Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes, I have seen a certificate. The certificate is signed by C. W. Young. It has the old share numbers 500,000,000 on it, but a rubber stamp is placed over it where it states that 10,000,000 is the authorized at .00001.
clayton gots the preferredz, they are non convertible, means he owns it and we all can make money.
It,s 4million common out, 2million preferreds not convertible to common out, 10 millions a.s consisting of 8million common 2million preferrrrrrrrrrrrrredz, 2million preferredz hold 51 percent voting power, but not convertible, but who carez at these number we going to sixty eight cents.
happy new year 2008 end to the delray beach scammers... bye bye bye pt.
Taylor holds the preferreds and takes a vig on the raise. The links are the past, this is Taylor's shell. It was ccde, ccdx, rhmx, rhna, msgm... Taylor admitted in recent discovery requests in my lawsuit that he was an authorized agent.
Um ya that,s what my calculator say
i dont think you are the cause of the stock going up or down, but do you really know clayton? i am told by md that he was on the boards, did have investments, and may have been aggressive discussing the stocks he had an investment in. some worked out for him, some didn't, but that's how he learned the shell was for sale. I don't know the guy, but I don't know if a single runin or two means you know him. md had arguments with him too, but said he's confident with him now.
I know major doesnt like Hayter, but he is confident of the new management and the company. I also know he hasn't sold a single share for his accounts or for his clients and doesnt intend to until it hits a fair price.
could be the case. regardless, i hope he has a good holiday season.
Another one of you and BRNs friends I presume! Shouldn't these be in the ibox?
http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/02/2002bcca0297.htm
http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/sc/99/16/s99-1632.txt
http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/sc/05/03/2005bcsc0319.htm
http://siliconinvestor.advfn.com/readreplies.aspx?msgid=11754423
I had that position it wasnt a very rewarding experience. But 10 percent can call a meeting and resolutions are bindinf with 30 percent of the vote.
Surprising how many places in Costa Rica are serving turkey for the American Thanksgiving. We can be thankful that tag team Paul Taylor and Corey Ribotsky can't print shares here due to their own litigation tactics.
Surprising how many places in Costa Rica are serving turkey for the American Thanksgiving. We can be thankful that Paul Taylor and Corey Ribotsky can't print shares here due to their own litigation tactics.
February 5, 2007, at 4:30 p.m., por favor.
Hi Paul! It's been so long since we've talked. Funny this stock interests you. I know they don't know who you are, but I bet it makes you wonder how they were able to keep the share price up while you kept having to do reverse splits. Same idea for a fraud, but better orchestrated than your chaotic press releases about voip service in Costa Rica. Now we both know that it's illegal there. Silly rabbit, tricks are for kids.
Here's my Paul Taylor related post. Review the documents carefully, especially Paul's signing for that company.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=24373659
LAWSUIT DOCUMENTS in my defamation suit against IMNM. The judge ordered the company to obtain new legal counsel within thirty (30) days. Prior counsel admitted he represented Paul Taylor and was NOT PAID for his services.
This is the Complaint I filed against IMNM for defamation
http://clerkofcourt.info/IMNM/2006-11-30.Complaint_against_IMNM.pdf
This is a letter from a guy named Tom Bibiyan that claims IMNM didn't defame me -- he did. Problem is, how did he know my son's name and the name of Paul Taylor's son (Zach). Worse, he says he did it for the hip hop company -- but this was still CCDX! I love this guy!
http://clerkofcourt.info/IMNM/2007-09-10.Bibiyan_Letter.pdf
Here's my motion for leave to do some more discovery
http://clerkofcourt.info/IMNM/2007-09-25.Calderon_Motion_for_Discovery.pdf
Then IMNM's attorney moved to withdraw. He said Paul Taylor sold the company without telling him.
http://clerkofcourt.info/IMNM/2007-10-01.Motion_to_Withdraw.pdf
Based on the name change, I asked the Court to amend the caption. The judge hasn't ruled yet:
http://clerkofcourt.info/IMNM/2007-10-09.Motion_Amend_Name.pdf
The judge denied my motion for more discovey to investigate Tom Bibiyan. She said it was an improper ex parte contact:
http://clerkofcourt.info/IMNM/2007-10-11.Order_Denying_Discovery.pdf
The judge denied the motion to withdraw because she reminded counsel that the defendant isn't Paul Taylor, but the company. She told counsel to serve the company:
http://clerkofcourt.info/IMNM/2007-10-11.Order_Denying_Motion_Withdraw.pdf
Counsel complied and provided the new contact information for Mr. Cotton. He again reminded the Court that Paul Taylor was in control when he was hired in late 2006 and that he transferred control without advising counsel.
http://clerkofcourt.info/IMNM/2007-10-16.Amended_Withdrawal.pdf
Paul Taylor answers discovery as "authorized agent" for the company. Paul states he is a preferred and common shareholder. Also pay careful attention to his notarized affidavit:
http://clerkofcourt.info/IMNM/2007-10-17.Responses_to_Interrogatories.pdf
Here is an appeal I filed asking the district judge to allow investigation into Tom Bibiyan:
http://clerkofcourt.info/IMNM/2007-10-18.Objections.pdf
The judge orders IMNM to obtain new counsel:
http://clerkofcourt.info/IMNM/2007-11-01.Order_Directing_IMNM_to_Obtain_Counsel.pdf
I file a motion asking the Court to compel the company to provide answers signed by an agent of the company, not Paul Taylor since he said he "resigned" and is now just a preferred shareholder.
http://clerkofcourt.info/IMNM/2007-11.06.Discovery_Compell.pdf
Hey all! How's everyone doing. Any developments? There's several on my end, but I can't talk about them.
Seems our Paul Taylor's quite involved with IMNM. I'll be posting some things on the IBOX there that will interest NCVT shareholders and ex-shareholders.
Oh Paul Taylor, where are you? I have something for you.
I hope everybody is happy with the value of their investment. We warned and warned from the CCDX days, but people still bought. That's the underlying problem: Pure greed.
FACT: IMMN is now IMNM 545 to 1 reverse split! Thank you Paul Taylor and your progeny Robert Cotton.
Paul Taylor's progeny did it again. His confederate Robert Cotton reverse split IMMN to IMNM 545 to 1. So that's CCDE to CCDX to RHMX to RHNA to MSGM to IMMN to IMNM.
IMMN is now IMNM, which you can shorten to IMMNINIMNM, which is Greek for, "You've been reverse split 545 to 1 baby." As Paul Taylor would say, "Naked short positions and stock manipulators on bulletin boards...." As Robert Cottow might say, "Don't mess with Texas we've got gold in them Chinese hills...."
Don't worry for me, I'll sue Paul Taylor soon. I'm making a list, I'm checking it twice, I'm going to see if he's naughty or nice.
You got it. He not only defrauded shareholders, he forged my signature and that forgery makes his actions involving me RICO.
I sued Real Hip Hop Matrix (now IMMN) for defamation. I didn't sue Paul Taylor related to Netco because I knew of some shareholders who were trying to do it and I didn't want to go there and ruin their action. Also I might have been a defendant in their action and needed to crossclaim Paul for indemnification and contribution. But now I will sue him, give me 30 days.
Paul Taylor's buying it up thinking he can make some bucks and vote the shares. I have only one word for you, Paul Taylor: Reeko.
I think he sold short right when he issued the pr using my name claiming the assets went to IPXes.
The press releases were billed to the account that Mr. Taylor listed himself as the contact and signed. Every invoice went to Paul. The phone numbers either went to Paul's VOIP that he had in his own name or Brian's Lingo in his name. The user ID and Password for the prs were under Paul's control. The IP address goes back to Paul's account. My name is contained in the pr but I didn't send it.
I hope Serfdom files an affidavit. Paul Taylor is a con artist. He didn't pay me, the pr company, Cusip, he caused me to be fired from my post-Netco job, he withheld the documents I needed to make Netco into a real company, he tried to frame Arnoldo Pacheco, he r/s the investors killing them over and over instead of doing something legit, the last r/s was by an unauthorized person, etc.
I don't think he's going to stop by there, I think he lets his minions do that.
That's the thing about bankruptcy court, they have alot of power to reverse transactions or find the money. Plus it's fast. You see the court alotted a maximum of one hour for the Corey motion to dismiss.
I wonder if Susan Taylor's coming?
I'll be filing a detailed declaration.
I'm thinking of a derivative action by a shareholder to sue Paul on behalf of the company. Major says it's a waste of time and said there are technical stumbling blocks but I think it'd be a good idea.
Maybe he's an attorney, just not the attorney you think. I highly doubt Corey's attorneys would engage in this dialogue at the expense of their client. I could be wrong, but it's so monotonous and bordian talking about everything ad nauseum, only someone with some emotional involvement would be here.
I am none.
On the contrary, the matter is wide open. Both Madison and Netco filed statements not opposing Marco's summary judgment as to his note.
Well, I'm going to bed, I'm Bordian out of my mind tonight.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
In re: Case: 07-10940
PRIVADA INC. Chapter 7
f/k/a NETCO INVESTMENTS, INC.,
Debtor.
RODRIGO CALDERON ARAYA’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS BANKRUPTCY
Petitioning creditor Rodrigo Calderon Araya (“Calderon”) opposes the motion to dismiss:
1. Calderon’s claims in this case are based on unpaid salary and fraud in connection with the inducement to be an officer of the entity, along with forged documents being used to oust Calderon from his position when he began to expose the fraud.
2. Calderon was hired by Privada/Netco Investments/Telatinos, Inc., a corporation with its primary designated office in Austin, Texas.
3. Calderon was to receive $2,500 per month salary, along with certain shares of restricted stock.
4. Calderon did not receive the majority of the salary.
5. After Calderon did not receive the necessary documents to perform his functions, he began to investigate the company.
6. Calderon learned that the majority of the press releases that touted the company’s business activities were false. That is, the company claimed to have millions of dollars in revenues, hundreds of thousands of customers, etc., when it was nothing but a shell corporation.
7. Calderon discovered that share issuances (including some shares to the creditors who filed the motion to dismiss) were obtained by forgeries to his signature. (It is not believed at this time that the creditors who moved to dismiss the action were aware of the forged signatures on the share conversions).
8. Calderon’s name was forged on documents purportedly giving control of the company to a Belize corporation, West Indies Sugar & Beet Co.
9. Unknown persons associated with WIS&B Co. signed a document purporting to appoint Arnoldo Pacheco as an officer.
10. Calderon spoke to Pacheco and learned that he was paid cash to sign documents and that he did not know the meaning thereof.
11. Calderon learned that accounts were opened at an offshore broker known as Red Sea Management in the names of Calderon and Pacheco. Stock for the debtor was placed therein.
12. Calderon did not authorize an account to be opened in his name.
13. Pacheco has now disavowed being an officer of the company.
14. Pacheco, due to purported arrests, cannot enter the United States.
15. Presently, there appears to be no officer of Netco.
16. Calderon’s investigation revealed there were never assets of the company.
17. The company is in default as to simple bills such as those for the press releases that were issued, the changes to its CUSIP number, and according to litigation documents, $15,000 to its stock transfer agent.
18. As Calderon did not receive compensation for my acting as the sole officer and director of the debtor, the claims appear to be undisputed.
19. The creditors who move to dismiss this action have not identified how the debtor is solvent.
20. Indeed, the creditors who wish this action to be dismissed admit that a default occurred as to their stock conversion agreements.
21. Calderon filed a motion to intervene in the litigation that the creditors who ask this Court to dismiss this action mention. The creditors opposed the motion to intervene.
22. In that action, the debtor has been named in an interpleader action as to the issuance of its stock. The debtor’s legal counsel moved to withdraw and it presently has no representation. This conclusively shows that the debtor is without the ability to function as to important matters such as its control persons.
23. It appears undisputed that: (1) The debtor engaged in a serious stock fraud; (2) The debtor is not paying its debts; (3) The debtor has no ability to defend legal actions filed against it; and (4) The debtor has no bona fide officers.
24. The only appropriate thing is for the debtor to be placed under the control of an independent trustee.
25. Calderon personally knows Marco Antonio Chavarria who the creditors refer to as being co-petitioner Keith Maydak. Calderon knows that Chavarria is not Maydak.
26. Even if Chavarria was Maydak, which is not the case, then it is all the more reason to place the corporation under Court control. Without somebody to take responsibility for the future actions of the company, and to investigate its past and seek compensation for the shareholder-creditors, then the company is clearly insolvent.
27. The creditors asking for dismissal of this case have not agreed to take over the company’s operations even though they appear to have a large debt owed by the corporation which converts into equity.
WHEREFORE, Petitioning Creditor Rodrigo Calderon Araya respectfully demands that this Court deny the motion to dismiss.
Respectfully submitted,
______________________________
Rodrigo Calderon Araya
Apartado 3124-1000
San Jose Costa Rica
+506 835 9966
PETITIONING CREDITOR
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Rodrigo Calderon, certify that I sent a true copy of the foregoing to all parties that have appeared in this action by airmail from Costa Rica and fax.
Patricia Baron Tomasco
Brown McCarroll LLP
111 Congress Avenue, Suite 1400
Austin TX 78701
Frederick Banks
PO Box 5000
Yazoo City, MS 39194
Malgorzata Duszak
ul. Chopina 2a/4
Elblag, Poland 82-300
Rodrigo C. Araya
Apartado 3124-1000
San Jose Costa Rica
Keith Maydak
ul. Chopina 2a/4
Elblag, Poland 82-3000
July 10, 2007.
______________________________________
Rodrigo Calderon Araya
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
In re: Case: 07-10940
PRIVADA INC. Chapter 7
f/k/a NETCO INVESTMENTS, INC.,
Debtor.
RODRIGO CALDERON ARAYA’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE SERVICE OF SUMMONS
Petitioning creditor Rodrigo Calderon Araya (“Calderon”) opposes the motion to strike service of summons:
1. In this case, service was effected more than once upon the debtor’s statutory agent in Texas. Nobody disputes this service, not even the movant.
2. However, because the consultant of the debtor, Paul Taylor, had share certificates and other documentation was sent directly to his house during Calderon’s tenure as an officer of the company, it seemed only fair that Mr. Taylor receive a copy of the bankruptcy summons in the event he chose to oppose it. Indeed, Mr. Taylor appears to be the de facto control person of this entity.
3. The summons and petition sent to Mr. Taylor by mail was refused. As such, it appeared proper to serve Mr. Taylor at home so he was sure to receive a copy.
4. The summons and petition served on Mr. Taylor’s residence was done as a courtesy so there could be no dispute of notice in the future.
5. In fact, the service of the summons enabled Mr. Taylor or his confederates to file the anonymous letter that appears on the docket in this case.
6. It seems that Mr. Taylor’s wife, Susan Taylor, merely objects to her home address being made public in these proceedings and is not challenging the sufficiency of service on the company itself, being made to the statutory agent of the company.
7. What Ms. Taylor appears to seek is the impounding of her address.
8. Calderon does not object to this Court directing the Clerk to redact Ms. Taylor’s home address from the public docket unless she desires to receive pleadings in connection with this case.
9. However, Ms. Taylor voluntarily appeared before this Court and has subjected herself to jurisdiction. There may be a need to obtain her testimony and, as an interested party, she has made herself subject to the discovery rules of this Court.
WHEREFORE, Petitioning Creditor Rodrigo Calderon Araya respectfully demands that this Court deny the motion to strike, but grant an Order directing the Clerk to redact her address from the publicly available documents.
Respectfully submitted,
______________________________
Rodrigo Calderon Araya
Apartado 3124-1000
San Jose Costa Rica
+506 835 9966
PETITIONING CREDITOR
I'd be happy to have a phone conference with you. You, me, KM.
Would you like to set it up?