a problem with that claim, then by all means pay him a visit.
Claims being made there without fins to back it up. You said there's no $10 mill in assets but you must have fins to make such a bold claim. We don't know that for certain. I don't know that myself, BUT to make a claim as if it's fact doesn't make it true either.
Nah, it won't end. Once the company puts out fins the gripe will be something different or maybe even still about fins.
Yep, sure enough. :)
We'll, if people on here talked to Mark the way we have it wouldn't seem so funny, now would it. But since there are only about a dozen of us who actually talk to Mark it doesn't seem so out of the ordinary, at least not to me.