Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Do you really think someone would file a false ID with the Court? There are less dramatic ways to proceed. The judge directed that it be filed under seal, so maybe he has the Marshals Service looking into it. I have no idea. I know it's real and I know the lawyer who authenticated it.
I don't think he's too worried about the allegation. I did read the Magistrate Judge's notes from the hearing. It didn't mention anything about Marco's notarized ID not being sufficient. In fact, it didn't say anything at all. One would think that if a federal judge says, "Send my your ID," and the ID wasn't right, he'd issue a show cause, etc. He'd ask for something more. But Corey's attorneys just say the judge said this and that, but there's nothing on the docket to back that up. That's bad lawyering.
Poor Major, can't speak a word of Spanish, and yet he's now Marco Antonio Chavarria. LOL.
The copies I have are very bad faxes and I can't OCR it. REmind me tomorrow and I'll upload it somewhere. Federal courts charge 8c a page so there's no direct link unless you have a PACER account.
So then, you're the man himself?
I can email them to you, PM me with an email. It's like some fairy tales.
No, you're probably an attorney information gathering so you can append one or two messages to legal pleadings so the Court takes it all out of context.
The widow didn't ask for any documents. In Replevin's world, everyone has motives, yet he has no name. I'll be it's Mr. Ross or something. That's just my guess.
I think Mr. Ribotsky's legal team thinks suspicion is evidence, have you read the pleadings they've filed?
Why would you care? I'm just saying you objected to Paul's information being taken out of the i-box, right?
He needs a time out, LOL.
I will show you my passport if you show me yours. We don't even know your name. We only know you are aligned with Corey Ribotsky, most likely one of his lawyers or paralegals. It's not hard to make money when you have a note that allows you to convert at .00005 or .000025 when the lowest price that the stock can be sold is .0001. That's a mighty fine business.
I have not seen such a document.
I have no evidence consideration for those notes occurred. I also have a suspicion, based on information in the public record, that he may be providing his investors with information about his conversions that would enable his associate in Florida (formerly of New York) to possibly short sell the stocks.
So ok, we agree a Corey DD site should be established.
When did I tell him?
Good then I'm glad you agree.
I'll get to working on the Corey dd site, and you can ask me whatever you want about Jon Miller and I'll answer you. Just so we're on the same page.
I think someone should create an independent website to give potential shareholders the due diligence they need. That website would contain all asset information derived from public records such as voters registrations, vehicles, addresses, judgments, and whatever else -- and it should be on all the players.
What do you think Replevin? Do you think Mr. Ribotsky's Republican voters registration should be available so that shareholders can get their dd on all involved? Or is it not important? I mean the voters registration shows the address for precinct purposes, so it'd probably be the most accurate. The Ferrari VIN so if someone get's judgment. All valid dd for an independent site.
I mean I understand that Replevin is critical about the removal of Paul's personal information from the internet. Maybe he's right, maybe it's fair game.
Corey Ribotsky communicated by fax, the same way Paul Taylor submitted all the share conversions. Paul did that to cover up the fact that he didn't have original signed documentation, or if he did only his fingerprints would be found.
I received no satisfactory explanation as to why or how Corey Ribotsky could mix up a company.
Would you want someone who mixed companies up when converting shares to manage your money?
I can give you Ribotsky's home address, we can post that there if Replevin gives us permission? How about it Replevin? Should Mr. Ribotsky's address go in the i-box? With his convertible notes, he's the control person.
I don't trust Jon. But I know he didn't get paid anything. I also don't trust Corey Ribotsky. He must be making alot of money with his downward spiral. Nice Ferrari he picked up, eyy?
Let's start talking about Corey Ribotsky instead of Serf and Jon.
Did you read the latest allegation -- Susan Taylor saying the process server doesn't exist?! Then saying that the Florida state civil rules somehow apply to bankruptcy. That good for a chuckle. I'm glad she appeared and made herself subject to the jurisdiction of the court. Now she can come for a deposition.
Replevin, maybe you should subpoena her!
Tell me why Corey's conversion requests came in to me with the name of the Canadian Netco Investments (which traded on the OTC BB)?
Tell me how Corey could possibly not know which company he was converting on?
I only know about the dish served cold where Paul and Marshal Schictman, his attorney, planned on handing Corey a bunch of restricted shares and then having the preferreds cancel giving Corey the company. I don't know anything else.
He doesn't even know about this I would guess. They took his name. I don't particularly get along with the guy, but when I saw his signature and my signature on a document selling shares to the Belize Beet Company, I figured out what happening.
Afar as suspicions, you are suspicious. I am not really interested in your opinion. Major says you are clearly aligned with Corey, so I came to see what it's all about today.
He doesn't even know about this. They took his name. I don't particularly get along with the guy, but when I saw his signature and my signature on a document selling shares to the Belize Beet Company, I figured out what was happening.
No, I repeatedly sought the information I needed and Paul kept blaming Jon Miller for withholding the information. Later I learned Jon had no idea his name was used on all this.
Do you have the $5 document?
Well he wouldn't like the restricted shares he'd get.
Madison has the ledger I suppose.
I'm not Marco. But Marco can probably act in the name of the company, but he can't very well go up to New York and beat up the staff at Madison Transfer to get the records.
But rest assured, if the bk goes through, the records will be turned over.
Well Corey's arguments are a stretch. First AJW is just a creditor of the company - what standing do they have to challenge the company's business deals. If they're more than a creditor, then the stock issued to them needs to be restricted like any other insider. Second the note that Corey disputes has been accepted by the State of Texas - both the Court in Austin and the Secretary of State.
What Corey ought to be doing is submitting his conversion requests to the proper person in charge or who he thinks is in charge.
He can submit the conversion request to me, I'll issue him some stock.
I don't think Paul "wrote" the legal filing. It seems to be the status quo of PT to spell names with one or two letters off. The shares issued to the President of Madison Transfer -- spelled wrong -- the shares issued to attorney Marshal -- one letter wrong. Shares issued to Arnoldo -- one letter wrong.
It's been there, I don't know why they put a . instead of a ,?!
I dont think Banks is saying that Marco's not the officer. I think he's assuming, arguendo, that what AJW argued is true, then there's no officer. The motion to dismiss challenges Marco as being KM -- which is laughable because why wouldn't KM just use his own name? Or that of his wife's? But AJW never explains who is the officer.
Marco's acting officer based on his control filed with the Texas Secretary of State and the judgment filed in the Austin, Texas local court that nobody challenged.
I honestly don't know what Marco's position is right now. He told me last that he's reviewing the matter. I don't think that AJW's attorneys served their documents on him. You would think they would have just for courtesy's sake.
Major's commentary from prison.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=21044052
Here, this isn't on the PACER yet. There were 50 some pages of exhibits, so it might take them a while to scan.
There may be text errors due to the OCR.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
In re: Case: 07-10940
PRIVADA INC. Chapter 7
f/k/a NETCO INVESTMENTS, INC.,
Debtor.
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS BANKRUPTCY AND DECLARATION OF FREDERICK BANKS
I, Frederick Banks, in opposition to the motion to dismiss bankruptcy, declare and state under the penalty for perjury that the following is true and correct (28 USC §1746):
1. My name is Frederick Banks.
2. I have read the motion to dismiss filed by other creditors in this case. I oppose the motion for the following reasons:
The debtor does not have legal counsel in the New York case that the creditors refer to;
The debtor appears to have no bona fide officers and the creditors seeking dismissal have not identified who is the control person of the company;
The debtor does not appear to be paying its debts (indeed, the creditors that seek dismissal admit that they are not being paid);
My claims are bona fide and the other creditors lack standing to challenge my claims. $8,300 is past due, and a total of $29,975 is contracted and will be due. Once appointed, the trustee will investigate the various claims; and
The debtor appears to have previously engaged in a widespread fraud scheme, admitted by past officers of the company, which warrants the appointment of an independent trustee.
3. In this case, an involuntary bankruptcy petition was commenced by three petitioners. The company appears to have been served with the bankruptcy summons on either July 5 or July 7, 2007, and it has not answered the petition. Based on information, this is because the company has no bona fide officers.
4. Three creditors have moved to dismiss the bankruptcy alleging a confusing set of insinuations about anonymous internet discussions and an attack on the credibility of the petitioning creditors (including the undersigned). I lack knowledge about most of the allegations.
5. The primary claim of the creditors who seek dismissal appears to be that there is a lawsuit pending against the debtor in the Eastern District of New York to determine control of the company. I am not a party to that lawsuit, so my claims cannot be made in that proceeding. However, I have reviewed documents in that case and it appears that the debtor’s legal counsel withdrew from the proceeding and nobody represents the interests of the company. See Exhibit A. Certainly, the debtor cannot receive a fair adjudication in the New York proceeding without legal counsel. The debtor appears in default in that proceeding and this alone demonstrates the insolvency of the company and the need for a trustee to be appointed immediately.1
6. The secondary claim of the creditors who seek dismissal of this case appears to be that they believe one of the petitioning creditors, Keith Maydak, is seeking control of the debtor using a nominee or via identity fraud. I have no knowledge in this regard. However, the creditors have not identified who should be controlling the company. It appears that nobody is in control of the debtor and that no officer exists. This appears to be all the more reason to place the debtor into the court’s control.
7. The purpose of an involuntary bankruptcy is for courts to be able to take control of an insolvent debtor. The creditors seeking dismissal do not appear to claim that the debtor is not insolvent. As shown by the attached documents that were disclosed to Banks by Rodrigo Calderon, the debtor does not appear to be paying its bills at all. See Exhibits B and C. Based on information, documents filed in Texas show the company has only $5.00 in assets. The creditors seeking dismissal provide no information showing the company is not insolvent.
8. As for my claim as a petitioner, I have filed a proof of claim concurrently with this opposition as to the funds presently owed to me. $8,300 is past due, and an additional $27,275 is due in the future. The creditors admit that they lack standing to challenge the claims of other creditors at this point. See ¶60 of the Motion to Dismiss, citing In re: Marketxt Holdings Corp., 347 B.R. 156 (Bk. S.D.N.Y. 2006); In re: Jr. Food Mart of Arkansas Inc., 234 B.R. 420, 421-22 (Bank. E.D. Ark. 1999). The debtor is the party to dispute my claims, but without an officer, it cannot do so. Thus, the bankruptcy should proceed and a trustee can dispute my claim if there is a basis to do so.2
9. Finally, as shown from the attached affidavits filed in other court actions, it appears that the company has engaged in widespread fraud. See Exhibit D. According to press releases, the company had millions of dollars. It is unclear where the money went. This is why bankruptcy is necessary – a trustee needs to track down the millions of dollars and all of the customers and collect the revenue. It also appears that forged stock certificates existed and the trustee can rescind them. I do not have personal knowledge of these events, but the affidavits present a prima facie case of widespread abuses that warrant a trustee.
WHEREFORE, Creditor Frederick Banks requests that this Court deny the motion to dismiss.
(Footnotes could not be read by the OCR).
Respectfully submitted,
__________________________________
Frederick Banks
PO Box 5000
Yazoo City, MS 39194
CREDITOR
I think he was born in 1969, not sure.
I have a dirty fax. As soon as it's on the Court's computer, I'll download it and provide a link. Maybe I can OCR it, it'll have a few errors, but you'll get the jist. I'll see what I can do tonight.
Now the language of Marshal Shichtman in the two documents, read it carefully. See if it's familiar to you.
As I said, I'll be offline all day. I'll stop in late tonight and see what's up.