Papers were filed where I am domiciled
with the Court Clerk also there is this,
Charlotte County Fl Grand Jury has filed for a Jury room and county mail box, Filing is to be delivered tomorrow. Enjoy this article explaining the power of the common law grand jury.
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/
WITHOUT THE JURY THERE CAN BE NO LIBERTY
Common law and its Jury has not been defeated, just hidden, the enemies of Liberty, who have taken
control of our education, just eliminated it from our curriculum along with a classical education and
anything else that might teach the American slaves (citizens) independence and freedom.
It is first important to understand that a court of record is a common law court in which it’s “judicial
tribunal has attributes and exercising functions independently of the person of the magistrate [judge]
designated generally to hold it and proceeding according to the course of common law, its acts and
proceedings being enrolled for a perpetual memorial. a decision of a court of record may not be
appealed and is binding on all other courts”. Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo. App. 220, 175 S.W. 227, 229; Ex
parte Glad hill, 8 M etc. Mass., 171, per Shaw, C.J. See, also, Led with v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155
N.E. 688, 689; 3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383; The Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481;
Exparte Thistleton, 52 Cal 225; Erwin v. U.S., D.C.Ga., 37 F. 488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis,
96 Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231.
The judicial tribunal is the Jury, also-known-as the Kings Bench, which “IS” The Supreme Court of
common law, according to Blacks Law, being so called because the king sat there in person, the style
of the court being "coram ipso rege". See 3 Bl. Comm. 41-43. The New York Supreme Court, early on
in 1829 confirmed this when it said; “The people of this State, as the successors of its former
sovereign, are entitled to all the rights which formerly belonged to the King by his prerogative”.
Lansing v. Smith, 4 Wend. 9 (N.Y.) (1829), 21 Am. Dec. 89 10C Const. Law Sec. 298; 18 C Em.Dom.
Sec. 3, 228; 37 C Nav.Wat. Sec. 219; Nuls Sec. 167;48 C Wharves Sec. 3, 7. The U.S. Supreme Court
as late as 1973 and 1992 [in US v Williams] also confirmed that even they could not second guess the
Jury when they said; “The judgment of a court of record whose jurisdiction is final, is as conclusive on
all the world as the judgment of this court would be. It is as conclusive on this court as it is on other
courts. It puts an end to inquiry concerning the fact, by deciding it. Inferior courts are those whose
jurisdiction is limited and special and whose proceedings are not according to the course of the
common law. Criminal courts proceed according to statutory law. Jurisdiction and procedure is
defined by statute. Likewise, civil courts and admiralty courts proceed according to statutory law. Any
court proceeding according to statutory law is not a court of record (which only proceeds according to
common law); it is an inferior court. Ex parte Watkins, 3 Pet., at 202-203. cited by SCHNECKLOTH
v. BUSTAMONTE, 412 U.S. 218, 255 (1973). If the Kings Bench is not present in the Court it is not a
Supreme Court of Common Law and has no jurisdiction over the people summonsed before it without
their consent.
It is at the Kings Bench (Jury) where the King (People) rules and decrees, it is at the moment of the
impaneling of a Grand Jury when the Supreme Court opens for Justice. And if the Grand Jury indicts it
passes the case for “final judgment” to the Petite Jury, thereby the Supreme Court remains in session
until judgment is decreed. The Grand Jury is the decreeing body outside the court room and the Petite
Jury is the decreeing body inside the court room.
The Grand Jury and Petite Jury are one, both are ministered by and made up of the People chosen at
random, they act and decree under the principles of Common Law that being justice, honor, and mercy
and they are guided by two common law maxims that being (1) without a victim there is no crime, and
(2) for every injury there must be a remedy.
Justice James Wilson, 1790, said; “The Jury is an important instrument of government, a great conduit
of communication between those who make and administer the laws and the People. All the operations
of government and all its officers come before the scrutiny of Juries, thereby giving them an unrivaled
ability to advocate public improvements and expose corruption in government”.
Thomas Jefferson spoke of the Jury in the Declaration of Independence when he penned “governments
are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”. The American
Jury is that institution whereby the People themselves consent to their actions, there exists no others,
therefore to deny the Jury is to deny the consent of the people and thereby self rule and Liberty.
History reveals that the only complainers against the Juries are our public servants and officers, most
of which are BAR members, that hold the title of nobility, esquire. (see Grand Jury Under Attack, by
Richard D. Younger, 1955) These people have seized control of our government, robbed us of justice,
liberty, peace, and security by constructing statutory prisons that control our behavior, and thereby have destroyed the American dream, a conscious Common Law Jury would mean the end of their rule, and the exposing of their crimes.
In March 1922 the New York County Association of the Criminal Bar announced that it planned a vigorous state wide campaign to abolish the [Grand Jury] institution. Former district attorney Robert
Elder called upon public prosecutors to take the initiative in replacing the "inefficiency, ignorance and
traditional bias" of grand jurors, and Judge Thomas Crain of New York supported the movement.
Testifying before the Committee of Law Enforcement of the American Bar Association, he observed
that "a judge or some other man learned in the law"(statutes) should participate in grand jury hearings.
In Minnesota attorney Paul J. Thompson urged his state to adopt the Wisconsin system of prosecution
upon the order of a district attorney. In 1922 Judge Roscoe Pound and Felix Frankfurter conducted a
survey of criminal justice in Cleveland and added the weight of expert testimony to those who sought
to eliminate use of grand juries. Pound and Frankfurter reported that juries were inefficient and
unnecessary, since trial courts were quite capable of protecting Americans against executive tyranny,
how’s that working out for usa?
Professional opposition to the inquest of the people did not go unchallenged, however. In 1924 the Grand Juror's Association of New York began publication of the Panel, a militantly pro-grand jury periodical. Through its pages, former grand jurors, judges, and prosecutors made clear the importance of the institution. The Association urged grand juries to exercise their full powers as representatives of the people and fought all attempts to make them mere agents of the court. As a result of its efforts grand juries took on a new importance for many citizens.
In 1938 at the New York Constitutional Convention approved by vote of the people on November 8,
1938 and later confirmed again on November 6, 2001 the following clause: Article I §6 “The power of
grand juries to inquire into the willful misconduct in office of public officers, and to find indictments or
to direct the filing of information's in connection with such inquiries, shall never be suspended or impaired by law. No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law”.
From the very beginning of our Nation BAR members were sabotaging the American experiment in a
concerted effort to subvert the people through an all out assault upon the sacred institution of juries,
that continues to this day; rejecting independent juries as a good thing and making feeble arguments
claiming they are inefficient, untrained in law, too expensive, dangerous, and often exceed their
authority.
Untrained in who’s law, man’s? Certainly not God’s for they don’t even know God except the god of
their bellies. Dangerous to who, tyrants and criminals? Inefficient and too expensive, by who’s
calculations and even if true what is the cost of justice? Exceeding who’s authority, the BAR? As a
matter of fact the People are the authority, how can they exceed themselves?
Clearly the only possible motive behind the BAR’s contempt for the Jury is fraud and tyranny, our
founding fathers understood this and that is why they wrote Article I Section 9which states “No title of
nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under
them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of
any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state”. It is illegal for BAR members to hold office and by their actions they have proven the wisdom of our fathers’ warnings.
Early on Jefferson came to the aid of Juries, the very institution that saved our founders from unjust
prosecutors from England who eventually carried many away across the sea to try them; Jefferson said:
"I know no safe depositary of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power." "Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty." "An enlightened citizenry is indispensable for the proper functioning of a republic. Self government is not possible unless the citizens are educated sufficiently to enable them to exercise oversight. It is therefore imperative that the nation see to it that a suitable education be provided for all its citizens. It should be noted, that when Jefferson speaks of "science," he is often referring to knowledge or learning in general." "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
We the people have lost our way 1, Liberties light has waxed cold 2, the minions 3 have woven a web of deceit 4, while the demigods 5 promise liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption 6: Our servants have become our masters, they have cast their spell upon us, transforming the American dream to a nightmare. The chains of apathy weigh heavy upon us, a darkness looms on the horizon, a darkness that can be felt, can be felt 7 ! While in the distance a faint cry is heard, to arms my sons, to arms, be strong, and put on the whole armor of yourFather8, that ye may be able to stand and save the sacred institution 9 or sleep on and await the fate of horror that will surly meet you in its end if you fail to respond to the Governor’s 10 last call to arms my sons, to arms and put on the whole armor and stand.
1Truth, John:14:6
2 Justice.
3 BAR Lawyers.
4 Statutes.
5 Politicians.
6 2 Pet:2:19
7 Exo:10:21
8 Justice, Honor and Mercy, Eph:6
9 Common Law Jury
10 God, Psa:22:28
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
