Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Lol…you got it!
It is very interesting to see the prediction about ATT calling uncle. Looking at the developments of the whole list of legal cases, they sure appear to be the obvious choice for reaching some deal.
Is it any coincidence the VPLM & ATT filed a joint stipulation to dismiss the Mobile Gateway lawsuit in Waco last week? Case 6:21-CV-00671 in Waco is now closed while the other 6 remain open. Things that make me go hmmmm.
Maybe seeking help might be in order!
Yes…I really do think!
Correct Stef. Jury selection for FB, Google, & Amazon currently scheduled in Albright’s courtroom on 11/8 at 1PM CST. Of course the schedule is always subject to change based on motions & stipulations but that’s what on the books as of this post!
https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/judges-calendars/
Quote:
“Judge follows the Constitution which means a right to a jury trial! So no rogue judgements in Waco!”
Still waiting to know what courts the alleged hearing(s) were in on the 14th. I don’t believe there were any hearings scheduled as many of the dates for replies were pushed out until 10/28…unless I missed something IN MY PACER ACCOUNT!
??? In what court?
Joint statement for Donato’s cases.
Sorry wasn’t very clear on the schedule…within the joint case management statement was a new proposed case schedule. If the judges accept the proposed schedule, that’s how the case management statement can affect the DJ dismiss date.
Rapz…if accepted by N CA judges, the joint case management statement filed on 10/7 might affect the motion to dismiss date and push out a few weeks. Depends on if the judges buy the Apple et al BS arguments or listen to VPLM for a change.
In addition, Koh, who is a “self-proclaimed expert” and of all people, already declared the RBR & Mobile Gateway patents are NOT connected so it would seem illogical for others judges with no previous exposure to these cases to go against her ruling.
Hopefully we’ll see an order to dismiss the DJ cases for the mobile gateway patents (‘234 & ‘721) sooner rather than later.
Right? Where can I get the shares at negative share prices? I’ll take (with pinky finger at the corner of mouth) 100 BILLION shares at that price and I’d conquer the penny stock world!
ROTFLMFAO…I always seemed to misplace my math homework too when the teacher called me out & schooled me! What a crock…
“…one of several offers…”. BS…there has only been a single offer from Dr. Gil mentioned.
Just like 2nd grade math class, work should be shown when arriving at such BS answers!
Well considering nothing would happen in Waco before all responses are in, most who follow the cases understand the Bigs are continuing to play the delay game and ask for an extension until mid-October so that’s when the next filings are due. Then there will be more delay games in motioning for a venue change in hopes of getting the cases back to the Bigs favorable courts in N CA…remind us again who doesn’t want the cases to ever get to the jury trial. Emil & Hudnell have been trying to move these cases along but have met nothing but obstruction, delays, & lies. If I didn’t know any better, I’d think I were watching a session of Congress!
Weird how the vague version of the story was posted rather than the full detailed version including names of all involved…didn’t see any names associated with VPLM listed, but then again, facts are stubborn things here!
https://vancouversun.com/business/british-columbians-face-u-s-criminal-civil-charges-over-alleged-massive-illegal-stock-scheme
Can’t…doesn’t have the receipts…only BS vague statements!
You know Stef…facts are stubborn things. Still waiting for that full stockholders listing. LMFAO!
Name one!
Well just for fun, which company shows more shareholders listed without digging into the details of financial statements? Who’s lying? 455 vs 1? Who’s the real scam here? Who’s going to be adding to authorized shares soon? One guess…and Emil is the Caron answer!
#SMFH
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/VPLM/security
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/FUNN/security
If you feel Emil is lying, please show us the full stockholder list for another penny stock! C’mon, dazzle us with some brilliance here.
We’ll wait!
Sure thing…
Right? How many spineless coward CEOS have the cajones to take on 3 trillion dollar companies stealing their patents? Only 1 that I know!
Rapz, thanks for the info. That’s thinking logically again…be careful logic is frowned upon by many when it comes to understanding VPLM.
Tough to show infringement of the judge doesn’t allow a court case to ever get to a stage of the trial to prove it. This is like buying a Boston Marathon medal on eBay then telling everyone you ran the race.
Exactly SD. Cognitive dissonance at its finest on display by Apple in their first ever changing responses.
Right…Don’t forget when one has a valid patent and any other company knowingly or unknowing uses the patented technology, that’s called INFRINGEMENT. Seems kind of odd that the Bigs headed right to tech-friendly N CA court and pushed to invalidate the VPLM patents under 101 after failing in the PTAB FWD appeal. Pushing for invalidation is usually the first play in the slimy legal playbook when the accused infringers don’t have the facts on their side. Let’s see what happens in Waco with an unbiased & knowledgeable judge running the show!
Lol DB. True story… “No one is required to practice PATIENCE, just as no one is required to hold/buy VPLM!! All free will!” Just like no one is required to display intelligent but it sure would help in the understanding of what’s going on with VPLM and how the stock market works.
Basic stuff here. It’s neither a good idea to litigate via PR nor show up a judge in public by acting as if VPLM already won the case. This really isn’t difficult to understand if ever been in front of a judge before…even in traffic court!
VoIP-Pal Provides a Summary of Recent Favorable Court Decisions Regarding its Pending Patent Litigations in the U.S District Courts in Northern District of California and the Western District of Texas
VoIP-Pal.com Inc. ("VoIP-Pal", "Company") (OTCQB: VPLM) is pleased to provide a summary regarding its current patent litigation cases and to clarify some of the recent court rulings.
Last month the U.S. District Court in the North District of California (NDCAL) denied administrative motions by Apple and AT&T asking the court to relate their declaratory-judgment actions against VoIP-Pal's Mobile Gateway patent lawsuit to their previously filed declaratory-judgment actions against VoIP-Pal's RBR continuation patent lawsuits.
Earlier this month the U.S. District Court in the Western District of Texas (WDTX), Waco Division denied requests from the defendants, Apple, AT&T and Verizon to stay VoIP-Pal's existing lawsuits in the WDTX. In doing so, the Court rejected the defendants' argument that the 2021 Mobile Gateway cases in WDTX were "substantially similar" to the 2021 RBR continuation cases in NDCAL.
"We are very pleased with these outcomes so far," said VoIP-Pal CEO, Emil Malak. "Hopefully these favorable decisions will be the first steps towards having our cases move forward in the Western District of Texas. We believe that our claims have merit, and we look forward to a favorable resolution of these matters. Patience is a virtue."
Lol…math is hard. I think this is called “reverse dumping”
Total Bullshit. This isn’t a criminal case. Patent cases are civil proceedings and there is no “presumption of innocence” for either side.
In patent cases that are run correctly, there is a presumption of validity for the patents which would tilt the advantage towards the patent holder.
The plaintiff still has to provide evidence & prove infringement to the court. Tough to do in VPLM’s case when the corrupt judge & the Bigs sidestep claims construction hearings and shoot right to a invalidity under 101. So much for presumption of validity!
That’s like starting the Boston marathon a mile from the finish line then saying my final time broke the 2 hour mark!
Maybe high risk/high reward stocks aren’t for everyone if the feeling is the CEO is deceiving the shareholders & one can’t live with being invested in a stock with large price variability.
Because the market over reacted, or possibly ongoing stock price manipulation by the bigs, some are now asking for a better PR to pump up the stock price?
Quote:
“…Emil has unfortunately chosen deceit as the form of governance.”
I have no issues with what the company put out. By following the court cases, the news made sense. No company should make public their litigation strategy.
As far as new ruling from Albright, I check the case daily and there’s no news ruling. Facebook filed a motion opposing dismissal that hit the docket today. That’s the only new filing in Albright’s court that shows on the Waco dockets. If you’ve seen different info, please enlighten the board.
Most investors? Na, maybe some who don’t understand how patent cases work, are desperate to get out, or need a quick adrenaline hit to support a fictional belief in their stock picking abilities.
A good investor makes their money at the entry point and if the due diligence was done correctly, doesn’t worry about the cyclical gyrations of the share price. If one doesn’t have the stones for the uncertainty in patent plays, then maybe savings bonds or hiding money between mattresses would have been better options.
Facts are stubborn things DB!
Touché
Gifted to his own trust is dumping? It’s all right there on the form.
Agree. Koh should be a non-factor in Waco since she already denied the DJ request to relate RBR to Mobile Gateway. Judge Donato still has am open DJ case which I suspect Hudnell will file a motion for dismissal, possibly next week, since the first to file issue is now put to bed.
The wheels of Justice turn a bit faster in Waco. Could still go either way but at least we’re fighting in a neutral venue so the merits of the patents will stand on their own.
Agree 100%
Not true...by Albright declaring that Waco is the first filed court, the cases will move forward in Waco. He also denied the Bigs motion for a stay which says we ain't waiting on N CA for cases that have been delcared unrelated to the Mobile Gateway patent.
Now let's see what kind of BS the Bigs try to throw at Albright & VPLM.
It's Game On in Waco!