Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I've been blessed. Thanks to the low sp I've been able to increase my position by almost 50%. I have no problem waiting a week or two for info. Will be that much sweeter as I will be that much richer. God bless CYDY.
I have no knowledge compared to many investors here, but even I can count. The batteries developed for ALYI will be in the millions over 3 years, not 2500 and you said was fact. The 2500 refer to the units developed for the fortune 500 chemical company to monitor their installations. If you won't read, don't expect any respect!!!!
Excellent 42Hours. Great work and very informative.
If we get revenue numbers today that are better than Dec I think we can.
Read the links that dh has put many hours and much effort to get the information together on this page.
Does anybody think we get Jan revenues this week?
If we show benefit then we should get EUA for covid right? Doesn't have to be stat sig according to others who got EUA. What do you think price will be if not stat sig but EUA is still applied for and granted?
Thanks for this. I feel if revenues for Jan are higher than Dec, I don't think a pull back to .60 will happen. I think if people want to get on the train before $1 they better do it quick.
I wonder if it is using graphene for the cathode? Everybody is trying to get away from cobalt, and even though graphene is expensive, it has tremendous properties that enhance battery performance.
Incredibly expensive and difficult to make in any quantity. If C-ion is not able to be brought to market, the next best thing for near term mass battery production, is lithium without cobalt, using graphene as the cathode or perhaps even hemp. Graphene has terrific properties for batteries, however, the technology is years and many dollars away from completely replacing lithium. Also a all-polymer battery on the horizon that is being developed by a former Nissan senior researcher which would be a lot cheaper and better performer. It has also been revealed that Tesla is working with CATL on lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, and these could be a real gamechanger.
I think along those same lines, if FDA gives first EUA then approval, and uplist to NASDAQ happens, followed by HIV approval. Only thing about shorts jumping in will be revenue statements. If leronlimab can show 5-10 billion as some have projected, then it could get crazy.
I hate to say it but I feel the FDA is looking for any small reason not to give leronlimab EUA that's why they wanted the early look. If they wanted to save lives, it would have happened long ago. I hate to say, but money seems to be the driving force, as you say, BP makes decisions. I still haven't heard from anyone whether or not they feel other countries might step up and give leronlimab a chance if FDA doesn't.
misiu143, I have read that a EUA may be given by FDA if a therapeutic "may be effective" as long as it is safe, is this correct? If that is true, why then not give a EUA based on CD10 results alone, as the NEWS2 scores would fulfill the "may be effective" clause, and safety has never been questioned. I know both you and Rockleo advocate that the people of the FDA are interested in the well being of the U.S. citizenry, however I cannot shake the thought that those in places of decision making have nefarious intent. The question is, would leronlimab get a hearing so to speak elsewhere if FDA doesn't come through? I watched the most recent youtube chat of the Philippines doctors, and even they seem perplexed as to why this has not been given the go ahead, yet seemed to say if FDA doesn't give their blessing, then the best that they could do was continue the course of action that they are on, which is OLE, your thoughts?
Thanks again dh. I have read the different links you have posted on the top of this page, nice work by the way. I have also gone back and found as many filings and realized that this company is incredibly transparent which is unusual for a otc. Many posters here are helpful with their dd, as you mentioned 42hours is one. I just had to express my gratitude for the work that you do, my confidence in the future of this company has increased greatly this last month.
dh, I have so much gratitude for your input. When I first got in at .09, I was tempted to sell in Jan when it got to .30. One of your posts really shed light for me on the potential here. Thank you again. What do you think are realistic sp expectations with the manipulation going on? I understand it is just conjecture, but do you think it might reach a break over point where the shorts reach a point of no return and have to cover?
Thank you
My question to you and to misiu143 as doctors, is that the FDA has seemingly given other therapeutics preferred treatment, in that EUA's have been given with less efficacy shown, as well as having more side effects. As much as I have invested in CYDY, I would hate to have this continue with regards to the CD12 results. In your learned opinion or other doctors on this board, if the CD12 results are "stat sig" is there any way that the FDA could not give a EUA for leronlimab. Not trying to be a downer, just nervous due to the apparent preferential treatment we've seen, and what could be possibly a major pain for BP leronlimab could be if approved. I'm not having a problem with the length of time for release of results, just wondering if the FDA has said, this or that wasn't done right, and causing a delay, or a limited use EUA.
So what will happen to C-ion technology? Will this battery technology not be put forth that could eliminate the dangers of lithium batteries?
Will other countries approve leronlimab if US doesn't? I have every confidence that trial results for CD12 will be great, however you bring up a point that hasen't been discussed much. Will UK or Canada or Philippines say yes to EUA if US doesn'the give EUA? What are the odds?
I hope that order doesn't get filled. I would like to see it go up from here.
It is hard to fathom, however once the revenues start increasing, and if I QST can have a statement saying x amount earnings per share, then look out! I believe we will shoot up with very few pullbacks.
I feel that with all the shorts, soon they will have to start covering. As you said the base seems to have been established at .75, and with the updates the company provides, there doesn't appear to be much opportunity for this anytime soon. If there is something major, this could rocket past $1 and head towards multiple dollars, with all the covering that will be done. I love the smell of fried shorts.
If they were to get $400 monthly from each of the 2500 units, which I believe would be cheap for the potential savings and service, that's a million additional revenue monthly. This is only the beginning guys, blue skies ahead.
I see what you're saying, what I'm asking is would it still be considered a success and therefore the 4 day rule for disclosure would not apply?
So what would constitute news that would have to announced in that time frame? If it wasn't "stat sig" but yet provided benefits for certain sub groups would that still be considered a success, even if it did not meet the criteria for EUA?
I wouldn't count on that. If news comes out that is really good this week, and if they project revenue to be higher for the month, (they have a habit of doing that) then I believe we head back north.
I agree, things need to cool down a bit or there will be a drastic crash. Yes, hard to believe, even after I "averaged up" yesterday, I am still at 3x my investment after only 6 weeks! Hard to believe, and this is just the beginnig.
Very excited about possibilities of COUV. I believe that C-ion batteries is the wave of the future. I wonder how long it will take until there are sales of this technology? From everything I've looked at, the only question I have is power density. I love the fast charge time, safety and non hazardous make up, as well as being able to integrate it into the frame of vehicle, but how far along is the development on power density compared to graphene and lithium? I understand that the cost is a lot less, so if the power density is not as great, is it possible to make a larger battery to provide the necessary longevity to compete with lithium? Anybody with answers please reply, as I have reached out to COUV without any response.
Yes, dividends would be great! Some would think that having this kind of thought process would be crazy for an OTC stock, however the approach that the management at IQST has, leads one to think like this. Long term growth and possible acquisitions of other business that lead to expanded revenue streams in ever increasing markets is the ticket for success. They know where the money will be in the future, and are looking to have a presence that will ensure continued growth.
Today was the best one day ever for my portfolio. Ya I'm gonna get drunk, already started.
I only had one stock of 8 go down in my portfolio today. One only had 14% gain and the rest were over 20%. What a day, 45k up. I'm gonna get drunk as well.
Don't you mean .001? A penny would be nice but it is still a ways away.
Yes, and I will be here as well. I believe if revenues continue, and began to increase slightly each month, and with reduced debt comes income potential, the shorts will have to bail which will increase sp even more.
It is an amazing feeling! I hope all this buying gets the attention of some big boys and they see the potential and get in. Then the shorts will have their pants on fire, ha ha!
I had to move my bid up as well to get the shares I wanted, but it will pay off handsomely before this year's out I believe.
Thanks Black-Ops. I value your opinion regarding how traders have manipulated the sp of CYDY. Do you think as others here have posted that there has been and possibly will be in the future, nefarious intentions in the FDA with CYDY? I know that people in government agencies often have there own agenda, but if CD12 results are stat sig, do you think that the FDA would try to impede CYDY in any way? I hope that for the people who need it, that this wouldn't happen, but I would like your opinion.
If this week there is confirmation from IQST regarding this in the upcoming pr that is spoken about on twitter, we could see +$1 this week!
I'm buying 30k more first thing Monday, and if I can get the price I want on another stock, I'll have another 25k. This is almost a sure thing, as I believe the revenues will do nothing but go up. All imo.
I sold some other holdings and the money just got in my account Fri after the bell. I will be "averaging up" come Monday morning.
Yes, that is correct. The .61 target was NOT set by IQST, rather an analyst, and as Caolson93 stated, it was before the most recent company updates, so it is need of updating. IQST has been very transparent financially with shareholders, to a degree which I've never seen from an OTC company, and the future endeavors with accompanying revenue, which are being targeted from the different subsidiaries show me that shareholder value is utmost on the management's mind. This board is very unusual, in that honest questions are appreciated, and usually answered, but please before any negativity, please do your DD. All imo.