Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
and you say that because.......?
Apple can't have it both ways....and they won't....
VPLM
VOIP PAL.com, Inc.
Common Stock
0.08
0.0005
0.63%
0.0789 / 0.083 (16750 x 10000)
Real-Time Best Bid & Ask: 04:37pm 01/11/2019
OPEN
0.08
DAILY RANGE
0.077 - 0.084
VOLUME
388,779
Total Falsehood
Infringement is proven in court.
When a company suspects it, experts determine the likelihood that their suspicions are correct and can be proven in court. VPLM has done this. Now VPLM is in court.
Once proven, this will be a very expensive lesson for Apple and others.
If you don't believe they can win, don't buy the stock.
I believe they can.
that's nonsense. There was a ton of expert testimony on both sides during the IPRs. These aren't unfounded generalized claims of infringement...Discovery will prove that.
oh, that is so funny....
not
That's the point of filing an infringement case. You think someone is infringing based upon your understanding of how things work - you file case, you go through all of the PTAB BS, then you prove it in court, and the jury gives you money.
Next...
I did.....the fundamental nature of these patents should cause great concern to the Silicon Valley companies that have infringed without regard for licensing.
Right -all they did was develop the intellectual property that has to do with virtually EVERY mobile call or message....
"Just a teeny tiny itty bitty little Voip cog"
Excuse me while I laugh out loud
prove that they are ridiculous.....In actuality, given the fundamental importance of '815 and '005 to the performance of an iPhone for example, there is nothing "ridiculous" about the damage models.
On the other hand, comments that are made, without full understanding are "ridiculous"....
Is that why the share price is moving higher?
wrong...the bar for Apple to get anything done is extraordinarily high. The new panel found no evidence that the judgement is tainted.
Apple knows they are getting painted into a corner
thanks
Colin Tucker C.V.
Director, Chairman of Voip Pal
Dr. Tucker is the former Director and CEO of Hutchison 3G, and one of the three founding directors of Orange plc, a company that was brought from a startup company in 1991 with a handful of staff to an enterprise with revenues of £3bn p.a. operating in 6 countries by 2000. Orange plc was ultimately sold to France Telecom for $25bn.
you really should watch it.....these are unfounded accusations. Colin Tucker is a great man....
LMAO
predicted by that fake website you posted. Oh, I am so worried
Apple knows EXACTLY who Voip Pal is and what the patents are. They have hired THE MOST EXPENSIVE AGGRESSIVE LAW FIRM for the IPR Sanction and they came up empty....
Your post is ridiculous
headed higher in January
clear breakout
prove it
wanna try that again?
Nice to see the bids lined up
BID PRICE
CDEL 0.084 30,000 12:34
ASCM 0.0835 10,000 10:31
CANT 0.083 27,711 10:23
ETRF 0.082 10,365 10:07
NITE 0.082 10,000 12:24
ASK PRICE SIZE TIME
CDEL 0.0864 10,000 12:34
ASCM 0.0865 10,000 10:28
MAXM 0.0865 10,000 12:26
CANT 0.087 100,000 09:31
ETRF 0.087 25,000 10:28
The PTAB ruling is a blow to Apple and a win for VPLM. They hoped to knock us out at the PTAB in IPR...
Mission NOT ACCOMPLISHED for APPLE
The PTAB has made it crystal clear
The are unhappy about the letters.
They did NOT impact the panel's decision making procedure which was based on
expert testimony.
They are not going to reverse the decision nor take away any patent claims (the latter ask on their part was so ridiculous I couldn't stop laughing)
The new panel found nothing to change the decision.
This is a WIN for Voip Pal, plain and simple. The Federal Court will certainly
consider the PTAB's decision as it goes forward with the cases.
Merry Xmas, shareholders.
Apple won nothing. They did NOT get what they wanted. The PTAB scolded VPLM, but found ZERO evidence that the judgement in favor of VPLM was tainted.
Apple got ZIP
"every little move".......remember the last time VPLM had a "little move in court"?
Only this time, it's different.....
But go ahead.....take your best shots....watch what happens next week
They are only allowed to reconsider the judgement based upon the evidence already presented and the case law used to render a decision. They would have to find that the letters caused the panel to "misjudge" the evidence and admit that they were influenced by the letters in rendering the incredibly detailed decisions rendered a year ago....
To Apple, I say...."Good luck with that..."
Great win for VPLM
#notconcerned
cheap stock.
CLEARLY large companies infringe without regard for intellectual property rights...that speaks loudly of THEM, and their greed and lack of fairness
100% WRONG
If my memory serves me, Emil's contract with Voip Pal is "not dilutable".....so, he maintains a 40% interest, even as the float increases from capital raises....so if the float was increased to raise capital to pay the bills (which it was) while fighting the legal battles, there would have to be an adjustment by shares issued to him, in order to keep his interest at 40%, correct? That's how I see it, anyway......not concerned.....
personally, I'm glad to see the cases moving forward, and the determination of the management team to see the patents monetized.....not easy fighting the "big boys"
in other news, the market is closed today......
you have ZERO EVIDENCE of this.
and then the bid was .07.....asking .075
oh Sam we are so moved by your concern...I am so grateful to know that there are people out there who really care.....
You're funny....
This company's patents are awesome
Nothing of Value?
Right, that's why Apple, Verizon, AT&T, and Twitter are in court....
Why would anyone award them? Because they own patents that are being infringed.