Order Display

ArcaEdge allows you to participate in a more transparent OTC market by displaying orders in both ArcaBook® and the OTC Montage. View all orders — regardless of their price level — in the ArcaBook, or simply view the best bid and offer displayed in the OTC Montage. ArcaEdge orders are anonymously represented by the Market Participant ID "ARCA" in the OTC Montage.

All ArcaEdge OTC orders are displayed and executed on price/time priority. The ArcaBook information includes:

Priced bids and offers
Orders aggregated by price
Share size available at the bid or ask price
Time of quote update
Anonymous representation under the symbol ARCBB
Attributed quotes are optional. Market Makers may choose to have their quotes attributed on ArcaEdge, via the ArcaBook feed, using their Market Participant ID. Or you may decide to post your order anonymously.


Order Execution
When the ArcaEdge order book is at the inside, your order will immediately be filled on ArcaEdge. The average speed of an order executed internally is less than one second. If a Market Maker is at the inside, the order will be routed at their displayed price. ArcaEdge orders are routed via direct connections, ACES® or phone calls to specific Market Makers made by our Trade Support Desk. Execution times will vary on orders routed outside of our system, based on the routing destination. Electronic orders are routed at a multiple of the displayed quote size, based on prior execution history. Any orders executed via phone will be presented for the full order size. Once an order has been routed, the balance is immediately displayed in the ArcaBook and displayed in OTC Montage in no more than 30 seconds.

ArcaEdge will assist you with NASD's Three Quote Rule. To assist you in following applicable regulations, the ArcaEdge trade support staff will use reasonable diligence and exhaust all efforts to find the additional quotes required before executing client orders. That means we will obtain the necessary quotes on your behalf before executing an order. These quotes can be provided to you upon request.

Orders received by non-subscribers of ArcaEdge, as permitted by SEC Rule 301(b)(3), shall be treated as Immediate-Or-Cancel (IOC) orders, whether indicated as such or not, and will be identified with the IOC Special Handling Code for ArcaEdge's OATS reporting purposes.

http://www.nyse.com/equities/arcaedge/1157538336472.html

Archipelago Trading Services, Inc.
OTC Equity Securities Agreement

Short Sale Transactions. Broker-Dealer represents that, in giving or transmitting an order to sell
any security through the ArcaEdge System, Broker-Dealer or its customer owns the security and
agrees to deliver it to ATS or its settlement agent by the applicable settlement date. Where
Broker-Dealer or its customer does not own the security, Broker-Dealer represents and warrants
that for each transaction that would constitute a short sale (a) Broker-Dealer has located the
security for purposes of borrowing the security in order to meet Broker-Dealer’s settlement
obligation; (b) the location of the security is one of Broker-
Dealer’s prime brokers or settlement
agent or other acceptable location; and (c) the security is in good deliverable form. Unless a
transaction is exempt from short sale restrictions, Broker-Dealer agrees that neither it nor any
other party acting on its behalf will effect a short sale or enter an order that if executed would
constitute a short sale without entering into the ArcaEdge System the designated electronic
indicator that such sale is or would be a short sale and a locate has been performed. If Broker-
Dealer is not a member of the NASD, Broker-Dealer and all parties acting on its behalf shall
provide all appropriate assistance to ATS in order for ATS to comply with all applicable rules and
regulations to locate securities to be delivered to settle and clear any such short sale.

http://www.nyse.com/pdfs/ArcaEdge_Subscriber_Agreement.pdf

http://www.nyse.com/equities/arcaedge/1157538336478.html

An institutional investor can gain direct access to NYSE Arca by becoming a sponsored participant. To become a sponsored participant, the institution must enter into a Sponsorship Arrangement with an Equity Trading Permit (ETP) holder. Both ETP holders and sponsored participants must enter into a User Agreement with NYSE Arca.

Individual Investors
Retail participants cannot become direct participants of NYSE Arca. Retail investors may contact their brokerage firm to inquire if that form routes orders to NYSE Arca. A retail investor can gain entry to NYSE Arca only through a direct access brokerage firm.

http://www.nyse.com/equities/nysearcaequities/1157538337478.html

very interesting Gold. United Solar, maybe? eom

RCCH listed "as an eligible security" on the Arca platform was

Effective Thursday, Sep 10, 2009

RCC HOLDINGS CORP COLORADO RCCH Y

http://www.nyse.com/equities/arcaedge/1157538334846.html

Complete List of ArcaEdge eligible securities


RCC HOLDINGS CORP COLORADO RCCH Y

http://www.nyse.com/equities/arcaedge/1157538334846.html

ArcaEdge® Begins Trading Pink Sheet® Securities

-Only Platform to Quote, Route and Trade OTCBB and Pink Sheet Securities-
New York, Feb. 21, 2008 -- NYSE Euronext (NYX ) today announced that ArcaEdge customers can now use the platform to trade Pink Sheet securities. As the only platform to quote, route and trade over-the-counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) and Pink Sheet securities, the all-electronic matching system of ArcaEdge offers extraordinary speed, transparency, liquidity and anonymity for customer orders in pre-open through regular trading hours (7:30 am - 4:01 pm ET).

With its interactive, real time display, ArcaEdge provides customers with:

Access to and display in both the ArcaEdge book and the OTCBB Montage;
Industry leading best execution intelligent order routing tools;
Several useful order types, including market, limit, stop and reserve orders, among others;
Speed, consistency and reliability in order matching through proven NYSE Arca technology with internal turnaround times of less than one second.
“We are proud and excited to continue to offer our valued customers even more trading capabilities that surpass our competitors in terms of functionality, accessibility and technology,” said Paul Adcock, NYSE Euronext Executive Vice President, NYSE Arca Operations. “Through primary listings and unlisted trading privileges (UTP), NYSE Arca is a leader in trading a range of securities and investment products. ArcaEdge furthers that initiative through the addition of Pink Sheet securities to our comprehensive list of financial instruments.”

For more information on ArcaEdge, including how to access this one-of-a-kind trading platform, advanced order types, and eligible securities, please visit: http://www.nyse.com/arcaedge

About NYSE Euronext
NYSE Euronext (NYX) operates the world’s leading and most liquid exchange group, and seeks to provide the highest levels of quality, customer choice and innovation. Its family of exchanges, located in six countries, include the New York Stock Exchange, the world's largest cash equities market; Euronext, the Eurozone's largest cash equities market; Liffe, Europe's leading derivatives exchange by value of trading; and NYSE Arca Options, one of the fastest growing U.S. options trading platforms. NYSE Euronext offers a diverse array of financial products and services for issuers, investors and financial institutions in cash equities, options and derivatives, ETFs, bonds, market data, and commercial technology solutions. NYSE Euronext's nearly 4,000 listed companies represent a combined $30.5 trillion/€20.9 trillion in total global market capitalization (as of Dec. 31, 2007 ), more than four times that of any other exchange group. NYSE Euronext's equity exchanges transact an average daily trading value of approximately $141 billion/€103 billion (as of Dec. 31, 2007 ), which represents more than one-third of the world's cash equities trading. NYSE Euronext is part of the S&P 500 index and the only exchange operator in the S&P 100 index. For more information, please visit www.nyx.com.


http://www.nyse.com/press/1203592168229.html

DURK:

NYSE Arca Market Makers
NYSE Arca provides a competitive marketplace for all participants, including liquidity providers. By adopting a system of competing Market Makers, interacting with orders in an all-electronic arena, NYSE Arca provides speed, efficiency and consistency to all order handling.


A Market Maker is a NYSE Arca Equity Trading Permit (ETP) holder that acts as a Market Maker for a security. Each Market Maker must apply in writing to register as a Market Maker Authorized Trader (MMAT). After authorization is obtained, the trader will be able to perform market making activities on behalf of his/her Market Maker.

Lead Market Maker
NYSE Arca has established the role of Lead Market Makers for stocks and ETFs with a primary listing on the exchange. Lead Market Makers have defined obligations in addition to incentives such as the ability to interact with Directed Orders.

http://www.nyse.com/equities/nysearcaequities/1158660655616.html

==============================================================

NYSE Arca Product Brief:
Lead Market Making
Lead Market Making Opportunities in Primary Listings on NYSE Arca
NYSE Arca has established the role of Lead Market Maker (LMM) for stocks and ETFs
with a primary listing on NYSE Arca. Lead Market Makers will have defined obligations
in addition to incentives such as the ability to interact with Directed Orders as described
in more detail below.
Becoming a Lead Market Maker on NYSE Arca
To participate in the program, broker-dealers who are Equities Trading Permit Holders (“ETP Holders”)
must register as Market Makers on NYSE Arca and meet the additional selection criteria established for
Lead Market Makers including (but not limited to):
• Experience with making markets in equities and related underlying markets (if any)
• Adequacy of capital
• Willingness to promote the NYSE Arca marketplace
• Issuer preference
• Operational capacity & support personnel
To learn more about the requirements associated with becoming a Market Maker and Lead Market Maker
visit our website at: www.nyse.com/marketmakers or contact your NYSE Arca Sales Representative.
The Role of the Lead Market Maker
The LMM will function as the exclusive Lead Market Maker in NYSE Arca primary listings. Among a Lead
Market Maker’s obligations are the following:
Quotation / Spread Requirements
• LMMs must maintain continuous, two-sided Q Orders (a Market Maker quote) for each security in
which the firm is registered.
• LMMs must meet minimum performance requirements which include the percent of time at the
NBBO, average displayed size, and average quoted spread. Performance requirements will be
determined by NYSE Arca.
Odd Lot Dealer
• LMMs must register as Odd Lot Dealers for each security in which the firm is registered.
• Odd Lot Dealers maintain an Odd Lot Tracking Order (OLTO) priced at the NBBO with a
maximum tradeable size of 99 shares during Core Trading hours.
• The OLTO is entered for the Odd Lot Dealer by the Exchange and fills are delivered to the Odd
Lot Dealer.
Lead Market Making
© 2007 NYSE Group, Inc. Page 2 of 7
NYSE Arca Limit Order Book
Directed Orders can interact with both the NYSE
Arca Book and the LMM G Order.
Non-marketable Directed Orders will be immediately
posted to NYSE Arca Book.
In primary listings where there is no LMM
relationship, all Directed Orders pass directly to the
NYSE Arca.
Designated Market Maker
Guarantee Order (G Order) Book
When the price of a Directed Order and the price of
the corresponding G Order overlap, the entire
Directed Order is sent as a matched order to NYSE
Arca Book. All, part, or none of the G Order may be
executed against the Directed Order depending on
the matching instructions (price and size) of the G
order and the prices available in the NYSE Arca
Book at the time the order is submitted.
Routing table validates relationship between
OSF and LMM before routing to LMM
Executed Trade
NYSE Arca Client Order
Non Directed Directed
Trading-Related Features
• In NYSE Arca primary listed securities, LMMs will be the only Market Markers with access to the
NYSE Arca Directed Order Flow Process and the Passive Liquidity Order (“PL Order”).
• LMMs must permission Order Sending Firms (OSFs) to route to the LMM in the Directed Order
Flow Process.
• LMMs may also utilize the NYSE Arca Passive Liquidity Order (“PL Order”) in its registered
securities.
LMM Fees for Applicable Order Types
• Please see Exhibit 1 of this document.
The Directed Order Flow Process on NYSE Arca
The NYSE Arca Directed Order Flow Process allows LMMs to trade against orders directed to them from
OSFs. As part of the NYSE Arca Directed Order Flow Process, LMMs enter G Orders that correspond to
the price/size guarantee a LMM is willing to commit to an OSF in a particular stock.
The following diagram illustrates the order interaction and flow between Directed Orders, Guarantee
Orders, and the NYSE Arca limit order book.

http://www.nyse.com/pdfs/LMM_Product_Brief.pdf

name one...no links necessary...just one...shouldn't be that difficult...I bet you don't

MJV, this might give you an idea as to what 2M can bring to RCCH:

http://www.reedconstructiondata.com/ask-our-experts/2009/02/i-need-some-green-project-ideas/

http://www.reedconstructiondata.com/ask-our-experts/2009/05/how-to-obtain-a-minimum-green-certification-for-a-new-concrete-building/

http://www.reedconstructiondata.com/companies/products/construction-management-services-from-2m-design-consultants/

Public Meetings Rescheduled For August on Fulton County Water and Wastewater Capital Improvements
The Water Services Division of the Fulton County Department of Public Works is hosting three public meetings beginning on August 18, 2009, to obtain citizen input on the annual update of the Water and Wastewater Capital Improvement Projects plan. Residents of municipalities served by Fulton County’s water and wastewater services are encouraged to attend.

Public Works expects to spend $186,000,000 for water and wastewater capital projects. The improvements will be funded from cash on hand without any requirements for borrowing funds.

The annual update of the plan is conducted to ensure that current service needs are being met. The proposed plan covers repair and replacement of major equipment systems for wastewater facilities and infrastructure and capacity improvements of water infrastructure to meet growth and demand requirements. The plan will be submitted to the Board of Commissioners for approval once public input is received.



http://www.fultoncountyga.gov/news-transmainmenu-616/149-government-news/1639

===============================================================

April 3, 2009
Podcast of this Roundtable event

The State of Georgia’s Action on Water

As Georgia continues to face water quantity and quality challenges, come hear about important water legislation at the Georgia General Assembly, about the state clean water revolving and stimulus package funds for water infrastructure projects administered through the Georgia Environmental Facilities Authority, and the developments underway with the Georgia Environmental Protection Division’s (EPD) implementation of the state water plan.

Stacy Shelton, moderator, Staff Writer, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Sally Bethea, Executive Director, Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper

Kevin Kelly, Senior Program Manager, Georgia Environmental Facilities Authority

Summary of Roundtable

Even though the core counties of Atlanta are no longer considered to be in a drought, Lake Lanier remains almost 10 feet below average levels, and water conservation will continue to be a top priority for the future. To address this ongoing issue, Stacy Shelton, staff writer at the AJC, moderated a discussion on the state of Georgia’s water supply and what is being done to document and better manage this resource at the state level. She was joined by Linda McGregor from the GA EPD, Kevin Kelly from GEFA, and Sally Bethea from the Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper.

Ms. McGregor began the discussion with an outline of the statewide water plan that is being developed by 10 regional water councils that were recently formed. Over the course of 2009 the staff of 300 will be performing a resource assessment to document the current volume and quality of surface water available, as well as the volume of groundwater contained in aquifers across Georgia. In 2010 the same councils will be using this data to forecast future needs of the state, and then legislation is planned to be enacted in June of 2011.

Kevin Kelly followed with a presentation outlining the role of GEFA as a state level infrastructure lender providing capital to local governments through the GA Fund and GA Water Supply Fund. These programs provide cities with low interest loans for sewer and drinking water projects, and in some cases federal funding can be used to forgive the principle. Mr. Kelly added that they have approximately $145 million to allocate from the federal stimulus bill, and that $24 million of that is dedicated to specifically “green” projects.

Ms. Bethea closed with a summary of recent legislation and current issues related to water from a conservationist perspective. The UCR has been working with state representatives to pass a bill that would require sub-metering in multi-family residential buildings so that individuals can be rewarded for conserving water. They are also proposing a tax holiday for water efficient appliances, and “common sense” measures that allow individuals to circumvent water intensive HOA landscaping requirements.

http://southface.org/web/programs&events/SART/sart_archive/sart_archive-2009.htm#april

Not sure why you feel the MM's are sick and corrupt. Are they all, or just one or two? Simple laws of supply and demand are at play.

It wasn’t until Belinda Morrow, Fulton County
Construction Project Director and one of the first 100 LEED accredited professionals in
the country, came on board and spearheaded a green & sustainable solution to the new
library building. That’s where Tate Access Floors came into play.



“We want our children to be better
environmentalists. It is our
responsibility to be good stewards of
the environment,” Belinda A. Morrow,
Fulton County Construc-tion Project
Director, one of the first 100 LEED
accredited professionals in the country.

http://www.tateaccessfloors.com/pdf/east_atlanta_library.pdf

==============================================================

Cooling Hotlanta Atlanta, Fulton County moving to fight global warming

The East Atlanta library branch, completed in 2005, is the first government building in metro Atlanta to attain LEED certification, said Belinda Morrow, the county's assistant director of building construction.

The contractor even donated renewable energy credits to power the library for the first two years.

Fulton is in the midst of auditing its energy usage in all county buildings, and is upgrading to EnergyStar-compliant heating, cooling and lighting systems. Even something as simple as turning off the air conditioning after working hours can save thousands of dollars, Morrow said.

Also, a pilot program will begin capturing methane from the Wolf Creek landfill in South Fulton in 2008.

Morrow said the county will be able to commit funds and personnel to many of the same programs Atlanta is eyeing thanks to the March 7 resolution, which was sponsored by commissioners Nancy Boxill and Tom Lowe on behalf of the Fulton County Citizens Commission on the Environment.

http://atlanta.bizjournals.com/atlanta/stories/2007/03/19/story1.html

Sponsored by:
U.S. EPA Region 4
Office of Pollution Prevention and Innovation
FEBRUARY 25-26, 2009

Market for Green Construction and Creating “Green Jobs”: Will “green” sell in a slumping market? Discuss local trends in selling and marketing green buildings and the latest on “green” job initiatives.

Moderator: Jeff Kohn, U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response



What is the Current Market for Green Construction?

Speaker: Carson Matthews, Certified EcoBroker in Atlanta, Harry Norman Realtors



Green Jobs in Construction

Potential economic stimulus to include green jobs, what does this mean for the construction industry?

Speaker: Mark Ross, BSC, Power Smart Building

Belinda Morrow, 2M Design Consultants, Inc

http://www.lifecycleconstruction.net/Agenda.html

================================================================


http://www.epa.gov/region4/p2/lifecycleconstructionconference2009.html

2009 Action Plan
for
Green Tech Jobs
A National Model for
2M Design Consultant’s
Green Tech
Jobs Training Program

http://www.epa.gov/region4/p2/2._Green_Jobs_in_Construction_-_Belinda_Morrow_1_of_2.pdf

================================================================

Leonard Morrow
EXPERIENCE OVERVIEW
Leonard Morrow has twenty-one years’ experience providing construction management
services nationwide for both public and private industry including municipalities, federal
agencies, utility markets, and financial institutions, the largest of which was providing
facilities consulting services for The Coca-Cola Company to develop, schedule, and
implement the budget and plan to re-stack several on-campus buildings and relocate offsite
employees to the campus. He has also furnished construction management
services for site acquisition and build-out of eight SPRINT, PCS’ affiliate administrative
and retail sites in Georgia and the Carolinas. Leonard has no qualms about tackling
projects with comprehensive work scopes and he is well known for completing them on
time and under budget using industry standard project management tools such as
Microsoft Project.


ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY

LEED documentation editor for Moody AFB LEED Silver BRAC Dormitory Project
LEED documentation editor for Ft. Jackson LEED Silver Joint Armed Forces
Chaplaincy Center Project
LEED documentation editor for Fulton County Government’s East Atlanta Library

LEED Silver Project, Georgia’s 1st LEED Silver public library

Editor Fulton County Government 2007 Action Plan for Climate Change submitted to
EPA for grant funding

Sustainability Director for a pervious concrete pavement firm

Promoted the EPA’s Green Buildings on Brownfields Initiative by conducting workshops for Fulton County residents on the latest remediation and redevelopment techniques to promote high performance buildings

Working with low income communities by helping them become up to 50% more energy efficient via the U.S. Dept. of Treasury’s New Market Tax Credit Program

Co-director of 2002 Green Town Hall Meeting sponsored by DOE, Koroseal Wallcovering, AIA, ASID and IIDA; Las Vegas 2005 Hospitality Design’s “HD Goes Green”

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Sprint PCS: Build out 8 administrative and retail sites in major southern markets

Sprint PCS: Provide as-built construction drawings and owners manuals

Tenet Healthcare: Oversaw construction management of 18 healthcare projects to prepare for January 1999 bi-annual federal accreditation inspection (JCAHO Survey).

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


Using New Market Tax Credits: to finance innovative energy upgrades making homes up to 50% more energy efficient while creating demand for jobs to install the “green” technologies by using New Market Tax Credits and real estate development partnerships.

2M Design Consultants, Inc.: Responsible for strategic planning, management of professionals and company infrastructure to furnish the highest quality construction management service.

City of Dallas, TX: Plan meetings with developers and property owners to determine revenue potential of a mixed-use public improvement district worth $800 million in land and improvements. Brief city council staff on an implementation schedule.

PCI Systems, LLC: Compose action plans helping businesses to becomesustainable.

Negotiate contract and compose press releases for LEED projects, “green” workshops, and New Market Tax Credit projects
PROJECTS


Construction management for renovation of Tenet Healthcare triage administration, examination area, and waiting area
Oversaw tenant build-out for medical office suites of Morehouse School of Medicine located at South Fulton Medical Center Professional Building
Co-direct Brownfields into Livable Communities Workshop for EPA on behalf of Fulton County Government
Recorded voiceover for the seven (7) minute East Atlanta Library’s 4D Animation produced by Max Wave Media, Inc. earning a LEED innovation credit
CERTIFICATION, AFFILIATION AND TRAINING

Affordable Energy Bank is a certified Community Development Entity in partnership with the U.S. Department of Treasury

U.S. Green Building Council Greenbuild Program Committee Member

Class C-9 licensed pervious concrete contractor, State of AZ Lic. #ROC225520

Certified Georgia Concrete & Products Association Pervious Concrete Technician

2008 Indoor Air Quality Certificate of Completion from Southface Energy Institute

2008 Energy Management Certificate of Completion from Southface Energy Institute

2008 HUD Grant Writing Certification

Certified NPDES Storm Water Discharge Inspector

Volunteer Skilled Supervisor, Habitat for Humanity

EMPLOYMENT


Vice President: 2M Design Consultants, Inc., Atlanta, GA 2007 to Present

Director of Sustainability: PCI Systems, LLC, Alpharetta, GA 2005-2007

Vice President: 2M Design Consultants, Inc., Atlanta, GA 1995-2005

Registered Representative: WMA Securities, Inc., Atlanta, GA 1993-1996

Economic Development Analyst: City of Dallas, Dallas, TX 1989-1992

Project Management Intern: City of Irving, Irving, TX 1987-1988

Project Manager: Company B Interiors, Dallas, TX 1985-1991

EDUCATION

University of North Texas, Denton, Texas - Master of Arts, Public Administration, 1989
U. C. Berkeley, Berkeley, California - Bachelor of Arts, Political Science, 1978

http://www.environmentaltrademission.org/lmorrow.php


================================================================



http://www.atlantasense.com/Riverdale.2M-DESIGN-CONSULTANTS-INC-166853.profile.htm

http://www.scs2000.org/greenschools.html

I wonder if this is the type of fuel cell technology mentioned in the PR. It would fit into the SBR 6000. JMHO


Electricity Generation from Wastewater Treatment using Microbial Fuel Cells

USC inventors have developed a solution to the world’s growing energy needs by utilizing the large of amounts of wastewater already moving through treatment facilities. The solution lies in a rotating-cathode microbial fuel cell (MFC) that generates electricity from ammonia oxidation. Wastewater, or water containing a high concentration of ammonia, is fed into the fuel cell where microorganisms complete ammonia oxidation in multiple steps that resemble the anaerobic ammonia oxidation process.

http://stevens.usc.edu/IP/08-287


===============================================================

KISSIMMEE, Fla.--(Business Wire)--
RCC HOLDINGS, CORP. ("RCC") (Pink Sheets Symbol: RCCH) continues it effort to be
totally green.

Relative to new technologies, RCC management held two meetings last week. The
first was with one of the largest solar power companies in the US. Discussions
touched on future projects in Canada and overseas. Follow on meetings are to be
held the week of May 4. Management also attended an expert discussion on the
state of fuel cell technology in preparation for future projects.

On international projects, management has received US Government agency input
relative to financing of an international project it is attempting to
participate in. Information has been passed to the country representative and
the company awaits feedback from that input. The project is for affordable
housing, a project whose roots began in 2008, and would introduce the RCC/IWS
technology to a developing country for the first time.

Relative to ongoing IWS subsidiary projects, on Tuesday, a marketing meeting was
held with CP of Bozeman to set up the marketing plan for the company's new joint
venture. Both parties agreed on the plan, which will be implemented within 30
days. More will follow on this. Also, in Montana, a project meeting was held for
a current project and related follow on opportunities. There were no unresolved
issues for IWS so the company awaits final information on an exact project start
date.

RCC Holdings Corp presented a formal letter agreement and understanding as to
the essential terms of the business arrangement ("Arrangement") between La Verne
University, a private University of California, and RCC Holdings Corp. RCC
management is committed to working closely with universities around the world to
promote and develop Alternative Fuels, Solar Power and Environmental products
for the future of the World.

Event Information
Title: E2 Water Quality Workshop
Category: Sustainability

Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Time: 8:30 a.m. - 2 p.m.
Calendar: (saved in multiple calendars)
Contact: Sandra Furnbach
Location: Babbio Center Auditorium, Stevens Campus, Hoboken, NJ
Open to public?: Yes
Ticket contact info: Sandra.Furnbach@stevens.edu

Complete Description:
You are cordially invited to attend the E2 Water Quality Workshop sponsored by the Environmental Entrepreneurship (E2 ) Lab at Stevens Institute of Technology. The E2 - Lab is an initiative funded by the Partnerships for Innovation Program, from the National Science Foundation. It is a collaborative effort between Stevens Institute of Technology, Polytechnic Institute of NYU, and Industry Partners.

The E2 Water Quality Workshop objectives are to identify and develop commercial/market opportunities that exist in the water quality space and define collaborative activities and projects to sustainably enhance water quality throughout our state. NJDEP Commissioner, Mark N. Mauriello will be giving an overview of current regulation trends, an opportunity not to be missed!!!! As a participant, you will be informed about state-of-the-art technology and you will be involved in identifying market opportunities for collaborative exploitation. It is our goal that the E2 - Lab will better focus academic research with regulatory objectives and industry needs by facilitating interaction between investors, researchers, regulators, and industry.

Registration is open online at http://www.stevens.edu/entrepreneurship/e2lab/form.php



Call for Research Abstracts

We invite original research addressing any aspect of improving water quality. Innovative technologies for monitoring and treating drinking water and storm water are the main topics for this workshop. However, all potentially relevant research will be considered for inclusion in the workshop, either as a technology presenter or as a poster presentation.

Previously the E2 Lab held two water workshops, which involved Stevens’ researchers only; the workshops are now open to researchers outside of Stevens. The benefits of participation in the workshop include:

· Networking with regulators, industry professionals, investors and other researchers

· Gaining feedback and direction in your research to make your research more industrially relevant and economically viable

· Identifying potential technology collaborators and/or investors promote specific advances in water technology.

http://events.nyu.edu/?cmd=showevent&cal=cal216&id=209401

================================================================
Federal Government Projects:
RCC/IWS completed its participation with multiple companies in submitting a proposal pursuant to a
National Science Foundation grant. It is participating, in this grant proposal, with other companies, and
New York University, Poly, which will be doing the research design and testing. The proposal is
directed at affordable housing, and RCC/IWS will provide its water and wastewater expertise to the
research. RCC sees affordable housing as a major developing market, both short and long term.

================================================================

Sierra Club Names NYU Among its Most Eco-Enlightened Universities for 2009 Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009N-534, 2008-09
The Sierra Club has recognized New York University as one of the United States’ eco-enlightened universities, or “Cool Schools,” in the September/October 2009 issue of Sierra magazine.
“It’s wonderful for NYU Sustainability to receive this recognition from a respected and long-standing voice in the environmental movement,” said Jeremy Friedman, coordinator of NYU’s Sustainability Task Force.
“We’ve been able to learn from other schools - and from the remarkable students, faculty and staff that make up our community - to zoom forward and make big strides in just three short years,” Friedman added. “We hope that being named a ‘Cool School’ by Sierra magazine gives NYU even more momentum so that we can continue to better address NYU’s environmental impacts and build a campus culture of sustainability.”
“We’re thrilled to see these schools making a real commitment to greening their campuses,” said Carl Pope, the Sierra Club’s executive director. “The next generation of students cares deeply about stopping global warming, and schools that take the initiative to become environmentally responsible are doing the right thing for the planet and are better poised to attract the best students.”
NYU was recognized for its efforts across eight categories: efficiency, energy, food, academics, purchasing, transportation, waste management, and administration.
“Rather than focus on one or two issues such as energy conservation and investment choices, we sought a comprehensive overview of each campus’s sustainability efforts,” said Sierra magazine’s editors Avital Binshtock and Michael Fox

http://www.nyu.edu/public.affairs/releases/detail/2733

no worries...7 - 10 days. lol

We seem to know more about what's going on in the industry...than people in the industry and the governments that are relentless in their bad decision making. It is a fact that the Eagle Sewer District took over control of 3 IWS systems. All of the wrangling and problems associated with this build, could have been solved with the IWS system. Where is IDEQ and EPA?!

Haemmerle asked how many municipalities in Idaho use decentralized systems whenthey have an existing sewer system. The applicant’s representatives replied none;Alabama is the only one that they know of. Robertson said that the Eagle area could haveused decentralized systems but they have not. Haemmerle confirmed that this would bethe first in Idaho to have both systems and asked if there have been any discussions withDEQ as to whether or not they would approve of such a system. The applicant’srepresentatives stated the RTF system that they are looking at is approved by the State ofIdaho. It has been submitted to DEQ in draft form for their preliminary review. DEQsaid it is typically approved on a state by state basis. Haemmerle wants to know an exacttrack record. They said they have been dealing with this type of system for 25 years.There are quite a few under construction. Haemmerle would like to know the age of theoldest system and when it was installed along with their track record. Keirn talked aboutthe diagrams that were shown and asked how many homes each unit served. Theyexplained that there would be 1 tank per home. Keirn is concerned about maintenanceand oversight. Currently our ordinance does not allow for this type of system. Hellensaid that DEQ says some standards are required that would have to be met. Mayor Davissaid, currently we do not know if DEQ will approve any of these alternative systems.Haemmerle explained that we need to know what DEQ says before we can make anytype of decision

---------------------------------------------------------------

The decentralized reclaim approach is a growing area in water resource management. TheEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) has gotten involved in the last 10 years becauseof the numbers of these systems that are being installed; 40% of new developments areusing decentralized systems. The advantages of a decentralized treatment system incomparison to a conventional centralized system is it produces high quality effluent,lower construction costs, lower operation and maintain costs, easier to match with stagedphased construction and avoids transfer of drainage basin.


http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:Fn5O-et1gpYJ:www.haileycityhall.org/cityCouncil/minutes/2009/City%2520Council%2520040609%2520-%2520Special%2520Meeting%2520minutes.pdf+idaho+wastewater+2009+decentralized&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

================================================================

http://www.mtexpress.com/index2.php?ID=2005127672

http://www.haileycityhall.org/planning/QuigleyAnnexation/StaffReports/StaffRpts052609/Quigley%20Wastewater%20and%20Water%20Memos%20052609.pdf

Yes, 3 years. Governments work slow. The point of the post was to outline an area of Montana where the problem of high nitrate levels and wastewater disposal have been solved by the IWS system. The Buffalo Estates subdivision has been given conditional plat approval...if the project moves forward IMO they would be using the IWS system in this area. There are other areas as well...Clark Fork River Basin...

that's correct frog. the initial press release MUST contain the following disclosure:

“Completion of the transaction is subject to a number of conditions, including but not limited to, Exchange acceptance and if applicable pursuant to Exchange Requirements, majority of the minority shareholder approval. Where applicable, the transaction cannot close until the required shareholder approval is obtained. There can be no assurance that the transaction will be completed as proposed or at all.
Investors are cautioned that, except as disclosed in the management information circular or filing statement to be prepared in connection with the transaction, any information released or received with respect to the transaction may not be accurate or complete and should not be relied upon. Trading in the securities of a capital pool company should be considered highly speculative. The TSX Venture Exchange Inc. has in no way passed upon the merits of the proposed transaction and has neither approved nor disapproved the contents of this press release.”

http://www.tmx.com/en/pdf/Policy2-4.pdf

hmmmm...Buffalo Estates

“The geology makes the groundwater inherently susceptible to surface contamination or nitrate contamination,”
LaFave said. “That’s what we think is going on down there.” In part due to the bureau’s research, the Montana
Department of Environmental Quality decided in mid-August to hold off on approving any more septic systems in
the southeast part of the valley until more is known about the situation.

That came as an especially disturbing surprise to developers of the 58-lot Homestake Meadows Phase Two
planned for land north of Blacktail Canyon Road and the proposed 75-lot Buffalo Estates, a little closer to town
along Continental Drive. Late-August construction couldn’t even start on a single house in the Warne Heights subdivision
since the builder could not obtain a septic permit.

http://www.mbmg.mtech.edu/pdf/geo-shortnews-summittvalley.pdf

===============================================================
BUTTE-SILVER BOW COUNCIL OF COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA APRIL 1, 2009 7:30 PM COURTHOUSE COUNCIL CHAMBERS

Steven Hess, Acting Planning Director, requesting conditional approval of final plat of the Buffalo Estates Subdivision – Phase 1. Recommendation: concur and place on file

ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS – REFERRED TO JUDICIARY 1.COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 09-17 A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT OF THE BUFFALO ESTATES SUBDIVISION – PHASE 1 OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF BUTTE-SILVER BOW, STATE OF MONTANA; PROVIDING FORTHE REPEAL OF ALL PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREIN

http://www.bsb.mt.gov/departments/additional/documents/200941RM.pdf

===============================================================

IWS SYSTEM BEING INSTALLED AT HOMESTAKE MEADOWS

http://www.montanastandard.com/articles/2009/07/08/area/hjjajcjchgjeef.txt

================================================================

Water levels and nitrate in Warne Heights, upper Summit Valley, Silver Bow County, Montana, Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology: Ground-Water Open-File Report 18, 52 p.

http://www.mbmg.mtech.edu/mbmgcat/public/ListCitation.asp?pub_id=11714&

Well, the big case didn't get dismissed...FWIW

HEARING RE: CMC/DISMISSAL
09/11/2009 - 9:30 AM DEPT. R12

BEN T KAYASHIMA PRESIDING.
CLERK: ELAINE CARLOS
COURT REPORTER HEATHER PFUTZENREUTER HEATHER PFUTZENREUTER
COURT ATTENDANT DENISE ANDRADE
-
APPEARANCES:
ATTORNEY MARK R. MCKINNIS APPEARS BY COURTCALL FOR RAYMOND CHIN.
PARTIES NOT PRESENT: STEPHEN AUST
-
PROCEEDINGS:
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE HELD.
PREDISPOSITION HEARING HELD
-
HEARINGS:
CURRENT HEARING CONTINUED TO 11/20/09 AT 09:30 IN DEPARTMENT R12.
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF TO GIVE NOTICE.
COURT ORDERS CSR HEATHER PFUTZENREUTER TO PREPARE A TRANSCRIPT OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 09/10/09.
ACTION - COMPLETE
=== MINUTE ORDER END ===

yeah froggy, it goes without saying that secret e mails are a no no. So is releasing PR's on the company's website.


In the Proposing Release, we stated that an issuer's posting of new information on its own website would not by itself be considered a sufficient method of public disclosure. As technology evolves and as more investors have access to and use the Internet, however, we believe that some issuers, whose websites are widely followed by the investment community, could use such a method.


http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-7881.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SEC_Rule_10b5-1

http://sec.gov/index.htm

stockwinner, this has as much to do with those who claim there is going to be a release from the exchange and we'll be trading on the new exchange. Best case scenario is we'll be issued shares of the CPC and they will be restricted for a period of time. Of course the value of RCCH will be what?... as they just sold off their one asset of value! lol

Once the target is identified, the CPC
issues a comprehensive news release
announcing it has entered into an
“agreement in principle” to acquire
the target business and disclosing the
principal terms of the agreement.
The CPC then prepares and files either a
filing statement (if a shareholder vote is
not required to complete the qualifying
transaction) or information circular (if
a shareholder vote is required, due to
fundamental changes in the corporate
structure, for example a name change,
or when the CPC and target are
amalgamating), with the TSX-V and the
relevant commission(s) for approval
within 75 days of the announcement,
which provides prospectus level
disclosure on the target company.
The TSX-V reviews the disclosure
document to ensure that the resulting
company following the qualifying
transaction meets the minimum listing
requirements of the TSX-V. Providing
the TSX-V finds all the documentation
satisfactory, they will issue a final
Exchange Bulletin indicating the
company now trades as a regular TSX-V
listed company.

http://www.weirfoulds.com/files/1825_CapitalPoolCompanies_May08.pdf

I didn't dig deep enough...so what. It can be completed much more quickly than you are touting.

same exact time frame... REVERSE MERGER, PRIVATE PLACEMENT, QUALIFYING TRANSACTION

http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/September2009/10/c4144.html?view=print

Corbal announces completion of qualifying transaction with iSign Media and concurrent private placement
TORONTO, Sept. 10 /CNW/ - Corbal Capital Corp. ("Corbal") (TSX-V:ISD) is
pleased to announce that it has received final approval of the TSX Venture
Exchange (the "Exchange") of its qualifying transaction, by way of a reverse
take-over (the "Transaction") transaction with iSign Media Corp. ("iSign").
Accordingly, iSign is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Corbal.
The common shares of Corbal will commence trading on the Exchange under
the symbol "ISD" at the opening of trading on Monday, September 14, 2009.





=============================================================

Reporting Issuer
Corbal Capital Corp. (the “Issuer”)
Suite 801, 1 Adelaide Street East
Toronto, Ontario, M5C 2V9
2. Date of Material Change
July 14, 2009
3. News Release
A news release with respect to the material change referred to in this report was disseminated on July 14,
2009 through CNW Group and filed on the system for electronic document analysis and retrieval
(SEDAR).
4. Summary of Material Change
The Issuer announced (i) the filing of its disclosure document (the “Filing Statement”) on SEDAR in
connection with its proposed reverse take-over transaction (the “Qualifying Transaction”) with iSign
Media Corp. (“iSign”) whereby the Issuer will acquire all of the shares in the capital of iSign in exchange
for shares in the capital of the Issuer, and (ii) its intention to complete a concurrent private placement
equity financing (the “Concurrent Financing”).
5. Full Description of Material Change
The material change related to the Qualifying Transaction is fully described in the Filing Statement of the
Issuer dated July 14, 2009 which was filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) on July 14, 2009.

IWS doesn't have an "active file", whatever that means. They will be merged into an "existing" CPC.

If it is your contention that an agreement has not been filed on Sedar along with a news release, you are correct. You are also correct when you state that the TSX does not make that initial news release.

You are incorrect when you state the company would have had to file "a long time ago"...whatever that means.


Let's look at actuality instead of making calls and reading confusing manuals.

Here is a company that completed its' QT yesterday. They completed it in 50 days. July 20 (initial release on Sedar) to Sep 10 (completed). This is the first one that I've looked at.

To claim there is not going to be a reverse merger b/c there is no filing is misleading. The initial PR from the CPC is what the longs here are looking for....whether they know it or not. lol




PROVIDENCE CAPITAL CORP. ("PV")
[formerly Providence Capital Corp. ("PV.P")]
BULLETIN TYPE: Qualifying Transaction-Completed/New Symbol/ Resume Trading
BULLETIN DATE: September 10, 2009
TSX Venture Tier 2 Company

TSX Venture Exchange has accepted for filing Providence Capital Corp.'s (the "Company") Qualifying Transaction described in its Filing Statement dated August 25, 2009. As a result, at the opening Friday, September 11, 2009, the trading symbol for the Company will change from PV.P to PV and the Company will no longer be considered a Capital Pool Company. The Qualifying Transaction includes the following which has been accepted by the Exchange:

The Exchange has accepted for filing the Mining Option Agreement dated July 13, 2009, whereby the Company can acquire of a 60% interest (the "Option") in mineral rights to 250 square kilometers constituting the Kanweaken Mineral Exploration Licence, located in the Republic of Liberia, Africa from Africa West Minerals Corp. ("Africa West").

http://infoventure.tsx.com/TSXVenture/TSXVentureHttpController?GetPage=NoticesContents&PO_ID=1110862&NOTICE_ID=142850

==============================================================

FROM SEDAR

Name and Address of Company
PROVIDENCE CAPITAL CORP. (the “Issuer”)
162 - 2906 West Broadway
Vancouver, BC V6K 2G8
Item 2 Date of Material Change
July 20, 2009
Item 3 News Release
News release dated July 20, 2009 disseminated in Vancouver, British Columbia.
Item 4 Summary of Material Change
The Issuer announces that it has entered into an option agreement dated July 13, 2009 with
Africa West Minerals Corp. (“Africa West”) to acquire a 60% interest (the “Option”) in the
Kanweaken Mineral Exploration License located in the Republic of Liberia, Africa.

RCCH

This company may not be making material information publicly available.

If you are an affiliate, employee, insider, or any person in possession of nonpublic material information about this company, please be advised that buying or selling this security may constitute trading "on the basis of" material nonpublic information prohibited under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5 and 10b5-1 thereunder. Violators of these laws are subject to civil and criminal penalties.

What is insider trading?

Illegal insider trading refers generally to buying or selling a security, in breach of a fiduciary duty or other relationship of trust and confidence, while in possession of material, nonpublic information about the security.

Rule 10b5-1 provides that a person trades on the basis of material nonpublic information if that person is "aware" of the material nonpublic information at the time of the purchase or sale.

Affiliates, insiders, relatives, or other persons in possession of material information should use extreme caution when buying or selling securities on the basis of material information, particularly in securities where the company is not making adequate current information publicly available as a matter of practice.

Why is Pink OTC displaying this warning?

Companies that are identified on pinksheets.com as having “No Information” may be placing their shareholders at risk of violating 10b5-1 insider trading rules. Pink OTC Markets recommends that investors wishing to place a trade in such securities contact the company to verify it is making adequate current information publicly available.

How can a company make material information publicly available?


Companies can make material information publicly available by registering a class of their securities and making current reports with the SEC.
Companies can make material information publicly available by qualifying under Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Exchange Act (“Rule 12g3-2(b)”).
For companies that are not subject to SEC reporting requirements under 12(g) or 12(b) of the Act, Pink OTC Markets provides the Alternative Reporting Standard to facilitate the availability of adequate current information.


Companies that post such information through the OTC Disclosure & News Service are able to conveniently and efficiently make their information publicly available on their quote page on www.pinksheets.com.


The Alternative Reporting Standard is designed for companies to meet the minimum disclosure requirements under SEC Rules 15c211 and 144(b) and assist companies in protecting their affiliates from 10b5-1 violations. Companies are urged to seek the advice of experienced securities counsel regarding materiality and methods to make material information publicly available.


For more information about the Alternative Reporting Standard, please visit our Alternative Reporting Standard page.

Note: Companies may choose to provide current information on their corporate websites. Pink OTC Markets encourages affiliates, employees, insiders, or any person in possession of nonpublic material information about a company to examine the company's corporate website for current information, if they are not able to find it through pinksheets.com or in current reports filed with the SEC, to ensure compliance with Rules 10b-5 and 10b5-1. However, the warning message on the company's quote page on pinksheets.com will continue to be displayed. To remove this warning message, the company must meet one of the three standards listed above.

For an overview of insider trading, visit the SEC’s website at http://sec.gov/answers/insider.htm.

http://www.pinksheets.com/pink/quote/quote.jsp?symbol=RCCH

Has anybody seen ARCA before, or is this a first?

thanks,

Johnny

Have a read...

The initial submission is presented to the Exchange’s Executive Listings Committee for consideration. If the application is conditionally accepted, the CPC will be invited to file the applicable documentation described in section 12.4of this Policy with the Exchange and mail the CPC Information Circular to the shareholders. Concurrently with mailing of the CPC Information Circular to theshareholders, the CPC must file the CPC Information Circular with the Exchange and the Commission(s) via SEDAR. If no shareholder approval is required, the CPC must file the CPC Filing Statement on SEDAR once it has obtained conditional approval from the Exchange. The CPC Filing Statement must be filed on SEDAR at least seven business days prior to the closing of the Qualifying Transaction and a news release must be issued, in accordance with section 12.4(i). Upon issuance of the news release, trading in the Listed Shares of the CPC will bebriefly halted so as to permit dissemination of the news release, in accordancewith section 7.3 of Policy 3.3 – Timely Disclosure

http://www.tmx.com/en/pdf/Policy2-4.pdf

NYSE Arca Equity Trading Permit Holders

To browse an alphabetical list of the approved member organizations that hold an NYSE Arca Equity Trading Permit (ETP) by name please refer to the link below:


http://www.nyse.com/pdfs/etpdirectory.pdf

http://www.nyse.com/equities/nysearcaequities/1212748919240.html

Alright, enough from me. Time to go pull in some real revenue. Looking forward to the spike to $37 bucks. I believe that would place our market cap at $370 billion...understandable with $15 billion in assets...LMFAO

good luck to all,

Johnny

g stop gnashing your teeth

yes, I know all about those defunct company's riddled in fraud. But since you do love that way back machine which I found for you... Isn't it a bit odd for an acquired company to sue its' parent? Notice the O in Capitol...proof the Eagle had his talons all over it...lol

January 2006 - The acquisition of Platinum Capitol Partners gives RCC Holdings a huge boost

It's just a couple posts down...lol


The potential in RCC/IWS is tremendous. If RCC/IWS didn't have the assets they could not be moved to the TSX. Fact. RCC/IWS main competition is trading currently for $36.00 per share. My opinion is RCC/IWS will surpass that PPS in the future.

I think the word you're realy looking for is disposed... but anyway... Have these been dismissed? I wonder how many people just didn't want to be bothered with "going to court"...filing a suit against the, uh...how did you describe him:

There is all indications that Gene Newton is a fantastic CEO and he will be showing all very soon.

I'd be laughing but...after going through some of these cases...not sure what the Eagle was pulling in the 90's but...lot of people filing from $1500 to $6000...yuk

Case Number Name Filing Date Charges Next Hearing Jurisdiction
RCVRS066713 NEWTON , GENE 09/26/2002 None Scheduled Rancho
STP15177 NEWTON , GENE 09/24/1999 None Scheduled
SWV36145 NEWTON , GENE 07/23/2002 None Scheduled
SWV44409 NEWTON , GENE 06/04/2004 None Scheduled
RCVRS076296 NEWTON , GENE 10/27/2003 None Scheduled Rancho
SCLSRE21366 NEWTON , GENE 01/08/1992 None Scheduled
SCLSRE22388 NEWTON , GENE 10/14/1992 None Scheduled
CCF07304 NEWTON , GENE 05/29/1998 None Scheduled
SCL95110 NEWTON , GENE 06/01/1995 None Scheduled
CIVCRE21567 NEWTON , GENE 07/01/1992 None Scheduled
SCLSRE22865 NEWTON , GENE 03/31/1993 None Scheduled
RCVRS061995 NEWTON , GENE 03/25/2002 None Scheduled Rancho
SCLSC14129 NEWTON , GENE 10/25/1995 None Scheduled
CWV137343 NEWTON , GENE 04/24/2002 None Scheduled
SCL75858 NEWTON , GENE 12/09/1991 None Scheduled
CIVCRE23311 NEWTON , GENE 03/11/1994 None Scheduled
SCLSRE22378 NEWTON , GENE 10/14/1992 None Scheduled
CIVCRE22543 NEWTON , GENE 07/09/1993 None Scheduled

Case Number Name Filing Date Charges Next Hearing Jurisdiction
SCL93980 NEWTON , VERNON GENE 03/17/1995 None Scheduled
RFLRS35260 NEWTON , VERNON GENE 03/08/1988 None Scheduled Rancho
SCL3859 NEWTON , VERNON GENE 12/17/1996 None Scheduled
CIVCRE23311 NEWTON , VERNON GENE 03/11/1994 None Scheduled


Case MWV103511 Defendant 2287373 NEWTON, GENE
Defendant 1 of 1


Action: EX PARTE HEARING RE: ARREST WARRANT - 03/15/2006 Miscellaneous Payment of $1.00 Received. - 07/05/2006

Case MWV103511 Defendant 2287373 NEWTON, GENE

Action: EX PARTE HEARING RE: ARREST WARRANT Date: 03/15/2006 Time: 4:00 PM
Division: R4 Hearing Status: DISPOSED

INGRID A UHLER

CLERK IRENE ROMO

DEFENDANT NOT PRESENT.

-

PROCEEDINGS

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF WARRANT OF ARREST FILED.

-

CUSTODY STATUS

CASE CUSTODY - FUGITIVE

fun, let's start with the definition of a stipulated judgement:

A stipulated judgment or agreed judgment is a judgment which both sides agree to have entered. If the agreement is not followed, the plaintiff can file an affidavit of default wherein the judgment can be entered without notice to the defendant(s). This default judgment is binding and failure to comply with it means that an enforcement action could be taken. Enforcement actions vary, but can include wage garnishment and/or property lien(s).

It can be plainly seen that the Plaintiff (Raymond Chin) has filed the stipulated judgement, is in arrears, and has granted a 30 day window to the defendant.

06/19/2009 9:30 AM DEPT. R12 HEARING RE: STATUS OF STIPULATED JUDGMENT Continued
Minutes
BEN T KAYASHIMA PRESIDING.
CLERK: LOIS M. PAHIA
COURT REPORTER LAURA MILLSAP LAURA MILLSAP
COURT ATTENDANT DENISE ANDRADE
-
APPEARANCES:
ATTORNEY MARK R MCKINNISS APPEARS BY COURTCALL FOR RAYMOND CHIN.
PARTIES NOT PRESENT: STEPHEN AUST, PLATINUM CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
-
PROCEEDINGS:
PREDISPOSITION HEARING HELD
PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL REPRESENTS THAT PLAINTIFF HAS AGREED TO GIVE DEFENDANT AN ADDITIONAL 30 DAYS
FOR PAYMENT AND REQUESTS THIS MATTER BE CONTINUED.
-
HEARINGS:
CURRENT HEARING CONTINUED TO 07/31/09 AT 09:30 IN DEPARTMENT R12.
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF TO GIVE NOTICE.

If payment is not made, the court shall set aside dismissall without prejudice, resume jurisdiction, and judgement will be entered in favor of plaintiff.

As far as dismissal of defendants. Chin could very well have decided to just go after Aust. But you have to remember there is also the cross-complaint.

Complaint Number: 2
Complaint Type: COMPLAINT (UNLIMITED)
Filing Date: 10/11/2007
Complaint Status: ACTIVE


Party Number Party Type Party Name Attorney Party Status
2 PLAINTIFF STEPHEN AUST Pro Per First Paper Fee Paid
6 CROSS-COMPLAINANT PLATINUM CAPITAL PARTNERS Pro Per
1 CROSS-DEFENDANT RAYMOND CHIN LAW OFFICES OF MARK R. MCKINNISS Answer 01/04/2008
4 CROSS-DEFENDANT GENE NEWTON Unrepresented Serve Required (WaitS)
5 CROSS-DEFENDANT RCC HOLDINGS CORPORATION Unrepresented Serve Required (WaitS)
7 CROSS-DEFENDANT EDWARD PICKENS Unrepresented Serve Required (WaitS


JMHO All parties signed onto the stipulated judgement. What is in that negotiated settlement is unknown. I do not believe that Gene Newton and RCC just walked away. The case will be dismissed in 2 days if payment is made.

and fun, thank you for the conversation

Johnny

Your staement is utterly fictitious. A kinard of biblical proportions.

Stipulated judgement was awarded to the Plaintiff, Chin against the defendants Newton, RCC Holdings corp, Aust, and Platinum. Yes the case has taken 2 years or so to be settled. Chin has given the defendants a number of continuances towards PAYMENT and STATUS of the stipulated judgement. The judgement is in excess of $25k.

How much did Newton claim Platinum was worth in assets before it obviously went bankrupt?

Note that the stipulated judgment is just that, a judgment. It allows the creditor to garnish wages and attach assets if you don't make the payments required. Once you file for bankruptcy, of course, the obligation to make payments stops, but the judgment may still act as a lien on your property which would need to be stripped off in your bankruptcy.

gp, it can't be definitively stated that the lawsuit has any bearing on the delay in the reverse merger.

IMO A CPC willing to invest in IWS would most certainly make sure that their investment would not be jeopardized by ongoing litigation in the parent company.

It's been stated by Newton that IWS is a wholly owned subsidiary of RCC. RCC is being sued and IMO will need to pay damages.

I'm not a lawyer, but I am a businessman and I would not make a substantial investment in a company that could possibly have a lien applied against it.

How do you think this will effect the merger to the TSX if the court case is closed on Friday?

IMO it's possible Newton convinced Chin do give him a continuance as he tries to put this deal together. I wouldn't doubt that a piece of IWS will go to Chin.

IMO Newton needs to bring more than the IWS products to the CPC's table. He needs to bring contracts. We may be waiting on a contract to be awarded.

IMO If the CPC was ready to invest in IWS, the lawsuit would have been cleared up immediately.


Do you still think it's going to happen and that there will be any uptick in share price when it does?

Yes, I do think it's going to happen. I also believe that shareholders have been massively diluted, lessening their stake in IWS. RCCH would most certainly rise on a successful listing of IWS. I will be selling, and running away on that rise for sure.

On a positive note, there have been some encouraging signs with Evolutech and the Quebec gov't. RCC IS actually installing 2 systems that we know of: Peak Health and Wellness and Homestake Meadows is a go. This was not the case a couple months ago.

But not even a successful reverse merger and the stock rising will change my opinion of the Great Eagle. I know what he's all about.

Looks like the MM's on the bid are more than happy to sell at the ask...not exactly quaking in their boots...are they?

Aust went pro per, RCCH was never represented.


Case CIVRS703175 - RAYMOND CHIN -V- STEPHEN AUST


Case CIVRS703175 - Complaints/Parties

Complaint Number: 1
Complaint Type: COMPLAINT (UNLIMITED)
Filing Date: 07/31/2007
Complaint Status: ACTIVE


Party Number Party Type Party Name Attorney Party Status
1 PLAINTIFF RAYMOND CHIN LAW OFFICES OF MARK R. MCKINNISS First Paper Fee Paid
2 DEFENDANT STEPHEN AUST Pro Per Answer 10/11/2007
3 DEFENDANT PLATINUM CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. Unrepresented Serve Required (WaitS)
4 DEFENDANT GENE NEWTON Unrepresented Served 08/01/2007
5 DEFENDANT RCC HOLDINGS CORPORATION Unrepresented Serve Required (WaitS)
Complaint Number: 2
Complaint Type: COMPLAINT (UNLIMITED)
Filing Date: 10/11/2007
Complaint Status: ACTIVE


Party Number Party Type Party Name Attorney Party Status
2 PLAINTIFF STEPHEN AUST Pro Per First Paper Fee Paid
6 CROSS-COMPLAINANT PLATINUM CAPITAL PARTNERS Pro Per
1 CROSS-DEFENDANT RAYMOND CHIN LAW OFFICES OF MARK R. MCKINNISS Answer 01/04/2008
4 CROSS-DEFENDANT GENE NEWTON Unrepresented Serve Required (WaitS)
5 CROSS-DEFENDANT RCC HOLDINGS CORPORATION Unrepresented Serve Required (WaitS)
7 CROSS-DEFENDANT EDWARD PICKENS Unrepresented Serve Required (WaitS)


Case CIVRS703175 - Actions/Minutes

Viewed Date Action Text Disposition
09/11/2009 9:30 AM DEPT. R12 HEARING RE: CMC/DISMISSAL
07/31/2009 CORRESPONDENCE COVERSHEET GENERATED TO MAIL COPY OF 7-31-09 MINUTE ORDER TO COUNSEL OF RECORD Not Applicable
07/31/2009 MARK R MCKINNISS LAW OFFICES OF IS REMOVED AS ATTORNEY FOR RAYMOND CHIN, AND LAW OFFICES OF MARKR. MCKINNISS IS ADDED AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD. Not Applicable
07/31/2009 UPDATE FIRM ADDRESS OF LAW OFFICES OF MARKR. MCKINNISS, ATTORNEY FOR RAYMOND CHIN.
07/31/2009 9:30 AM DEPT. R12 HEARING RE: STATUS OF STIPULATED JUDGMENT Continued
Minutes
BEN T KAYASHIMA PRESIDING.
CLERK: LUANN GEESINK
COURT REPORTER MYRA PONCE MYRA PONCE
COURT ATTENDANT DENISE ANDRADE
-
APPEARANCES:
NO APPEARANCE.
-
PROCEEDINGS:
PREDISPOSITION HEARING HELD
-
HEARINGS:
HEARING RE: CMC/DISMISSAL SET FOR 09/11/09 AT 09:30 IN DEPARTMENT R12.
NOTICE GIVEN BY COURTROOM CLERK.
ACTION - COMPLETE
=== MINUTE ORDER END ===

06/19/2009 9:30 AM DEPT. R12 HEARING RE: STATUS OF STIPULATED JUDGMENT Continued
Minutes
BEN T KAYASHIMA PRESIDING.
CLERK: LOIS M. PAHIA
COURT REPORTER LAURA MILLSAP LAURA MILLSAP
COURT ATTENDANT DENISE ANDRADE
-
APPEARANCES:
ATTORNEY MARK R MCKINNISS APPEARS BY COURTCALL FOR RAYMOND CHIN.
PARTIES NOT PRESENT: STEPHEN AUST, PLATINUM CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
-
PROCEEDINGS:
PREDISPOSITION HEARING HELD
PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL REPRESENTS THAT PLAINTIFF HAS AGREED TO GIVE DEFENDANT AN ADDITIONAL 30 DAYS
FOR PAYMENT AND REQUESTS THIS MATTER BE CONTINUED.
-
HEARINGS:
CURRENT HEARING CONTINUED TO 07/31/09 AT 09:30 IN DEPARTMENT R12.
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF TO GIVE NOTICE.
ACTION - COMPLETE
=== MINUTE ORDER END ===

06/16/2009 FAXED LETTER FROM MARK R. MCKINNISS RE: STATUS REPORT FILED. Not Applicable
06/15/2009 FAXED LETTER FROM MARK R. MCKINNISS RE: COURTCALL ON 6/19/09 FILED. Not Applicable
06/05/2009 9:30 AM DEPT. R12 HEARING RE: STATUS OF STIPULATED JUDGMENT Continued
Minutes
BEN T KAYASHIMA PRESIDING.
CLERK: LOIS M. PAHIA
NOT REPORTED
COURT ATTENDANT SHANNON DURAN
-
APPEARANCES:
ATTORNEY MARK R MCKINNIS VIA TELEPHONIC MESSAGE PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER.
PARTIES NOT PRESENT: STEPHEN AUST, PLATINUM CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
-
PROCEEDINGS:
HEARING CONTINUED AT REQUEST OF PLAINTIFF.
PLAINTIFF TO FILE A STATUS REPORT 5 DAYS PRIOR TO 06/19/09 VIA FAX OR FILE A STIPULATED JUDGMENT.
IF A STIPULATED JUDGMENT IS FILED THE MATTER WILL GO OFF CALENDAR.
-
HEARINGS:
CURRENT HEARING CONTINUED TO 06/19/09 AT 09:30 IN DEPARTMENT R12.
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF TO GIVE NOTICE.
ACTION - COMPLETE
=== MINUTE ORDER END ===

04/20/2009 REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT RE: ORAL PROCEEDINGS 4-20-09 (LYNETTE MILAKOVICH, CSR) FILED Not Applicable
04/20/2009 9:45 AM DEPT. R12 COURT TRIAL SET FOR COMPLAINT (UNLIMITED) FILED 07/31/2007 OF RAYMOND CHIN Continued
Minutes
BEN T KAYASHIMA PRESIDING.
CLERK: LUANN GEESINK
COURT REPORTER LYNETTE MILAKOVICH LYNETTE MILAKOVICH
COURT ATTENDANT DENISE ANDRADE
-
APPEARANCES:
ATTORNEY MARK MCKINNISS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER.
PLAINTIFF RAYMOND CHIN PRESENT
DEFENDANT STEPHEN AUST PRESENT IN PRO PER.
-
PROCEEDINGS:
05B*MEDTHLD.
SETTLED AS TO ENTIRE ACTION..
RECITED INTO RECORD. TERMS OF SETTLEMENT RECITED.
-
HEARINGS:
HEARING RE: STATUS OF STIPULATED JUDGMENT SET FOR 06/05/09 AT 09:30 IN DEPARTMENT R12.
NOTICE WAIVED.
ACTION - COMPLETE
=== MINUTE ORDER END ===

04/17/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. R12 READINESS CALENDAR VACATED
04/16/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. R12X EX-PARTE MOTION RE: TO CONTINUE TRIAL Pre-D Complete
Minutes
BEN T KAYASHIMA PRESIDING.
CLERK: LUANN GEESINK
COURT REPORTER TRACI TROLI TRACI TROLI
COURT ATTENDANT DENISE ANDRADE
-
APPEARANCES:
ATTORNEY MARK MCKINNIS (APPEARS LATE) APPEARS BY COURTCALL FOR RAYMOND CHIN.
STEPHEN AUST APPEARS BY COURTCALL.
-
PROCEEDINGS:
PREDISPOSITION HEARING HELD
EX-PARTE HEARING IS HELD.
EX PARTE ORDERS DENIED.
ESTIMATED LENGTH OF TRIAL 2 DAY(S).
CASE TO PROCEED AS TO NON-JURY TRIAL.
-
HEARINGS:
COURT TRIAL ON COMPLAINT (UNLIMITED) FILED 07/31/2007 OF RAYMOND CHIN IS SET FOR 04/20/09 AT 09:45 IN DEPARTMENT R12
VACATE READI HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 04/17/09 AT 08:30 IN DEPARTMENT R12.
NO FURTHER NOTICE WILL BE GIVEN.
ACTION - COMPLETE
=== MINUTE ORDER END ===

04/15/2009 OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO/FOR CONTINUE TRIAL FILED BY RAYMOND CHIN Not Applicable
04/15/2009 FAXED LETTER FROM MARK R. MCKINNISS RE: COURTCALL ON 4/20/09 FILED. Not Applicable
04/15/2009 TRIAL BRIEF FILED BY RAYMOND CHIN Not Applicable
04/13/2009 COURTCALL CONFIRMATION FROM STEPHEN AUST FOR 4/17/09 FILED. Not Applicable
04/13/2009 FILING FEE PAID BY STEPHEN AUST FOR MTN TO CONT TRIAL Not Applicable
Minutes
Receipt: 090413-0393 $40.00

04/10/2009 MOTION RE: TO CONTINUE TRIAL FILED BY DEFENDANT STEPHEN AUST Not Applicable
01/02/2009 9:30 AM DEPT. R12 OSC RE: MEDIATION / CMC Pre-D Complete
Minutes
BEN T KAYASHIMA PRESIDING.
CLERK: ELAINE CARLOS
COURT REPORTER KELLI WETHERFORD KELLI WETHERFORD
COURT ATTENDANT C B STUELAND
-
APPEARANCES:
ATTORNEY MARK K MCKINNIS (BY COURTCALL) PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER.
PARTIES NOT PRESENT: STEPHEN AUST
-
PROCEEDINGS:
PREDISPOSITION HEARING HELD
MEDIATION WAS NOT COMPLETED DUE TO PARTIES HAVING BEEN UNABLE TO AGREE UPON A MEDIATOR.
JURY WAIVED BY PLAINTIFF.
-
HEARINGS:
TRIAL READINESS/ASSIGNMENT CALENDAR SET FOR 04/17/09 AT 8:30AM IS CONFIRMED.
FOR TRIAL BEGINNING 04/20/09 AT 9:30AM.
PARTIES TO SUBMIT TRIAL BRIEFS AT LEAST 5 COURT DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL READINESS DATE.
ACTION - COMPLETE
=== MINUTE ORDER END ===

12/19/2008 8:30 AM DEPT. R12 OSC RE: MEDIATION / CMC VACATED
10/30/2008 ON COURT'S MOTION, THE OSC (SET 12/19/08) HEARING PRESENTLY SET IN THIS CASE, IS ORDERED RESET FOR 01/02/09 AT 09:30 IN DEPARTMENT R12. NOTICE SENT TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD. Not Applicable
10/30/2008 VACATE OSCM HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/19/08 AT 08:30 IN DEPARTMENT R12. Not Applicable
05/08/2008 9:30 AM DEPT. R12 FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Continued
Minutes
BEN T KAYASHIMA PRESIDING.
CLERK: DIANE VAN TASSEL
COURT REPORTER LAURA SANDERS LAURA SANDERS
COURT ATTENDANT DENISE ANDRADE
-
APPEARANCES:
ATTORNEY MARK MCKINNIS (BY COURTCALL) PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER.
DEFENDANT STEPHEN AUST (BY COURTCALL) PRESENT IN PRO PER.
-
PROCEEDINGS:
CONFERENCE HELD
THE COURT ORDERS THE MATTER TO PROCEED TO MEDIATION.
PARTIES TO SELECT MEDIATOR AND NOTIFY THE COURT WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THIS DATE
TRIAL ESTIMATE IS 5 DAYS
-
HEARINGS:
OSC RE: MEDIATION SET FOR 12/19/08 AT 08:30 IN DEPARTMENT R12
SET ON TRIAL READINESS/ASSIGNMENT CALENDAR 04/17/09 AT 08:30 IN DEPARTMENT R12.
TRIAL SET AT 04-20-09 AT 9:30 IN DEPT. R12
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF TO GIVE NOTICE.
ACTION - COMPLETE
=== MINUTE ORDER END ===

05/08/2008 8:30 AM DEPT. R12 MOTION RE: TO COMPEL RRESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS Off Calendar
Minutes
BEN T KAYASHIMA PRESIDING.
CLERK: DIANE VAN TASSEL
COURT REPORTER LAURA SANDERS LAURA SANDERS
COURT ATTENDANT DENISE ANDRADE
-
APPEARANCES:
NO APPEARANCE.
-
MOTION
PHONE CALL RECEIVED FROM MOVING PARTY VIA ATTORNEY MARK MCKINNISS.
OFF-CALENDAR. REASON: AT REQUEST OF MOVING PARTY AS RESPONSES WERE RECVD
ACTION - COMPLETE
=== MINUTE ORDER END ===

05/07/2008 FAXED LETTER DATED 5/7/08 FROM MARK R. MCKINNIS REGARDING COURTCALL ON 5/8/08 FILED. Not Applicable
05/07/2008 FAXED LETTER DATED 5/6/08 FROM STEVE AUST REGARDING COURTCALL ON 5/8/08 FILED. Not Applicable
05/01/2008 8:30 AM DEPT. R12 MOTION RE: TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS FILED BY PLAINTIFF RAYMOND CHIN VACATED
04/25/2008 9:30 AM DEPT. R12 FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Continued
Minutes
BEN T KAYASHIMA PRESIDING.
CLERK: MARY FLORES
COURT REPORTER LAURA SANDERS LAURA SANDERS
COURT ATTENDANT DENISE ANDRADE
-
APPEARANCES:
ATTORNEY MARK R MCKINNIS (BY COURTCALL) PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER.
DEFENDANT STEPHEN AUST PRESENT IN PRO PER.
-
PROCEEDINGS:
CONFERENCE HELD
AFTER CASE HAD BEEN SET TO 05/01/08 AT 8:30 TO TRAIL MOTION PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL CALLED (BY
SECRETARY LESLIE) STATING THE 05/01/08 WAS A CONFLICT WITH THEM AND WISHES TO RESCHEDULE DATE
TO 05/08/08. THEY HAD ALREADY NOTIFIED THE OPPOSING SIDE BEFORE CALLING THE COURT TO
RESCHEDULE AND THERE WAS NO OPPOSITION TO CONTINUE.
-
PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL STATED HE FILED A DISMISSAL AS TO OTHER DEFENDANTS. COURT DOES NOT HAVE SAID
DISMISSAL. ATTORNEY STATES HE WILL RESUBMIT THE DISMISSAL.
-
HEARINGS:
FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SET FOR 05/08/08 AT 09:30 IN DEPARTMENT R12.
-
LAW & MOTION RE: TO COMPEL RRESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS SET FOR 05/08/08 AT 08:30 IN DEPT. R12.
VACATE L&M HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 05/01/08 AT 08:30 IN DEPARTMENT R12.
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF TO GIVE NOTICE.
ACTION - COMPLETE
=== MINUTE ORDER END ===

04/22/2008 FAXED LETTER DATED 4/22/08 FROM MARK MCKINNISS REGARDING COURTCALL ON 4/25/08 FILED. Not Applicable
04/22/2008 OPPOSITION SENT TO LEGAL RESEARCH Not Applicable
04/22/2008 DECLARATION OF STEVE AUST IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FILED Not Applicable
04/22/2008 DECLARATION OF GREG AUST IN SUPPORT OF STEVE AUST OPPOSITION FILED Not Applicable
04/22/2008 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT FILED BY STEPHEN AUST, PLATINUM CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.. Not Applicable
04/21/2008 FAXED LETTER DATED 4/17/08 FROM STEVE AUST REGARDING COURTCALL ON 4/25/08 FILED. Not Applicable
04/21/2008 OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO/FOR REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS DEEMED ADMITTED FILED BY STEPHEN AUST Not Applicable
04/08/2008 NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FILED BY RAYMOND CHIN. Not Applicable
04/04/2008 MTN TO COMPEL RESP TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS SENT TO DEPT MOTION BIN Not Applicable
04/04/2008 MOTION RE: TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS FILED BY PLAINTIFF RAYMOND CHIN. Not Applicable
Minutes
Receipt: 080404-4159 $40.00

02/22/2008 UPDATE PARTY ADDRESS FOR STEPHEN AUST. Not Applicable
02/22/2008 9:30 AM DEPT. R12 FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Continued
Minutes
JUDGE BEN T. KAYASHIMA
CLERK: LUANN GEESINK
COURT ATTENDANT DENISE ANDRADE
REPORTER: JILL LANGLEY
-
APPEARANCES:
ATTORNEY MARK MCKINNISS (BY COURT CALL) PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER.
DEFENDANT NOT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS:
CONFERENCE HELD
DEFENDANT HAS NOT COMPLIED WITH PLAINTIFFS DISCOVERY REQUESTS. PLAINTIFF INTENDS TO FILE A
MOTION TO COMPEL.
-
HEARINGS:
FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SET FOR 04/25/08 AT 09:30 IN DEPARTMENT R12.
NOTICE TO BE GIVEN BY PLAINTIFF.
ACTION - COMPLETE
=== MINUTE ORDER END ===

01/18/2008 FAXED LETTER DATED 1/17/08 FROM MARK MCKINNISS REGARDING COURTCALL ON 2/22/08 FILED. Not Applicable
01/04/2008 ANSWER FILED BY RAYMOND CHIN; PARTY REPRESENTED BY MARK R MCKINNISS LAW OFFICES OF. Not Applicable
01/03/2008 NOTICE OF CMC FILED BY RAYMOND CHIN. Not Applicable
12/28/2007 9:30 AM DEPT. R12 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Continued
Minutes
BEN T KAYASHIMA PRESIDING.
CLERK: CHRISTINA STIPE
COURT REPORTER RHONDA BROWN RHONDA BROWN
COURT ATTENDANT DENISE ANDRADE
-
APPEARANCES:
ATTORNEY MARK R MCKINNISS, VIA COURTCALL PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER.
PARTIES NOT PRESENT: STEPHEN AUST
-
PROCEEDINGS:
09:45
DEFENDANT STEPHEN AUST NOT PRESENT.
-
HEARINGS:
FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SET FOR 02/22/08 AT 09:30 IN DEPARTMENT R12.
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF TO GIVE NOTICE.
ACTION - COMPLETE
=== MINUTE ORDER END ===

12/26/2007 CMC STATEMENT SENT TO DEPT R12 W/O FILE FOR 12/28/07 CMC Not Applicable
12/26/2007 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT FILED BY RAYMOND CHIN. Not Applicable
12/26/2007 UNABLE TO CONTACT ATTORNEY MCKINNISS FOR COURT CALL APPROVAL DUE TO HIS RESTRICTED PHONE LINE. FILED. Not Applicable
10/30/2007 8:30 AM DEPT. R12 OSC RE: SERVICE COMPLETION Off Calendar
Minutes
BEN T KAYASHIMA PRESIDING.
CLERK: LUANN GEESINK
MINUTES UPDATED BY MARLENE GALINDO
COURT REPORTER JILL LANGLEY JILL LANGLEY
COURT ATTENDANT DENISE ANDRADE
-
APPEARANCES:
NO APPEARANCE.
-
PROCEEDINGS:
OFF-CALENDAR. REASON: NO APPEARANCE
HEARING DATE OF 12/20/07 CONFIRMED.
ACTION - COMPLETE
=== MINUTE ORDER END ===

10/26/2007 PROOF OF SERVICE FILED ON GENE NEWTON; PARTY SERVED ON 08/01/07. TYPE OF SERVICE IS PERSONAL. Not Applicable
10/11/2007 SUMMONS ISSUED - ORIGINAL FILED IN COURT FILE. Not Applicable
10/11/2007 CROSS-COMPLAINT FILED ON COMPLAINT (UNLIMITED) FILED 07/31/2007 OF RAYMOND CHIN BY STEPHEN AUST, PLATINUM CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. Not Applicable
10/11/2007 ANSWER FILED BY STEPHEN AUST; PARTY REPRESENTED BY PRO/PER. Not Applicable
Minutes
Receipt: 071011-0906 $320.00

09/26/2007 PROOF OF SERVICE FILED ON STEPHEN AUST; PARTY SERVED ON 09/10/07. TYPE OF SERVICE IS PERSONAL. Not Applicable
07/31/2007 SUMMONS ISSUED - ORIGINAL FILED IN COURT FILE. Not Applicable
07/31/2007 COMPLAINT AND PARTY INFORMATION ENTERED Not Applicable
Minutes
Receipt: 070731-1912 $320.00

07/31/2007 CASE ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO DEPARTMENT R12




Case CIVRS703175 - Pending Hearings

Date Action Text Disposition
09/11/2009 9:30 AM DEPT. R12 HEARING RE: CMC/DISMISSAL