It was not put to bed.

If it was you would be able to explain to me how that was accomplished.

I notice a distinct lack of an explanation on your part.

Because you have no explanation. Because one does not exist.

You've been led to believe by the lying pumpers that just because George pursues something it automatically means it is a slam dunk.

After all, why try something unless it's a guarantee, right?

The problem is they gloss over any failures.

A quick and handy example is the GVSI share cancellation of Eastern Asia Group Limited. The fact that George pursued it means that it must be a slam dunk, right? He only does things that he will win right?

Wrong.

He ended up dismissing that portion of the share cancellations. He couldn't make it happen. Even though he thought he could.

Obviously, something there was still an issue. He pursued it anyway but ended up failing.

And that is not pre 2021, that is 2023.

The problem is that it was not put to bed. That's what the lying pumpers want you to think and the ignorant just lap it up because it's what they want to hear.

Go ahead, explain how it was put to bed. I'll bet you can't.

All you can say is " it was put to bed".

You have no idea what the reasoning behind that is. You just ignorantly repeat it.

Everybody ignore the price drop since filing started or going Pink Current! Ignore! Ignore!

Pretend everything is new!!!

No open FINRA proceeding? Bummer, I think people were hoping George had put in for the name and ticker change.

So now you want to get shitty with me and go above and beyond the stupid racist "accent" you put on for your posts?

Fine. You want to get shitty with me then I have no problem slinging it right back.

Those types of posts are in response to being followed around and harassed just for the sake of harassing me because they don't like that I tell the truth about the stock they are bagholding. Did you notice that is not how I replied to golf?

One would hope so. And I genuinely hope the CE does come off.

I'm just not a fan of echo chambers with everyone telling each other "hey, everything's great, the company says so, the CE will be off any day".

Perhaps I'm a bit jaded after seeing plenty of these, but I'm also a bit of a realist after seeing a bunch of these.

And I don't trust a thing these companies say.

He's telling the truth though. Just because some dumbass makes a trade he regrets doesn't change factual screenshots and legit links.

I know you lying pumpers hate the truth, of course.

That's why you insist no one should listen and everyone should block.

Because you hate people knowing the truth about your lies.

If anyone knows stalking someone on a message board, it sure would be Hokie.

Have you seen this insanity? All those harassing replies to Hi_Lo, fugging nuts, man.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/memberpoststoboard.aspx?user=45896&boardid=26119
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/memberpoststoboard.aspx?user=45896&boardid=8816
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/memberpoststoboard.aspx?user=45896&boardid=19763
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/memberpoststoboard.aspx?user=45896&boardid=11489

Are you claiming you were given explicit instructions under penalty of death on when to sell or something?

Or are you just trying to pretend someone else is responsible for your own trades you made freely?

My concern is that OTCM realizes that ICOA was really trying to pull one over on them with the Goodwill. After all, ICOA said everything had already been done and all communication had been replied to and they were just waiting... While the Goodwill was still on the books...

Then suddenly ditching it, kinda feels like admitting that was a scam the whole time even though they were representing to OTCM everything was done....

So does OTCM just say, "okay we'll let you start trading again so the insiders can all cash out finally"?

Or does OTCM say "fugg you ICOA, you were lying your asses off right to our faces even after saying everything was done, no way we're going to let you get back to normal trading so the insiders can all cash out finally"?

If a shoplifter gets caught and sheepishly admits to having an ear of corn down their pants then perhaps a slap on the wrist is an appropriate punishment. But what if it turns out that while admitting to only the 59 cent corn they also secretly still had several dozen ribeye steaks worth a grand hidden in jacket pockets? If the steaks get found then is the slap on the wrist still appropriate? Or has this just escalated, both because of the value and because of the intent to deceive?

It's that intent to deceive that has me wondering about ICOA.

Time will tell.

You are replying to my post where Nasdaq themselves literally say that an applying company must be in compliance with all of the corporate governance requirements of the exchange they are trying to uplist from.

I guess you are just getting desperate and trying to get technical and claim "They didn't say anything about a caveat emptor!!!! They never specified caveat emptor!!!! You can't prove they won't accept a caveat emptor!!! They never said the exact phrase caveat emptor!!!!"

Get real.

They're not going to accept a caveat emptor.

Show me a single caveat emptor that ever uplisted. Oh, that's right you can't. Because none ever has.

https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/Material_Search.aspx?cid=34&mcd=LQ

Seeing as people have been getting 3's, calling 4 the bottom is a straight up lie.

Or you could just get on the Bid for some and not play these stupid word games.

For anyone new being pressured to "Iggy"/Ignore, perhaps you should ask yourself why? Why would the pumpers want to censor what you see on the board? Notice how "bashers" never instruct anyone to Ignore anyone else? That's probably because we feel everyone should have access to all the information presented for your own consideration and your own determination of what is real and what you are being misled about.

And it's quite simple. If you are seeing some posts that look they are something you have read before then simply pass them by. No one is forcing you to open and fully read every post. But then you can also keep your eyes open for new information that you might have missed if you had everyone on Ignore. For example, the first evidence that share cancellation newspaper publications were underway was actually posted here by a "basher". If that was important to you, you would have missed it.

Also pay attention to the fact that some pumpers that claim they have all the "bashers" on Ignore keep replying to them... Yup - they are lying to you about Ignoring. They only want YOU to Ignore while they absolutely keep an eye on what we are posting. They want YOU in the dark, but not themselves.

Beware the folly of only believing things that you WANT to hear. Sometimes reality jives with what you hope for, sure. But sometimes you must be prepared for it to not jive. That's just a reality of existence...

And if you see that I copy and paste this post again in the future, guess what? You have the power to simply pass it by next time. No one is forcing you to read it again.

You replied to me just last night, big boi.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172492671

You keep pretending to threaten to stop responding yet you just can't help yourself every time.

See ya next time! Toodles!

The best is pretending to care so little yet being so compelled to keep replying.

I love it.

Dat rent-free living in your head, it's wonderful. Like a freebz AirBnB, just roomier because there's no brain furniture in the way and I can just frolic about naked, helicoptering to my heart's content.

I know you just pictured that.

😘

Nobody cares about fake block declarations.

But thanks for putting in the fake effort..

It hit the FINRA Daily List today.

Illegal shares? Prove it.

Amazing how you can never prove these air shares you always talk about.

Probably because they don't exist.

That's "news" from April. It's now August, FYI.

I was simply making an analogy. If profit had been overstated like that and then rewound everyone would be up in arms.

For some reason the Goodwill being ditched seems to have been totally glossed over by many when it is in fact sketchy as hell.

It was not shorted 54% yesterday, you're full of crap.

Let me guess, https://otcshortreport.com/company/GVSI..

I've given you the links multiple times explaining why you are lying but I guess I have to again.

From FINRA and OTCMarkets:

https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-051019

https://blog.otcmarkets.com/2018/11/13/understanding-short-sale-activity/

https://blog.otcmarkets.com/2023/05/08/what-investors-should-know-about-finra-daily-short-sale-volume-data/

Nasdaq isn't going to accept a Caveat Emptor uplist. You have to be dumb as a box of rocks to think they would. Full stop.



https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/Material_Search.aspx?cid=34&mcd=LQ

Does copy and paste somehow invalidate the information? Of course not. It's just being efficient as opposed to retyping everything by hand.

Boy, you sure do put a lot of effort into claiming posts don't matter. Like, a LOT of effort.

Obviously it does in fact worry you.

I'm pretty sure the CE disqualifies a ticker from uplisting to Nasdaq. They have a reputation to uphold as they are quite proud of proclaiming.

You post fake tweets, man. You're not one to admonish with "do better".

The concept of Goodwill is not suspicious, just like the concept of profit is not suspicious.

But a company reporting an outrageous amount of profit and then later just willy-nilly dialing it way back with no explanation is suspicious as hell.

Just like with ICOA and it's Goodwill amount.

It's the amount of the Goodwill and that it was just casually tossed away that is suspicious.

By the way, a ticker can also be delisted instead of just sitting there in perpetuity hoping for the CE to come off.

A post that is true during the day is just as true when it is posted at night, and vice versa.

I can't help but notice that your commentary does not even attempt to refute any of his posts.

Nice try. But that's not the 2013 in question. You conveniently left out the screenshot of the SEC part of the filings. From https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GVSI/disclosure, here is the SEC portion of interest:



As you see, the 2007 Annual is there and then they filed the NT 10-K for 2008 but never followed through with the actual filing itself.

So 2008 through 2013 are missing and then the 15-12G was finally filed 7/10/2013. And yes, that is AFTER the 2013 had already been due. So even though the company started filing 2013 stuff as an Alternative Reporter that 2013 SEC filing was still missing and FINRA demanded to see it, along with the other 5 missing SEC Annuals.

These are the source of the Notice of Deficiency and why 2013 is included even though there were later OTC Alternative filings that covered 2013. If the 15-12G had been filed just a bit earlier then the SEC 2013 would not have been included.

You are cherry picking a recent and favorable date.

Others would argue that first filing back in January was a more important date for "starting a clock".

Others would argue for getting pink current in February when a bunch of new investors were able to get in as a more important date for "starting a clock".

And there have been hella more red days than green since those events.

People bagholding since back then didn't decide to just "reset their clocks" to two weeks ago. They are very cognizant of how long they've been waiting for events to unfold.

There was no mention of the mom, it was commentary on the CEO's, uh, "performance".

That's absolutely fair game.

The FINRA Notice of Deficiency was not in place at that time.

But it is now.

Okay, then what is your opinion of them tossing the half a billion dollar Goodwill aside like it was a used napkin and just pretending like nothing happened?

Doesn't that seem just a little bit on the suspicious side?