Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Somebody learned!
SolarCity Launches Solar Loan Program in 14 States
2 days 19 hours 18 minutes ago - DJNF
Now it's possible for many customers to pay less for solar than they pay for utility power and receive thousands in tax credits; Fixed payment options to start around $50/month1
SAN MATEO, Calif., June 2, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- SolarCity (Nasdaq: SCTY) has unveiled a new solar loan program--available in 14 states --that will allow many customers to immediately pay less for solar each month than they previously paid for utility bills and pocket thousands in additional dollars from applicable tax credits. The company has leveraged its installation volume--SolarCity installed more residential solar in 2015 than the next 50 competitors combined--to negotiate extremely favorable terms on behalf of its customers.
"We can now offer a loan that makes it possible for many customers to pay less for solar from day one, and still receive thousands back in tax credits on top of that," said SolarCity CEO Lyndon Rive. "This program will allow thousands of additional customers across the U.S. to install solar this year and start saving money immediately, and we expect to work with multiple lenders that will allow us to expand to several new states by the end of the month with the same great terms for our customers."
SolarCity's new loans replace its popular MyPower product--which allowed SolarCity to provide more loans in 2015 than any other solar installer--with new options that include fixed payments and shorter terms. The new loans offer a range of features:
-- 10-year loan with annual percentage rate as low as 2.99%.
-- 20-year loan with annual percentage rate as low as 4.99%.
-- Customers can prepay their entire balance or prepay a portion of their
loan to lower their monthly payments at any time, with no fees or
penalties.
-- SolarCity's loans include the industry's best service package, including
a 20-year warranty, production guarantee, and continuous monitoring.
-- SolarCity provides the industry's best mounting system and installation
aesthetics, and backs up its agreements with the largest in-house service
footprint in the industry, with 90 local operations centers.
-- SolarCity will provide and install a Nest Thermostat at no additional
cost for qualifying customers.
SolarCity's new solar loans are available today in Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Texas and Washington, D.C., and the company expects to announce new locations soon. Interested homeowners can contact SolarCity directly at 1-888-SOL-CITY (1-888-765-2489) for a free, no-obligation solar consultation or visit the company online at http://www.solarcity.com/residential.
About SolarCity
SolarCity (NASDAQ: SCTY) provides clean energy. The company has disrupted the century-old energy industry by providing solar power to homeowners, businesses and government organizations for less than they spend on utility bills. SolarCity gives customers control of their energy costs to protect them from rising rates. The company makes solar energy easy by taking care of everything from design and permitting to monitoring and maintenance. Visit the company online at www.solarcity.com and follow the company on Facebook & Twitter.
This release contains forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, statements regarding customer adoption, savings, loan availability and expansion. Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by, which such performance or results will be achieved, if at all. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in or suggested by the forward looking statements. You should read the section entitled "Risk Factors" in SolarCity's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and identifies certain of these and additional risks and uncertainties. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.
(1) $50/month payment based on a 20-year loan of $7,680 principal amount, at 4.99% APR with monthly auto pay
Logo - http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20160225/337791LOGO
To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/solarcity-launches-solar-loan-program-in-14-states-300278469.html
SOURCE SolarCity
/Web site: http://www.solarcity.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
June 02, 2016 07:00 ET (11:00 GMT)
« Back to Stocks News
As Batteries will be one of the big life bloods of solar...
Tesla Executive Implies Battery and Autonomous Driving Breakthroughs
“Much better batteries are possible,” he said. “We’re seeing performance improvements, not just cost reductions … [as evidenced by] more energy in the same volume of materials.
“On the technical side, that comes in terms of energy storage research; chemistry research, material science to make better batteries, and improve materials and reduce the cost. There’s a lot of room to improve there. It’s nowhere near the fundamental ceiling or physics limits yet. It’s an exciting and vibrant area.”
Fannie Mae’s Financing for Solar: A Game Changer for the Solar Industry
http://blog.rmi.org/blog_2016_06_01_fannie_maes_financing_for_solar
Mortgage companies play an important role in making solar photovoltaics (PV) more affordable and accessible for homeowners, which is a key component to unlocking the economic opportunities of home energy upgrades. Learn more about how this complements RMI’s Residential Energy+ initiative, which is working with top industry representatives to make better energy performance more accessible, affordable, and desirable for U.S. homeowners.
Mortgage giant Fannie Mae just unlocked the lowest cost of capital for new solar installations to date. This follows the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD’s) recent decision to finance new solar installations within a first mortgage transaction, a potential game changer for the solar industry with the ability to bring about the next order of magnitude increase in solar installations.
Fannie Mae’s HomeStyle Energy Mortgage offers the lowest cost of capital for solar (currently a mid-three percent range fixed rate). To date, this market is the largest untapped source of low-cost capital that the solar industry can leverage for the benefit of homebuyers and mortgage refinancers. A new source of low-cost capital is increasingly important in order to accelerate solar industry growth, as some solar leasing companies have seen their own cost of capital rise in recent months or had access to capital shut off completely. This could be the game changer the solar industry has been looking for, with the capacity to change everything from the value proposition of solar ownership all the way to how solar is marketed and sold to current and future homeowners.
What is the HomeStyle Energy Mortgage?
The HomeStyle Energy Mortgage from Fannie Mae enables a homebuyer or mortgage refinancer to add a solar system after the mortgage loan has closed. This is done by allowing up to 15 percent of the “as completed” home value to be used to pay for the cost of a solar system with funds escrowed by the lender, and gives the homeowner 180 days after the closing date to have the solar system installed. The new mortgage requires a home energy report to determine the cost-effectiveness of the solar improvement. The report must show that the present value of energy savings is greater than the cost to install. The homeowner must also have an as-completed appraisal, which includes value for the not-yet-completed solar system.
The initial concept, including the benefits of financing new solar installations within a purchase or refinance mortgage, was first proposed in 2012 to industry stakeholders, including Rocky Mountain Institute. It was then presented in 2013 at the Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.
Methods for developing a value for solar using the appraisal industry’s income and cost approaches were proposed in 2010, and later published in the fall 2013 edition of the Appraisal Journal (a publication of the Appraisal Institute), and have been allowed by both Fannie Mae and HUD since 2015. Appraisers, realtors, homeowners, and lenders can now estimate the market value of solar by using the free online PV Value® tool that was recently developed by Energy Sense Finance with funding from the Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) SunShot initiative.
Why This is a Game Changer
Adding solar when purchasing a home or refinancing a mortgage has the potential to become the default choice, like repainting a room, doing new landscaping, or any other minor improvement a homeowner makes when completing a new real estate transaction. Fannie Mae’s financing for solar can result in:
More captured value: As homeowners continue their shift away from leasing solar to owning solar, this new financing will allow homeowners to both capture more of the monthly savings (instead of paying it out to a third party), and capture the value of solar within their home’s appraised value.
Lower installation costs: This new financing method for solar will help drive down installation costs by allowing homebuyers and homeowners to consider small, local solar installation companies for a quote. Many smaller solar installation companies are currently unable to offer competitive low interest-rate financing arrangements, yet are properly licensed, trained, and able to offer very competitive installation costs without financing.
Solar as a commodity: Taking financing out of the equation will encourage healthy competition between installation companies and turn solar into a commodity, because homebuyers and mortgage refinancers can now have the cost of the solar installation included within their mortgage at their low, already agreed-upon interest rate. It’s like walking into a car dealership with a check in hand from the local credit union, knowing what the the value of the car is before purchasing, and eliminating the need for any dealer-provided financing.
Increased viability: As installation costs align with local marketplaces, solar will become competitive with traditional energy sources in more states, including those with lower utility rates, increasing the solar adoption rate in the process.
The Technical and Market Potential
The conforming mortgage industry currently averages just over four million purchase and refinance transactions per year. Meanwhile, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory estimates that up to 89 percent of available small rooftops measuring less than 5,000 square feet are good candidates for solar and can support a minimum system size of 1.5 kW.
If Freddie Mac follows Fannie Mae and HUD with a similar offering of its own, it could open up financing for new solar installations within 3.5 million residential mortgage transactions per year, allowing for solar systems to be installed after mortgage transactions close.
While several factors will have an impact on the actual market potential—age of roof, local utility rates, net energy metering policy, installation costs, available solar resource, and others—as utility costs continue to increase and the cost to install solar continues to decrease in many states, we estimate between 1 and 1.75 million homeowners will take advantage of the ability to finance solar installations at the lowest interest rate available.
This new market potential comes as the solar industry recently celebrated its one millionth installation, a milestone that took nearly 40 years to achieve.
Just one million installations of homeowner-owned solar per year at a value of $10,000 per system has the potential to add $10 billion annually to residential property values nationwide.
What About Lower Income, Low Down Payment Borrowers?
For those who can’t meet the typical Fannie Mae requirements for a higher down payment, income, or credit score, there is a similar product from HUD, referred to as the “solar and wind technology policy.”
It can be used with both purchase and refinance transactions, and allows for up to 20 percent of the “as-is” home value prior to the solar installation to be used to cover the cost of a solar installation. Additionally, it gives the borrower up to 120 days after the mortgage closing date to have the solar system installed.
What About New Home Construction With Solar?
For new home construction, the DOE’s SunShot initiative funded a working group, led by Sandia National Laboratories, that put together Solar Basics for Homebuilders, a guide that lays out the financing options available to both homebuilders and homebuyers who want to include a solar system with their new home.
Additionally, the Appraisal Institute, working in conjunction with the National Association of Homebuilders and the Building Codes Assistance Project, put together information for homebuilders to ensure that the new homebuyer receives an appraisal from a competent appraiser who has received specific training in valuing homes with solar.
There are now multiple sources of low-interest rate financing mechanisms in place for new solar installations that allow virtually all current or future homeowners to own their solar, maximize their monthly savings, and ensure the solar PV value is included in the appraised value of their homes.
Where Do We Go From Here?
Marketing to homeowners and homebuyers is the first step to ensuring they become aware of new low-interest rate financing options for solar. At the same time, appraisers need to be trained in how to properly develop value for solar systems before conducting an appraisal on a home with a solar PV system. Even further, underwriters need to be educated on allowable valuation methodologies. To assist with this effort, the Appraisal Institute offers a two-day course titled “Residential and Commercial Valuation of Solar,” developed with funding from the DOE’s SunShot initiative. There are additional educational efforts underway that will be announced later this year.
Solar installers may seek to work with real estate agents, home sellers, and homebuyers to educate them about these new financing options. They may also offer a solar installation quote with each new listing, along with an estimate of the value using the free PV Value® tool. Additionally, they may want to obtain a home energy rater designation and become a HERS or HES rater, if current guidelines remain in effect.
Energy Sense Finance plans on undertaking education efforts relating to valuation of solar with the free PV Value® tool, providing a national database of solar installations to appraisers, and addressing the valuation of energy storage with solar in the new Ei Value® platform that will be available later this year.
Providing a source of low-cost capital and enabling market value for solar were two missing pieces needed to enable a more rapid solar adoption rate and, now that those are coming into place, the solar industry can look forward to many sunny days ahead.
Jamie Johnson is the founder and CEO of Energy Sense Finance.
Rooftop solar is getting dirt cheap. That’s good news for consumers, but trouble for businesses
http://www.zmescience.com/science/news-science/rooftop-solar-growing/
Solar energy has become dirt cheap, and the market is flourishing. GTM research says the solar market should grow by 119 percent in 2016 compared to the previous year. The low prices are making a lot of rooftop residents jubilant, but the same can’t be said about the largest solar contractors in the states whose stocks have plummeted by more than 50 percent.
SolarCity stocks have fallen more than 50 percent this year. Image: GigaOm
This model worked very well so far. Customers would lease an installation over 20 years and pay less or at least as much as they did to their local utility. The business would make a nice profit on the interest. Everyone won.
Now, many new customers can afford to pay all the upfront costs themselves. In 2014, 72 percent of all rooftop solar was owned by a third-party, but by 2017 this figure should plummet to less than 50 percent, says GTM. This forecast is backed by the current market fluctuations. SolarCity’s stocks were down 53 percent in 2016 while Sunrun was down nearly 50 percent.
Companies need to adapt, and some do. SolarCity’s dropped its very popular MyPower solar loan program this year and is now running much shorter loan programs ranging from seven to ten years.
Great mention of JN/SUNW in this article. 2 days old....
RENEWABLE ENERGY
http://www.capecodtimes.com/article/20160531/NEWS/160539987
Cheap solar raises tough questions
System prices drop, putting leasing companies under pressure
A worker secures a solar panel to a residential rooftop during a SolarCity installation in Albuquerque, New Mexico Sergio Flores/Bloomberg
By Christopher Martin
Bloomberg
Posted May. 31, 2016 at 2:01 AM
It's tough to argue with free. That's why the no-money-down solar lease became the most popular choice for U.S. rooftop power.
Now, though, the equation is changing. Falling costs are making it easier for consumers to buy solar systems outright, and banks and solar installers are promoting loans with no upfront payments. That's a threat to companies such as SolarCity, Sunrun and Vivint Solar, which built their businesses on people signing decades-long contracts.
Installation growth is slowing for the big three U.S. rooftop solar installers, and GTM Research, an industry consultant, is forecasting the percentage of consumers buying rather than leasing residential systems will expand to 45 percent this year, from 38 percent in 2014. Shares in all three companies have plunged more than 40 percent this year, for a variety of reasons including a failed acquisition bid for Vivint and questions about SolarCity's strategy.
"Leasing was the major game but that's changing quickly," said Patrick Jobin, an analyst at Credit Suisse Group AG. "Consumers are starting to realize there are better options."
Greg Gill, a retired IBM employee, was looking for ways to cut his $400 monthly utility bill. He considered leasing but decided to pay $32,370 for a 7.3-kilowatt system that was installed in September at his home outside Sacramento.
Gill charged it on a credit card (to earn rewards) and then paid it off in cash, he said. His April utility bill was $1.18, he earned a $10,000 tax credit and he's expecting an 11 percent return on the investment.
"A tree-hugger friend of mine was dead-set on SolarCity," Gill said. After talking to five installers, he crunched the numbers and concluded that buying was a better deal.
"It really was a no-brainer," he said. "Even if you financed it at 3 percent, you still come out ahead over leasing."
He's not alone. By next year, customers who own their systems will make up the majority of the U.S. residential solar market for the first time since 2011, according to Boston-based GTM. Third-party companies, mainly lease providers, will account for the rest. And that shift is accelerating. Last July, Nicole Litvak, a GTM analyst, predicted that owning wouldn't become the top choice until 2020.
Leasing companies are aware of the trend, including SolarCity, the biggest U.S. rooftop installer, which rolled out a no-money-down loan program this month. That replaced a more complicated financing program introduced in 2014 that ended this year.
"We anticipate loans will continue to be very popular," Kady Cooper, a spokeswoman, said by e-mail. The financing deals offer returns to SolarCity that are comparable to leases, she said, in part because the company's volume helps it negotiate terms with lenders. A 10-year loan comes with a 2.99 percent fixed interest rate, and 20 years gets 4.99 percent.
SolarCity's growth is slowing. It expects to install about 1 gigawatt of panels this year, about 15 percent more than last year. In February, the company said 2016 installations would increase as much as 40 percent.
Vivint announced in November that it was offering loans in Utah, its home state, through a partnership with the financing company Solar Mosaic Inc., with plans to expand to other states.
"There is some increasing demand from customers that would like to own their own system," Casey Briggs, a spokeswoman, said in an e-mail, though leases remain "the primary driver in the market for residential solar."
At Sunrun, leasing will make up about 80 percent of its business in the fourth quarter, down from 85 percent now. It introduced a loan program in September. The San Francisco-based company installed 60 megawatts of panels in the first quarter, up 63 percent from a year earlier. In the fourth quarter, it added 68 megawatts, an 83 percent increase from the same period a year earlier.
Ownership offers advantages over leases, said Jeffrey Osborne, an analyst at Cowen & Co. Consumers don't get entangled in decades-long contracts, and because they own the panels they get all tax benefits and other incentives.
"When I put solar on my house it made so much more sense to buy," Osborne said. Leasing "made a lot of sense in the beginning. Now that there are a million solar rooftops, banks are more comfortable" financing the systems.
Installers say consumers are showing more interest in owning the panels on their roofs.
Nebraska aims for five-fold increase in solar generation this year
SOLAR: Nebraska is set to quintuple the amount of solar being produced in the state this year. (NET)
FREE POWER IS ADDICTING!
--------------------
Solar power on the rise in Nebraska
When people talk about renewable energy in Nebraska, they’re usually talking about wind power. But the use of solar power is on track to more than quintuple in the state this year, with the prospect of more to come in the future.
It’s a windy afternoon at a construction site on the western edge of Lincoln. Weaving through a field where thousands of metal posts jut from the ground, construction workers hoist tabletop-sized solar panels up and bolt them into place.
More than 15,000 panels are being installed over 20 acres here, in what will be the state’s largest solar installation, just north of the interstate.
“We’re pretty happy with the location, being right along Interstate 80. It should make a nice landmark for people coming and leaving Lincoln. You’ll be able to see it pretty well,” said Scott Benson, manager of resource and transmission planning for the Lincoln Electric System.
When it goes online next month, the project will generate 3.6 megawatts, which is enough to power about 900 homes. Benson says 1,300 LES customers have voluntarily agreed to contribute, starting at $3 a month, to bring the community solar project to Lincoln. A private company, Enerparc, is building and will operate the facility, and LES will buy the power that’s generated.
David Bracht, head of the Nebraska Energy Office, says the state started this year with only around 1 megawatt of solar power on line. That’s enough to power roughly 250 homes. The Solar Energy Industries Association, a trade group based in Washington, D.C., ranked Nebraska 48th among the 50 states and the District of Columbia for installed solar capacity, ahead of only Alaska, North Dakota and South Dakota. But the Association’s research director, Shawn Rumery, says Nebraska has the potential to rank higher – 38th for rooftop solar panels in urban areas, 10th for bigger installations in rural areas.
“Nebraska ranks relatively low in rooftop pv (photovoltaic) potential, because you don’t have as many homes there as California or Texas would. But you rank relatively high in, I think, rural utility scale because you have a lot of land without any shade,” Rumery said.
Bracht said Nebraska’s relatively low rates for conventionally-generated electricity also play a role in other states taking the lead in solar power.
“In California, the retail rate that a residential customer would pay is probably more than double what a customer pays here. And so consequently, long ago that solar panel made a lot of sense to that customer in California,” he said.
But Bracht says a 30 percent federal tax credit on solar power investments, available to both homeowners and businesses, has spurred innovation and dropped the cost of generating solar power by almost 80 percent over the last six years. (For information on low-interest loans for solar projects, click here).
That and other factors have contributed to an increase in solar business in Nebraska, says Graham Christensen, who runs a solar consulting and contracting business.
“It’s been a long, kind of gradual process. I think the trends are that it is picking up. A lot of folks are really wanting to know how to make this work, both on an environmental side but also just on a business standpoint. All those trend lines appear to be good, whether it’s in the country or in Nebraska,” Christensen said.
Christensen says there are still some challenges. Nebraska’s “net metering” law requires utilities to buy any excess power generated by customers with solar panels, but only from systems up to 25 kilowatts. Christensen says that’s more than enough for the average homeowner, but not enough for others.
“If you’re a little bit bigger than a mid-sized farm, you’re over that 25 kilowatt threshold pretty easily. So you can’t really justify after that point to power your operation in an economical fashion,” he said.
When the net metering law was adopted in 2009, utilities argued that allowing it for larger solar generators could cost them more money for bigger lines to put the power on the grid.
Another factor that has spurred solar development in other states is a direct production credit for every kilowatt hour generated. That’s been proposed in Nebraska, but never passed.
Still, Bracht said he expects more solar projects in the future. Bracht says solar projects, which are built to produce much smaller amounts of power than even one wind turbine, could be an increasingly good fit for Nebraska’s smaller public power districts and communities.
“I think when it comes to solar, particularly community solar, the fact that we are 100 percent public power actually is supportive of community solar developments,” he said.
Bracht said with the Lincoln project and other smaller ones built or under construction this year, Nebraska will add around five times as much solar power this year as it had at the end of 2015. For information on solar projects in Nebraska, click here.
It's back to CABN again.... Not doing good...
Solar PV Prices Will Fall Below $1.00 per Watt by 2020
https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/solar-pv-prices-to-fall-below-1.00-per-watt-by-2020
GTM Research describes how the U.S. will achieve the ambitious SunShot target.
by Mike Munsell June 01, 2016
http://www.greentechmedia.com/research/report/us-solar-pv-price-brief-h1-2016
According to GTM Research’s latest report, U.S. Solar PV Price Brief H1 2016: Pricing, Breakdowns and Forecasts, pricing for fixed-tilt ground-mount PV systems will hit $0.99 per watt by 2020. This would achieve the Department of Energy’s ambitious SunShot target of $1.00 per watt by the end of this decade.
The report provides a detailed breakdown and forecast of solar costs by component and segment.
FIGURE: Utility Fixed-Tilt PV Systems Pricing by Cost Category
Source: U.S. Solar PV Price Brief H1 2016: Pricing, Breakdowns and Forecasts
http://www.greentechmedia.com/research/report/us-solar-pv-price-brief-h1-2016
GTM Research estimates the price for a utility-scale fixed-tilt ground-mount PV system to hover around $1.25 per watt today. Modules represent half of the cost, additional hardware such as inverters and balance-of-system components represent 22 percent, and the remaining 28 percent is made up of soft costs.
The report notes that soft costs present the both biggest opportunity, but also the largest hurdle for future cost reductions, particularly in the residential and commercial market segments where prices are much higher than in the utility-scale segments.
Residential PV prices in the U.S. average $3.00 as of the first half of this year. According to the report, soft costs make up 64 percent of residential system costs today, and despite system prices falling by a third by 2020, soft costs will still account for 60 percent of the total system price.
Average U.S. commercial solar prices just dipped below $2 per watt, but the report highlights additional opportunities for further cost reductions.
Google’s Project Sunroof Expands to 42 States and Millions More Rooftops
image description
Tesla Discontinues 10-Kilowatt-Hour Powerwall Home Battery
image description
The End of SunEdison: Developer Now Looking Into Liquidating Its Assets
White Papers
Storage 101 for Solar Installers
Solar Power Plant Reliability – Why Should We Care?
“Commercial PV installers need to find more ways to shorten the length and de-risk aspects of the project cycle in order to substantially reduce origination and overhead costs,” said Ben Gallagher, GTM Research solar analyst and lead author of the report.
He notes that solar-specific software tools and simplified business modes will also help lower solar costs. GTM Research forecasts U.S. commercial solar pricing to fall 25 percent between 2015 and 2020.
FIGURE: U.S. PV Systems Pricing
http://www.greentechmedia.com/research/report/us-solar-pv-price-brief-h1-2016
Sunworks Inc (SUNW) Downgraded to Sell at Zacks Investment Research
Must mean that it is going up!
http://zolmax.com/investing/sunworks-inc-sunw-downgraded-to-sell-at-zacks-investment-research/666735.html
Zacks Investment Research downgraded shares of Sunworks Inc (NASDAQ:SUNW) from a hold rating to a sell rating in a report published on Tuesday.
According to Zacks, “Sunworks, Inc. provides solar power solutions. The company focused on the design, installation and management of solar power systems for commercial, agricultural and residential customers. Sunworks, Inc., formerly known as Solar3D, Inc., is based in Roseville, United States. “
Expansion, not an acquisition....
The whiners will say that it's costing them money... LOL!
??
Oregon made a commitment to go coal free and expand renewable energy....
SunWORKS coal doesn't/
Oregon Set To Become First Coal-Free State
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/oregon-coal-free_us_56da088ce4b0ffe6f8e98a7c
Oregon lawmakers have approved legislation to eliminate coal from the state’s electrical supply by 2035, the first U.S. state to do so.
Let them be back 20 years. Just set your place the way you want. 1 good builder and 1 good installer. You have 5 1/2 to almost 6 sun hours.
Much easier for off the grid set up.
Water would be the hardest.
Other than that you are good to go.
Sun and water in and poop out. That is all that you need.
Go ahead and raise your oil and gas prices...
Our product will continue to get cheaper. AND WE WILL WIN!
Sniper ought to like this...
In our opinion: Transitioning from coal to solar — Utah in the crosshairs
Deseret News editorial
Published: Tuesday, May 31 2016 5:55 a.m. MDT
Updated: 4 hours ago
A public meeting this month on plans to adjust the manner in which federal coal mining leases are managed drew protests from miners and others who say the government has an agenda to destroy the coal industry. The same week, state officials detailed an explosion in the growth of solar energy generation in Utah. The juxtaposition of the two incidents illustrates the crossroads at which the nation’s energy policy now sits. Government policy will influence but not determine where it goes from here, which is becoming manifestly clear.
The transition from reliance on non-renewable energy sources is progressing at a pace not anticipated only a few years ago. The rapidity of the growth in solar installations will speed up the pace at which demand for coal-fired energy diminishes. For those in the mining industry, the change is painful. For the communities that have long supported coal extraction, it is hugely disruptive. Government regulators shouldn’t be asked or expected to manipulate land policies for the purpose of preserving jobs, but policies must take into account the impact of the upheaval on people and the places where they live.
A public hearing on the Bureau of Land Management’s plan to put a three-year moratorium on new coal leases as it considers adjustments to leasing policies drew several hundred coal industry workers, many of whom condemn the plan as a campaign to appease powerful environmental interests. But the government would be negligent if it failed to recalibrate its policies in light of the trends toward lower coal demand.
That trend is clearly influenced by the upsurge of both supply and demand for solar power, which in Utah has resulted in significant increases in industrial generating capacity, as well as in the use of household rooftop systems. The state anticipates new solar generation systems will add 850 megawatts of additional capacity next year. In the last six years, the number of tax credits processed for household rooftop solar installations increased from about 150 to more than 3,000.
Interesting comment that I remembered. Buy a home with solar installed. $20 or $30 more on the mortgage, and save $150 per month on the electric bill....
Eventually they learn!
Australia brown coal warriors switch to solar, disruptive technologies
http://reneweconomy.com.au/2016/australia-brown-coal-warriors-switch-to-solar-disruptive-technologies-22350
By Giles Parkinson on 30 May 2016
U.S. solar power demand intensifies
Local plant runs at full capacity as falling cost of electricity generation heats up market
By all measures, 2016 is turning out to be a monster year for the solar industry, and by extension, for solar panel makers such as First Solar Inc.
The U.S. solar market is expected by year’s end to have grown 119 percent over 2015 numbers, with the number of panels installed providing a whopping 16 gigawatts of power, more than doubling last year’s previous record-breaking 7.3 gigawatts, according to Boston-based GTM Research.
Currently, the six production lines that employ 1,400 workers at First Solar’s solar panel manufacturing plant in Perrysburg Township are running at full capacity, producing commercial grade, thin-film solar panels for utility-scale solar power plants.
First Solar, based in Tempe, Ariz., has no room to expand its only plant in the United States even if it wished to do so.
According to GTM, which stands for GreenTechMedia, utility solar projects will be 74 percent of installations this year.
But Sean Gallagher, vice president of state affairs for the Solar Energies Industry Association, said the market is booming for the consumer rooftop industry too.
Overall, the industry is being driven by continued falling prices in the cost of power generation from solar panels, an extension at the end of last year of federal tax credits for using solar, blossoming state policies mandating more use of green technologies such as solar and wind, new rules allowing those who have solar power to interconnect with the power grid, and the growing use of net metering — the act of someone with solar panels being allowed to use the power that they generate at any time.
“The growth has been strong year over year. As these facets continue to take hold, and the cost comes down steeply, that increases the ability of customers to go solar and that increases the likelihood of bigger projects getting done,” Mr. Gallagher said.
The surge this year in demand for solar panels is being driven, in part, by the previous uncertainty of the federal Solar Investment Tax Credit, or ITC.
The credit was set to expire at the end of this year, prompting many large-scale solar projects to be fast-tracked and pushed to go in 2016 for fear of losing the valuable 30 percent tax credit.
At the end of 2015, the credit was extended through 2023, easing some of the pressure to get projects done this year, experts said.
“There may be a slight dropoff in 2017 because of the effect of the ITC,” Mr. Gallagher said. “A lot of projects were pulled forward by companies trying to get projects done this year. But we foresee strong growth in the market after 2020. By that time, we predict an annual market of 20 gigawatts of new solar projects.”
The residential market too is soaring, thanks to a new industry practice that began a few years ago — the leasing of panels.
“You already have lower prices so more customers can afford solar panels. But there’s increasing acceptance of third-party leasing models, like a car lease,” Mr. Gallagher said. “That takes down the upfront cost that many customers previously couldn’t afford.”
However, Ohio is a lagging participant in the surging solar market in the United States.
Only about 10 megawatts’ worth of new solar power was installed in Ohio in 2015, according to Solar Energy Industries Association.
One megawatt of solar power is enough to power about 164 homes.
GTM Research said in 2015 the state ranked 28th overall in solar installations.
For 2016, the solar energy association estimates Ohio will add just 15 megawatts, and in the expected upcoming boom years, just 25 megawatts for 2017 and 43 megawatts for 2018.
Jason Slattery, who is the director of solar for solar projects installation firm GEM Energy, one of the companies in the Rudolph/?Libbe Group, said Ohio, whether deliberately or not, is reluctant to embrace green energy like solar.
“From our perspective — and we do solar development all over the U.S. — when looking at the surrounding states, Ohio is like the solar donut hole,” Mr. Slattery said. “We’re doing activity on solar projects in all the states surrounding Ohio. But Ohio is challenged.”
In 2014, the state legislature and Gov. John Kasich put a two-year freeze on mandates requiring utilities to find at least 25 percent of their power from solar, wind, and other green sources by 2025 and reduce overall energy consumption by 22 percent.
This year, a bill has been introduced that freezes Ohio’s renewable portfolio standard mandate permanently, although Mr. Kasich has said he is against it.
Mr. Slattery said the freeze and a permanent one make no sense when most other states are going in the opposite direction.
“Solar in Michigan is booming. Indiana’s booming. Pennsylvania, I would not say it is boom there, but it is doing more than Ohio,” Mr. Slattery said. “And New York is really booming.”
“Ohio is the first to freeze their [renewable portfolio standard],” he said. “And yet, what we’re seeing is the other states are increasing their [standards]. They’ve already met their goals and they’re increasing their requirements.
“Ohio is the oddball, which totally baffles my mind,” Mr. Slattery said.
However, the slowdown in solar expansion in Ohio has not affected state-based companies involved in the industry.
GEM Energy will grow 30 percent this year, Mr. Slattery said. “There is activity in development solar projects in Ohio, not as many as we’d like, but there is some growth planned over the next few years,” he said.
And the company is actively bidding on multiple projects in the surrounding states, Mr. Slattery added.
First Solar began noticing a jump in demand a year ago, prompting it to hire 60 more workers to push production at the area plant to nearly 600 megawatts and make it the largest solar module assembler in North America.
The growth spurt for 2016 and beyond means it is highly unlikely any dip in employment will occur at the Perrysburg Township plant over the next five years and possibly longer, company officials said.
The extension of the federal Solar tax credit, in particular, has given industry a huge boost and in turn, made the fortunes of First Solar and others in the industry look sunny.
“We already have a longer-term pipeline of projects that was quite strong,” Steve Krum, a First Solar spokesman said.
“The ITC extension rushed some projects in the early stage of development out a little further because there’s no need to get under the wire anymore,” Mr. Krum said.
“But the bigger thing is I think it has created a greater confidence in the industry on the whole. People can now go forward without the anxiety of a shoe dropping and curtailing things,” Mr. Krum added.
First Solar, which in 2011 began building a second U.S. plant in Mesa, Ariz. but then sold the nearly-unused facility in 2012 after the market was saturated with unsold panels, is now talking again about adding a plant if demand continues to grow.
The company would need a new facility to build its Series 5 and Series 6 solar panels — larger products now in prototype stage that have three times the wattage of the standard Series 4 panels now made in Perrysburg.
First Solar is developing the Series 5 at its plant in Malaysia. But Mr. Krum said that if the company decided in the next few years to go ahead with a new plant, it could be built anywhere.
First Solar chief operating officer Tymen de Jong, said in April during the company’s annual presentation to Wall Street analysts that it has the machinery for a new plant.
“We do have eight lines of stored tools that we purchased back in 2009. So if we choose to, we can do something like this: starting in late 2017 we can deploy four lines of Series 4 technology; we take them out of storage; we upgrade them to [Series 5] technology node,” Mr. de Jong said.
The new lines “requires a new building. ...,” Mr. de Jong added.
Read more at http://www.toledoblade.com/Energy/2016/05/29/U-S-solar-power-demand-intensifies.html#Tb1qAz0izskjGYDU.99
This man is trying to save the planet - and if he can't save you money as well, he'll pay you
Norman Crowley wants your business to save money on energy costs - and he'll pay you if he fails. How confident is that?
He spoke to Paul Melia
Norman Crowley is on a mission. The founder and chief executive of energy-efficiency company Crowley Carbon, he wants to educate the world about climate change - and make money in the process.
With the signing of the Paris Climate Agreement last December, world leaders have sent the message that the way we power our homes and run our businesses is changing. We are moving away from fossil fuels and to renewables.
But the first step to tackling climate change is to reduce energy consumption, which is where Mr Crowley comes in. He says he can reduce bills for companies with an annual spend between €400,000 and €1m. He will pay you if he fails.
"What bugs me is the lack of speed at which this problem is being handled by pretty much everybody," he says. "We can take the costs of lighting down by 80pc (using efficient bulbs and controls), but yet 90pc of sites we visit have old lights in them - which is a no-brainer.
"Say, for example, you're a food company with an annual energy bill of €1m. We can take it down by €350,000 a year. And you don't need any money, we will finance it.
"We have €400m coming from various banks including Santander, Bank of London and the Middle East (BLME) and Close Leasing. With stock market volatility, the pension funds aren't getting the returns. The money men of the world are starved of yield, and they're moving in this direction.
"But if you want to finance it, there's no catch. I insure the risk. I take a bond out with Munich Re - so I pay if you don't get the saving."
But reducing consumption is just one part of the grand plan. The next stage is to take large energy users completely off-grid, allowing them to generate their own power.
The Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland says there are some 180 companies across the State with an annual energy spend of €1m. They account for around 56pc of total industrial use. Even taking a fraction off-grid could go an enormous way towards making a meaningful cut in emissions.
"The first thing we do is energy efficiency," he explains. "We reduce your bill by 35pc. It might be more efficient lights or chillers, and there's a two-year payback, which is a 50pc return on your money.
"The next thing in, for example a food company, is to figure out the waste you have, which is food. We take that food, use anaerobic digestion and produce gas. The payback for anaerobic digestion is in four and a half years. Then we install solar. If I put all those things together it means you're off grid.
"Until this year, you needed a government subsidy to do this - but because solar is cheap and technology around energy efficiency so good, it means the blend works.
"If the company paid for all that stuff, it could cost around €10m, or €650,000 per year for 15 years. But we can finance it, covering all the costs including operations and maintenance. The reason we should all be excited about this is we're not relying on Government subsidies. The efficiency piece is the spice, and our payback is going down all the time."
From Clonakilty in Co Cork, the 45-year old father of two grew up on a farm but quickly moved towards technology. He learned to weld when he was 14, before discovering computers and getting "hooked" on writing code.
In 1995, he established technology company Trinity Commerce which he sold to Eircom four years later for £14m.
"I retired at 28, but then I discovered retiring was a bad idea," he says.
With others, he then set up the Inspired Gaming Group which invented the digital slot machine.
"Before we came along, bookies had slot machines with an average take of £200 a week. We asked why they didn't have a digital one where you could download games. So they said 'why don't you go and do it'.
"We built one, and it was rubbish. The second was better, and we got better at it, and by the time we finished they were taking in £700 a week."
By 2006, when it floated on the London Stock Exchange, the company had 2,500 employees and revenues of $500m. It was sold two years later. He owned 20pc.
Along the way he also established 'The Cloud'. which was Europe's largest WiFi operator. It was sold to Sky in 2011 for £80m.
The next challenge was figuring out what to do next.
"You're 38. You want to set up a business which makes money, but which brings an honesty to what you're trying to do. We also wanted to do something which was a bit more meaningful.
"We looked around at what the problems were out there, and one of the biggest was climate change which we wanted to tackle."
And so in 2009, with his brother Tom, he founded Crowley Carbon and the grand plan to tackle climate change began. It set up above a Spar shop in Delgany, Co Wicklow, before moving to the Powerscourt estate five years ago.
"At the start we went after supermarkets, and we were very good. We told the supermarkets we could reduce their energy consumption by 30pc, and we did. We were as shocked as they were.
"Then we started working with industrial customers. Our first industrial customer was Dawn Meats - we reduced their oil bill on one site by 90pc, and on average by 50pc to 60pc.
"We expanded into the UK around 2010, and into the Middle East in 2012. Now we're all over the world and across 20 counties - Bangalore, Costa Rica, the Middle East and the US."
Clients include Vodafone, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Dawn Meats and Boston Scientific. The industries span from food processors to car manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, office blocks and factories.
The company has done work on the Centre of Engineering and Manufacturing Excellence in London, and six 80-storey towers, where energy costs fell by €1m each.
"Our team spans guys who worked with the Royal Navy for years and others who operated chillers. A lot of the excitement is learning new things, and I love that part of the business. You could be in a food factory then a place making cars, then the biggest shopping mall in the world or world's biggest building."
In the past, it was people who operated the equipment, but that's rapidly changing.
"One of the things that's enabling this is the digital factory. A car has hundreds of sensors, and there's no-one with a spanner starting it. But in a factory, there's people manually tweaking boilers and chillers.
"Our technology C3 (Carbon Control Centre) is putting sensors all over a factory and those sensors are deciding the most efficient way to run a plant. That hasn't happened before.
"We finished a project recently and 15 people didn't do that job any more. To be honest, there is a negative jobs story there. But there is a huge shortage of guys who know how to run stuff - we hire people to tell us what to tell the sensors to do. Remember too, it's said that if or when driverless cars take off, 5pc of the world's people will become unemployed."
He says that selling the message about the merits of efficiency is easier now.
"There's no mystery, it's just engineering, Customers might say they have no money. We say we have €400m, and it's the right thing to do, it's just irresponsible not to do it. I get frustrated. Look how cool it is - you're going to your client and saying: 'You haven't spent money, you've reduced bills by 35pc and you're going to be off-grid'.
"The excuse is you need to have the government to subsidise it. You don't. There's nothing we need new to happen. It's not all in the future. All of a sudden it's real."
A particular bugbear of Crowley's is the lack of ambition on efficiency in the public sector. Under EU rules, we must reduce energy consumption by 33pc by 2020. We're half-way there with less than three years to go.
"Crowley Carbon doesn't do government work. Our sales people aren't allowed to bid for contracts anywhere in the world, so we're not looking for the business," he says.
"But it's a disgrace that the public sector isn't doing it. Hopefully with the commitments we have made to the world in Paris, we will now get onto it.
"A €2bn investment would help massively on the 2020 target and would avoid a massive amount of fines. The truth is the money is there, and the process of doing efficiency projects in Government will create a sea of employment because plumbers, electricians and others have to do this work.
"The problem is there hasn't been the political will to do it. But it's all good news. It's money."
Among his priorities is the Centre for Climate Change, a foundation he established in 2015, and the Cool Planet Experience which opens in Powerscourt early next year.
An interactive visitor attraction, it aims to illustrate the extent of the climate change challenge and demonstrate some of the solutions. The centre is tied into universities and supported by corporate sponsors. The Sunday Independent and INM are media sponsors.
"We felt that if people knew how serious the problem is, and how easy it is to do something about it, they would do something about it," he says.
"The first stage is to educate every child between six and 18 years for free, to educate them on the challenge and how easy and fun and profitable it will be to fix it."
The foundation partners include the NTR Foundation, Calor, Vodafone and Crowley Carbon. It will cost around €3m to put in place, with Crowley Carbon putting in around €1m.
"People might say: 'It's easy for Crowley, he made money and can do the do-gooder stuff'. But we lose sleep about where money is coming from for the foundation. We're putting a big chunk of our profits into this. We're putting our money where our mouth is. We have a mission."
Sunday Indo Business
Total is a global, integrated energy producer and provider, the world’s fourth-largest international oil and gas company1 and second-largest solar operator
If other energy companies would have woken up earlier, we wouldn't have such a war!
http://us.total.com/en-us
Renewables Become New Baseload For Power In South Australia
May 26th, 2016 by Joshua S Hill
.Only a week after South Australia closed its last coal-fired generator, renewables are stepping up to act as the state’s power baseload
The imaginatively named southern Australian state of South Australia recently closed its last coal-fired generator earlier this month, with Alinta Energy’s Port Augusta brown coal power generator switched off on the morning of May 9th. RenewEconomy‘s Live Generation figures show coal’s absence, leaving gas, wind, and solar to pick up the slack.
South Australia’s power generation will necessarily flex, as is the nature of renewable energy, and you can see that gas is likely to serve immediately as the reliable energy generator for the immediate future.
However, the Melbourne Energy Institute believes that, “already a new pattern is emerging that points the way to a new energy system” in South Australia “built around wind and solar and other renewables,” rather than coal, gas, or nuclear. RenewEconomy‘s live figures show things as they are at the time I’m writing, but a graph provided by Dylan McConnel from the Melbourne Energy Institute shows the first week of electricity production in South Australia after the Port Augusta coal plant was switched off.
As can be seen, wind energy (the green in the middle) provided a substantial majority of the state’s power for the week.
The Melbourne Energy Institute believes this is to be the likely pattern in the future for electricity generation in South Australia. Energy systems with high renewable energy penetration will rely first on variable electricity providers such as wind and solar, and then resort to “flexible” or “dispatchable” sources such as gas, as is the situation at the moment, or looking forward, hydro, solar towers with storage, and emerging technologies such as geothermal or ocean energy.
This means in the near future, South Australia may need to rely on gas from in-state, or brown coal from Victoria. Looking forward, however, South Australia may need not worry, with plans for 100% renewable energy by 2030 in the cards.
-----------------
Renewable Energy: Southern Australia Leads Take-Up
by Graham Pierrepoint
The concept of renewable energy is one which continues to provoke debate the world over – with those in favor keen to emphasize its clean nature and effective energy production over existing power sources such as coal and nuclear plants – however, wind farms and hydro-electric dams are yet to be taken up in the majority worldwide. South Australia, however, appears to be leading the movement towards widespread take-up of renewable energy.
The closure of the state’s last coal power station has seen South Australia convert to renewable sources for the bulk of electricity provided to citizens, with over 50% of energy produced accounted for from solar and air power – with the remaining half accounted for from combined cycle gas plants. The transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy comes largely as a result of the coal plant – that had been in operation for over three decades – no longer being able to compete financially with the lowering rates of renewable energy. As a result, the planet closed down despite having been in operation since the mid 1980s – making it the end of an era, and a large contribution to South Australia’s RenewablesSA initiative.
The initiative was set up to promise investment of $10 billion in low carbon initiatives leading up to 2025 – and this latest move shows that the state is unafraid of seizing the promise with both hands just seven years into the initiative. The Independent further states, however, that a dependency upon renewable energy generation may not yet be forthcoming as current systems need to adapt to the new sources of power. It is clear that South Australia is committed to moving forward with a gradual conversion to cleaner power sources in future – but it will mean concerted work to ensure that existing frameworks are able to fall back on natural resources.
The use of natural resources for power continues to inspire a debate that takes into account financial viability, long term effectiveness and just how feasible it will be to replace existing fuels – and it is clear that there are a number of nations throughout the world that continue to commit to such causes. With South Australia and Portugal recently leading such initiatives, it will remain to be seen if the world can eventually convert to air or solar power full-time – but, rest assured, we will aim to be amongst the first to let you know of any developments!
“I know a lot about solar”, Trump revived the old canard that solar and wind are “very expensive”, and estimated a 30-year payback time.
Great, he could give solar tech to China.
Just like way back, where "everybody wanted" 4,000# American Iron, and gave away the small car market....
Japan, just loved us...
Renewable energy jobs continue to rise even as employment in the broader energy sector falls
IRENA Press Release:
Abu Dhabi, U.A.E., 25 May 2016 – More than 8.1 million people worldwide are now employed by the renewable energy industry – a five percent increase from last year – according to a report released today by the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) at its 11th Council meeting. The report, Renewable Energy and Jobs – Annual Review 2016, also provides a global estimate of the number of jobs supported by large hydropower, with a conservative estimate of an additional 1.3 million direct jobs worldwide.
“The continued job growth in the renewable energy sector is significant because it stands in contrast to trends across the energy sector,” said IRENA Director-General Adnan Z. Amin. “This increase is being driven by declining renewable energy technology costs and enabling policy frameworks. We expect this trend to continue as the business case for renewables strengthens and as countries move to achieve their climate targets agreed in Paris.”
The total number of renewable energy jobs worldwide rose in 2015 while jobs in the broader energy sector fell, finds the report. In the United States for example, renewable energy jobs increased 6 per cent while employment in oil and gas decreased 18 per cent. Likewise in China, renewable energy employed 3.5 million people, while oil and gas employed 2.6 million.
As in previous years, enabling policy frameworks remained a key driver of employment. National and state auctions in India and Brazil, tax credits in the United States and favourable policies in Asia have all contributed to employment increases.
Countries with the most renewable energy jobs in 2015 included China, Brazil, the United States, India, Japan and Germany. The solar photovoltaic (PV) sector remains the largest renewable energy employer worldwide with 2.8 million jobs (up from 2.5 at last count) with jobs in manufacturing, installation and operations & maintenance. Liquid biofuels was the second largest global employer with 1.7 million jobs, followed by wind power, which grew 5 per cent to reach 1.1 million global jobs.
“As the ongoing energy transition accelerates, growth in renewable energy employment will remain strong,” said Mr. Amin. “IRENA’s research estimates that doubling the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix by 2030 – enough to meet global climate and development targets – would result in more than 24 million jobs worldwide.”
Select report findings:
Solar PV is the largest renewable energy employer with 2.8 million jobs worldwide, an 11 per cent increase from last count. Employment grew in Japan and the United States, stabilised in China, and decreased in the European Union.
Strong wind installation rates in China, the United States and Germany drove a 5 per cent increase in global employment to reach 1.1 million jobs. Wind employment in the United States alone rose by 21 per cent.
Jobs in liquid biofuels, solar heating and cooling, and large and small hydropower decreased due to various factors including increased mechanisation, slowing housing markets, the removal of subsidies and the drop in new installations.
With more than a third of the global renewable energy capacity additions in 2015, China led employment with 3.5 million jobs.
In the European Union, the United Kingdom, Germany and Denmark were the global leaders in offshore wind employment. Overall, job figures in the EU declined for the fourth year due to weak economic growth. Jobs fell 3 per cent to 1.17 million in 2014, the last year for which data is available. Germany remains the highest European Union renewables employer– employing nearly as many as France, the United Kingdom, and Italy combined.
In the United States, renewable energy employment increased 6 per cent driven by growth in wind and solar. Solar employment grew 22 per cent – 12 times faster than job creation in the United States economy – surpassing jobs in oil and gas. Employment in wind industry also grew 21 per cent.
Japan experienced impressive gains in solar PV in recent years, resulting in a 28 per cent increase in employment in 2014.
In India, solar and wind markets have seen substantial activity, as the ambitious renewable energy targets are translated into concrete policy frameworks.
Africa has also seen many interesting developments leading to job creation, including solar and wind development in Egypt, Morocco, Kenya and South Africa.
IRENA’s early research indicates that the renewable energy sector employed larger shares of women than the broader energy sector.
Download Renewable Energy and Jobs – Annual Review 2016: http://bit.ly/1TrVO5o
Because until now, JN and crew have made great sense. Still near 0 debt with a $40M + evaluation.
Not like Sandridge Energy with a $11M in value and what? $4B indebt?
Isn't there a debt to equity ratio?
Even Elon is taking a page out of JN's book.
Did a HUGE secondary like 10% to raise billions to expand production to a huge number.... 500,000 cars....
Use that $30B equity to become a major player...
And WE will become a major player too!
2 hours 38 minutes until another SOLAR off grid experiment!
http://www.spacex.com/webcast
Clean-Energy Jobs Surpass Oil Drilling for First Time in U.S.
Green workforce rose 5% worldwide in 2015 to 8.1 million
Irena expects as many as 24 million in clean energy by 2030
The number of U.S. jobs in solar energy overtook those in oil and natural gas extraction for the first time last year, helping drive a global surge in employment in the clean-energy business as fossil-fuel companies faltered.
Employment in the U.S. solar business grew 12 times faster than overall job creation, the International Renewable Energy Agency said in a report on Wednesday. About 8.1 million people worldwide had jobs in the clean energy in 2015, up from 7.7 million in 2014, according to the industry group based in Abu Dhabi.
Fed by state initiatives to spur clean energy and innovative financing measures offered by companies such as SolarCity Corp., developers are adding workers at record rates to install rooftop panels. Oil and gas producers by contrast have slashed 351,410 jobs worldwide since prices began to slide in the middle of 2014, according to Houston-based Graves & Co.
“The continued job growth in the renewable energy sector is significant because it stands in contrast to trends across the energy sector,” said Adnan Amin, director-general of Irena, which is based in Abu Dhabi. “This increase is being driven by declining renewable energy technology costs and enabling policy frameworks. We expect this to continue as the case for renewables strengthens and countries move to achieve climate targets.”
The pace of jobs growth worldwide slowed last year from 18 percent in 2014 mainly because of lower investment in biofuels following the oil price slump, which made alternative fuels less economically attractive, Irena said. Brent crude prices slipped 35 percent last year, the third consecutive decline. Biofuels made from crops such as sugar and corn employed 1.7 million workers, second to solar with almost 2.8 million jobs.
The group projects the workforce in clean energy will grow to 24 million by 2030 if United Nations targets are met on climate change and development.
The 58 percent slide in oil prices since June 2014, triggered by Saudi Arabia’s grab for market share, has prompted reductions in employment in the fossil-fuels industry. Many higher-cost producers in the U.S. shale industry, Canada’s oil sands and Brazil’s deepwater-drilling projects have become unprofitable. The transition to clean energy spurred by a landmark deal in Paris involving almost 200 nations is reflected in the global labor market for renewables.
China installed the most new renewable capacity in the world in 2015 with 65 gigawatts. It employed 35 percent more people in its clean energy industry than in oil and gas.
China, Brazil and the U.S. were at the front of the pack for renewable energy jobs. Asia is home to 60 percent of the world’s renewable energy employees, up from just over 50 percent in 2013. Japan saw jobs in its solar PV industry gain by 28 percent in 2014.
Most of Brazil’s clean energy workers were in the liquid biofuels industry, which was the second-largest job market in renewables after solar PV.
A couple of days old...
State regulatory review board rejects PUC's net-metering limits
May 19, 2016 3:15 PM
A state regulatory review board has struck down limits on how much surplus electricity customers who have their own alternative energy generators, like rooftop solar panels, can sell back to utilities in Pennsylvania.
The five-member Pennsylvania Independent Regulatory Review Commission on Thursday unanimously rejected the caps, which were established by the Public Utility Commission in February after a contentious public rulemaking process. The rules would have limited the amount of electricity a customer can sell to a utility at full retail rates — a process known as net metering — to 200 percent of that customer’s annual consumption.
At issue was whether the PUC had the legal authority to impose the limits. The review commission rejected the rules because the PUC “could not point to any statutory language or anything from the General Assembly that said they were permitted” to set the 200 percent cap, IRRC executive director David Sumner said.
Net metering was permitted as part of the 2004 Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards Act, in which legislators set a capacity limit for residential systems at 50 kilowatts. They also capped commercial systems at three megawatts and industrial systems at five megawatts.
But the PUC wanted to go further, imposing an additional limit on the size of solar installations based on how much power customers generate above their consumption. In approving the rules in a 3-2 vote in February, the PUC called the net metering limits an important consumer protection that balances renewable energy growth with keeping power prices affordable.
“A key point in this discussion is the intersection of two state mandates,” PUC spokesman Nils Hagen-Frederiksen said. “The requirement that customer-generators receive the ‘retail value’ for any excess power that is returned to the grid,” he noted, “potentially contradicts the requirement that utilities acquire power in a manner that ensures the lowest price over time for consumers.”
The review commission’s rejection Thursday comes after the state Department of Environmental Protection last week urged that the limits be scrapped. The cap was also opposed by alternative energy advocates, including the solar and landfill gas-to-energy industries.
Utilities generally supported a lower limit on the size of energy systems that qualify for net metering.
Mr. Hagen-Frederiksen said the PUC will review the regulatory review commission’s action as well as recent public comments on the rules before deciding how to proceed.
The PUC can either withdraw the regulation or resubmit it to IRRC, with or without revisions, within 40 days for another review.
The changing makeup of the PUC will be a factor influencing any path forward for the rules. One of the majority votes in favor of the net-metering limits, Pamela Witmer, left the commission in April after her term expired. Gov. Tom Wolf has nominated his senior energy adviser David Sweet to fill the vacancy, but the nomination must first be confirmed by a majority of the state Senate.
Daniel Moore: dmoore@post-gazette.com, 412-263-2743 and Twitter @PGdanielmoore. Laura Legere: llegere@post-gazette.com.
Nanomaterials could double efficiency of solar cells by converting waste heat into usable energy
Posted 25 minutes ago by Devin Coldewey
http://techcrunch.com/2016/05/24/nanomaterials-could-double-efficiency-of-solar-cells-by-converting-waste-heat-into-usable-energy/
An experimental solar cell created by MIT researchers could massively increase the amount of power generated by a given area of panels, while simultaneously reducing the amount of waste heat. Even better, it sounds super cool when scientists talk about it: “with our own unoptimized geometry, we in fact could break the Shockley-Queisser limit.”
The Shockley-Queisser limit, which is definitely not made up, is the theoretical maximum efficiency of a solar cell, and it’s somewhere around 32 percent for the most common silicon-based ones.
You can get around this by various tricks like stacking cells, but the better option, according to David Bierman, a doctoral student on the team (and who is quoted above), will be thermophotovoltaics — whereby sunlight is turned into heat and then re-emitted as light better suited for the cell to absorb.
Sound weird? Here’s the thing. Solar cells work best with a certain wavelength of light — perhaps ultraviolet is too short, while infrared is too long, but let’s say 600nm (orange visible light) is perfect. Only some of the broad-spectrum radiation emitted by the sun is at or around 600nm, which limits the amount of energy the cell can pull out of that radiation — that’s one of the components of the Shockley-Queisser limit.
What Bierman and the others on his team did was to add a step between the sun and the cell: a carefully engineered structure of carbon nanotubes. “The carbon nanotubes are virtually a perfect absorber over the entire color spectrum,” said Bierman in the MIT news release. “All of the energy of the photons gets converted to heat.”
The team’s thermophotovoltaic cell in action.
Normally heat is undesirable in a solar cell, as it’s just waste energy that can interfere with normal operation. But in this case, the heat is not allowed to dissipate; instead, the carbon nanostructure converts the heat back into light — at the exact optimum wavelength of the photovoltaic cell.
The result is a huge increase in efficiency, and that’s not the only benefit. Heat, unlike light, is easy to store and move. If the day’s sunlight was entirely converted to heat and stored away, it could be converted to light on demand — like, say, at night. In other words, this technique essentially allows sunlight to be saved for later.
Experimental results bore out the theory, and a prototype TPV cell performed as expected. But the tech still needs to make it out of the lab, and manufacturing the complex carbon nanomaterials in bulk is no simple task. So you won’t be using thermophotovoltaics next year or the year after — but the technique is a tremendously promising one and unlikely to be left on the shelf.
The team’s research was published in the journal Nature Energy.
I see 1st QTR EPS
2014 lost 43¢
2015 lost 10¢
2016 lost 2¢
IMPROVEMENT!
1st Qtr 2016 had 20 rain days vs other years in a drought with less rain days...
THey will be able to make more money WHEN THEY ARE WORKING!
Simply put after my study...
People who lost in the last year, bought at the top of the market...
But in the LONG RUN, they SHOULD win! (nothing guaranteed EVER)
5 years:
Sandridge Energy VS SUNW
Sandridge Energy -99.82% or $180 on a $100,000 investment left over!
SUNW +740% or $740,000 on a $100,000 investment....
https://www.google.com/finance?chdnp=1&chdd=1&chds=1&chdv=1&chvs=maximized&chdeh=1&chfdeh=0&chdet=1464090197145&chddm=507518&chls=IntervalBasedLine&cmpto=OTCMKTS:SDOCQ&cmptdms=0&q=NASDAQ:SUNW&&fct=big&ei=Uz5EV_mhO4uamAH5rJ3ABw