Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
After today's 19 executive orders....... Will America follow King Obama or will America follow the Constitution????
getting real hard to find ammo. Even reloading components are unavailable.
Reloading components are very hard to get. Spent the last several days combing the internet looking for them, SOLD OUT. I have lots but lots is never enough.
What do we have in store for us tomorrow with the constitution killer at work?
Glad to hear this. I was pissed at walmart for stopping the sale of ammo and had plans to boycott the store like I would any other anti gun stores. Glad to hear I can still be a patron.
I used to go plinking every week. Saving my ammo now. Buying up the three P's now.
Primers, powder, projectile's
Patriotic Group To Build Armed 'Defensible' Neighborhood Fortress
A group of like-minded patriots, bound together by pride in American exceptionalism, plan on building an armed community to protect their liberty.
The group, named Citadel, intends to purchase 2,000 to 3,000 acres for the project in western Idaho. The community will comprise of 3,500 to 7,000 families of patriotic Americans who "voluntarily choose to live together in accordance with Thomas Jefferson's ideal of Rightful Liberty."
According to the Citadel website, Rightful Liberty means that "neighbors keep their noses out of other neighbors' business, that neighbors live and let live."
Citadel explains that residents in the community will be bound by the following:
Patriotism
Pride in American Exceptionalism
Our proud history of Liberty as defined by our Founding Fathers, and
Physical preparedness to survive and prevail in the face of natural catastrophes --such as Hurricanes Sandy or Katrina -- or man-made catastrophes such as a power grid failure or economic collapse.
Residents should also agree that being "prepared for the emergencies of life and being proficient with the American icon of Liberty -- the Rifle -- are prudent measures."
Some of the benefits of the Citadel community include a safe, well-prepared, patriotic community where children will be educated in school, not indoctrinated.
The community will be protected by a perimeter wall that will be inaccessible to "tourists." Each neighborhood within the community will have lower walls, dividing the town into defensible sections.
The website has a link to applications where prospective residents can sign up. According to Citadel, more than 200 families have completed applications, even before any land has been purchased.
While Citadel may sound wonderful to many who are reading this, the community has posted a warning on their home page:
"Marxists, Socialists, Liberals and Establishment Republicans will likely find that life in our community is incompatible with their existing ideology and preferred lifestyles."
Citadel says that every patriot selected to live within the community "will voluntarily agree to follow the footsteps of our Founding Fathers by swearing to one another our lives, our fortunes and our Sacred Honor to defend one another and Liberty against all enemies, foreign and domestic."
http://cnsnews.com/blog/gregory-gwyn-williams-jr/patriotic-group-build-armed-defensible-neighborhood-fortress
Patriotic Group To Build Armed 'Defensible' Neighborhood Fortress
A group of like-minded patriots, bound together by pride in American exceptionalism, plan on building an armed community to protect their liberty.
The group, named Citadel, intends to purchase 2,000 to 3,000 acres for the project in western Idaho. The community will comprise of 3,500 to 7,000 families of patriotic Americans who "voluntarily choose to live together in accordance with Thomas Jefferson's ideal of Rightful Liberty."
According to the Citadel website, Rightful Liberty means that "neighbors keep their noses out of other neighbors' business, that neighbors live and let live."
Citadel explains that residents in the community will be bound by the following:
Patriotism
Pride in American Exceptionalism
Our proud history of Liberty as defined by our Founding Fathers, and
Physical preparedness to survive and prevail in the face of natural catastrophes --such as Hurricanes Sandy or Katrina -- or man-made catastrophes such as a power grid failure or economic collapse.
Residents should also agree that being "prepared for the emergencies of life and being proficient with the American icon of Liberty -- the Rifle -- are prudent measures."
Some of the benefits of the Citadel community include a safe, well-prepared, patriotic community where children will be educated in school, not indoctrinated.
The community will be protected by a perimeter wall that will be inaccessible to "tourists." Each neighborhood within the community will have lower walls, dividing the town into defensible sections.
The website has a link to applications where prospective residents can sign up. According to Citadel, more than 200 families have completed applications, even before any land has been purchased.
While Citadel may sound wonderful to many who are reading this, the community has posted a warning on their home page:
"Marxists, Socialists, Liberals and Establishment Republicans will likely find that life in our community is incompatible with their existing ideology and preferred lifestyles."
Citadel says that every patriot selected to live within the community "will voluntarily agree to follow the footsteps of our Founding Fathers by swearing to one another our lives, our fortunes and our Sacred Honor to defend one another and Liberty against all enemies, foreign and domestic."
http://cnsnews.com/blog/gregory-gwyn-williams-jr/patriotic-group-build-armed-defensible-neighborhood-fortress
Patriotic Group To Build Armed 'Defensible' Neighborhood Fortress
A group of like-minded patriots, bound together by pride in American exceptionalism, plan on building an armed community to protect their liberty.
The group, named Citadel, intends to purchase 2,000 to 3,000 acres for the project in western Idaho. The community will comprise of 3,500 to 7,000 families of patriotic Americans who "voluntarily choose to live together in accordance with Thomas Jefferson's ideal of Rightful Liberty."
According to the Citadel website, Rightful Liberty means that "neighbors keep their noses out of other neighbors' business, that neighbors live and let live."
Citadel explains that residents in the community will be bound by the following:
Patriotism
Pride in American Exceptionalism
Our proud history of Liberty as defined by our Founding Fathers, and
Physical preparedness to survive and prevail in the face of natural catastrophes --such as Hurricanes Sandy or Katrina -- or man-made catastrophes such as a power grid failure or economic collapse.
Residents should also agree that being "prepared for the emergencies of life and being proficient with the American icon of Liberty -- the Rifle -- are prudent measures."
Some of the benefits of the Citadel community include a safe, well-prepared, patriotic community where children will be educated in school, not indoctrinated.
The community will be protected by a perimeter wall that will be inaccessible to "tourists." Each neighborhood within the community will have lower walls, dividing the town into defensible sections.
The website has a link to applications where prospective residents can sign up. According to Citadel, more than 200 families have completed applications, even before any land has been purchased.
While Citadel may sound wonderful to many who are reading this, the community has posted a warning on their home page:
"Marxists, Socialists, Liberals and Establishment Republicans will likely find that life in our community is incompatible with their existing ideology and preferred lifestyles."
Citadel says that every patriot selected to live within the community "will voluntarily agree to follow the footsteps of our Founding Fathers by swearing to one another our lives, our fortunes and our Sacred Honor to defend one another and Liberty against all enemies, foreign and domestic."
http://cnsnews.com/blog/gregory-gwyn-williams-jr/patriotic-group-build-armed-defensible-neighborhood-fortress
Patriotic Group To Build Armed 'Defensible' Neighborhood Fortress
A group of like-minded patriots, bound together by pride in American exceptionalism, plan on building an armed community to protect their liberty.
The group, named Citadel, intends to purchase 2,000 to 3,000 acres for the project in western Idaho. The community will comprise of 3,500 to 7,000 families of patriotic Americans who "voluntarily choose to live together in accordance with Thomas Jefferson's ideal of Rightful Liberty."
According to the Citadel website, Rightful Liberty means that "neighbors keep their noses out of other neighbors' business, that neighbors live and let live."
Citadel explains that residents in the community will be bound by the following:
Patriotism
Pride in American Exceptionalism
Our proud history of Liberty as defined by our Founding Fathers, and
Physical preparedness to survive and prevail in the face of natural catastrophes --such as Hurricanes Sandy or Katrina -- or man-made catastrophes such as a power grid failure or economic collapse.
Residents should also agree that being "prepared for the emergencies of life and being proficient with the American icon of Liberty -- the Rifle -- are prudent measures."
Some of the benefits of the Citadel community include a safe, well-prepared, patriotic community where children will be educated in school, not indoctrinated.
The community will be protected by a perimeter wall that will be inaccessible to "tourists." Each neighborhood within the community will have lower walls, dividing the town into defensible sections.
The website has a link to applications where prospective residents can sign up. According to Citadel, more than 200 families have completed applications, even before any land has been purchased.
While Citadel may sound wonderful to many who are reading this, the community has posted a warning on their home page:
"Marxists, Socialists, Liberals and Establishment Republicans will likely find that life in our community is incompatible with their existing ideology and preferred lifestyles."
Citadel says that every patriot selected to live within the community "will voluntarily agree to follow the footsteps of our Founding Fathers by swearing to one another our lives, our fortunes and our Sacred Honor to defend one another and Liberty against all enemies, foreign and domestic."
http://cnsnews.com/blog/gregory-gwyn-williams-jr/patriotic-group-build-armed-defensible-neighborhood-fortress
Utah A.G. tied to alleged fraud, says indicted businessman
Jeremy Johnson says new A.G. brokered attempt to derail federal investigation.
First Published Jan 11 2013 11:59 pm • Updated 9 minutes ago
Embattled St. George businessman Jeremy Johnson says new Utah Attorney General John Swallow helped broker a deal in 2010 in which Johnson believed he was to pay Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid $600,000 to make a federal investigation into Johnson’s company go away.
But when the federal government filed a lawsuit Johnson thought he had paid to quash, he demanded Swallow return some of the $250,000 initial payment. Then, just days before the Nov. 6 election, Johnson engaged in a frenetic but unsuccessful effort to get Swallow to drop out of the race, saying information about what Johnson called a "bribe" would come out and force the Republican’s resignation if he became attorney general.
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/home3/55598812-200/johnson-swallow-rawle-attorney.html.csp
Utah A.G. tied to alleged fraud, says indicted businessman
Jeremy Johnson says new A.G. brokered attempt to derail federal investigation.
First Published Jan 11 2013 11:59 pm • Updated 9 minutes ago
Embattled St. George businessman Jeremy Johnson says new Utah Attorney General John Swallow helped broker a deal in 2010 in which Johnson believed he was to pay Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid $600,000 to make a federal investigation into Johnson’s company go away.
But when the federal government filed a lawsuit Johnson thought he had paid to quash, he demanded Swallow return some of the $250,000 initial payment. Then, just days before the Nov. 6 election, Johnson engaged in a frenetic but unsuccessful effort to get Swallow to drop out of the race, saying information about what Johnson called a "bribe" would come out and force the Republican’s resignation if he became attorney general.
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/home3/55598812-200/johnson-swallow-rawle-attorney.html.csp
They don't care what is really going on they just hate guns and want them gone so they can further control your life.
On hanity last night they had some of the law abiding citizens that have had their names addresses plastered on a map because the legally own a gun.
Instead of going after the bad guys they are going after the good gun holders.
Sean asked if they outlaw guns how many will be criminals and not turn in their guns. Most raised their hand. These idiots goal is to turn lawful gun owners into criminals.
i know no one that will give up a single gun unless its empty.
I like that
They want to ban all military type weapons. This could ban every weapon on the gun shelf.
They say after taking all the ar's ak's that bolt actions were military because they were. They could even say a flint lock was a military weapon because it was. Where will it end.
It depends on what the meaning of is is remember!
WASHINGTON – In the wake of Vice President Joe Biden’s promise that “there is executive action that can be taken” regarding weapons bans, Michael Hammond, the legislative counsel for Gun Owners of America, warned Barack Obama could expand the use of government psychiatrists to prevent gun ownership.
Hammond set the stage by saying, “Barack Obama doesn’t have the votes to get semi-automatics banned, therefore the possibility he will go crazy and regulate them through executive order.”
As a means to enforce gun confiscation and reduce gun ownership, Hammond believes Obama could order the “expansion” of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.
Also known as the Brady Check, the system is designed to filter those who can purchase weapons by disqualifying prospective firearms customers if they suffer from a mental illness or some other factor that could deem them unable to own a firearm.
Hammond says that the final decision under NICS for determining who is capable of owning a firearm is a “government psychiatrist.”
“The Clinton administration interpreted the NICS to mean that if a government psychiatrist determined you were unfit you would no longer be able to own a firearm,” he said.
Hammond fears that Obama could start sending lots of names to the NICS system based in West Virginia.
“It is theoretically possible using the Obamacare database or the Social Security system…it is possible to come up with a much broader list to send to West Virginia,” he said.
The list of those who are prohibited from firearm ownership already extends extensively into war veterans. Hammond says that “about 150,000 vets coming back from Iraq have lost their guns.”
That’s because of government determinations about their injuries when they return to the United States, especially those who report issues with PTSD, the aftermath of traumatic situations in war.
In the event that Obama would start using such a maneuver, Hammond said, the main enforcers of both gun control and gun confiscation would be the Department of Homeland Security and the Justice Department.
He said he hopes there is a political solution to the issue.
He cited the number of Democrats who are from conservative states who are up for re-election in 2014, which would lead them to reject gun control.
“I think that we will win legislatively. There are 11 ‘red state’ Democrats up for re-election in 2014,” he said.
The “red state-blue state” references have been reversed over the years, as the networks and polling companies originally used blue to represent the GOP; a strategy that was reversed a few years ago.
If however, gun confiscation would occur via executive order, Hammond said, local law enforcement will be essential for the preservation of people’s Second Amendment rights.
“We are encouraging sheriffs and local law enforcement to stand between the people and federal law enforcement,” he said.
He notes that actions already taken by states such Montana, with the Montana Firearms Freedom Act, can effectively nullify federal law and therefore giving legal leverage to local law enforcement.
The Montana Firearms Freedom Act was written to nullify any federal jurisdiction over weapons made and kept inside the borders of Montana. The law is in the court system, where it was challenged in court by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
Similar laws have been passed as well in Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, South Dakota, Utah, Tennessee, and Wyoming. http://mobile.wnd.com/2013/01/obamas-gun-control-weapon-psychiatrists/
WASHINGTON – In the wake of Vice President Joe Biden’s promise that “there is executive action that can be taken” regarding weapons bans, Michael Hammond, the legislative counsel for Gun Owners of America, warned Barack Obama could expand the use of government psychiatrists to prevent gun ownership.
Hammond set the stage by saying, “Barack Obama doesn’t have the votes to get semi-automatics banned, therefore the possibility he will go crazy and regulate them through executive order.”
As a means to enforce gun confiscation and reduce gun ownership, Hammond believes Obama could order the “expansion” of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.
Also known as the Brady Check, the system is designed to filter those who can purchase weapons by disqualifying prospective firearms customers if they suffer from a mental illness or some other factor that could deem them unable to own a firearm.
Hammond says that the final decision under NICS for determining who is capable of owning a firearm is a “government psychiatrist.”
“The Clinton administration interpreted the NICS to mean that if a government psychiatrist determined you were unfit you would no longer be able to own a firearm,” he said.
Hammond fears that Obama could start sending lots of names to the NICS system based in West Virginia.
“It is theoretically possible using the Obamacare database or the Social Security system…it is possible to come up with a much broader list to send to West Virginia,” he said.
The list of those who are prohibited from firearm ownership already extends extensively into war veterans. Hammond says that “about 150,000 vets coming back from Iraq have lost their guns.”
That’s because of government determinations about their injuries when they return to the United States, especially those who report issues with PTSD, the aftermath of traumatic situations in war.
In the event that Obama would start using such a maneuver, Hammond said, the main enforcers of both gun control and gun confiscation would be the Department of Homeland Security and the Justice Department.
He said he hopes there is a political solution to the issue.
He cited the number of Democrats who are from conservative states who are up for re-election in 2014, which would lead them to reject gun control.
“I think that we will win legislatively. There are 11 ‘red state’ Democrats up for re-election in 2014,” he said.
The “red state-blue state” references have been reversed over the years, as the networks and polling companies originally used blue to represent the GOP; a strategy that was reversed a few years ago.
If however, gun confiscation would occur via executive order, Hammond said, local law enforcement will be essential for the preservation of people’s Second Amendment rights.
“We are encouraging sheriffs and local law enforcement to stand between the people and federal law enforcement,” he said.
He notes that actions already taken by states such Montana, with the Montana Firearms Freedom Act, can effectively nullify federal law and therefore giving legal leverage to local law enforcement.
The Montana Firearms Freedom Act was written to nullify any federal jurisdiction over weapons made and kept inside the borders of Montana. The law is in the court system, where it was challenged in court by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
Similar laws have been passed as well in Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, South Dakota, Utah, Tennessee, and Wyoming. http://mobile.wnd.com/2013/01/obamas-gun-control-weapon-psychiatrists/
WASHINGTON – In the wake of Vice President Joe Biden’s promise that “there is executive action that can be taken” regarding weapons bans, Michael Hammond, the legislative counsel for Gun Owners of America, warned Barack Obama could expand the use of government psychiatrists to prevent gun ownership.
Hammond set the stage by saying, “Barack Obama doesn’t have the votes to get semi-automatics banned, therefore the possibility he will go crazy and regulate them through executive order.”
As a means to enforce gun confiscation and reduce gun ownership, Hammond believes Obama could order the “expansion” of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.
Also known as the Brady Check, the system is designed to filter those who can purchase weapons by disqualifying prospective firearms customers if they suffer from a mental illness or some other factor that could deem them unable to own a firearm.
Hammond says that the final decision under NICS for determining who is capable of owning a firearm is a “government psychiatrist.”
“The Clinton administration interpreted the NICS to mean that if a government psychiatrist determined you were unfit you would no longer be able to own a firearm,” he said.
Hammond fears that Obama could start sending lots of names to the NICS system based in West Virginia.
“It is theoretically possible using the Obamacare database or the Social Security system…it is possible to come up with a much broader list to send to West Virginia,” he said.
The list of those who are prohibited from firearm ownership already extends extensively into war veterans. Hammond says that “about 150,000 vets coming back from Iraq have lost their guns.”
That’s because of government determinations about their injuries when they return to the United States, especially those who report issues with PTSD, the aftermath of traumatic situations in war.
In the event that Obama would start using such a maneuver, Hammond said, the main enforcers of both gun control and gun confiscation would be the Department of Homeland Security and the Justice Department.
He said he hopes there is a political solution to the issue.
He cited the number of Democrats who are from conservative states who are up for re-election in 2014, which would lead them to reject gun control.
“I think that we will win legislatively. There are 11 ‘red state’ Democrats up for re-election in 2014,” he said.
The “red state-blue state” references have been reversed over the years, as the networks and polling companies originally used blue to represent the GOP; a strategy that was reversed a few years ago.
If however, gun confiscation would occur via executive order, Hammond said, local law enforcement will be essential for the preservation of people’s Second Amendment rights.
“We are encouraging sheriffs and local law enforcement to stand between the people and federal law enforcement,” he said.
He notes that actions already taken by states such Montana, with the Montana Firearms Freedom Act, can effectively nullify federal law and therefore giving legal leverage to local law enforcement.
The Montana Firearms Freedom Act was written to nullify any federal jurisdiction over weapons made and kept inside the borders of Montana. The law is in the court system, where it was challenged in court by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
Similar laws have been passed as well in Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, South Dakota, Utah, Tennessee, and Wyoming.
http://mobile.wnd.com/2013/01/obamas-gun-control-weapon-psychiatrists/
We are being attracted from all sides on gun control. They need to get on the offense and start scoring. We have been hiding in the locker room. We need more Carlton Heston.
pry my gun from my cold dead hand.
By sitting back letting these ass holes attack and attack and say almost nothing it makes it look like you feel guilty! Bull shit! We are not guilty lets fight! We did nothing to bring on this shooting why act like it. NRA GO OUT AND KICK SOME BIDEN ASS!
I am an NRA member and i give to them when i can afford extra. I for one feel the NRA has been quiet! during! this attack on the 2 nd amendment..! I want more from them.
Eric Holder to Stay on as Attorney Eric Holder to Stay on as Attorney General General
Attorney General Eric Holder, a lightning rod of criticism from Republicans, is staying on in his job as President Barack Obama starts his second term.
A White House official said on Wednesday that Holder is among the Cabinet members who will remain in their position. He has been working on Vice President Joe Biden's task force on finding ways to reduce gun violence after last month's mass killing in Newtown, Connecticut.
It is rare for an attorney general to serve more than four years.
The country's top law enforcement officer has been the target of fierce criticism from Republicans, who tried to oust him after a botched department operation called "Fast and Furious" that targeted gun trafficking along the U.S.-Mexico border.
The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives allowed more than 2,000 weapons to illegally slip into Mexico.
The operation was brought to light when a U.S. border patrol agent was killed in December 2010 in Arizona and two guns connected with the case were found at the scene of the shootout.
It is unclear how much longer Holder plans to work for the Democratic president. There has been speculation that he might stay for six months to a year.
Holder has joined Biden in holding talks with various interest groups on how to cut down on mass shootings. The Biden group is expected to recommend a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition clips along with making background checks universal for all gun purchasers.
"He remains focused on his job, as illustrated by his involvement in the gun violence sessions," said a Holder aide.
http://www.newsmax.com/m/Article/S01
Also how can they go after anyone for poaching wild game. The gun is at fault! Not the person!
Why do they sell hunting licenses? They collect millions each year for what?
Pisses me off! Why should I buy the license? I don't kill the animal the gun does.
I want my money back!
Foreign Troops to Confiscate American Guns Under UN Treaty
Aaron Dykes Infowars.com July 27, 2012
For those who’ve been wondering how the domestic gun grabbers or the United Nations think they’re going to get away with gun control here at home, one need look no further than Article 15 of the UN’s Arms Trade Treaty.
Many American troops are patriots who understand their oaths to uphold the Constitution, so they can’t be counted upon to confiscate guns. But foreign troops are another story.
Article 15 of the UN Arms Trade Treaty, if ratified, provides for foreign “assistance to implement the Treaty,” and mandates that nations who can provide requested support must do so if requested by member nations. That includes legal, financial, technical as well as “material” assistance to enforce a treaty that declares “recreational, cultural, historical and sporting activities” to be the “exclusively” recognized reasons for lawful private ownership, and which further recognizes the “inherent rights” of the State (i.e. nations under the treaty) to self-defense, but makes no mention of the rights of the individual.
Read the language of Article 15 for yourself:
Article 15 International Assistance
In fulfilling the obligation of this Treaty, States Parties may seek, inter alia, legal assistance, legislative assistance, technical assistance, institutional capacity building, material assistance or financial assistance. States, in a position to do so, shall provide such assistance. States Parties may contribute resources to a voluntary trust fund to assist requesting States Parties requiring such assistance to implement the Treaty.
States Parties shall afford one another the widest measure of assistance, consistent with their respective legal and administrative systems, in investigations, prosecutions and judicial proceedings in relation to the violations of the national measures implemented to comply with obligations under of the provisions of this Treaty.
Each State Party may offer or receive assistance, inter alia, through the United Nations international, regional, subregional or national organizations, non-governmental organizations or on a bi-lateral basis. Such assistance may include technical, financial, material and other forms of assistance as needed, upon request.
Will foreign troops be going door-to-door to ensure compliance with new gun registry policies, imposed limits on ammunition and magazines, or in enforcing outright confiscation? Joint training exercises conducted between U.S. armed forces and various foreign armies have trained to do just that.
In 2010, the Infowars crew covered Operation Vigilant Guard, a joint training exercise in Chicago, in which U.S. troops drilled with Eastern bloc troops to partner in stopping terrorism, dealing with meth dealers and WMDs, as well as in gun confiscation. Countless other exercises have taken place on U.S. soil involving similar joint operations for a martial law occupation with the participation of foreign troops:
http://www.infowars.com/foreign-troops-to-confiscate-american-guns-under-un-treaty/
Foreign Troops to Confiscate American Guns Under UN Treaty
Aaron Dykes Infowars.com July 27, 2012
For those who’ve been wondering how the domestic gun grabbers or the United Nations think they’re going to get away with gun control here at home, one need look no further than Article 15 of the UN’s Arms Trade Treaty.
Many American troops are patriots who understand their oaths to uphold the Constitution, so they can’t be counted upon to confiscate guns. But foreign troops are another story.
Article 15 of the UN Arms Trade Treaty, if ratified, provides for foreign “assistance to implement the Treaty,” and mandates that nations who can provide requested support must do so if requested by member nations. That includes legal, financial, technical as well as “material” assistance to enforce a treaty that declares “recreational, cultural, historical and sporting activities” to be the “exclusively” recognized reasons for lawful private ownership, and which further recognizes the “inherent rights” of the State (i.e. nations under the treaty) to self-defense, but makes no mention of the rights of the individual.
Read the language of Article 15 for yourself:
Article 15 International Assistance
In fulfilling the obligation of this Treaty, States Parties may seek, inter alia, legal assistance, legislative assistance, technical assistance, institutional capacity building, material assistance or financial assistance. States, in a position to do so, shall provide such assistance. States Parties may contribute resources to a voluntary trust fund to assist requesting States Parties requiring such assistance to implement the Treaty.
States Parties shall afford one another the widest measure of assistance, consistent with their respective legal and administrative systems, in investigations, prosecutions and judicial proceedings in relation to the violations of the national measures implemented to comply with obligations under of the provisions of this Treaty.
Each State Party may offer or receive assistance, inter alia, through the United Nations international, regional, subregional or national organizations, non-governmental organizations or on a bi-lateral basis. Such assistance may include technical, financial, material and other forms of assistance as needed, upon request.
Will foreign troops be going door-to-door to ensure compliance with new gun registry policies, imposed limits on ammunition and magazines, or in enforcing outright confiscation? Joint training exercises conducted between U.S. armed forces and various foreign armies have trained to do just that.
In 2010, the Infowars crew covered Operation Vigilant Guard, a joint training exercise in Chicago, in which U.S. troops drilled with Eastern bloc troops to partner in stopping terrorism, dealing with meth dealers and WMDs, as well as in gun confiscation. Countless other exercises have taken place on U.S. soil involving similar joint operations for a martial law occupation with the participation of foreign troops:
http://www.infowars.com/foreign-troops-to-confiscate-american-guns-under-un-treaty/
Yup i know. We will see. Maybe they will give them to us. LOL
Buy low sell high.
No i think the bought them to give to the united nation troops.
Hope im wrong
Good luck America
It is pointless talking to these idiots.
Number of hunting licenses issued in the U.S.
Posted on August 15, 2011 by Humane Trends
Method/Source: Using data provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regarding the number of hunting licenses issued throughout the country, the established baseline is 14,974,534 licenses (2011).
http://www.humanetrends.org/ht/number-of-hunting-licenses-issued-in-the-us/
You have proved you know so very little about guns i wonder if you have ever seen this.
AMENDMENT II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
That proves how very little you know about guns. That is a black powder muzzle loader used when the constitution was written. This is what the army and militia used to defeat the red coats.
The second amendment is not put in place for hunting.
Americans Won’t Give Up Their Guns, Law Or Not! … J. D. Longstreet Monday, December 17, 2012 6:20
Ordinarily, I’d agree that THIS is no time to be arguing gun control. With the pain still intense in Connecticut, there should have been a truce declared, to allow for grieving. But the plain truth is, those who declare that a good crisis must not be wasted, jumped the gun (as they usually do) and began a nationwide PR war through the national Mainstream Media to bring as much pressure to bear as they possible could on our government for laws to ban certain guns, eventually ALL guns in the hands of US civilians. To those on the political and those pushing gun control — in the childish naivete — You need to understand two things: One —Americans are NOT going to give up their guns! That’s one. Number two is this: If you really want to begin a civil war in this country, continue your efforts to take those guns and you will most certainly have one, and I do not think you have any idea, any inkling, of just how ferocious and brutal such a war can be.
If you thought for one moment that American gun owners would assume the fetal position and begin sucking their thumbs — please allow me to disabuse you of that monstrously mistaken assumption!
For the past four years gun owners across America have been planning for just such a move by the gun control crowd. They have been purchasing weapons in record numbers and they have created secret caches of both weapons and ammunition that you simply will not believe. I’d go so far as to say some are even “leaning forward,” eager for the chance to protect the US Constitution.
Look. Trying to confiscate Americans guns will erupt in pitched firefights, gun battles, between American civilians and government law officers. The government will, as Charlton Heston famously stated, have to “pry the weapons from their cold dead hands.” Heck, the government might actually get away with a couple of such encounters before the backlash begins. But it will begin — and when it does, there will be hell to pay. In the end, it will be the end of the United States as we know it. Understand. There are some states that will move to secede rather than obey federal laws that force their citizens to disarm. Other states will arrest and incarcerate federal officers attempting to disarm that states citizens within the physical boundaries of that state. I just don’t think the gun control folks are thinking with their brains. They exude emotion — PURE emotion, and a dangerous lack of common sense. What they are pushing for will bring nothing less than wreck and ruin to this country.
Do you realize that the number of armed American hunters, alone, surpasses the numbers of all the standing armies of the world — combined? Deer hunters in just one state, alone, number more than the armies of Iran, France, and Germany combined! SOURCE: http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1889966/pg1 Do you realize that a HUGE proportion of them are veterans of the finest military on the planet?
And don’t think you can just track gun hoarders down and arrest them. It took the US military TEN YEARS to find Osama Bin Laden — and he was one man! Try rounding up millions. Can you see the nightmare?
A law that would try to confiscate guns in America would, like Prohibition, suddenly turn America into a nation of criminals. The Eighteenth Amendment to the Constitution, and the Volstead Act caused multiple deaths. “Effective enforcement of the alcohol ban during the Prohibition Era proved to be very difficult and led to widespread flouting of the law. The lack of a solid popular consensus for the ban resulted in the growth of vast criminal organizations, including the modern American Mafia, and various other criminal cliques. Widespread disregard of the law also generated rampant corruption among politicians and within police forces.” SOURCE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_in_the_United_States
Banning so-called assault weapons (otherwise known as “scary looking” weapons) does next to nothing to reduce gun crime. “The Justice Department’s interviews also showed so-called “assault weapons” are not a major cause of gun violence. Only about 8 percent of the inmates used one of the models covered in the now-expired assault weapons ban… .” http://beforeitsnews.com/tea-party/2012/12/americans-wont-give-up-their-guns-law-or-not-j-d-longstreet-2469558.html
Some people are real stupid!
Yes it is. I am a dealer for BVAC ammo and they told me lsst week
4 to 5 months to fill my latest order.
Why don't we see protests in the streets apposed to gun control!
Protests against these idiots trying to destroy the construction!
We need to sound off!
He has no problem with lies. The constitution is a floor mat.
Nice. I like that
If its okay for these newspapers to put names and addresses on a map telling everyone who owns a hand gun. I say anyone voting against the constitution (2nd amendment) should have their names and addresses put on a map for all to see!