Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
you just created a profile today to comment on CCTC? I think though you have a decent analysis of the patent. Welcome abord I-hub and hope you are the real deal!
I dont think you will see a dime pal! Next week is going to be good IMO!
Hope they use CCTI's technology! The government is willing to back clean coal technology!
$1 billion a year over 10 years from the federal government to help the coal industry develop green technology such as "carbon capture and sequestration" of emissions. Such a provision could be crucial to West Virginia Senator John Rockefeller and others from states that mine and use coal.[color=red][/color]
http://af.reuters.com/article/metalsNews/idAFN1917275720100319?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0
Hope CCTI gets a piece of this pie!!!!
US Senate climate bill to give free permits - sources
Fri Mar 19, 2010 9:38pm GMT
Government would aid "clean" coal efforts"
By Richard Cowan and Timothy Gardner
WASHINGTON, March 19 (Reuters) - U.S. power generating companies would get free pollution permits, at least initially, as part of a compromise climate change bill being written in the Senate that also would give the coal industry $10 billion to develop "clean" technology, sources said on Friday.Democratic Senator John Kerry is trying to push a bill through a skeptical Senate this year that would address global warming by reducing the 6.4 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions the U.S. puts into the atmosphere annually, mostly by burning fossil fuels.
While the bill is not yet ready to be introduced in the Senate, Kerry has held a series of briefings for lawmakers, industry groups and environmentalists to preview the proposal.
Power companies, which emit 40 percent of U.S. greenhouse gases, would be the first to face pollution limits. In return, the industry has demanded breaks claiming that otherwise it would have to shut down plants.
Those breaks include some free permits to pollute and "offsets" that give them the option to invest in clean energy projects that preserve lands and forests in the United States and abroad.
A coalition of 20 environmental groups on Friday praised Kerry's effort, saying the pollution-reduction goals provided "the leadership needed by the U.S. Senate to create jobs, increase energy security, reduce carbon pollution and protect public health."
Kerry, working with Republican Senator Lindsey Graham and independent Senator Joseph Lieberman, is weighing a climate change bill that would impose a cap-and-trade system in 2012 on electric utilities, many of which burn large amounts of coal, the fuel that emits the most greenhouse gas.
According to trade industry sources, the power companies would initially be given many of the required pollution permits for free, similar to the bill passed last June by the House of Representatives. But the House bill calls for an economy-wide cap-and-trade program starting in 2012, not just utilities.
When he ran for president in 2008, Barack Obama called for selling all of those permits to industry under cap-and-trade, in which carbon dioxide emissions fall as fewer and fewer permits are allowed over 40 years. Once companies obtain the permits, they could be traded on a regulated market.
The House's cap-and-trade provision has been reduced to apply only to utilities at first in the compromise bill. In 2016, factories would begin to be covered as well. Other elements likely to be in the bill, according to industry and environmental sources, are:
-- $1 billion a year over 10 years from the federal government to help the coal industry develop green technology such as "carbon capture and sequestration" of emissions. Such a provision could be crucial to West Virginia Senator John Rockefeller and others from states that mine and use coal.
-- A new carbon tax on oil, possibly at the refinery level, which would filter down to consumers. The taxes would be linked to the price of carbon stemming from the utility industry cap and trade program. The goal is to encourage consumers to buy more fuel- efficient cars. Some of the revenues could go back to consumers.
-- $54 billion in new loan guarantees to encourage an expansion of the domestic nuclear power industry, whose plants do not emit greenhouse gases, but face big problems with storage of waste and the cost of building new plants. There would be new tax breaks for the nuclear industry too. It's unclear how the bill would fix the nuclear waste problem or speed up regulatory review of new construction permits.
-- The establishment of a "clean energy standard" that would expand a Senate Energy Committee "renewable energy standard" to allow more fuels to participate, including nuclear. The committee plan focuses on wind, solar and other renewable sources. While it's nearly emissions-free, nuclear is technically not a renewable power source.
-- New incentives to encourage heavy-duty trucks to transition from diesel fuel to natural gas.
Other elements of the bill previously reported include:
-- A price collar to protect against fluctuations in the price of carbon traded under the power company cap-and-trade. It would keep prices in the range of $10-$30 per ton.
-- The legislation would aim to bring carbon emissions down by 17 percent by 2020, from 2005 levels.
-- Firms with smokestack emissions below 25,000 tons would not face new pollution restrictions.
-- Controls on smokestack emissions from factories, including steel, chemical, paper and cement, would be phased in beginning in 2016 under a cap and trade program.
-- The EPA would be prohibited from regulating factory greenhouse gas emissions.
-- A border tax to be triggered in future years to protect U.S. manufacturers from cheaper goods from countries that do not have as strict environmental controls in place. Ohio Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown has been insisting on this. It could offend some "free-trade" senators though.
-- New incentives for offshore oil drilling. (Additional reporting by Thomas
http://af.reuters.com/article/metalsNews/idAFN1917275720100319?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0
Thanks Admiral... Just trying to help out! What I am getting from all these articles is that Clean coal technology is very much needed, and the goverment is jumping in with both feet. There is tremendous oppurtunity out there, and I hope CCTI takes full advantage.
Could CCTI be a buyout candidate as well???
There is more great articles out there, but I dont want to seem to desperate!!!LOL
U.S. Chamber: Senate climate bill moving closer to industry’s liking
By Ben Geman - 03/17/10 04:27 PM ET
The top lobbyist for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce said Wednesday that the broad climate change and energy bill under construction in the Senate is moving in a direction that’s “largely in sync” with industry goals.
Bruce Josten, the chamber’s top lobbyist, spoke to reporters Wednesday after a host of industry trade group officials met in the Capitol with Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) about the bill the senators are crafting.
Josten’s comments were hedged and careful, but they were far removed from the Chamber’s strong criticism of the climate bill the House approved last year.
“The fairest comment would be, directionally speaking, the way they are trying to conform and shape this bill I would suggest is largely in sync with what most people in American industry think is the direction you are going to have to go if you are going to have a successful program,” Josten said.
Kerry, Graham and Lieberman are scrapping the “economy-wide” cap-and-trade bill the House approved in favor of a more sector-by-sector approach. This would include a cap-and-trade plan for power plants, while greenhouse gases from motor fuels would instead be addressed through a consumer fee.
The senators are also planning to add sweeteners -- such as major financial support for new nuclear power plants and "clean coal" projects, as well as wider offshore drilling -- to attract support from industry and centrist Democrats and Republicans.
Today's meeting was the second such session over the past week with a broad array of trade groups, representing sectors such as oil companies, utilities, railroads, and many others.
“We obviously talked some substance because we need to talk some substance, so we went through an outline of things we are thinking about,” Kerry told reporters after the meeting. “We shared individual sector issues and different thoughts about approaches in those sectors, and we got quite specific about some of those things.”
Josten also said: “They are being very constructive, they are trying to figure out how to make this work for the American economy, the different sectors of the economy that are going to be affected one way or another, and I think just as, if not more importantly, for the American consumer.”
The senators plan to complete draft legislation as soon as late next week and send it to the Congressional Budget Office for scoring and to EPA for modeling, but they also say that schedule may slip.
This post was updated at 5:04 p.m.
http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/87433-us-chamber-senate-climate-bill-moving-closer-to-industrys-liking
Report: Mercury pollution from many power plants rose
2 hrs 7 mins ago
WASHINGTON — Many of America's coal-fired power plants lack widely available pollution controls for the highly toxic metal mercury, and mercury emissions recently increased at more than half of the country's 50 largest mercury-emitting power plants, according to a report Wednesday.
According to the nonpartisan Environmental Integrity Project , five of the 10 plants with the highest amount of mercury emitted are in Texas . Plants in Georgia , Missouri , Alabama , Pennsylvania and Michigan also are in the top 10.
The report, which used the most recent data available from the Environmental Protection Agency , found that mercury emissions increased at 27 of the top 50 plants from 2007 to 2008. Overall, power plant emissions of mercury decreased 4.7 percent in that period, but that amount was far less than what would be possible with available emissions controls, the report said.
Coal-fired power plants are the largest source of mercury pollution, generating more than 40 percent of U.S. emissions. Mercury released into the air settles in rivers and lakes, where it moves through the food chain to fish that people eat.
Mercury exposure in fetuses can result in children born with learning disabilities. Each year more than 300,000 babies may have an increased risk of such exposure, the report said.
"Even though the technology exists today to dramatically reduce the mercury pollution, the U.S. power industry has delayed cleanup and barely made a dent in the power plant emissions," said Ilan Levin , an attorney with the Environmental Integrity Project .
"Delay by both the EPA and the electric power industry is what has caused this," he said.
Mercury emissions in some states have declined as power plants have added pollution controls for sulfur dioxide and particulate matter that have a side benefit of reducing mercury as well. Some of the pollution controls were added as a result of settlements of lawsuits seeking enforcement of federal and state regulations.
Since 1990, the EPA has been required under the Clean Air Act to impose pollution controls on many forms of air pollution, including mercury. To date, however, there is still no national regulation to limit mercury pollution.
The EPA is working on a mercury reduction rule and has agreed in a court settlement to complete it by November 2011 . The agency adopted a cap-and-trade scheme of tradable mercury emission allowances in 2005, but a federal court ruled that it didn't comply with the clean air law and threw it out in 2008.
U.S. power plants emitted 44.7 tons of mercury in 2008. The EPA had forecast in 2005 that it was possible to reduce mercury emissions to 15 tons per year under the Bush administration's plan and with the use of pollution controls aimed at reducing smog and soot, and that stricter requirements could reduce it to five tons a year.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20100317/sc_mcclatchy/3454041_1
Coal output in China`s Inner Mongolia estimated at 700 mln tonnes
Wednesday, March 17, 2010 16:53 WIB | Economic & Business | | Viewed 177 time(s)
Beijing (ANTARA News/Asia Pulse) - Inner Mongolia in northern China is planning to control its coal output at about 700 million tonnes in 2010, according to the Economic Committee of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.
Inner Mongolia is a major coal production base with the largest output in China.
In 2009, its coal output hit 600 million tonnes.In order to optimize its coal industrial structure, the province will start a program of coalmine mergers in 2010.
http://www.antara.co.id/en/news/1268819622/coal-output-in-chinas-inner-mongolia-estimated-at-700-mln-tonnes
http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90778/90860/6922869.html
China to build new port to boost Inner Mongolia's coal output19:58, March 17, 2010 Email | Print | Subscribe | Comments | Forum Increases the bookmarktwitter facebook
digg Google
Windowslive Delicious
buzz friendfeed
Linkedin diigo
reddit stumbleupon
The landlocked coal-rich Inner Mongolia in north China will soon have an open access to ship its coal from a port in its neighboring province to fuel-thirsty customers in eastern and southern regions.
A port terminal to be built in Huludao, Liaoning Province, will support an annual throughput of 50 million tonnes of coal when the first phase of the project becomes operational by 2012, Zhao Rongqing, the chief of port affairs in Huludao City, said on Wednesday.
The annual throughput would be eventually expanded to 230 million tonnes, Zhao said.
He said a 300-km railway will be built to link the port directly with Xilingol, a major coal production base in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.
Inner Mongolia is China's coal heartland. Its verified coal deposit of 732 billion tonnes is much greater than the 250 billion tonnes in Shanxi Province, which is currently China's biggest producer of the fossil fuel.
The region's coal output has been quickly catching up, reaching 600 million tonnes last year, compared with 615 million tonnes in Shanxi.
However, transport bottlenecks have been hindering Inner Mongolia from sending the resource to end users in coastal and southern regions, where coal-fired electricity plants suffer severe fuel shortages every year, especially in winter and summer.
"The landlocked northern region has 60 percent of the country's coal reserve. However, southern and coastal regions consume 70 percent of the country's electricity. Current road and railway transport for coal cannot meet the demand," said Zhao Yonghua, deputy mayor of Ulanqab City, Inner Mongolia.
He said the traffic problem in the region was so serious that Inner Mongolia in January introduced an odd-even license plate policy for cargo trucks to ease traffic congestion .
Shipping the coal by sea is expected to get some of trucks off the road.
"I was too excited to sleep when I heard the port plan," said Wang De, deputy head of the economic commission in Xilingol.
He said the prefecture with a verified coal reserve of 150 billion tonnes of coal would see its output of coal reach 100 million tonnes this year and 350 million tonnes by 2015.
The port will offer a "fast lane" to distribute the resource, Wang said.
http://www.idahostatesman.com/2010/03/17/1120898/report-mercury-emissions-climb.html
Report: Mercury emissions climb at many large coal-fired power plants
By RENEE SCHOOF - McClatchy Newspapers
Copyright: © 2010, McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
Published: 03/17/10
Email Storyclose Email Story Comments (0) | Recommend (0)
ELSEWHERE
http://www.environmentalintegrity.org
WASHINGTON — Many of America's coal-fired power plants lack widely available pollution controls for the highly toxic metal mercury, and mercury emissions recently increased at more than half of the country's 50 largest mercury-emitting power plants, according to a report Wednesday.
Five of the 10 plants with the highest amount of mercury emitted are in Texas, according to the nonpartisan Environmental Integrity Project. Plants in Georgia, Missouri, Alabama, Pennsylvania and Michigan also are in the top 10.
The report, which used the most recent data available from the Environmental Protection Agency, found that mercury emissions increased at 27 of the top 50 plants from 2007 to 2008. Overall, power plant emissions of mercury decreased 4.7 percent in that period, but that amount was far less than what would be possible with available emissions controls, the report said.
Coal-fired power plants are the largest source of mercury pollution, generating more than 40 percent of U.S. emissions. Mercury released into the air settles in rivers and lakes, where it moves through the food chain to fish that people eat.
Mercury exposure in fetuses can result in children born with learning disabilities. Each year more than 300,000 babies may have an increased risk of such exposure, the report said.
"Even though the technology exists today to dramatically reduce the mercury pollution, the U.S. power industry has delayed cleanup and barely made a dent in the power plant emissions," said Ilan Levin, an attorney with the Environmental Integrity Project.
"Delay by both the EPA and the electric power industry is what has caused this," he said.
Mercury emissions in some states have declined as power plants have added pollution controls for sulfur dioxide and particulate matter that have a side benefit of reducing mercury as well. Some of the pollution controls were added as a result of settlements of lawsuits seeking enforcement of federal and state regulations.
Since 1990, the EPA has been required under the Clean Air Act to impose pollution controls on many forms of air pollution, including mercury. To date, however, there is still no national regulation to limit mercury pollution.
The EPA is working on a mercury reduction rule and has agreed in a court settlement to complete it by November 2011. The agency adopted a cap-and-trade scheme of tradable mercury emission allowances in 2005, but a federal court ruled that it didn't comply with the clean air law and threw it out in 2008.
U.S. power plants emitted 44.7 tons of mercury in 2008. The EPA had forecast in 2005 that it was possible to reduce mercury emissions to 15 tons per year under the Bush administration's plan and with the use of pollution controls aimed at reducing smog and soot, and that stricter requirements could reduce it to 5 tons a year.
The Environmental Integrity Project is a nonprofit organization that promotes stronger enforcement of anti-pollution laws.
Read more: http://www.idahostatesman.com/2010/03/17/1120898/report-mercury-emissions-climb.html#ixzz0iTJFczZ6
Interesting read!
17 March 2010 - Press Release - Miliband pursues clean coal tech as UK growth sector
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Industrial Strategy outlines industry worth up to £6.5 billion and sustaining up to 100,000 jobs by 2030.
Yorkshire and Humber identified as the UK’s first low carbon economic area for CCS.
£6.3 million awarded to SSE’s (Scottish and Southern Energy) 5MW carbon capture project in Ferrybridge, Yorkshire.
New Government Office of CCS takes up work driving development of policy, technology, regulation and funding.
Industrial growth, energy security and action on climate change are the three prizes to be had in backing Carbon Capture and Storage technology, Ed Miliband said today.
The Energy and Climate Change Secretary said:
“CCS presents a massive industrial growth opportunity for the UK. We have a strong, established and skilled workforce in precisely the sectors needed to get CCS deployed at scale. And we have some of the best potential sites in all of Europe for CO2 storage under the North Sea.
“Coal is the most abundant worldwide energy resource but it is also the most polluting, so there is no solution to climate change without CCS.
“Yorkshire and Humber is well placed to see the benefits from the jobs that investment in CCS can bring, other regions will too.
“For the UK economy as a whole these benefits could be worth up to £6.5 billion a year, sustaining jobs for up to 100,000 people, by 2030.”
Rosie Winterton, Minister for Yorkshire and The Humber, said:
"Today is an extremely important day for the economy of Yorkshire and The Humber. Our region has been designated the UK's first Low Carbon Economic Area for Carbon Capture and Storage - technologies with the potential to cut CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel power generation as well as from our energy intensive industries.
"In addition, the Government's £80 million investment in Sheffield Forgemasters will enable it to supply the civil nuclear power industry and other markets and to compete globally in this lucrative sector.
"Both these announcements position Yorkshire and The Humber as a world leader in the development and production of the type of energy needed in a low carbon economy and will mean more jobs and further investment in our region."
The CCS Industrial Strategy sets out how the UK can make the most from its knowledge and skills in engineering, geology and the subsea sector and become a centre for CCS innovation and business.
As part of the strategy, Yorkshire and Humber was today named as the first low carbon economic area for Carbon Capture and Storage. The region’s Ferrybridge power station, owned by SSE, was today awarded £6.3 million towards its £21 million 5MW carbon capture trial by DECC, the Technology Strategy Board and Northern Way.
Other regions like Teesside, Merseyside and Thames Valley could also become centres for this technology.
The UK is at the forefront in the global development of CCS technology. The Government has an Energy Bill before Parliament to provide funding for four commercial-scale CCS demonstration projects and last week announced funding for the Front End Engineering and Design studies as part of a competition to build one of the world’s first commercial scale carbon capture and storage demonstration plants.
A new Office of CCS starts work today inside DECC, and will facilitate the delivery of CCS in the UK and help to promote its rapid take up globally.
Today the Government marked the first year of New Industry, New Jobs - a strategy to put Britain at the cutting edge of new industrial development, especially in the infrastructure and skills they need to meet future challenges and take advantage of new opportunities.
http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/news/pn10_043/pn10_043.aspx
Nice post, and very true! Patience will pay off, but you have to be willing to HAVE PATIENCE!!!
Here is a great read for those who have not see this! Sorry if a repost. I think he is right on with his ideas IMO.
http://waynecrumpley.blogspot.com/
Monday, March 15, 2010
Update On Blog of February 4, 2010
"When it's raining Gold, Reach For a Bucket, Not a Thimble."
-Warren Buffett, February 27, 2010
On Thursday, February 4, 2010, I sent out a Blog entitled "Stock Price/Business Opportunity Dis-Connect at Clean Coal Technologies, Inc. (CCTC.PK)." That day the CCTC stock closed at $.07 per share. Over the next six trading sessions the stock went down to $.04 per share. Today, the stock closed at $.147, double the price when I wrote the Blog. Read the Blog at http://WayneCrumpley.Blogspot.com.
Here are some further insights on this opportunity for you who are interested. On January 6, 2010 the CCTC shares closed at $1.20. The average daily volume was approximately 10,000 shares per day. There were approximately 1,600,000 shares of outstanding "free-trading" registered shares available owned by approximately 3,000 shareholders. On January 14, 2010, approximately 435,000,000 shares of existing "restricted" stock became eligible for "free-trading" status that ONE day! (The officers, directors, control persons, and affiliates have slightly different rules. This accounts for approximately 100,000,000 shares. There are approximately another 100,000,000 shares of people who are "close" to the company who understand what's happening, and will not be substantial sellers of the CCTC stock at current prices). From the January 6, 2010 closing price of $1.20, just 24 trading days later, on February 10, 2010, the CCTC stock hit its all-time low of $ .0370 per share. Keep in mind none of this stock action has anything to do with the underlying performance of the Company; this is strictly a "stock phenomenon." From January 14, 2010 to January 29, 2010 (11 trading days), there were 10,632,487 shares traded. In the month of February 2010 there were 272,151,291 shares traded (19 trading days), and so far in March, including today, there have been 55,287,601 shares traded (11 trading days). Therefore, from January 14, 2010 through March 15, 2010 (41 trading days), there have been 338,071,379 shares traded. Assuming that there were 150,000,000 shares cleared and processed by the Company, the stock transfer agent, and the selling broker/dealers, that means every share available has been sold twice to someone. Or, to say this in a different way, let us assume that there are 435,000,000 total shares outstanding; 200,000,000 are being held by officers, directors, control people, affiliates, and knowledgeable close investors; and from the balance of total stock held by everyone else; 150,000,000 out of 235,000,000 shares have gone through the process of delivering their shares to a broker/dealer for sale. I personally think this is a stretch!
I think the market-makers and some speculators recognized early on the opportunity of having 435,000,000 shares becoming eligible for "free-trading" status in one day on a stock then trading 10,000 average shares per day. (The "shorters" would analyse this by thinking, with an average volume of 10,000 shares per day, [Demand], and an immediate availability of 435,000,000 shares [Supply], this stock is going down!). Market makers have the legal right to sell shares short that they do not own. This is called "naked" short sales. It would be my educated guess that the company has a 40,000,000 to maybe as much as 60,000,000 over-hanging "short" position.
The next step is . . . how do the "shorters" cover themselves, and what is the direction of the stock. The "shorters" will "cover" when they are certain the stock is heading "UP." What happens if there is no stock for them to purchase? All of a sudden the "supply/demand" position is turned on its head. Instead of no Buyers (demand) looking at a 435,000,000 share supply, we now have maybe 40,000,000 to 60,000,000 short demand chasing no supply. As fast as the stock went from $1.20 per share to $ .04 per share, it is my opinion that the stock could go from $.14 per share (present), back to above a dollar. There could develop a "feeding frenzy" to buy the stock to stop the losses of the stock moving up.
Since early January until now, and continuing, the "company development" and the "stock sales" have been dis-connected. In my February 4, 2010 Blog, I explained some of the projects the company is working on, i .e., the Chinese Inner-Mongolian coal and gasification plant, the India (Global Ink) licensing agreement, and other foreign and domestic transactions that are and have been for some time in the works. All of these company developments are not being considered in the stock transactions of the last two months.
On March 31, 2010 (two weeks from now) the 2009 Annual Report (10-K) is due to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This report is the third 10-K for this company, and should be substantially better than the December 31, 2007, or the December 31, 2008 Annual reports. On May 15, 2010 (two months), the first quarter (10-Q) report for fiscal year ending December 31, 2010 will be due. The next quarterly report will be the second quarter, ending June 30, 2010, which will be due the SEC by August 15, 2010. All of these things take awhile for the "market" to hear about, consider, and digest. There has been a lot of talk that as the Company moves closer to positive cash flow, and over-all development, the Company would hire a full-time Chief Financial Officer (CFO), and a full-time Public Relations (PR) person. Hopefully, both of those hires will happen soon!
My prediction is . . . for Clean Coal Technologies, Inc. (CCTC) stock price is that it could get to over $1.00 per share by, or before, September 15, 2010.
How is it possible for CCTC to go from $.14 to $1.00 within six months? What happens from March 15, 2010 to September 15, 2010 are the following:
1) Annual Report (10-K), due March 31, 2010;
2) First Quarterly report (10-Q), due May 15, 2010;
3) Second Quarterly report (10-Q) due August 15, 2010;
4) Company hiring a full-time Chief Financial Officer (CFO), and a full-time Public Relations person;
5) Developmental reports, pictures, and video of the progress of the Chinese Inner Mongolian project;
6) Progress reports from India of the progress of Global Ink;
7) Other signings of technology licensing agreements with other companies in China or other Asian countries presently being considered;
8)Possible signing of one or more licensing agreements in the United States for the use of the Company's technology; and
9) Other things which I know nothing about.
It is my personal opinion that the next six months will be interesting and exciting! At $.14 per share, it is my further opinion that Clean Coal Technologies, Inc. (CCTC.PK) is under-priced and its short-term and long-term prospects may very well make these shares the opportunity of a lifetime! As always, I must say that I am not, nor any of my companies, are not stock brokers, broker dealers, an accountant, lawyer, or investment advisor. In deciding if you want to speculate in the stock of Clean Coal Technologies, Inc., or any other securities, you need to consult with a professional investment advisor who knows you, your personal financial circumstances, your tolerance for risk, and if the investment is right for you. I am basing my opinions upon over 50 years of speculating in the stock market, and being in business for almost 50 years. My experience and background can be reviewed on my website at: http://www.PacificStatesCapitalCorp.com. Again, as always, these are my personal opinions, and . . . I could be wrong!
Posted by Wayne Crumpley at 9:22 PM 0 comments
Labels: 2010, Update On Blog of February 4
I hear ya! I had sharebuilder and got raped. Scottrade has been quite nice so far.
I guess when we least expect a PR it will happen? I am not expecting one anymore, so maybe it will surprise me???
you might have a second calling as a promoter bud! LOL
LMAO!!! Now that made me smile. Thanks for lightening up the mood! WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE Go CCTC!
I am too! and will continue as well. At this point I have no choice. Its all or nothing for me! Great potential here, but sometimes it gets tough around these woods! Not selling until my target is reached even if that means a year or more... This is the bottom IMO, and great starting point!
I hoping all this silence by Shakerzzz and Admiral is a good thing, but not sure how? Hmmmmm...
Its starting to get real quiet in here!!! I can hear myself think... Is everyone jumping ship before the PR? Hope there is a damn PR...Shhhhhhhht
Admiral... Did you give up on us ol bagholders? Did you sell your position?
i think most folks will sell all, or most of their positions! It would be wise to keep some in for the run up to 1 dollar IMO. I personally am staying in the game until at least .70 and will keep some in for the long run. I believe CCTI will make great gains going forward.
Its a coming... She will blow, and I am taking her for the ride of my life! News tomorrow possibly, and next week would be a great birthday present!!!
Interesting Article out today! Obama is pushing the idea. Maybe CCTC can get something going here in the US sooner than expected?
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/greenhouse/post/2010/03/clean-coal-energy-department-spends-154-million-on-texas-project-to-capture-coals-carbon/1
What exactly did cramer say about clean coal? Was it positive, or was he trying to push the idea of natural gas over coal? Whats up Shakerzzz?
Admiral, what are your thoughts on the link? I think its really interesting to see Larry Hunt at the top of the list. Is there any connection here? Just curious what your thinking...
whatever shorty! Dont miss the Train!!!! She is leaving the station.
I appreciate all your hard work on CCTC Admiral. I know what you meant in your posting. Thanks for keeping us informed when it counts. You are well respected on my end! GLTA, and lets have a great rest of the week PR or no PR... This stock will blossom into a great one!
ok got it!
why was my post deleted? anybody?
ok makes sense. Sorry to hear so many freaking out about your comments! So do you happen to know what the PR might entail when it does come out. Did the company single you out about some of their info?
So Admiral, are you saying you dont have a position in CCTC, and are waiting to buy after the PR? Or are you waiting to buy more when things start moving again?
great point! Follow the money...
I am longer than that! I mean going longer than a month. Great potential here all around.
what kind of response did you get? is it positive for us shareholders, or negative?
When we break the .30 resistance level where is the next one?
The State Journal Register (3/1): Rep. Jay Hoffman (D-Ill.), “has a very tangible way of showing off his environmental credentials: he has written a book. ‘Hope from the Heartland: Jobs, Clean Air, Energy Security. A Sustainable Approach,’” published by Lewis & Clark Community College, that “pounds home the message -- with plenty of repetition -- that the United States needs a comprehensive energy policy, and that Illinois has the resources to lead the way and create jobs in the process.” Hoffman is “an advocate of clean use of coal -- noting that past federal clean air legislation hurt the Illinois coal industry by making many utilities switch to low-sulfur coal from Western states. He wrote that new coal plants are being built ‘at unprecedented rates in countries such as China, India and Russia.’” Hoffman said it is “‘imperative that we develop clean-coal technology to lessen CO2 emissions so they don't do further harm to the environment.’”
Good things a coming folks!!!
CCTC > strong close > There is over $12 billion in clean coal research underway right now in 43 states — even ones not normally associated with coal production. Use the map below to learn about clean coal technology projects around the country.
http://www.americaspower.org/The-Facts/Clean-Coal-Technology
great days ahead. It will be an intersting month, and year for CCTC. Hope to get some news that puts us into orbit... and then TO DA MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOON! I had to say that LOL. GLTA
could a juicy PR be out very shortly? maybe after close? Any way you slice it looks like green pasteurs ahead!
why yes... Thought I would do some digging! Am I getting warm?