Enjoying life.....
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
For all practical purposes, Boris is the company's Investor Relations person, and there is nothing wrong with an investor taking to Investor Relations.
Do you also think it wrong for Boris and I to discuss history regarding the Wars of German unification?
It amounts to nothing more than name dropping. Has no bearing on this stock/company.....but if it makes you happy that you've found some inconclusive dirt, then have fun with it.
As for me, and likely all longs, I don't care!
AXXA Long
I agree fully. All this finger pointing, is nothing but a distraction in futility.
I did. You will never find what the ellipsis contained because the reference words were taken from plea minutes that are not made public. Like I said, show me where there's a court case against Boris. You won't find it because it doesn't exist.
Block? "What you talkin' about, Willis?"
Nope...nothing proven.....You have no documents regarding Boris engaging in fraud.
In fact, event the jest of what you posted is misleading.
The case you referenced was not about Boris, but about an attorney found guilty of larceny.
The full paragraph you lifted your text from reads,
"As revealed in the plea minutes, from in and about
September 2007 to April 2008, the respondent
"engage[d] in conduct, believing it to be probable,
that [he was] rendering aid to ... Boris Matsokhin
and others, to aid such person to commit a felony,
including grand larceny in the second degree and
residential mortgage fraud." More specifically, the
respondent provided false documentation,
including HUD–1 forms, to facilitate numerous
fraudulent mortgage transactions."
You see it was the attorney that ""engage[d] in conduct, believing it to be probable,
that [he was] rendering aid to..." therein, it was the attorney that was believing that he was engaged in rendering aid to a felony. "Beliving" is not the same as actually doing. I asked a couple of lawyer friends and they concurred.
In essence, there is no proof that Boris has ever participated in a crime.
BTW, you have to pay to get the full document, you know, the one without the ellpsis, but I guess you can't afford that, or maybe you only want your version of the truth. Nothing new there.
The court document you cited was detailing the guilty of an attorney. There are no court documents showing that Boris was convicted of fraud.
In the text you quoted: "...rendering aid to ... Boris Matsokhin..."
The ellipsis between the words "aid to" and "Boris" indicate words were left out on the text. What are those words? Without those missing words, the quote you offered has no context, thus rendering your accusation of Boris very misleading.
Is status quo with next quarterly on the horizon.
I'll let the "authorities" know you said that. Have a good day!
BarChart is more like TA, namely, for Pink like AXXA....worthless.
Best bet for predicting AXXA pps is a dart board. That's what you use, right, hippy?
Uh-oh...123tom123 is new fodder for hippy.
We wait to hear your opinions, tom.
$AXXA Long here
But IGBK is not a holding company like AXXA....big difference in marketing strategies.
Funny...got any more?
Exactly...zip credibility.
Oh, do you're a financial advisor now?....an anonymous person without credentials? Really! LOL
Ah, such a far fetched opinion.
Yes, you have posted a lot opinions here.
Yep, just opinions, no fact.
Ha#! No proof, as usual.
Oh, no...A whole (sic) 1/1000th of O/S shares have been traded today!
Nah, everyone knows the A/S has increased.
Ah, yes, conspiracy theories abound
But only on twitter/X
Yeah, that will go over well by calling them "you people." I don't remember the last time a CEO-wanna-be had any affect on a company.
Hmmmm.....maybe you should contact the thousands of shareholders and tell them that YOU want them to only transact trades on the ASK. Maybe they would listen to you (not).
Correction..."ain't happenning" Yet.
Shares are need for the new acquisition deal. Revenue looks nice but it contributes to profit, and working capital.
Pinks intrinsically have no $$$ until shares are issued. Then $$$ from issued shares is used to acquire businesses/assets per the design of the company. A company without assets and reserve $$$, is called a scam. AXXA has assets and reserve $$$.
Old history...not a matter.
A/S is not dilution. A/S is a static number.
His credentials are better than yours? Not surprising..
If you have a Russian surname, he'd probably include you too.
Me thinks the new A/S will primarily be used for making new acquisitions
It took 5 years to increase the O/S, so by extrapolating, the O/S should max out in about 10 years. AXXA could have a pps in the 1
$15-$20 range by then.
Not for what they gain in return.
They? Which "they" are you talking about?
Yes...I have OPINIONS and you have OPINIONS....I can express mine and you can express yours.