Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
They have 12 million debt. Of course they are converting
I'm sure there is a bias somewhere. Personally, I really like nvidia. I put a 970 in my rig and it works like a charm. The shield however was a waste of 50 bucks
Could very well happen. I think I may have been too ancy after watching it trade a little longer. Market is hurting bad right now, there is no question about that
Agreed. A lot of people over at dell aren't too big of fans of this stock either
Re-entering here
It's situational and all depends on the trade agreement and the PPS you bought at vs the current PPS. I would say that a buyout has overwhelming odds favoring the investors though
Shorts and MMs do not coordinate. This is a result of Hilary not winning to ensure the balance of wallstreet. Trumps policies are volatile and neglecting to some of the espionage that the nation has been building for years. This market will be perfect for swing traders as we watch how trump delivers on his words "drain the swamp"
That's a better answer. I would like to see a trail scatter plot for effeciency vs yield with a regression line. I think that would be a good idea for the company as well. They can throw it on their poster at these conventions and it would act as more convincing sales pitch
For what, fuel consumption? Because as someone with a plant physiology degree the units that matter in photosynthesis are nm and g/s-1m-2
I don't think you understood what I was saying. What is the cost/cost trade off? Because specialty gear is generally much more expensive and not completely worth the money when compared to yield
The real question is how does the price vary between competitors. As we all know money talks more than specialty. Specific wavelength lights are pricey when you can use a generic heat producing white light
No, at least not yet. Other stocks, very much yes
Bill is sleazy. I get the train of thought, you can't let investors know that you are getting crushed, you have to give them hope or the stock price will be finished. However, enough is enough, now he is just tarnishing any reputation he may have come back with
Not a fan of the market open gap
Not cool dude
He hasn't had a single correct call in the 3 years I've been here. Always far too bullish
It's going to be a NT-10Q
I'm a buyer again
I still say that SRNA needs to pick up their marketing on their own. The 30k spent last quarter was weak. It's a niche market so they need to build a team, run off commission, to personally meet and sell to the consumers. Word of mouth is not good enough and the upside to positive marketing is enormous in the sum of all business
Very well written article. I recommend all to read and thank you for posting
Most of the booms are just shells anyways. The run is jumped by potential, even if they never capitalize
Now to fix that debt that's accumulating interest ;)
20% short volume last week
40% buy rating
I'd have to agree. I know I'm going to be put on the hot seat for this but I sold two days ago and I'm waiting for the Bears to lose grip before I rinse and repeat
It ran with the sector. It's important to note that it is up 300% off of nothing substantial. Support is building but it's not entirely strong. Resistance has been heavy at physical currencies such as a dime and a quarter. Last run came from breaking the dime resistance which held it down for so long. The stock is currently volatile so I would recommend watching it trade before throwing 55k at it
Conversions of promissory note balances to common stock- 889,905 (August 15 10-Q) shares issued- 17,888,828.
Deficit in working Capital of approximately 3,465,000 as of June 30, 2016. Additionally, the company has generated cumulative net losses of approximately 12,514,000 during the period of inception through June 30, 2016.
Revenue increased to 1,891,000 as compared to 1,678,000. (13% increase)
The decrease in advertising and marketing expenses from 93,000 to 29,000. ( 69% decrease and a bad plan in my opinion)
a net operating loss of 1,450,000 compared to 2,395,000 6 months prior
Preferred stock: .000001 par value 150M authorized 77M outstanding
Common stock: .000001 par value 350M authorized 145,268,135 and ,125,839,862 shares issued and outstanding, respectfully.
No, that's not even close. It's more like, if you want to go to Vegas, then your playing by the rules of Vegas. You made the choice to gamble, if you lose all your money are you just going to sit around and complain about how the games are rigged all day? It's not anyone else's fault you made the wrong calls.
The SEC has much bigger things to deal with other than prajna'a discontent. They regulate the companies and protect the investors if the company has any wrong doings... They are doing just fine
No, it's based off how people place their orders. The MMs make most of the money on the difference between buy price to order price. You can always use a limit order
The only reason you think the MMs are so corrupt is because your are trading in the OTC. This is the most unregulated and volatile market around. It's not the SECs job to tell you that OTC is a huge gamble. They have bigger fish to fry than the programs that provide the market to begin with. You either play to win the game or you sit back and complain about how unfair it is but you still play anyways
Not what I said at all but good try putting words in my mouth
I think it's not going to be what people are expecting to see. Frankly, I don't understand the hype. Even if a new market opens up for Cali, it's not like any company will just instantly benefit. It still takes hard work, good implementation, and time to enter in a new market. Just because there is potential doesn't mean success.
Solid quarter after solid quarter is what you want to see if you are a SRNA long. In addition, debt elimination with less toxic financing in the future is something to keep an eye on
When you use the words such as "fraud stars", it makes you come off as bias and crying wolf. How about links and proof to back your claims? If you already have posted proof, then why keep at it?
That's the million dollar question right there. Seems more of a hassle than it is worth
Considering there wasn't anything substantial, 300% isnt embarrassing at all. It's ok to be bullish, but come on man. There is like 50 different factors that make every company trade different. You can just compare 2 by percent and not cover the key features. If financials continue to show progress than the price will go up on its own. Other than that, unless there is a big pick up in volume again, trading sideways is what you want to see
Volume will be the key thing to watch for
It just raised 300%. This stock will be doing well just to channel in this range for awhile
For real. I even sent that guy two articles on how to prevent MM interference but he would rather just complain instead
Got killed on Friday when we couldn't break 1c
I think somewhere in the range of .21-.22
They have plenty of shares I promise you that