Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Who is glad they averaged down to $0.005 today? AAPT wheels off the cliff!
So a $150K sale at -80% gross margin is better than $0 sales? Todays market says the liquidation of Pawtizer is not a good thing!
Pawtizer hype got AAPT's valuation up from $500K ($0.001) to $35 million ($0.07), base on that value increase, Pawtizer is AAPT's most successful product ever. Also at 19 months in stores, it is getting closer to the all time longest selling product as well.
Hail Pawtizer. Now RIP
I am shocked as well. Either they believe the lunacy or they want others the buy into that crock so they can sell.
PittBullyInc. will not sell a product like Pawtizer, but we may be competitive in the Dog Bar and treat Business
Those prices were $0.40, $0.45 and $0.50. Pretty bad for a product with an MSRP of $5.00. HORRIBLY BAD MANAGEMENT DECISIONS EVERY TIME.
I now wonder if Pawtizer will even sell at the Dollar store. How funny would it be if they return it?
I visited the 10th Walmart in the past few months. It was reported to have Barz in stock, but it did not. I think Wally is phasing out the product.
Selling a product 90% below MSRP and its being celebrated. Too funny!
Selling a product 90% below MSRP and its being celebrated. Too funny!
I will send some friend in So Cal out to verify the locations you claim has them
I went to my 10th different Walmart today. It was one of the Walmarts that was reported to be selling NutraBars. As of today, there were no NutraBars on the shelves. I am starting to suspect that Walmart is phasing out the product.
The supplier that got stiffed has no inventory to sell. The dollar store means AAPT is selling inventory at a 70% to 90% loss on every unit. Even if they sold all $750K inventory, it probably yielded $50K to $100K in cash.
It might, but the opinion stated as fact is wrong.
I would respect that statement if it came from an attorney practicing in the U.S. Since it is not ...........
AAPT "Had" to file lawsuit as wrongdoing cover-up. Mr. Grushkin did not "have" to file the counter suit.
AAPT was committing crimes and dishonesty. Mr. Grushkin reported that dishonesty. AAPT is claiming that the dishonesty, lies, cheating and tax evasion is a confidential matter. No court or jury in the world will believe that claim.
AAPT's only hope is to prove that all of Mr. Grushkin's allegations are false, but we all know that they are true, so AAPT has no valid claim against Mr. Grushkin.
With all the other judgments against AAPT, judgment liens will be filed so AAPT could never collect even if they won and Mr. Grushkin paid.
AAPT's lawsuit is a totally stupid waste of shareholder money and management time.
AAPT's marketing strategy is 1) Tell retailers the product will sell itself. 2) Get a retail order 3) Spend all the marketing dollars on management bonuses instead of advertising. 4) Hype the stock and raise more PP dollars. 5) Do nothing to sell the product 6) spend the PP monies on themselves. 7) watch the stock tank when there is proof on horrible sales 8) Get convertible debt to survive for about 18 months. 9) Spend half of the convertible debt on themselves. 10) Announce a new product and repeat the entire process.
HAHAHAH. AAPT never pays so everything AAPT gets is Pro Bono. HAHAHA. The 50 hours of pro bono work is for indigent people. Businesses are never considered indigent, even though after paying themselves millions the company is indigent.
Think of the conversation with AAPT and the Lawyer:
AAPT: Please work for us for free. We don't have any money.
Lawyer: Well how much did you earn last year?
AAPT: Uh, $750, 000 that we disclosed.
Lawyer: How can someone who makes that much be considered poor?
AAPT: Well we have to pay for a rented mansion, a Rolls Royce and a Mercedes, a house keeper, a dog walker, a fashion advisor and a massage therapist.
Lawyer: You scum sucking douche bags need to get a grip on reality. Good Bye
PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THIS ATTORNEY SOLICITATION
That was said in 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006. However, the only one's that make money at AAPT and Schwartz and Bershan.
Hoes indeed. AAPT managers would do anything for a PP investment and lying cheating and stealing are the most respectable acts that are included.
Yep. Not B&L manipulation. It must be the market maker. Wait, maybe it was the one armed man. hahhahaha.
Good luck with your complaint and remember, when you have 2 tons of marijuana hidden in your basement, you might not want to call the police on your neighbor for smoking some reefer.
Great analogy: Eurpoean's came to America, brought diseases which killed the natives and reneged on treaties and captured land that was not their own. Barry and Lisa came to the Pet industry, brought their corrupt business practices, did not honor their contracts and took shareholder money that did not belong to them. Thanks for pointing this out.
FACT: STARRQUEENS IS TAX EVASION VEHICLE ONLY. AAPT IS TOAST.
I GUARANTEE NO 10Q BY NEW YEARS DAY. The guy you heard it form, who spoke to a guy that hear it from another guy is WRONG. There is no CFO or controller, unpaid bills at the CPA firm, no accounting staff showing up to work and NO HOPE OF COMPLETING A 10Q this year.
StarrQueens illegal and undisclosed in 2009, 2010, 2011. Nothing was "explained". Just an incorrect opinion on a message board.
StarrQueens created in 2009. Disclosed in 2012. Is it legal if undisclosed transactions were made in 2009, 2010 and 2011. I GUARANTEE IT WAS NOT LEGAL to commingle investor funds and fail to pay taxes on those transactions. Leave the legal analysis to the lawyers and/or the Americans that live here and know more about our laws.
Why buy E&O insurance when you can just put money in Star Queen tax free?
Yes, AAPT can lie to more investors and funnel more cash into Star Queens until the truth is known. The truth that Pawtizer failed and NutraBars are not selling fast enough to sustain a Company with as much overhead and high salaries as AAPT
Join AAPT's B.O.D. Become personally exposed to liability for Payroll taxes, shareholder misstatements and corrupt business practices. AAPT does not pay director fees so you will be serving without compensation (AAPT's strategy with employees) and taking risk. HMMM: No reward and lots of risk. No reward and lots of risk. Sounds like the typical analysis for penny investors.
ABSURD: AAPT cannot sue for damages caused by telling the truth. The argument in court would be "We would have sold shares at a higher price if our lies were not exposed." No judge or jury in the world is going to buy that argument.
By the way, AAPT would have many more employee labor judgments and vendor lawsuits if not for the fact that there is nothing to gain from suing AAPT. Many have already sued an won, but AAPT never pays. So if you were an employee or vendor and you got stiffed, why incur the cost of lawyer to get nothing?
Even if you are correct and there is nothing to gain from suing Mr. G, then why is AAPT wasting shareholder money doing so? They are also exposing their own crimes to world by doing so. They are going to have to prove that the allegations against them were false. Personally, I am betting that Mr. G is telling the absolute truth and he will be the winner in this ungodly horrific mess.
Tax time is coming and the IRS wants their share
Only SchWARTz&berSCAM make money at AAPT. "Stop getting into lawsuits and making profits" said every investor that ever owned shares in AAPT. "When you give money to AAPT you are giving it to me" said Lisa berSHAM.
"AAPT will spend shareholder money like its there own" said Pitt Bully
AAPT owes Wienberg $200K. AAPT did not pay (big surprise I know) Wienber. Wienberg thus has a judgment against AAPT and did not pay. Wienberg filed a lien (a judgment lien) on any monetary award that Mr. Grushkin may make to AAPT should AAPT prevail. That means AAPT must COLLECT more than $200K, plus lawyer fees for this nonsensical lawsuit to be worth the shareholder dollars they are paying for it. If Mr. Grushkin prevails, Wienberg would not get at money that AAPT pays to Mr. Grushkin.
Raise your hand if you think AAPT will collect more than $200K plus lawyer fees?
California loves employees, hates employers. I expect EG to win $150,000 a year for 5 years as the result of the wrongful termination suit. That's $750,000 (same as 1 years pay for the 2 clowns). Schwartz and Bershan will not pay because they are bottom dwelling scum suckers. EG will end up the second biggest creditor of AAPT, behind only the IRS. HHMMMM!
You can't set your house on fire and sue the guy who called the fire department after it burned. AAPT was lying, cheating and tax evading and they are trying to sue the guy that said they were doing it. AAPT MUST prove that it was totally untrue or they are responsible for the collapse of the stock.
By the way, you said "if forced AAPT could sue"? Hello? They were not forced but they sued anyway. That initial lawsuit was like going to the police and saying the car you stole was stolen from you. Actually, that lawsuit was more retarded than that.
RIP AAPT
EXCELLENT POST! THE FORCE IS STRONG WITH YOU YOUNG JEDI! AAPT to implode in a ball of flames like the Federation Star Cruiser.
A GREAT WITNESS. He is currently employed as a regional bank examiner with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. You have to pass a Federal background check to get a job like that.
bought 1 machine that does not work. KSU students doing temp work for beer money. Not impressive
WRONG: The AAPT lawsuit was a cover-up of their crimes. So obvious.
The wrongful termination of an employee that was pressured by management to take illegal actions is a state crime and this case is in a state court. All of that disclosure BS is Federal and should be in Federal court. Come to think of it. EG wanted this case in Federal court. AAPT is stupid to pursue Federal issues in State court, but we already know that AAPT management is INCOMPETENT. AAPT will be paying EG if they had any money not pocketed by management.