Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Wanted to post a couple of charts showing what I was talking about last Thursday when I stated that I had about a .0095 price level from a previous wedge. I’m showing first a couple of good examples of a combination of different triangles and wedges showing how they can differ in size, shape, time, etc and not always the perfect Google example or easily read matching volume correlations. These current stocks are ones that I have traded up or down on the bigger boards periodically but I’m making no recommendations good or bad, I am not in them at this time (may or may not change in a moment depending on my mood), and are using them only for current representation of triangle and wedge patterns and no other technical or fundamental analysis.
These are not drawn by me or by opinion, but by a program based on parameters and criteria calculated from thousands of numbers and past examples and the lines are put there automatically on the charts by the computer and program when certain numbers or the pps has met certain parameters or limits pertaining to each particular example of a wedge or triangle with a flag or two mixed in. Its only my computer, but next I will post my BEHL chart with my interpretation and my lines of recent and possible projections.
First on from left to right are a bullish rising wedge, ascending triangle, symmetrical triangle, falling wedge, and last to the right is another ascending triangle in which is not confirmed with a breakout as of yet.
Next we have again all bullish from left to right are a flag and then a falling wedge both within a symmetrical triangle, then another flag. At the far right, a real interesting combination has been formed with a program triggered triangle signaling a reverse inside a falling wedge with a rising wedge extending out of that and including a upward channel joining the falling and rising wedge. The last rising wedge has not been confirmed with a breakout as of yet. Remember all of these lines are created or drawn by the program with no keystrokes or mouse movement from me, but has shown to be pretty accurate in the reactions of pps.
+1
I'm probably starting to sound like a old man (which I'm not ), but I remember when the EPA wasn't even formed. My son was born about 4 1/2 years later. Words like "conservation" "ecology" "recycle" were bad words to many, putting the prefix "bio" in front of something was just plain weird, especially for the big business and big money. Times have changed dramatically in just every few years since then when you look back. Now when one looks forward, some big changes are just on the horizon and so is big money and big business, and IMO so is BEHL.
The words may be just some boring governmental bureaucracy statements for some. But just seeing these few historical words, I believe it will be as much of life changing as the desktop computer. Once just some things some people talked about among relatively few, then poof, it's as common place as having dinner. In everyones lives on a daily basis with no thought to that it is there, but only to the advancing application of it.
Just getting through the posts today so just saw this, sent you a reply PM late last night (maybe morning depending your time zone). If you didn't get it, I'll paste my answer here. Let me know.
For the bulk of the trades yesterday, the pps stayed the same, but at the very end of the day it was brought down between .0099 and .0098 (a .0001 difference), so the best that it could be painted was a measly 1% lower pps. This would make you right technically with the your statement on the pps down on almost double volume from the previous day.
Now I'm presuming since you believe that BEHL is a "flipper paradise" that you have already noticed that at the beginning of the last run to the higher high and maybe beginning to an overall upward trend that the pps almost tripled in volume and pps went down over 6%. Just an observation by itself.
There are also statistically many days the pps went down a little (or basically stayed the same) on at least double the volume and the following days after that the pps has gone down, gone up, or stayed the same.
Now I don't believe there is anything wrong with trading, flipping, or anything else in any stock with ones own money. That is the stock market and each persons right to do what they want in it. It is what it is and no matter how one likes a certain stock, it will be traded one way or another.
I personally trade everyday, but I have found that I can do in less than a week (sometimes in a day) what anyone can do in a month with BEHL, it's just not like it used to be, fact. But like I said anyone can do whatever floats their boat and power away to their hearts content, but their really is lots out there that is much better for that purpose, that is also a fact.
I would have to disagree though to your statement that "something isn't adding up" when comparing the pps and your volume statement. We've been here before. It does add up, we of course can only speculate on what all of the calculations are (all different input) and will see what the final outcome will be and have our own view of course what those will be.
I'm not sure that you would get the answers to all of your questions on a bullish BEHL board though when hinting to the O/S, at least not the ones your hoping for, I don't know. You will get some pretty good valid ones though IMO. Time may be to buy back in.
That is one option, at least one most here would like I'm sure. It's definitely setting up for one. One can almost feel the tension in the air.
Anyway, got to go and take care of some business and hope everyone has a great weekend. Next week will probably be very telling.
I agree other than to add that it may be the announcement or news of pending revenue or statement to that effect and that can happen anytime. I believe there are quite a few heavy watchers out there and are paying attention and already knew about the team way before the news announcement along with retail traders.
Todays volume was interesting and of course there can be a debate about what it meant, but worth a look and adding to everything else IMO.
Have to also say, even though changed now, it was quite a narrow range of .0001 at the end there.
I believe you might be right, and I agree with both you and Arnold that there is pretty good support at the .01, the bulk of the trades today have been holding there (have had a few myself). I feel it could actually break that support and still go up without it spiraling downward (I'm not counting a painted or manipulated close). I am interested in why you see that it will break up -- I don't want to be the only one out on the limb here.
I have had no fear in expressing my thoughts, good or bad, right or wrong, they are there in previous posts if you care to read them. Not saying that all of them are right and I have no crystal ball that works on a regular basis, only sometimes. I'm also sure that I will post more of my thoughts in the future unless people tell me to get the heck out of here. So stick around, there are some good people here with their input and their thoughts and there is always room for others to come in with their intelligent thoughts and views. If you have something to share, I welcome it, I just respectfully challenge you to be a little more in depth than a one line .01 horizontal support statement and want to say welcome to the board.
I have something a little different but of course it depends what one is really looking out for. .01 support is not the only thing going on here thats for sure. Stating only that support is about as good as stating that the trading range is in .009 to .013 or .014 -- great safe comments, one has about a 50% price leeway, but I like to be a little more challenged than that and I would suggest that anyone look a little more deeper than just a couple of horizontal support or resistance lines or single TA's with just the default settings for their investment strategy.
For a relative comparison, you've got to back about a year before the P&D and one can see some similar action, but I look at BEHL as a new company and a new picture being formed. Not enough maturity before the P&D and I believe one can't really form the proper picture in the rise and fall of any overblown hype and I treat a P&D in a completely different perspective as a regular analysis.
Most stocks are certain TA "friendly" and I'm now looking for some determining traits as a beginning for BEHL and believe that "changes" are taking place and we will see them more and more as BEHL progresses.
If you have saved to your computer, use the third party free site, such as tinypic.com -- there are others for personal preference. From tinypic.com, upload the pic from your computer with the "browse" for file function and set the "resize" right below the "browse" for file due to "default" may not be what you want. After you hit the "upload now" icon, there will be a "IMG code for forums and message boards" -- copy and paste that code into your message.
That is one way that works.
No it is not. Good to use a third party site (ie: tinypic.com) if your not. Upload pic to them and copy and paste "code for message boards" next to uploaded pic. Some times a pic on web page has that code with it. Make sure you don't double the [img][/img], the copied paste already has it.
Oh, and welcome aboard.
That same supply and demand take both "supply" and "demand". We have neither at this point. It's called low volume. As Steve pointed out, think about how much money could they really be getting in the whole scheme of things.
I would have to disagree with that you can use that premise in stating that "probably" the company is diluting. Dilution does not simply base itself on downside pressure of pps nor does downside pressure "probably" mean dilution. In this case, A+B does not equal C, even though "A" might have a little "B" in it and "B" might have a little "A" in it, but so does D, E, F, G, etc.
Dilution of a stock is explained factually with Google, and it does happen, but it takes some numbers based on verifiable events and not conjecture just because a pps goes down. Stocks pps goes up and down all the time. Its bad analysis to presume that every time a stock price goes down and accumulates, that it is "probably" being diluted.
I thought maybe you had some verifiable numbers that correlated with the description of stock dilution that I might not be aware of. Please state them if you do because I can't see just using "simple supply and demand" to confirm stock dilution. Supply and demand is a entirely different issue IMO.
Where are the few shares coming from? Some retailers, but mostly just the computer as I've suggested in the past is my belief. Everyone is welcome to theirs.
Boy, how did you fit all of that on one page? Were cooking now heh.
Yea, that wait thing can be quite the b*!@ some times, but quite necessary at times. The old saying goes, "Good things come to those who wait".
It's a runaway. Sometimes I can do it right. Go QASP!
I don't think the "hype" has started, but will come soon enough. Quite common that accumulation has been slowly happening and lots of investor/traders are either waiting for the break upwards or the very low price that one believes might happen (like your .005). I'm not at the .005 school, but I'm in all three groups described.
Why do you say probably? Not saying your wrong, just wondering what your premises are that your basing it on.
I'll admit that I am guilty of some of those EOD buys (maybe most in a particular day). I'm basically confirming amounts it takes to change indicators for false reads and percentage changes on my TA's among other things. Sorry about that, it really won't effect much other than real short term signals and would be voided the next day. The volume around here just makes me want to doodle.
I'm not sure which line you meant, the A/D line (advances vs decline) or the AD line (accumulation vs distribution) which are different. But the AccDist line that I have been showing on my chart will really not be affected due to one IMO should be looking at that line with at least a month and preferably more in order to look at what it's doing with pos/neg divergence and the A/D won't really be effected either IMO due to one has to include the whole number, not just a small part.
But your correct that the close is one of the pps points that I believe is one of the points that are greatly manipulated and to be taken with a more critical view and a "grain of salt" analyzing any particular stock. Just my take.
Here's a little new buzz on Sapphire. A quick good read.
"Sapphire Expands Board with Petro and Agra Talent"
".......“This may well be the year that all roads lead to algae,” says Jason Pyle, CEO of Sapphire Energy....."
http://www.algaeindustrymagazine.com/sapphire-expands-board-with-petro-and-agra-talent/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+AlgaeIndustryMagazine+%28Algae+Industry+Magazine%29
Nope, good to dream though.
I don't think to many day traders are here, to low a volume and can't really get enough gains for most that trade that way. To many other places to put that money for more action and better decision for the money. I actually have about a .0095 support line or low pps range from a previous descending wedge that was broken and have a pretty good buy there, but didn't get anything to mention as of yet.
Triangles are only so good, and aren't really there until confirmation and after the fact and good to wait until after a solid breakout IMO. The current triangle has really turned into a descending triangle from a bullish pennant which can be taken as bearish and is watched for downward break. But there are way to many problems with that triangle in this instance. BEHL isn't in a upward or downward trend, spaces of lows and highs are pretty much nil, can be voided and faked easily,yada, yada, yada, so I don't take to much weight in the bottom breaking momentarily.
I expected a fake out at the end of this current trend which IMO is currently happening. Of course I can be wrong, but given a lot of other TA's and current changes and happenings going on with the company, I just can't see anything but the computer doing its thing. I'm still gambling that it's going up and have been increasing my position for longer term outlook than this week.
Anyway I'll post a chart later showing what I'm talking about for discussion for anyone that's interested in the TA debate. I'm always up for any analytical review and input. I'm definitely not infallible and have lost my share of money, but obviously I'm counting on a win here.
Time waits for no one. But then sometimes its good to wait for time. So one never knows.
Back in at .0123. Let the news ring.
Morning doubleg, for a minute I thought maybe everybody went back to bed. BEHL still getting tighter in the pennant, am getting alerts that the 20 is crossing the 50, at this minute the 20 is higher. Something got to give soon.
You may be on to something there. There has been several studies to use docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), polyunsaturated fatty acids, and Omega 3 ethel esters derived from algae. Why am I writing words that I can't pronounce is this. Drugs like Lovaza are used to lower high levels of triacylglycerol (TAG) in adults that suffer from high hypertriglyceridemia with the omega-3-acid ethyl esters processed from fish oils.
A couple of the studies on algae derived DHA triglyceride oil or algal-DHA was published just last year and was getting some very good results.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19145206
http://resources.metapress.com/pdf-preview.axd?code=p573lm3uut70h708&size=largest
But I'm a little confused and not quite understanding is how using a triglyceride lowers triglycerides in the body. Not a chemist, but might be the bonding that algae cells are doing with it and keeping it away from our system. Just learning more about it myself and maybe someone else can explain.
To match this though and as I understand the process, it is the triglycerides that we extract from inside the algae cells and convert that oil to biofuels and it is that process that gives the most impediment for commercialization against regular oil costs.
But when it comes to drug costs, it seems to me that very well the same process would be quite effective and cost savings. I believe that since it is already quite proven with endless studies and applications for omega-3 benefits to the cardiovascular system, that all we are needing is time for recognition on algae omega-3. That time is been happening now IMO and we will see it in the near future.
You bet. It's about the same as I use the AccDist line for, I switch from time to time. In fact if you put about the 15 on the CMF and overlap it, it looks darn close. Just one more confirmation of positive change. Really nice to look at, makes one feel all warm inside.
Technically speaking, we have a small storm brewing. It's not uncommon for the pps to peak and be way above the 20 day line and then drop back and go up and down around it. It's not uncommon for the 20 day to touch the 50 or maybe barley go over it at a pps high or peak and then the 20 falls back down and pps falls substantially below that and from the fifty at the price lows or dips. Normal computer business and the last few months of BEHL.
One of the things I like about TA's are that they are nothing but numbers, programs are nothing but numbers, and patterns develop with both.
We now have a different scenario occurring in which the price is in its lows or close to the bottom of the dip IMO and it is not below the 20 but exactly the same close (.0107) with the 20 bumping the 50 (.0108) and with the price being in the low range instead of the high range. With that, an added pressure, the 100 day is just a stones throw away (.0119) and at this point the storm is brewing with the computer not wanting the 20 to cross the 50 and then the 100 with it being so close and with the low price and volume already at the bottom range, creates a lot of pressure needed to go lower and little pressure to go higher and break. Kind off relates to the "fake, shake, and break" philosophy.
Who will win? I've got the opinion we will. Never can be 100% that's for sure and this is the stock market where nothing is certain, but it's sure playing the part.
Here's one more application being worked on with waste treatment.
Algal Bioremediation with HydroMentia
April 5, 2010—by Tamra Fakhoorian
"A hot buzz term in the emerging algal industry, “algal bioremediation” means using algae to scrub nutrients from water systems as a cost-effective alternative to existing water treatment systems......"
http://www.algaeindustrymagazine.com/algal-bioremediation-with-hydroentia/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+AlgaeIndustryMagazine+%28Algae+Industry+Magazine%29
Whats that darn parrot saying about BEHL there pirate, anything good, or was that the other pirate that had the bird?
I don't make these chart rules up, they are already written and proven. Can't take just the pps, there is more bullish signals, but here's a matching example of what I've talked about with the AD line (dotted blue). And MSFT volume went down also considerably for their average at that time.
You tell me, which number matches? Long(#1) or short(#2,3)?
http://www.incrediblecharts.com/indicators/accumulation_distribution.php
BEHL chart (went ahead a drew the pennant):
To me that seems right in line. Been getting the site together behind the scenes, giving it a couple more weeks to see some algae process, killing a few birds at once and maybe all still within stated goal time.
ob·jec·tive–noun
Something that one's efforts or actions are intended to attain or accomplish; purpose; goal; target.
Sometimes ones objectives can be not on the exact time line as one states, especially in business, but as long as diligence, quality, and 80-90% is being obtained and anyone can see that it will be completed by the stated objective or shortly after is good enough for most. Now thats different than a deadline.
dead·line–noun
The time by which something must be finished or submitted; the latest time for finishing something.
IMO, one must discern the difference.
Agreed mostly, but I think once we break about .0175 it will get easier to get over that and reasonably quickly to .025-.03. Of course depends on the revenues posted, but if it wasn't for all of the past, we would be there already and should be. If everything goes as planned, I'm looking for over a nickel+ in 6-8 months. Given the pps will go up and down during that time, but getting a higher base support as it does it and one might get that super surprise also, never know.
Yes, definitely down to earth news brief, kind of reminds one of a real company with sincerity, not any pumped up Hollywood drama there. The kind of news that I think will get believability, sincerity, and ease of accomplishment of stated goals in future statements. Going to show they can "walk the walk" I believe. Words are chosen carefully, and I also really like;
"In addition to implementing the Company's Community Algae Farm, (encompassing approximately 150+ acres of land in Southern California), BioCentric Energy will begin site assessments and the subsequent deployment of algae farms for clients throughout the US, as well as many other countries."
implement –verb (used with object)
to fulfill; perform; carry out: to put into effect according to or by means of a definite plan or procedure.
I still wouldn't expect any high pps toward a dollar or anything in the next year or anything. One has to realize for every organic and solid $.10 is about %1000 increase from here. I'd rather keep my expectations down and be super happy if more happened rather that expecting too much and be super disappointed.
Just want to say that it's really tight here, and if there's some news, there won't be any shake, it will just break. There is no fight to take it up and something more dramatic has to be done to bring it down -- the two trades were me at 13:59:57 and 14:01:11 -- I was just messing around (the very last one AH not me). If you behlieve, one might just take some at the ask and take the risk, if one doesn't then one can wait and maybe get some (maybe not as many) for a lower pps (a different risk). Due to volume at the low ends, where I like buying them, it's taken me almost 4 months to get where I want to be. Take it for what it worth, but as several people have stated, news is due with no rules as to when, but algae grows quick. All IMO.
See how easy that was. I thought maybe you didn't like the color so I took it back off.
Day isn't over. John Person says you have to wait to take it, along with it's really late and its flashed before. I'm looking for the fake, shake, and break so let it stay. They will probably be pretty stingy though, everyone has to share. Even if they take it lower to sub, it's going to be really hard to beat the previous low, so it still will be positive short, med, and long. But don't listen to me, I'm only guessing.
Also there is a small green arrow which indicates a 15 day MA crossing the 30 SMA (the blue one is the PPS buy arrow, and still haven't got the down one). I use many MA crossings to determine beginning and end of trends. That specific one is part of a triple MA and is a bullish signal, but is matched with a 30 over 60 to really indicate maybe a longer term trend, which hasn't happened. Still not a bad arrow for short term generally and one has to correlate them with other indicators. This chart gives some MAs with a standard momentum and MACD indicator and they are generally up which is a good thing.