Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Big news coming in 19 trading days as per company guidance. How big is the only question. I think volume will start building again soon ahead of the 10-Q and the stock price will break .0002 by then at least. I could be wrong, usually am when it comes to timing, but one would normally expect that traders/investors will load up ahead of the news.
20 trading days until 10-Q. Should heat up anytime now.
Some years ago, I did business plans for clients of a business brokerage. No one who understands business valuation would call RNVA investors gullible. The stock is overdue to break out on current value alone.
The part about artificial dilution says a lot about why RNVA is so ridiculously undervalued according to all conventional valuation measures.
The last four quarterly reports all exceeded my expectations, and I was already bullish. The market will value RNVA in on revenue and earnings. That means out of the 000s on valuation, pennies on continued growth and some modest speculation.
We all expect dynamic revenue growth to continue as per CEO guidance. Earnings should follow the same trendline except for factoring some modest frontend Myrtle Recovery Center costs ahead of fully realized revenues there.
Less than 10 billion traded since last 10-Q. The Sabby prospectus is still being executed. When Sabby is done, RNVA runs. Nothing in the way but flippers after that.
No time of trade indicated.
Less than a month until the Q3 10-K. My prediction, RNVA will at least hit .0003, maybe even break out, by then. Investors will start loading again very soon, no doubt.
Sabby is being forced out of RNVA cheap. The new insider trading rules and SEC pressure gave the CEO all the leverage to negotiate that prospectus. Time for the market to finish removing this bad faith investor from the picture. When that is done, RNVA runs.
A trading day with volume of two or three billion shares would get it done, IMO.
That is interesting. I think that might mean the transfer agent had to register Sabby shares at .0009 to fill the buy order with Sabby shares at .0001. I think. We're getting there for sure.
Or continue the $2.74 million debt reduction rate of the first half through Q3 and Q4. Better yet, increase the debt reduction rate. I would not preclude repurchases of corporate equity in preferred shares, but paying off debt appears to be priority one.
Last trading day of Q3. However you look at it, we are about to get to the good part. Dynamic revenue and earnings growth. Company guiding (in SEC filings) continued dynamic growth. An institutional investor not known for good faith being shown the door at a rock bottom stock price.
That's called fact checking. Your statement was false.
The bottom line of a P/L is a profit or loss. That's why it's called P/L. Also called earnings, meaning the money the company made that may be applied to debt reduction, corporate equity buybacks, dividends, or reinvestment in growth. RNVA is turning a sharply increasing profit.
Got my Goonytunes coloring book here.
News just out: RNVA Earns Gazillions!
Who wants to leave? Not me.
Absolutely not diluting corporate equity. Sabby seems to have waited a bit longer this time for bids to stack, but still didn't get it. The evidence Sabby has been selling .0001s, not waiting for the .00014, is getting pretty damned strong.
I guess we could start posting stuff like, "Zacks Rates RNVA Strong Buy," but I for one prefer to be able to live with myself.
If a few more would go after it like you have, I believe this thing would break out.
Surely you meant say 3.5 billion? Or 350 million?
Meant for you: Billion?
Billion?
Out of trips and beyond.
I recommend Saving Capitalism by Robert Reich. You'll find it a good read on the topic.
The charts are fine, actually better when it comes to those values between 0-.0001 and .0001-.0002 and figuring out what's going on with those special MM instructions.
E*Trade will not let you transfer OTCs to a new account there. You have to sell them first, so I'm stuck with Schwab.
I just filed a (fraud) complaint with the FTC. After all, the FTC approved the merger. I recommend every TD client do that and highlight the fact that TD clients got screwed by the merger. It's easy. Nothing changes without action. We have ways to let regulators know when we get the short end of the stick. We should use them. If the FTC gets enough complaints, maybe they make some inquiries and put some pressure on Schwab.
Ask for broker assistance to trade a higher amount, then complain like hell until they wave the broker assisted trade fee. Worked for me. Hard to answer the question why you are being charged for a trade you have always been able to do yourself. Also, they are sensitive to threat of FTC and CFPB (junk fee) complaints. FTC particularly interested in how the merger screwed TD clients. It might not hurt to mention you are considering it. I say former TD clients need to give Schwab hell until they fix that.
You have no moral compass whatsoever, do you?
Yes, Q4 will tell. Q3 should include frontend costs of Myrtle ahead of revenues, but that could give us good hint of what's to come.
Yes, Schwab clips you with what amounts to junk fees on a 000. Also, you can't access level II from the main website as you could with TD. They are adding think or swim, but that's the bells and whistles. They need to make the basic services do just that - serve.
TD had so much more experience providing an online trading platform. I have encountered many little tweaks TD made a long time ago that Schwab has never thought of. Schwab should have just changed the logo and color scheme on TD's platform and moved their online clients to it, not the other way around. I sure hope drastic improvements really are coming. Former TD clients have lost much value, which defeats the purpose of the merger IMO. Schwab must have some real pea brains in the boardroom IMO. It never occurred to them that TD had actually earned its clients' business.
Schwab. I wish I hadn't taken the bait on the switch from the TD format. Maybe those were trades directly through the transfer agent? Hard to say for sure.
Hmmm. My chart shows about 4.6 billion over those three days. I wonder what the discrepancy is.
No income. Pure speculation on the company's search for an acquisition without even having stated a business purpose for it other than to make the share structure seem better. A joke.
I'm still waiting for a day with a few billion traded. Still haven't seen one since a year ago almost.