Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Lot of those who bought at 8 cents or less protecting profit after multi-day decline and lack of confirmation of extension, IMHO.
I can imagine sale of 20 million shares or much more were triggered by stop loss orders at 1 cent.
Do you suppose that is what the confidential treatment order was about?
The confusion today over ticker symbol and the news that settlement will not be final until May have both affected buying, (as well as shares being off-loaded).
Thank you for this information.
Thanks for this, please can you tell me where these positive statements were made exactly?? Thanks.
One certainly wonders what the H has been going on...
Well, I think they really are trying to overcome past mistakes. And I hope despite the odds that they succeed.
So, do you think they are trying to reinvent themselves as a kind of "boutique" advisory firm? I greatly value your insights. Thank you.
If I'm in it, it must surely be a "ship of fools" about to sink. Excepting yourselves, of course: meaning everyone on this board.
I'm not clever at all, and only chose this volatile stock based on a pattern that I cannot put in words.
It's sickening
Keep the positive thoughts...
Well let's hope for a turnaround.
Only average volume at 15:46
Weird. Refers to 2011 analyst notes as recent, and makes it sound as though insiders own very little of the stock, excepting TFG radiant who allegedly bought twice for $1 in 2015. Really??
Fulleroots - any idea why this good news is followed by fall in share price? I would have thought it could recover at least to 3-10 cents on getting that past nightmare out of the way. Is all the selling how they've been paying their lawyers??
2 million sh purchased @ +/- .09, for $180,000. Can't be a dummy or anyone expecting it to fall down more?
Thanks. Do you have a specific strategy for handling a stock when a R/S occurs?
Thanks for posting this; one hopes the bloodletting ends with this news
That's what I meant; 1:15, not 15:1 was my understanding how it is represented.
You mean a 1 for 15 RS? How long did the 3.50 last?
I have never seen a R/S to be beneficial. Can you provide some examples where it was beneficial?
Very disappointing, yes. But IF there is to be any turn-around, I think it will become visible in next 30-90 days.
Makes sense, your analysis.
Brilliant effort, brilliant analysis. Thank you.
Looks like pre-arranged trades at a discount, the last minute/ closing seconds big block trades. Chinese getting a bigger piece of the technology they want??
The non-compliance was overcome in September 2014 by a R/S. It would look very shabby to do that again only 16 months later. Indeed, questions arise from not having even stayed in compliance for 8 (?) months after the last R/S. True, many oil stocks lost 30 to 90% in that time frame. Let's hope there are other deals with big investors to buy a portion of their shares at higher prices. A major contract announcement would help now.
Maybe they have to pay high to attract talent willing to tarnish their reputations by association. But then they should exhibit the alleged talent.
I've watched this go from 20 to 10 to 1 cent, and clearly, anyone asleep at the wheel when it was at some altitude, must feel even more enraged at the incongruous salaries and bonuses, with inadequately transparent and frequent news to shareholders.
Notis to Medbox: Please attend to shareholders concerns: Given your high salaries, a share price below 30 cents is unsupportable, and you should cut your salaries until you get there. Until you stop shafting your shareholders, a mere name change is not going to help the company.
Does granting those shares not incentivize them to bring up the share price by contributing value to the company? At least, is that not the idea, when they are cash-starved?
Good example. Why didn't you tell us when ZINC was 7 cents?
"Cannabis shifts from outlaw to mainstream
Chicago group seeks regulatory approval to launch hemp exchange"
This was a news headline from the Financial Times today.
Low volume of selling MDBX so far today. CANV is up, while big sell off in MJNA.
At least today, fewer are selling!
Sounds good
It's not impossible something really big is on the way; and, it doesn't really matter to the exchange whether they transfer to OTC after 180 days instead of now, given the earnings trend has become more positive, and they have refreshed financial backing (however dismal for common shareholders so far). Since the already changed exchanges in 2014, I would hope they would make more effort to stay where they are now. But they could get moved to OTC without it being the end of the world. Not ideal, but better than the B word.
First sensible thing you've ever said, on this board.
Or failure.
You know, early in 2015, this was trading at $2.00/ share, and I believe it will again within the next 2-3 years.
What board would that be?
Also, would the person who posted a link to the site that announces Nasdaq extensions granted, kindly repost it?
Major investors and/or that special tribe I call the MOTU's (Masters of the Universe) get better prices than small retail investors. It isn't fair, but they do. If they are buying as investors, it is good. If someone is running for the exits, not so good...
Well spotted, verax.
Amen, Amen
Company name change to Notis Global; no apparent courtesy shown to shareholders by informing of if or when ticker symbol will change, or what it will be.