Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That was a brief after hours or premarket aberration, on the OTC transfer news hysteria. I'd guess you won't see 3's again.
Have heard that Amazon online has Enerplex products. Everything is online these days- the consumer products like smartphone chargers are aimed at people who
Live online...
Well, as one poster here stated months ago, they "shoot themselves in the foot" letting share price fall below 1 cent, because many potential investors including internationally cannot trade in sub-penny increments.
No, but it looks like TSA Stores had half a dozen cases with themselves named March 15, so I wonder if TSA possibly declared bankruptcy, and this is their list of creditors?? No idea, really. Also, are you sure the word Solar was in the case name? There is another company called Ascent Technologies, Inc.
"very exciting , its now 1 month from transition from the Nasdaq , low .0485 and high .1211"
Absolutely, I have to agree with you. Even if the pattern of behavior has tested our patience -- and driven some of us out of our wee minds. ??
Agree, more upside potential than risk
here.
Did I see May 16? Please confirm
Independently, because I follow several stocks. Sometime May -- IF I recall. You can find out from their website or ask your broker.
It is not clear the difference you point out in number of shares traded can be blamed on dilution, because the volume was higher Jan 8-11, and again Feb 5-11, than 2 weeks ago. The table shows fluctuating number of daily shares traded, not necessarily dilution per se. I don't know how to confirm any difference in authorized or outstanding shares since your time frame of interest, but that is what has to be shown, to claim that dilution is killing the share price.
Well, Fraede... you read everyone's minds...
Yes. But now I realize they'd rather have a discount off cheap shares, and that they'd be risking higher transfer prices (so less shares?) if they allowed the shares to behave naturally. So I guess we're in purgatory for the balance of 3 years, however many months or years remains...
Deals for conversions at discounts are the absolute pits for shareholders. At least I'll stop holding my breadth for any substantial movement upward....
At least they should have an interest to seek higher sale prices. Must be some mediocre technician working there. I should write to his supervisor....
Thank you. Wise.
Let me know if you find any addresses, I will try to write, too.
Is it discoverable somehow?
So Redwood can profit $50,000 or $100,000 every month laundering the shares they got at a big discount. Sad.
Thanks. Please would you explain more details. (Is the company buying back shares from Redwood? I thought they had been giving shares out in exchange for $$.) who is getting shares, Redwood? how is price decided weekly, and how long do you expect it to go on? What if any is the relationship between TGF Radiant and Redwood?
Thank you for any time you can spare to help me understand this.
Good for you! I hope you are well rewarded. It is a lot of time and effort to correctly analyze something like this. One should not end up empty handed!
"Is the company a good long term hold or growth story?
>> I think so. But it may be safer taking any 30% profit off the table here and there. It's volatility has been such that anyone even slightly prudent uses tight stops. These keep getting whacked. I don't use them because I'm an idiot. But I think that is what is happening. Areas between 6 and 7 attract buying, but conviction falls apart completely above 10 cents.
That vicious cycle has to be broken. I hear "dilution, dilution, dilution!!!", but I never see any proof that that is what is going on. I see pairs of traders or MM's raking it in by taking 1 cent profits on millions of shares every day. Nice work if you can get it. That won't change until everyone HOLDS and stops inviting pillaging with transparent stop loss orders. If you have to use them, please, make them "all or none" or reserve orders that don't advertise how cheaply you can be bought out.
"Are there valuable patents and sales in the pipeline. "
It is said to be so.
"Is a trend reversal appearing? What may be the catalyst for the next 20+ mil volume day? "
It is my humble opinion this is the case. Catalysts: share price .065 today, and all the existing positives -- anticipation of contracts and increasing revenue trend. I expect another stab at .09-.10 soon, but I am not interested in all this "treading water" below 12 cents. I think we don't get traction until concrete news of contracts-related revenue and increasing confidence pulls shares above .25 again. That may not happen until next earnings release, assuming it is strongly positive. In the meantime, this seems to be the personal banana dispensing machine of a pair of 800 lb. Gorillas. $25,000/ week on 1 cents moves is a really nice income for gorillas.
"MM VNDM moved to .10"
What a head fake!
They seemed to be at the forefront when share price ran up in 2013-2014. Jeff Goh seemed a turn around signal, but the lack of transparency and poor communication about what/where and WHEN, to give shareholders any confidence, has been most disappointing. All too vague. They need pressure to say WHEN there will be concrete improvement, and they need to demonstrate with personal sacrifice (salary cuts) that they have not forgotten small investors.
I think Jeffrey Goh needs to get a lot of letters from people like yourself, (long-term conscientious investors who have been burned by the past mismanagement). An activist campaign.
Yes, may take some time, but with all the effort they've made I can't believe it won't recover at least .20
Intermediate term.
Pretty fair summary... Take a look at TK. I'm not happy that I got out at par then watched it go from 5.50 to above 8 recently. PRGN IS scary right now.
But it's a first step.
Descending wedge gaps up
Is that right??
Nice.
What a wonderful expectation!!!
Oh! Joyful sounds! Music to my ... Ummm... Eyes!!!
Re: "A Thing of the past"...
I think significant energy has been expended to dissociate Notis Global from the extreme embarrassment that Medbox became... Now let us pray they make use of this dissociation to shareholders advantage.
Rebranded!
Penknee- was it a typo? I wondered why some would put in 1000% more than the others.... Seemed like it should've been $25k for all?
Not clear - what is relation between Ascent Solar and Amtech?
Well, I am sure you are right, but perhaps not the Monday after the annual nadir of dreadful March Options Expiration week. But let us hope soon after.
MagicMarvin, RE: "JMO"
I really LIKE your opinion!
Some of us hoping the 6's are history, John!
Dud iligence: anecdote irrelevant to SGY!
Unfortunately, in 2009 and after, they discovered
The Lazarus Syndrome
Many funds and individuals will not hold a stock under $3, as a matter of policy. The more that these shares are redistributed to the many, instead of a few (large institutional owners), the lower the future risk of sudden big dumpathons by a single entity will be.
I tried and tried to buy shares below $1, but none of the children would give me the candy out of their pockets. Why wouldn't anyone sell me their shares below $1, If all that you say is true?
You already posted that.
"Dude iligence" -- for $100,000, I will spend my valuable time to answer your questions. That's just to compensate for the aggravation. Questions to be limited to 5 in number. Subject to be restricted to stocks. Answers not to be construed as investing advice. However, I will not go back and read all your posts regardless. (Why do you require so much personal ATTENTION?)
Jptrick, THANKS.
Some people believe that when they walk down the sidewalk, it is their physical movement that causes the clouds to move. Usually, these people are under age 4. But apparently not always...