Hardly Breathing
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Pump the AXIM pump. Lofty expectations. Leopards don’t change their spots.
The most relevant post ever went something like
IT’S A SCAM!!!!
The biggest lie was…
I’m just an investor.
Insider buying is not reliable. The CEO of an oil and gas company received a margin call on his own shares. It seems the market did not agree with his optimistic view. Investing is not as simple as stating a cliche. If it were we all would be rich and not avaraging down or up on our holdings when we are behind the trade.
Despite the protestations of republicans Dr. Googles masks, depending upon the type, do offer some protection against infection. I rather would follow the science than the protestations of a few who feel their rights are more important than their responsibilities to society. AXIM rapid tests for anti-bodies could help to provide early warning resulting in protection.
Once the test kits have been approved the federal government might then consider giving the test kits to citizens for free and saving costs and tying up emergency rooms with people who have a common cold but not Covid. Ultimately it could save hundreds or billions of dollars down the road which would be better spent by the consumer rather than on medical costs. With healthcare being the leading cause for personal bankruptcies it may assist in stabilizing health care costs for those who cannot afford them.
The take on the wearing of masks which some say with certainty is not effective to protect oneself from potentially becoming sick from Covid is very narrow and has the appearance of a political statement rather than one of science. The example of hazmat suits is narrow and seemingly intended to show the protection required when working with a virus (thus negating the wearing of masks during this pandemic) that we now face-but the other reason, and perhaps reasons why hazmat suits are worn in a lab is just not to protect researchers from becoming infected but it also ensures that samples they are working with remain uncontaminated. But it is common to present only one aspect when trying to make one’s point and I am sure, like the explanation behind the fake pandemic remark made here you were not attempting to be subjective and unintentionally forgot to mention it also protects the samples being studied. Masks have been shown to be effective but really history does repeat itself because those against public health measures showed the same type of behaviour during the Spanish flu (which by the way did not come from Spain).
I doubt very much that is the case here. It is not unknown for OTC company management to act in a manner contrary to the interests of their shareholders such as FITX or ACRL to give two examples of behavior contrary to shareholder interest but not this company. The more I read about what they are wanting to achieve the more I believe they are what they are -a small pharma trying to bring a useful product to the market. If it becomes accepted it could be c a boon to shareholders and governments. Canadian friends have told me provincial governments have been providing rapid test kits to their citizens for free. This upfront cost could ultimately save them hundreds of millions of dollars in diagnostic and treatment costs.
Did he have a nick here? Sorry not familiar with that person.
You lost me there. And who is Ray Epps?
Who is that?
TTCM is a pimple on the belly of the tech sector that is getting squeezed. Squeeze it hard enough and Lamountain puss comes out, along with Leonarditus germs that spread from continent to continent, making it the Covid 19 of the investors world but don't take my word for it.
Here is an independent third party assessment of TTCM...
Is Ttcm a good investment?
Our Ai stock analyst implies that there will be a negative trend in the future and the TTCM shares are not a good investment for making money. Since this share has a negative outlook we recommend looking for other projects instead to build a portfolio.
Jolt Cola?! Wow that is a throwback.
We are all looking forward to the news release in April of this year. That could be a game changer for AXIM information, or disinformation.
This company is a two man leaking submarine ride.
Nothing but it does serve to provide some sort of vicarious thrill by thinking this useless excuse generating app offers anything remotely positive to anyone except the stock promoters.
He is throwing himself a pity party of late. While insisting on errors made by the court and proclaiming he is financially ruined his profile stated they are somewhat grateful for the opportunity to retire this early in life. He claims the pandemic is fake but backpedals from that statement in true trumpian fashion by saying he means it is over amplified as to its risk(s). I do hope the court goes hard on him and it might then provide a greater incentive to try it again. Now they are teaming up with other stock pumpers to attack those who do not buy into his self pity act.
One must then be careful when choosing one’s words in a public forum. Your statement the pandemic was fake is somewhat different in meaning and intent from the assertion of it being overblown which in my opinion has not been the case at all and the playing of politics followed the very real pandemic not vice versa. Mr. Trump was in office and despite his best attempts to downplay the clear and present danger while in office chose to be vaccinated and getting the booster declaring that it works and calling out those who do not reveal their status as “gutless” but perhaps he meant to say something completely different. When using Trumpisms it is perfectly acceptable to say that is not what was meant. What would make a pandemic fake or blown out of proportion? Is there a benchmark number of deaths before we can say it is not fake or overblown? I think however I will accept the studies of respectable scientists over qualitative assessments that largely depend upon sentiment than fact. Masks do work when properly used unless of course the entire world has been hoodwinked. I choose science over republicanisms any day when it comes to science. Much of the debate is identical to the resistance to being made to wear seatbelts. Many thousands are killed each year wearing them but that does not mean they do not save lives.
I am curious why you think Immunopass is needed at this time - you seem to be linking Covid to the need for Immunopass testing for antigens in patients who have had covid, but you also stated the pandemic is fake. Can you explain the contradiction? Unless I misinterpreted the following statement you posted...The one thing I didn't fully take into account at the time was the politics behind this entire fake pandemic.
You stated...
"Re: None 0
Post #
2877
of 2897
Looking back, I see that my first post here was on July 29th of last year.
At that time, I never expected the EUA for AXIM to take this long.
Over the last 6 months, I have accumulated quite a few more shares in AXIM than I had originally anticipated.
I guess there are two ways to look at it, but with every purchase, the stock price was pretty much less than before.
That is kind of a scary way to invest (buying interest in a "penny-stock" whose share price is continuously diminishing), but the product that first attracted me to AXIM (Immunopass) had (and continues to have) so many beneficial aspects (for not just the United States but for the entire World as well), that investing in this product felt almost like a "no-brainer."
The one thing I didn't fully take into account at the time was the politics behind this entire fake pandemic."
So what does AXIM that is so important to help those infected during a fake pandemic?
It may have been beneficial to you if Immunopass was available to you to avoid having had the vaccinations administered to yourself. Or is that a requirement of the courts and or prison system?
Stops are very effective but you must place your stop based not only on price but on the volume at that price to avoid being taken out on a low volume move. You execute the order at the time it happens, manually, rather than entering the stop in advance but the key is the relationship between price and volume, not one or the other, but in tandem. Low volume stocks like AXIM are volatile.
They would need to know support and resistance but remember those are based on price, but of course, they would include where volume came to support price and resistance levels. Lower volume stocks by their nature are slow moving and much easier to determine SnR levels than a quickly moving stock but again, this is all algorithmic so hunting and pecking trying to determine those levels is a thing of the past, for the most part. Rather than focusing on stop levels investors should learn how to properly use stop orders.
Stop limit orders cannot be seen by market makers. To trigger stop losses a market maker would have to calculate the volume at price. The stop order only becomes visible when the price is hit, not before. Once the price is hit the stop order, if the price moves lower (or higher in a short position) becomes a market order unless one uses a stop limit order, then the trade may only be partially filled before expiring. There is a myth market makers can see stop limit orders-they are kept in a what is called a blind book which then becomes visible when the price for the stop triggers the order. Using stop limit orders is important. If AXIM drops to .20 then sell but stop selling if the price drops to .18. Most traders use only stop loss orders. Using market orders at the open or close will cause gaps.
Applying "dream" to AXIM is not quite apropos, perhaps it might better be replaced with "hope" or "I hope someone buys the story and I can sell my shares to them" or even "wouldn't it be nice (insert share price here)" but certainly not a dream about the event. Given the rather anemic volume of late, one might then expect the price to be volatile in both directions based on little volume to validate the price move. The AXIM price should move up if there is sustained volume, in other words, watch for a repetition of volume much like hitting the key on a piano where not using the pedals, you hear the initial note strongly then the gradual diminishing of it. Another striking of the key indicates volume then the dropping off, and so on. Of course, there has always been the argument as to what constitutes noise and what is music. Simply put music is fast attack and slow decay whereas noise is a fast attack and fast decay (the striking of a drum stick on a table top for instance). It is a spike to nothing, whereas the sustain after the initial note being struck is what you want in trading any stock, up or down. So watch for the music, the continual striking meaning volume, which gives you a stepping up pattern or stepping down pattern. Perhaps later I can illustrate the dangers of averaging down in a downtrend, but not today. Buyers are needed not sellers and I don't wish to be blamed for bringing the price down.
I think the "I had a dream" was covered quite well enough by Martin L King.
ask kayakzz questions pertaining to prcessing of charges.
it was stated..."and I am guessing "they" have until the end of January to load their boats accordingly. My inspiration is telling me EUA on or about 2/2/22."
I call nonsense to that theory about AXIM. It is very easy for the regulators, if they suspect front running by those in possession of information not yet released by the company, to determine who bought and when, particularly if suddenly employees of a federal agency begin purchasing shares on the open market of AXIM. However it is common practise to initiate unsubstantiated IMO views of a stocks trading. Trading tapes can be pulled an examined. An STR can be reported to the TRF for examination and potential breaches, particulary in OTC traded stocks.
You are most welcome, Perhaps in the future I could give you some examples of averaging down and the pitfalls to avoid when doing so but most people averaging down attempt to catch a falling knife, with negative results. To do so now on the AXIM board would prove to be a distraction and should the price continue to fall the appetite for being shown a better way likely would not be acceptable to many here.
The SEC has limited resources available to them. Why pursue Drago now Baltia has been delisted? They may be aware of his upcoming sentencing but again, what would be gained by pursuing him? I could see the DOJ trying to join the dots between as Drago stated, the more than $200Million he put through his check cashing businesses some of which may have been checks from those who may have sold Baltia shares, (and the $9 Million referenced in his case by the DOJ in question was, in his own words, a drop in the bucket) would be no point to launching an investigation and his sentencing for his misdeeds, however much he likes to say he is a victim and not a convicted criminal. The SEC may flag those individuals should they begin to show up as executives of other publicly traded companies, even if they show up on the over the counter market. Of course those sociapaths who commit crimes and refuse to acknowledge the role they played in their own demise are the same ones who gather followers and who profess they are god fearing people, who never would lie, cheat or steal, and when they are caught at it use a political slant to show it is the country, and not their actions that are the true criminals. Some, like Drago will promote and follow people who show disdain for process and whose self-serving political agendas (like a former president) overrules ethics, morals, and accountability. I watched your evolution as a Baltia shareholder from being up 102% on the Baltia share purchases to a disgruntled it is all a scam victim, which of course is common, especilly with OTC stocks of the lower tiers. Hopefully Drago gets to sit in a cell for years contemplating how to get his two books published (the ones he feels are a must read) and who knows, maybe a line or two about Baltia and how he was just a common shareholder, nothing more, and a common shareholder who hosted a party, had access to informaton most others did not and was just this guy, ya know.
At best it would be difficult, at worst, impossible. Price targets, depending upon who one consults with are arbitrary in cases like this due to a lack of earnings, cost basis, and numerous other inclusions that affect the share price and net asset valuations. You will find many investors (and promoters) don rose colored glasses when stating investment earnings possibilities. Of course there are many cliches about such things (don't count your chickens before they hatch springs to mind) but it is a far better thing to be realistic rather than hopeful. When teaching technical analysis decades ago, one of my favorite expressions when asked such questions was always this - HOPE does not trade on the markets. At that time I would have students type HOPE into a chart analysis format and tell me what the current trend was and give them half an hour to get ready to explain their analysis. The bottom line, at that time, was HOPE does not trade on the markets. Hope itself is a very dangerous thing because it imposes upon the investor the idea they cannot possibly be wrong therefore they do such things as ignoring stop losses, averaging down in a downtrend (I referred to that as making love to maintain chastity), and ignoring all of the indicators that tell them they are in a losing trade. With AXIM sentiment is the leading indicator of price performance and potential rewards, again a very dangerous way of looking at the performance of the stock. What you, and many others are really asking is this - Can someone tell me please that I am correct and this stock will be worth a gazillion dollars because I may have over invested based on sentiment. The key element is volume-volume validates price, not the other way around. It is far too soon to even ask that question as regards AXIM.
My daughter just graduated with first-class honors from Oxford Law School and has accepted a position with a large British firm based in Barcelona so I will now be able to take the train to visit with her as she begins her new career.
You cannot know these things in advance. Technical analysis can shed some light on the subject but market sentiment does create share price movements outside of reason. Too many unknown factors at this time to make a plausible assumption. Could be short covering, could be inexperienced traders using market orders. Tale of the tape. Very small lots.
Recent Trades - Last 10 of 68
Time ET Ex Price Change Volume
15:44:52 Q 0.288 0.047 40
15:41:29 Q 0.288 0.047 40
15:38:41 Q 0.295 0.054 50
15:38:30 Q 0.2775 0.0365 100
15:25:59 Q 0.30 0.059 900
15:25:58 Q 0.28 0.039 100
15:09:37 Q 0.26 0.019 2,500
15:08:05 Q 0.26 0.019 2,400
15:07:42 Q 0.28 0.039 100
15:06:25 Q 0.2601 0.0191 2,500
Interesting isn't it. I have kept his posts, posting numbers, especially his attacks on the judicial system and motivation for their persecution of him and will forward to the presiding judge for consideration during the sentencing phase. He has a large ego and is currently doing his walks on water routine on the AXIM board where he publicly declared he is buying those shares then states he does not own one share due to his accounts being closed and liquidated but is now managing a trust account. He is practising writing his books no one will care about as his posts dwarf most. He definitely suffers from the Messiah complex and was even trying to raise funds on GoFundMe to pay for the last supper.
So is the Bible. It is not the date of the publication but rather the information. Since no studies by major respected objective researchers have come forward to offer proof vaccinations cause sterility one can assume there are none. The Mayo clinic is beyond reproach and they seem to have the final word here. Of course there are conspiracy theorists in abundance but none worth giving serious thought to. Dr. Google is the least reliable source of information on the topic. So those who developed the vaccine one must assume, have not had it, ensuring they, and only others like them will be able to procreate while the rest of the world slowly dies off. Since AXIM has used the Mayo clinic research skill sets, attacking the Mayo is attacking AXIM. You can always find political agenda conspiracy theorists in abundance but nothing worth considering seriously. Even our former President has had the booster and is advocating for it, but that has caused some to abandon their savior and look elsewhere for deliverance.
I guess your word is no good. You stated you no longer would post here but yet, here you are again spreading spam about your latest venture.
The Mayo clinic is above reproach and it will be interesting going forward to see if they weigh in on recent developments here and ongoing research. The Mayo Clinic is very well respected.
https://www.henryford.com/blog/2021/04/fertility-rumor-covid-vaccine
The myth behind the vaccines causing sterility.
Remember BLM (Baltia Lies Matter)
He is intent on cultivating a following for himself it seems on the AXIM board, hyping his ideas for books outlining his struggles against the federal government. He conveniently does not mention his conduct, the compiling of dossiers on federal government employee's and the like, and stalking him-and now invoking the Republican ideology and calling himself a patriot. The guy has an ego bigger than most. Criminal as victim. Sure John, sure. I still find it interesting how just an investor can host a party for the big wigs, have access to information no one else had, and the like. Supposedly and this is confusing, he states he is buying AXIM stock but then states he does not own any shares. The leopard is growing more spots.
The test performed in a hospital or extended care facility would be done by onsite staff rather than tie up centralized laboratories and would give a quick snap shot into the status of the patient's ability to fight off an infection. The kits would be handled by staff to avoid the issues the public has in performing them properly. Done by properly trained staff would lend further credence to the acceptance as a reliable test.
One use different from direct consumer acceptance would be in long term care facilities or hospitals to allow staff to determine the risk to the patient should there be an outbreak in a home (long term care residential) or hospital ward who have been provided the third, or booster jab. This would allow for selective placement into isolated areas where contact among staff/patients whose antibodies (the patients) are not as prevalent as others who receive the jab, lowering the risk of infection by knowing upfront the potential for transmission among the more poorly protected patients. This could go a long way to preventing further transmission and reduce the risk to insurers who might then cover the cost of the test and hopefully avoid a payout upon death of the patient, or long term care costs. At home testing is fine and well but studies have shown in other areas the inability to properly perform the test makes a negative/positive result less reliable.
The criminal as victim. Nothing new.