Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So Wallace's wife left him due to GOSY?
Because "flyash" Wallace refused to acknowledge that his obsession with GOSY and the Spencers was aberrant?
Or did she leave him because after going through a full psych exam and being put on meds, he then refused to take his meds due to his love of the "juice" in stalking the Spencers?
What is your opinion as to why Wallace's wife got sick of his constant trolling for the Spencers and left him?
She knew he needs daily medication, but since he refused, she left him due to his obsession with Spencer and GOSY?
Is Wallace now obsessed with Paula Nelson because his wife left him due to his stalking of her and the Spencers?
This was told to me by those known to me that have no reason to lie to me.
mo-
Mech
Spencer helped develop the world's first two legged walking robot!
Here's a list of the tech GOSY has invented over the last 15 years with only $1.7M in cash:
Spencer has an excellent, professional business education:
Spencer's tenure in industrial robot design is impressive:
Spencer's tenure in consumer electronics is impressive:
Over 120 public videos of CareBots in action!
4 videos here in public venues:
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2011
4 eldercare alpha trial videos:
(Some with elderly family members, now deceased. The family members were never in assisted care or nursing homes, but allowed to stay at home with dignity and privacy. Family is always first with GeckoSystems. Most folks consider "family first," too.)
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2010
18 videos here in public venues:
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2009
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2007
12 videos here in public venues:
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2006
5 videos here in public venues:
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2005
16 videos here in public venues:
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2004
60 videos here in public venues:
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2003
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/2002/images/DCP00216.jpg
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/2001/images/DCP00206.jpg
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/2000/images/Pow%20Wow%20photo%2002.JPG
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/1998/images/imageFPK.JPG
Over 100 videos in public venues viewed by non GOSY affiliates, authenticating the reality of GOSY's world class "mobile robot solutions for safety, security, and service."
No joysticks, no "man behind the curtain," and no "staged" demonstrations!
Facts be facts-
Is this ZMP evaluating GOSY's BaseBot?
So Wallace's wife left him due to GOSY?
Because "flyash" Wallace refused to acknowledge that his obsession with GOSY and the Spencers was aberrant?
Or did she leave him because after going through a full psych exam and being put on meds, he then refused to take his meds due to his love of the "juice" in stalking the Spencers?
What is your opinion as to why Wallace's wife got sick of his constant trolling for the Spencers and left him?
She knew he needs daily medication, but since he refused, she left him due to his obsession with Spencer and GOSY?
Is Wallace now obsessed with Paula Nelson because his wife left him due to his stalking of her and the Spencers?
This was told to me by those known to me that have no reason to lie to me.
mo-
Mech
Simple, I understand Rule 144 better than Wallace.
And I am not an attorney!
Go figure-
Maybe it is because I see great good in the world and that the SEC, for example, is there for the GOOD of ALL stockholders, not just to enable Wallace to create "willing victims."
Good to have the fact uncontested that Wallace CANNOT violate RULE 144.
Hence there will be NO sale of Spencer's stock, now or ever since FEDERAL LAWS TRUMP STATE LAWS.
Whew-
Good to have that well established!
Mech
http://www.geckosystems.com/W_W_W reveals that Wallace's exalted opinion letter SAYS NOTHING AT ALL IN ANY WAY ABOUT RULE 144.
Why is that?
Did Wallace get a too cheap opinion letter?
Probably Wallace "forgot" to tell the attorney ALL the facts.
Like the stock was held by a beneficial owner, eg.
Rut roh...
And, why was the SEC created if not to protect stockholder interests, as in GOSY's 1300+, from manipulation that Wallace brags about being legal?
One more time:
NONE of Spencer's stock will be sold...
...by Neil Wallace, his parents, the "sheriff," or anyone else.
The IRREFUTABLE reasons why it CANNOT happen are:
1. The proposed sale VIOLATES Federal securities laws, specifically Rule 144 which governs the sale of all restricted stock, REGARDLESS of WHO is doing the selling or the circumstances.
Further, Rule 144 REQUIRES that ONLY FINRA/SEC brokers execute ANY and ALL sales.
So the sheriff does not have to comply with Rule 144?
SURE, they do!
BECAUSE:
2. Federal law ALWAYS trumps state law.
Whenever state law conflicts with Federal law, FEDERAL ALWAYS prevails and precludes enforcement of any and all state laws that conflict with Federal laws.
3. GOSY's DE attorney has demonstrated competence MANY times.
Wallace has NEVER collected ANYTHING in the 5 years of his FAILED attempts to collect monies from GOSY and/or the Spencers NOT legitimately earned by him or allegedly due his parents.
Therefore, NONE of Spencer's stock CAN be sold by Neil Wallace, his parents, the "sheriff," or anyone else.
In conclusion, the Spencers will NOT be losing majority control of GOSY since their 51% ownership is in preferred GOSY shares is NOT at risk in ANY manner, or have ANY of their common stock holdings sold, either.
Wallace has chosen to not make public the so called opinion letter he hee haws about being the "end all" solution supporting his position. Of course he won't since his position is INDEFENSIBLE.
facts remain facts-
Mech
One more time. Rule 144 applies to ALL sales whether voluntary or INvoluntary in order to prevent ILLEGAL manipulation of the stock's price and ALL sales MUST go through a registered broker such that RULE 144 is complied with.
This is one primary reason why the SEC was created:
To prevent scoundrels from manipulating stocks to the detriment of the other stockholders.
Isn't that what Wallace wants, and brags about doing?
To drive GOSY's pps down to squat so he can get control of majority and oust the Spencers?
That is why Wallace's ILLEGAL attempt to circumvent SEC regs WILL NOT HAPPEN.
Wallace WILL NOT be allowed to damage the other 1300 GOSY stockholders simply because he loves to have a "willing victim" in the Spencers.
The Spencers want to be rid of Wallace.
That's why the mutual TPO and PPO were pursued, and continue to be.
Guess Wallace is unfazed by the near certainty of his PUBLIC HUMILIATION and infuriating daddy...
BTW, just because a low level judge is ignorant, does not mean they are stupid, retarded, or in any way mentally or emotionally challenged. IMO, others may disagree...
So why was the SEC created if NOT to protect stockholders from ILLEGAL stock manipulation such that RULE 144 is observed.
Is that not what Wallace keeps bragging about?
Driving the price down to gain control and oust the Spencers?
Isn't that self defeating of Wallace, to brag about VIOLATING SEC regs?
Why would any sane person brag publicly about breaking any law, much less Federal?
Is that why the FBI is now assembling a file on Wallace et al?
This ILLEGAL manipulation he keeps bragging about?
Pretty amazing for Wallace to continue to believe that the SEC's Rule 144 does not apply to him.
Is Wallace special?
mo-
Mec
Not according to GOSY's DE attorney's legal brief.
Rule 144 ALWAYS applies.
Wallace is getting an VERY expensive and PUBLIC education here.
One may find some personal DD insightful.
I did.
Ask an SEC attorney that understands Rule 144, instead of avoiding its mention or reference in any manner whatsoever.
I am right.
Even GOSY's attorney agrees:
http://geckosystems.com/W_W_W/Notice_of_Appeal-stocksale.pdf
http://geckosystems.com/W_W_W/Brief_for_appeal_of_stock_sale.pdf
Mech
Wallace should not be concerned. Don't you agree?
Here's why:
NONE of Spencer's stock will be sold...
...by Neil Wallace, his parents, the "sheriff," or anyone else.
The IRREFUTABLE reasons why it CANNOT happen are:
1. The proposed sale VIOLATES Federal securities laws, specifically Rule 144 which governs the sale of all restricted stock, REGARDLESS of WHO is doing the selling or the circumstances.
Further, Rule 144 REQUIRES that ONLY FINRA/SEC brokers execute ANY and ALL sales.
So the sheriff does not have to comply with Rule 144?
SURE, they do!
BECAUSE:
2. Federal law ALWAYS trumps state law.
Whenever state law conflicts with Federal law, FEDERAL ALWAYS prevails and precludes enforcement of any and all state laws that conflict with Federal laws.
3. GOSY's DE attorney has demonstrated competence MANY times.
Wallace has NEVER collected ANYTHING in the 5 years of his FAILED attempts to collect monies from GOSY and/or the Spencers NOT legitimately earned by him or allegedly due his parents.
Therefore, NONE of Spencer's stock CAN be sold by Neil Wallace, his parents, the "sheriff," or anyone else.
In conclusion, the Spencers will NOT be losing majority control of GOSY since their 51% ownership is in preferred GOSY shares is NOT at risk in ANY manner, or have ANY of their common stock holdings sold, either.
Wallace has chosen to not make public the so called opinion letter he hee haws about being the "end all" solution supporting his position. Of course he won't since his position is INDEFENSIBLE.
facts remain facts-
Mech
Here are some CURRENT facts about GOSY and why ALL development stage companies are undervalued:
Financial compliance reasons why GOSY is undervalued:
1. Compliance with Federal Accounting Standards Board's (FASB, http://www.fasb.org/ ) Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) distorts the true economic condition and performance of the company.
This is due to the requirement to expense 100% of all R&D in the year incurred. Hence a complete writeoff of all R&D expenditures, regardless of present and/or future value to ZERO. This required compliance with GAAP forces the Development Stage company to place no assets on their Balance Sheet on the proprietary Intellectual Properties (IP) regardless of the level of probability of future revenues from their R&D activities.
2. Federal and state tax laws also distort the true economic condition and performance of GOSY.
This is due to the requirement to prepare financials in accordance with FASB 's GAAP for tax filings. This required compliance with GAAP forces GOSY as a Development Stage company to place no assets on their Balance Sheet on the proprietary Intellectual Properties (IP) regardless of the level of probability of future revenues from their R&D activities.
3. European Unon (EU) accounting standards, if applied to GOSY's financials, would portray the true economic condition and performance of the company much more realistically.
This is due to the requirement to expense only 50% (not 100%) of all R&D in the year incurred. Hence since not a 100% writeoff, 50% is carried as assets on the balance sheet. This fairly reflects the net worth of a Development Stage company from the EU perspective. The EU requires only a 50% writeoff of all R&D expenditures. This simple accounting change would dramatically flip GOSY's net worth and stockholder equity deep into positive territory.
This required compliance with GAAP forces GOSY --as a Development Stage company-- to place no assets on their Balance Sheet on the proprietary Intellectual Properties (IP) regardless of the level of probability of future revenues from their R&D activities.
4. Ignoring discounted cash flow (DCF) analyses of GOSY's financial pro formas lowers the net present value (NPV) of future net profits of GOSY regardless of hurdle rate (minimum ROI) determined as sufficient for the level of risk.
Ignoring increased stockholder dividends due to significant tax loss carry forwards (which reduces taxes due for several years and hence increases the aftertax income available for distribution as stock dividends to stockholders) distorts by lowering the net present value (NPV) of future dividend payments to GOSY stockholders regardless of hurdle rate used.
The long and short of it all?
GOSY's $8,000,000 in expenditures the last 15 years does not show up on the Balance Sheet due to compliance with GAAP.
NOT because the IP has little or no value.
That reality definitely undervalues GOSY's IP!
mo-
Mech
Over 120 public videos of CareBots in action!
4 videos here in public venues:
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2011
4 eldercare alpha trial videos:
(Some with elderly family members, now deceased. The family members were never in assisted care or nursing homes, but allowed to stay at home with dignity and privacy. Family is always first with GeckoSystems. Most folks consider "family first," too.)
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2010
18 videos here in public venues:
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2009
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2007
12 videos here in public venues:
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2006
5 videos here in public venues:
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2005
16 videos here in public venues:
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2004
60 videos here in public venues:
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2003
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/2002/images/DCP00216.jpg
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/2001/images/DCP00206.jpg
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/2000/images/Pow%20Wow%20photo%2002.JPG
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/1998/images/imageFPK.JPG
Over 100 videos in public venues viewed by non GOSY affiliates, authenticating the reality of GOSY's world class "mobile robot solutions for safety, security, and service."
No joysticks, no "man behind the curtain," and no "staged" demonstrations!
Facts be facts-
Is this ZMP evaluating GOSY's BaseBot?
Spencer has led the invention of the tech GOSY has invented over the last 15 years with only $1.7M in cash:
Spencer's PROFITABLE management of four consumer electronics stores is impressive:
Spencer has worked for first tier aerospace companies:
Spencer helped develop the world's first two legged walking robot!
Spencer's tenure in industrial robot design is impressive:
Spencer's tenure in consumer electronics is impressive:
Over 120 public videos of CareBots in action!
4 videos here in public venues:
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2011
4 eldercare alpha trial videos:
(Some with elderly family members, now deceased. The family members were never in assisted care or nursing homes, but allowed to stay at home with dignity and privacy. Family is always first with GeckoSystems. Most folks consider "family first," too.)
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2010
18 videos here in public venues:
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2009
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2007
12 videos here in public venues:
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2006
5 videos here in public venues:
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2005
16 videos here in public venues:
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2004
60 videos here in public venues:
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/?year=2003
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/2002/images/DCP00216.jpg
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/2001/images/DCP00206.jpg
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/2000/images/Pow%20Wow%20photo%2002.JPG
http://www.geckosystems.com/timeline/1998/images/imageFPK.JPG
Over 100 videos in public venues viewed by non GOSY affiliates, authenticating the reality of GOSY's world class "mobile robot solutions for safety, security, and service."
No joysticks, no "man behind the curtain," and no "staged" demonstrations!
Facts be facts-
Is this ZMP evaluating GOSY's BaseBot?
As you know Culdesac, GeckoNav is very extraordinary!
From my careful reading of their website I have learned that their AI navigation software is 5-6 times faster than a jet fighter pilot and runs on low cost, low clock X86 CPU's.
http://geckosystems.com/high_level/geckonav.php
This is indeed a paradigm shift!
Great breakthrough by GOSY!
Financial compliance reasons why GOSY is undervalued:
1. Compliance with Federal Accounting Standards Board's (FASB, http://www.fasb.org/ ) Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) distorts the true economic condition and performance of the company.
This is due to the requirement to expense 100% of all R&D in the year incurred. Hence a complete writeoff of all R&D expenditures, regardless of present and/or future value to ZERO. This required compliance with GAAP forces the Development Stage company to place no assets on their Balance Sheet on the proprietary Intellectual Properties (IP) regardless of the level of probability of future revenues from their R&D activities.
2. Federal and state tax laws also distort the true economic condition and performance of GOSY.
This is due to the requirement to prepare financials in accordance with FASB 's GAAP for tax filings. This required compliance with GAAP forces GOSY as a Development Stage company to place no assets on their Balance Sheet on the proprietary Intellectual Properties (IP) regardless of the level of probability of future revenues from their R&D activities.
3. European Unon (EU) accounting standards, if applied to GOSY's financials, would portray the true economic condition and performance of the company much more realistically.
This is due to the requirement to expense only 50% (not 100%) of all R&D in the year incurred. Hence since not a 100% writeoff, 50% is carried as assets on the balance sheet. This fairly reflects the net worth of a Development Stage company from the EU perspective. The EU requires only a 50% writeoff of all R&D expenditures. This simple accounting change would dramatically flip GOSY's net worth and stockholder equity deep into positive territory.
This required compliance with GAAP forces GOSY --as a Development Stage company-- to place no assets on their Balance Sheet on the proprietary Intellectual Properties (IP) regardless of the level of probability of future revenues from their R&D activities.
4. Ignoring discounted cash flow (DCF) analyses of GOSY's financial pro formas lowers the net present value (NPV) of future net profits of GOSY regardless of hurdle rate (minimum ROI) determined as sufficient for the level of risk.
Ignoring increased stockholder dividends due to significant tax loss carry forwards (which reduces taxes due for several years and hence increases the aftertax income available for distribution as stock dividends to stockholders) distorts by lowering the net present value (NPV) of future dividend payments to GOSY stockholders regardless of hurdle rate used.
The long and short of it all?
GOSY's $8,000,000 in expenditures the last 15 years does not show up on the Balance Sheet due to compliance with GAAP.
NOT because the IP has little or no value.
That reality definitely undervalues GOSY's IP!
mo-
Mech
These NAKED SHORTERS are FOOLS-
if they believe any of Wallace's unadulterated BS.
Here's what others are saying about Wallace:
These NAKED SHORTERS are FOOLS-
Here's one very good reason why:
Financial reasons why GOSY is undervalued:
1. Compliance with Federal Accounting Standards Board's (FASB, http://www.fasb.org/ ) Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) distorts the true economic condition and performance of the company.
This is due to the requirement to expense 100% of all R&D in the year incurred. Hence a complete writeoff of all R&D expenditures, regardless of present and/or future value to ZERO. This required compliance with GAAP forces the Development Stage company to place no assets on their Balance Sheet on the proprietary Intellectual Properties (IP) regardless of the level of probability of future revenues from their R&D activities.
2. Federal and state tax laws also distort the true economic condition and performance of GOSY.
This is due to the requirement to prepare financials in accordance with FASB 's GAAP for tax filings. This required compliance with GAAP forces GOSY as a Development Stage company to place no assets on their Balance Sheet on the proprietary Intellectual Properties (IP) regardless of the level of probability of future revenues from their R&D activities.
3. European Unon (EU) accounting standards, if applied to GOSY's financials, would portray the true economic condition and performance of the company much more realistically.
This is due to the requirement to expense only 50% (not 100%) of all R&D in the year incurred. Hence since not a 100% writeoff, 50% is carried as assets on the balance sheet. This fairly reflects the net worth of a Development Stage company from the EU perspective. The EU requires only a 50% writeoff of all R&D expenditures. This simple accounting change would dramatically flip GOSY's net worth and stockholder equity deep into positive territory.
This required compliance with GAAP forces GOSY --as a Development Stage company-- to place no assets on their Balance Sheet on the proprietary Intellectual Properties (IP) regardless of the level of probability of future revenues from their R&D activities.
4. Ignoring discounted cash flow (DCF) analyses of GOSY's financial pro formas lowers the net present value (NPV) of future net profits of GOSY regardless of hurdle rate (minimum ROI) determined as sufficient for the level of risk.
Ignoring increased stockholder dividends due to significant tax loss carry forwards (which reduces taxes due for several years and hence increases the aftertax income available for distribution as stock dividends to stockholders) distorts by lowering the net present value (NPV) of future dividend payments to GOSY stockholders regardless of hurdle rate used.
The long and short of it all?
GOSY's $8,000,000 in expenditures the last 15 years does not show up on the Balance Sheet due to compliance with GAAP.
NOT because the IP has little or no value.
That reality definitely undervalues GOSY's IP!
mo-
Mech
let's talk about this:
http://geckosystems.com/W_W_W/Notice_of_Appeal-stocksale.pdf
http://geckosystems.com/W_W_W/Brief_for_appeal_of_stock_sale.pdf
isn't that more relevant than Wallace's obsessions and dysfunctional personality disorders as they impact GOSY?
since NO sheriff sale, does that mean no further harassment for Wallace?
Wallace has stated publicly numerous times that since he got the misdemeanor warrant against Spencer that Spencer has not harassed Wallace on line-
has anyone heard otherwise?
I haven't is why I ask-
Mech