GO ACCR!!!
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I wonder if this will be in the .000s soon? You said another stock would be .000s soon, and that hasn't happened,,,,so I wonder, will ISBL be .000s soon? When I did my DD, I found alot of people just moving around. They stay, for a while, and then move around......kind-a-like jumping beans, so they don't get caught.
I wonder if this will be in the .000s soon? You said another stock would be .000s soon, and that hasn't happened,,,,so I wonder, will ISBL be .000s soon? When I did my DD, I found alot of people just moving around. They stay, for a while, and then move around......kind-a-like jumping beans, so they don't get caught.
Why did they mention Dr. Dre in the PR? It's Doctor Dre, not Dr. Dre......some people might get confused. Remember, Dr. Dre is trademarked......and we don't want the real Dr. Dre to file a lawsuit against ISBL for trademark infrigement, now do we?
Mark (words only): DR. DRE
"Class Status: Active
entertainment services by a musical artist and producer, namely, musical composition and production of musical sound recordings"
http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=75350899
Why does the PR today say Dr. Dre?
This important info about ISBL:
"Beere Financial is moving its business strategy towards the automotive business and out of the Entertainment and Technology Business. The company announced that it has sold its entertainment subsidiaries, CED Entertainment, Vessel Worldwide Music and Swirl Entertainment and its remaining non-automotive subsidiaries for the assumption of corporate debt. An agreement to terminate its relationship with American Rural Broadband was reached allowing its management to operate as a private entity. "
For the asumption of debt. That means that BRFG owns some of our debt, and they gave us CED for that debt.
bashing? give me a break. i posted a PR from another company, that mentions important information about ISBL, and that's called bashing? and fyi....i'm sneaky...i still own 2mln isbl, so don't jynx my gamble position. i had 6mln at the high,,,,,before i found about the increase in AS. i just want to know why all these companies have common people involved.
reg d exemptions are usually a RED FLAG. but, my experience has shown that dirty little scams spike and run the best. later.
Are you the one deleting posts in here, so people cannot do DD?
"Beere Financial is moving its business strategy towards the automotive business and out of the Entertainment and Technology Business. The company announced that it has sold its entertainment subsidiaries, CED Entertainment, Vessel Worldwide Music and Swirl Entertainment and its remaining non-automotive subsidiaries for the assumption of corporate debt. An agreement to terminate its relationship with American Rural Broadband was reached allowing its management to operate as a private entity. "
So, BRFG assumed debt of ISBL. That's what today's BRFG PR states. Norman was President of BRFG before, and the same guy who is mentioned with CPN Events Rick, was President last year of BRFG. NetCert cought CPN in 2005....and I want to know the difference between CPN International and CPN Enterprises? Anf both companies rely on REGDEX filings to sell their stock.
NETCERT incorporated in Colorado:
Summary ID Number: 20041247737
Name: NetCert, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Registered Agent: CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY
Registered Agent Street Address: 1560 Broadway Ste 2090, Denver, CO 80202, United States
Registered Agent Mailing Address:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Principal Office Street Address: 91 Strawberry Hill, Unit 124, Stamford, CT 06902, United States
Principal Office Mailing Address:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status: Noncompliant
Form: Corporation
Jurisdiction: Colorado
Formation Date: 07/15/2004
Term of Duration: Perpetual
Annual Report Month: March
http://www.sos.state.co.us/biz/BusinessEntityDetail.do;jsessionid=0000XMUwAA_inm9EKLmGJQNazOA:11nm16...
I see some other docs here listing Mel Rich:
http://www.sos.state.co.us/biz/ViewImage.do;jsessionid=0000XMUwAA_inm9EKLmGJQNazOA:11nm16ef4?masterF...
So,,,,looks like some Uncle B's Bakery with a JASON WONG changed their name from Uncles Bs to NetCert in 2005 per:
http://www.sos.state.co.us/biz/ViewImage.do;jsessionid=0000XMUwAA_inm9EKLmGJQNazOA:11nm16ef4?masterF...
Then,,,,,,,from NetCert to ISBL it changed in July 2006, and then in Sept 2006....NetCert files a REGDEX document saying that it will sell securites exempt from Reg D of the SEC.
If they merged with ISBL in July 2006.......why is a Net Cert filing in September 2006 valid?
Here is the SEC fililng for NetCert on the REGDEX. Which means, Regulation D Exempt.
Form Formats Description Filing Date File/Film No
REGDEX [html][text] 1 KB [Paper]Notice of Sale of Securities [Regulation D and Section 4(6) of the Securities Act of 1933], item 04
Acc-no: 9999999997-06-041204 (34 Act) 2006-09-25 021-95384
06048609
Anyways, I don't want to fight with anyone. I've learned over the years, that sometimes the dirtiest scams are the ones to spike hard and fast. It's the ones that I like.........So, I use reverse psychology when investing......I become aggresive...... while I investigate, and then decide to buy. I bought ISBL last week of July @ .004 about 1mln...then bought some more up @ .006....then sold 1/2 average .0037.....should i buy back in before this dirty little scam spikes hard?
How can an entity that merged itself in Juy 2006 then in Sept 2006 say that they are selling securities....and then the surviving entity ISBL use that REGDEX filing to piggyback itself? Only reason why ISBL is trading with MMs is because of the REGDEX filing from September 2006 from NetCert...and NetCert in July 2006 became ISBL. So, answer the question please?
Regulation D Offerings
Under the Securities Act of 1933, any offer to sell securities must either be registered with the SEC or meet an exemption. Regulation D (or Reg D) provides three exemptions from the registration requirements, allowing some smaller companies to offer and sell their securities without having to register the securities with the SEC. For more information about these exemptions, read our publications on Rules 504, 505, and 506 of Regulation D.
While companies using a Reg D exemption do not have to register their securities and usually do not have to file reports with the SEC, they must file what’s known as a "Form D" after they first sell their securities. Form D is a brief notice that includes the names and addresses of the company’s owners and stock promoters, but contains little other information about the company.
If you are thinking about investing in a Reg D company, you should call the SEC’s Public Reference Branch at (202) 551-8090 or send an email to publicinfo@sec.gov to determine whether a company has filed Form D or to obtain a copy. If the company has not filed a Form D, this should alert you that the company may not be in compliance with the federal securities laws.
You should always check with your state securities regulator to see if they have more information about the company and the people behind it. Be sure to ask whether your state regulator has cleared the offering for sale in your state. You can get the address and telephone number for your state securities regulator by calling the North American Securities Administrators Association at (202) 737-0900 or by visiting its website. You’ll also find this information in the state government section of your local phone book.
For more information about the SEC’s registration requirements and common exemptions, read our brochure, Q&A: Small Business & the SEC.
http://www.sec.gov/answers/regd.htm
Good grief.......Here is the NTCI filing from 2006 on the SEC website:
NET CERT INC (0001377450)
State location: CT
Business Address
91 STRAWBERRY HILL SUITE 124
STANFORD CT 06902
410-290-5154
Mailing Address
91 STRAWBERRY HILL SUITE 124
STANFORD CT 06902
Key to Descriptions
[Paper] Paper filings are available by film number.
[Cover] Filing contains an SEC-released cover letter or correspondence.
To limit filing results, enter
form type or date (as 2002/05/23).
Form Type
Prior to
Ownership?IncludeExcludeOnly
10 Entries20 Entries40 Entries80 Entries100 Entries
Items 1 - 1
Form Formats Description Filing Date File/Film No
REGDEX [html][text] 1 KB [Paper]Notice of Sale of Securities [Regulation D and Section 4(6) of the Securities Act of 1933], item 04
Acc-no: 9999999997-06-041204 (34 Act)
Now, read this from the same SEC filing:
Filer Information:
NET CERT INC (Filer) (0001377450)
IRS No.: 000000000 | State of Incorp.: | Fiscal Year End:]/b]
Type: REGDEX | Act: 34 | File No.: 021-95384 | Film No.: 06048609
Business Address
91 STRAWBERRY HILL SUITE 124
STANFORD CT 06902
410-290-5154
Mailing Address
91 STRAWBERRY HILL SUITE 124
STANFORD CT 06902
Electronically, I cannot pull up the State of incorporation for Net Cert Inc. The reason why ISBL is trading on the status....is because of the REGDEX filing that NTCI did in 2006.
I think that no one here knows what a REGDEX filing. Someone please tell me what state is Net Cert incorporated?
NO ONE WILL ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!!!!!!!!!
Do you want me to show you the link to the NetCert REGDEX filings from fall 2006? Here they are:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1377450/999999999706041204/9999999997-06-041204-index.htm
So, where is NetCert incorporated? WHERE??????????
No, that is wrong.
NTCC reverses split, and since NTCI is a good available symbol....when NTCC reversed, the new symbol is NTCI. NTCI lost it's trading symbol last year when it merged with ISBL. Here is the news from August 17, 2007:
NTCC: 1-100 Reverse Stk Split Eff Monday, Aug 20
FRIDAY , AUGUST 17, 2007 03:00 PM
According to the NASDAQ Dividend List, Nutech Inc. (OTC: NTCC) are expected to effect a reverse stock split on August 20, 2007. This 1-100 reverse stock split was originally declared on August 17, 2007.
DECL-DATE X-DATE REC-DATE PAY-DATE
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
08/17/2007 08/20/2007 N/A N/A
AMOUNT: 1-100 reverse split
FREQUENCY: N/A
CHANGE: N/A
ADDITIONAL INFO: New symbol: NTCI. Holders of 10,000 shs or less (pre-split) will be issued a minimum round lot of 100 shs (post-split)
Knobias may issue additional reminder alerts to track the important dates surrounding this corporate action.
So, where id NTCI originally incorporated?
WHWRE IS NETCERT INCORPORATED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WHAT STATE IS NETCERT ORIGINALLY INCORPORATED? ONLY SEC FILING WE HAVE FOR ISBL IS THE SEC FILING REGDEX IN 2006 FOR NETCERT.....SO TELL ME, WHERE IS NETCERT INCORPORATED?
Oh, yeah....they changed the words:
CENTRAL PARK NORTH INTERNATIONAL
CENTRAL PARK NORTH ENTERPRISES
Something stinks in here, and it's not my underarm.
I don't lie, so you are making a big mistake. I asked if NetCert USA, INC and NetCert, INC are the same company. NetCert USA had their corporation revoked in May 2006. If they are not the same company.....FINE. I'm asking a freaking question. So, then ask this question,
NTCI in 2005 says they purchased CPN (Central Park North), right RETARD?
So, if NTCI in 2005 purchased CPN....why in 2007 does ISBL (which is the old NTCI) say that they have formed a joint venture with a company that is supposedly their own purchased subsidiary?
What, are you going to tell me that NTCI sold CPN, and then CPN and ISE BLU formed a venture to promote concerts?
Do you want me to show the PR where NTCI purchased CENTRAL PARK NORTH? Here it is:
NetCert's Global Expansion Plans Continue…; NetCert Completes Deal with Central Park North International and Announces the Appointment of Mel Rich as Interim CEO of NetCert Inc
Business Wire, June 9, 2005
MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. -- NetCert Inc. (Pink Sheets: NTCI) announced today that it has completed its acquisition with Central Park North International as it continues with its Global Expansion Plans, and has announced the appointment of Mel Rich as the Interim CEO.
So, answer the question, if NetCert buys out CPN...and then NetCert merges into ISBL.....why would ISBL then say in a recent PR that:
"Ise Blu Equity Corp. (PINKSHEETS: ISBL) announced today that it has signed a Joint Venture Agreement with Central Park North Enterprises to form Central Park North Worldwide Events.
Why does a company that merger with another company, that bought CPN, have to announce they signed a deal with that acquired company?
Am I the only one here that sees this?
I'm going to win my bet.....just you wait and see.
Oh my god.......they said this will not cause dilution. Are they retards!!!!!! By issuing preferreds that are convertible to common.....you have what's called fully diluted shares. So.....if they didn't need to increase the AS.....until next year.....why not just sit tight until then, and only increase the AS in one year? Besides, with a convertible preferred......they can sell now.......stay short,,,,,and then next year when convert the preferreds to common....and flatten out the short.
I'm going to win!!!!!!
I'm only allowed 3 posts per day as a "cheapo" member of IHUB......so I'll talk to you guys tomorrow.
kruy,,,,i have been gambling in the penny tables for many years now.....they go up and down, and sometimes sideways, and then sometimes in the toilet, and sometimes they scream for 400,000% gains, like LFZA did last fall from subpenny to .80 in a couple of months. fact is though.....if you had a piece of pie with 140pieces, and then that same pie was cut into 500pieces, you have to understand that an increase in the authorized is dilution. whether or not the increase in shares is good or bad.....is not the point. the point is that this ceo, in my opinion, issued PRs with our understanding the authorized was 140mln. we now find out, it's 500mln. he didn't issue any pr's about the increase in authorized. imagine if they had issued the pr last month about DRE and CED and at the same time,,,,,,said in the pr, "Oh, by the way, we are increasing the authorized to 500mln to pay for this transaction." Listen, you do what you do....I just don't like it when I have to find out the hard way, via Nevada corp website that the authorized was increased. Why won't he post the profit numbers, and a business plan? Have you been to the ISBL website, it's outdated, and the last news is from many months ago. Point is, I think he should have been more upfront about dilution. An increase in the authorized is dilution. Now, whethere or not any of those extra 360mln shares make it to market.....that's another story, and yet to be seen, in my opinion.
Sorry to come over here from RB.....but @ 10:56am EST I discovered that ISBL increased the authorized from 140,000,000 to 500,000,000 and this was approved on 8/20/07 per Nevada Secretary Website:
Action Type: Amendment
Document Number: 20070566759-07 # of Pages: 1
File Date: 08/20/2007 Effective Date:
Previous Stock Value: Par Value Shares: 140,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 Par Value Shares: 10,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 No Par Value Shares: 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Total Authorized Capital: $ 150,000.00 New Stock Value: Par Value Shares: 500,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 Par Value Shares: 50,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 No Par Value Shares: 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Total Authorized Capital: $ 550,000.00
So, I had a small gambling position, and then decided to blow out of it @ .004 and .003......very small. Why would this CEO dilute from 140,000,000 to 500,000,000 and not tell shareholders publicly that he was diluting?