Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Kathy is paid company stock promotion as per SEC doc
Klook is her partner. The below are paid prmoters as per their disclaimers. There's even a new stock promoter out there who just started.
8. Most of the DD on this company is paid promotion such as wallstreetreporter.com , investortoinvestor.com , Investor Relations Worldwide Corporation asianinvestoronline.com , WillyWizard.com , marketreporter.com , ceocast.com, nanotechinvesting.com is company site, stockreporter.de, Charles Van Musscher of Gruenwald, Germany, The Geneva Group, Inc. of Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida and probably others. Check out their disclaimers on their sites. They have been paid to promote NPCT.
This is all in their press release. They even release PR's about hiring more stock promoters. What are you talking about?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
I'm not invested in these dog stocks
I only invest in larger stronger profitable companies. I just hate seeing investors getting fleeced by stock promoters, independent pump and dumpers and fraudsters. I am willing to just into the fight and post the truth about these dog stocks. If I see someone about to be raped, I will warn them. If I see someone being raped, I will try to get the guy off of them. You would just walk away and go find something pleasant to watch. I'm not that type of person.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Here are the lawsuits against hte CEO
I always post them. They are all from pacer which is a pay site owned by the government. http://pacer.uspci.uscourts.gov/ I've even posted this link many times before. I see you did not post a link to the actualy lawsuits which refute my post. tsk tsk. Investor to investor is paid stock promotion. It's not a real site.
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (Denver)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 91-CV-65
Kanchanapoom, et al v. Zufelt, et al
Filed: 01/14/91
Assigned to: Judge Sherman G. Finesilver
Jury demand: Both
Demand: $5,000,000
Nature of Suit: 850
Lead Docket: None
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Dkt # in USDC C Dist CA : is CV89-7321-RMT (Ex)
Cause: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
PAUL METZINGER Paul H. Metzinger
defendant [COR LD NTC]
Paul H. Metzinger, P.C.
600 - 17th Street
#2309-S
Denver, CO 80202
U.S.A.
303-592-1010
PAUL METZINGER, P.C. Paul H. Metzinger
defendant (See above)
[COR LD NTC]
2/5/91 9 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Richard Metzinger,
defendant Robert H. Burgener, defendant E.M.I. Inc.,
defendant Crown, Ltd., defendant King, Ltd., defendant Sid,
Ltd. by Timothy James O'Connor, Mary Frances O'Connor (yk)
[Entry date 02/06/91]
It is ordered that the
second cause of action is dismissd as to Paul H. Metzinger
and Paul H. Metzinger, P.C. and First Trust Corp. It is
ordered tht the 8th and 12th causes of action are
dismissed.
U.S. District Court
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (Denver)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 96-CV-1300
Maxam Gold Corp v. Timberline Conslts, et al
Filed: 06/03/96
Assigned to: Judge Clarence A. Brimmer
Jury demand: Defendant
Demand: $1,667,000
Nature of Suit: 190
Lead Docket: None
Jurisdiction: Diversity
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
MAXAM GOLD CORPORATION Michael H. Berger
fka [COR LD NTC]
Maxam International Waldbaum, Corn, Koff, Berger &
Corporation Cohen, P.C.
plaintiff 303 East 17th Avenue
#940
Denver, CO 80203
U.S.A.
303-861-1166
Raymond Harris
[COR LD NTC]
(To be updated)
Cary Ira Schachter
[COR LD NTC]
Conant, Whittenburg, French &
Schachter, PC
600 North Pearl Street
#2300
Dallas, TX 75201
USA
214-999-5100
FTS 999-5747
v.
TIMBERLINE CONSULTANTS, INC. John Henry Schlie
defendant [COR LD NTC]
John H. Schlie, Atty at Law
1120 Lincoln Street
#1600
Denver, CO 80203
USA
303-832-6890
RON KNITTLE John Henry Schlie
defendant (See above)
[COR LD NTC]
PAUL METZINGER John Henry Schlie
defendant [term 10/09/96]
[term 12/23/96] (See above)
He was sued over stock certificates.
U.S. District Court
District of Utah (Central)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 88-CV-897
SEC v. Faspaq, Inc., et al
Filed: 09/30/88
Assigned to: Judge Bruce S. Jenkins
Jury demand: Defendant
Demand: $0,000
Nature of Suit: 850
Lead Docket: None
Jurisdiction: US Plaintiff
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 15:77 Securities Fraud
PAUL H. METZINGER
defendant
[term 01/30/89]
The SEC won the case against the main defendant. Paul had case against him dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction. SEC was supposed to refile against him in CO which is the proper jurisdiction but didn't.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
The masses are not always correct
there were quite a few shareholders at slph and just a few people on tony's team calling it a scam. It was a scam. The few were correct. The masses are generally wrong, especially when they are all hired stock promoters.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
matt, can I post a pic from company website?
Can I post a pic from a public company's website on their corresponding board here? I would like to post a pic from the company's open house from the npct company site. Is this allowable? I don't want to embed it. I just want to post the link. I need to prove a point.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Here is some HONEST unpaid for DD on NPCT
1. The CEO was sued for fraud by the SEC (see below for lawsuit dockets)
2. The CEO was also sued for racketeering and was involved in a lawsuit over missing stock certificates.
3.The CEO's last company went bankrupt, i.e. a division of Intercell. There may be more.
4. NPCT was started as a mining company then became a distributor of skylights symbol SUNY and now sells hitech? The assets of npct i.e. patents and patent applications were bought with printed shares from a division of Intercell. Intercell considered their value ZERO. CEO Paul Metzinger is also the CEO of Intercell. symbol IICP.OB http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=IICP.OB&d=t As of 9/25 their stock is at .14
5. No direct revenue, no profits. They had a tiny tiny bit of income for consulting about something which had nothing to do with the company.
6. They have hired many, many stock promoters. One of them posted on the message boards that toxic funding is good and the funder was a good company when that was not the case. The company is currently suing the funder for stock manipulation and securities fraud.
7. They have an Open House every year which is basically just a stock promotion meeting. Here is a photo from it. They promote it heavily in Asia, Germany and the US yet they only had 35 people and I see at least five stock promoters in the audience. If this were a revolutionary product, how come more people weren't there? Why'd they even take a photo of such a small audience? http://www.nanopierce.com/daten/company/openhoeuse_event/oh_images/
Audience/Thumbnails/TN_the_audience1.jpg
8. Most of the DD on this company is paid promotion such as wallstreetreporter.com , investortoinvestor.com , Investor Relations Worldwide Corporation asianinvestoronline.com , WillyWizard.com , marketreporter.com , ceocast.com, nanotechinvesting.com is company site, stockreporter.de, Charles Van Musscher of Gruenwald, Germany, The Geneva Group, Inc. of Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida and probably others. Check out their disclaimers on their sites. They have been paid to promote NPCT.
9. Paul Metzinger is also CEO of Intercell. They did a 1:20 reverse stock split and their stock is at .14 That means it is really worth less than a cent. He changed the stock symbol also. He wasn't even in any type of business. His words again "I am currently assessing with the Board of Directors various business opportunities, which could well form the basis for the future business activity of the Company. There are several opportunities which we find of particular interest and which are in markets of substantial size upon which to build a real operating company. We have no specific restrictions imposed upon our search. I invite any shareholder who may be aware of a technology or a business opportunity, which they think may be of interest to the Company, to please contact me."
10. Intercell also had problems with the SEC with their reports. They had to restate them. This straight from the CEO. "Our previously announced plan to restructure, recapitialize and refinance Intercell Corporation was, unfortunately, delayed because of a frustratingly long effort to accommodate the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission on certain technical accounting issues relating to the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999."
11. The CEO begs shareholders not to verify contracts with other companies. This is very troubling and suspect.
http://www.nanopierce.com/daten/investor/press_archive/shletter14_09_01.html
"We are currently engaged in extremely sensitive discussions with many major global players in the microelectronics industry. These discussions and future business relationships can and will be jeopardized if shareholders make direct contacts with any of these companies in what may be a well intentioned effort to find out what is going on.
Recently executives of one company, at the highest levels, contacted us expressing extreme and troubling concern about calls received from inquisitive shareholders. These executives felt "compromised” being faced with answering questions about what they deemed to be inside material information, which obviously they could not disclose or even affirm or deny. These contacts must stop otherwise we may lose the opportunity to ever again deal with these companies. It destroys our reputation to be a trustworthy partner."
12. NPCT stock promoter Stockreporter sued by the SEC for fraud in his promotions. Here is the npct stock promotion. http://www.mary.cc/npct/sp.htm Here is the SEC lawsuit against the Stockreporter. http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr16680.htm
more info here http://www.mary.cc/npct
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
You need to post the info more than once
Posts get scrolled off daily. The information needs to be there. You see people doing DD reports every day. Also, sometimes people will ask why is this not a good investment and you must say because EPS last quarter was -.78, COH is $78,000, COG is 88%... To have to link every single statement to an SEC doc every single time is so tedious that it makes posting impossible. Everyone knows where to find SEC docs. I feel as long as you say the last 10K or the last 8K, that's good enough. To have to hunt down the links, copy paste, just to make a one sentence reply is too much to ask.
Linking to items does not mean it's legitimate either. npct links to a bunch of stock promoters website and the company owned industry news site. slph also owns a clean fuels industry newsletter. What's in those sites mean nothing. It's just paid promotion by the company itself. Heck, I can link to my DD sites here http://www.mary.cc/astn http://www.mary.cc/npct and that doesn't mean anything. If I made those sites look professional, investors might not realize that it's just an individual posting an opinion and some info.
Chas, do you think my DD sites above can be considered legitimate honest research or is it just bashing? Everything is backed up with links and quotes.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
My point exactly, matt
We are all just anonymous individuals posting our opinions about stocks on message boards. Joe's idea to ban "bashers" is just insane. Anyone else's idea to also ban "promoters, hypesters" is also just insane. To try and make regulations over "bashers" and "promoters" is impossible and completely against what all these boards are about. The name calling will continue. Heck, even my honest negative posting buds are calling each other "bashers" now. I guess it's kinda like the "N" word on stock boards. "Say, homie, howz ma basher bruther frum anuther mutha doin' yo!" Can't we all just get along?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Tony's slph out was great
You've got to admit that. I love the video where tony asks how this extremely intricate and revolutionary fuel cleaning machine actually works and the guy goes "you put oil and water in a beaker, put it here and bamm, that's it." I bet home meth labs have more equipment that this supposedly on the brink of success public chemical company.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
My point, we are all anonymous
we have no idea who the poster next to us is. It could be a paid promoter, a consultant, someone who received shares in a holding compnay, someone who got a cheap loan from the company, the ceo himself, an idiot who thinks npct is a good investment because some stock promoter told him...
We can never know who is who doing what so there is no way to promote and promoter basher regulation here. I could be a big fat slob of a guy. Matt could be just a teenager eating pizza and pepsi typing on his computer in his bedroom with an armadillo on his head for all we know. We will never know.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
joe, joe, joe,
you are trying to bait me into a fight. No thanks.
Stock tip: npct is a bad investment. No direct revenue, no profits, toxic funding, CEO was sued for fraud by the SEC, CEO was forced to restate books by the SEC, CEO sued for racketeering, his last companies went bankrupt, he said a gold mine had tons of gold when it didn't, he said an oil field had tons of oil when it didn't, he got sued for fraud both times, they are being sued by the toxic funder for slander and breach of contract, they have more stock promoters than a certain imfamous RB hypester has aliases.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Who will enforce touters, bashers?
Who would be willing to check out their information? What if it's in a pay site? Should Matt pay to go in there to verify the information? I see enforcement being very difficult.
Also, most touters sued by the SEC post without their disclaimer. There's no way to know who's a pro or not. Plus, they could be independent pump and dumpers hyping for their own private account.
Then we'd have to get into what are "bad" words. Stock promoter, pump and dumper, hypester, basher, board terrorist, "investor relations," ... I don't think enforcement is feasible. Matt's got enough to do. I also think that hypesters or bashers could use the rules just to make posting anything difficult. If I post "Astn share price new all time low today of .20" do I have to post a link to the quote for that day? chart? If I post "income for 1999 was -$2,645,000" do I have to link it to the SEC info. every single time I post the income for that year?
I believe the new rules would be difficult to enforce and could be abused by either side. I'm sure everyone will find loopholes also like calling bashers, hypesters by new names with the same connotation.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Great definitions, chas
I agree with those definitions. I also agree that if someone doesn't fit that description, they shouldn't be called a basher or a tout as it does have a bad connotation. I for one am not a basher. I am not paid to post. I'm not trying to affect the price. I'm not short. I'm not profiting. I'm not posting unsubstantiated information. Just because someone posts negative news about a stock does not make them a basher. Don't shoot the messenger. Just because someone posts an honest positive news item doesn't make them a tout.
There is a grey area though. Some dishonest paid stock promoters do not disclaimer that htey are paid. The promoters are also getting sneakier now. One such company which I shall not mention goes so far as to have another website about nanotechnology the industry in general. Then it slips in some great news about it's company trying to have the reader believe that it's an independent website just covering the inudstry when it's actually owned by the company. Sulpco also does this. They have another website that's supposed to be a clean fuel newsletter when it's really just a touting arm of the scammy company. See insidetruth.com report on that one. It'll have you rolling in the aisles. The undercover video is killer.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Bashers and touts and bears,
oh my!
What's everyone talking about here?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Nothing wrong with promoters who disclose
I just have a problem with promoters who promote a bad investment as a good investment. I don't like unethical or fraudulent promotion. If they predict the share price to be $30 when they know it probably won't go over .75, that is fraud. If they say they are presenting a paper an npct product and it turns out they're just presenting a piece aobut the industry in general, that is also a lie. If they relate the honest news, no problem. If they guilt the lily to the point of fraud, that is a problem.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Nobody should want to get on my bad side
if I did have a bad side
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Are you being compensated for promoting kathy's touts?
this is a legitimate question.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
.20 all time low today.
.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
ASTN loses lawsuit...again
16-OCT-2001
03:17 PM ORDER - ORDER ENTERED/236 NOTICE GIVEN WOLF, FLORA B
Docket Entry: 24-01090224 IT IS ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED AND THE ORDER ENTERED AUGUST 27, 2001, GRANTING DEFENDANT MARY CUMMINS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS IS HEREBY AFFIRMED. ...BY THE COURT: WOLF, J. 10-11-01.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Sorry, Vinny, but my time is up
As long as I promise to play nicely with others and not run with scissors, I can post on the big people's boards again. If I'm not good though, I'll be back.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
You in jail too?
Looks like we are stuck here together. Oh well. You know how to play chess?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
ASTN IPO company sued for FRAUD by SEC
Managing director of that company is currently a director at astn.
ASTN stock promoter sued for fraud by the SEC
They missed all their projections.
What do you mean astn is legitimate?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Oh yeah? I'm baaaaaaaaack
joemoney here as we all know has his marketreporter hype site listed in his profile. He also has a yahoo club where he tries to find stooges to buy his touts. He sends them emails about killer stocks. On the bottom of his emails in his wild and crazy disclaimers he actually states that his disclaimer is not guaranteed to be truthful. Disclaimers are supposed to be truthful or what's the point. You are really a piece of work joe. You have no soul at all.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
SEC sues ATS company Wamex
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 17178 / OCTOBER 11, 2001
SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. WAMEX HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL., United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Civil Action No. 01 CV 9056 (October 11, 2001).
SEC SUES TWENTY-SIX ENTITIES AND INDIVIDUALS IN $30 MILLION MARKET MANIPULATION SCHEME
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it filed a complaint in the federal District Court for the Southern District of New York against: WAMEX Holdings, Inc. ("WAMX"), a New York-based company with purported plans to operate an Alternative Trading System ("ATS"); Mitchell H. Cushing, WAMX's former CEO; Russell A. Chimenti, Jr., WAMX's former Chief Administrative Officer; Edward A. Durante, a stock promoter residing in Gardiner, New York; Roger M. DeTrano, a consultant hired by WAMX; Trevor Koenig, a former broker residing in British Columbia, Canada; Charles R. Eisenstein, of Brooklyn, New York; Alfred Peeper, a resident of Spain; Eugene C. Geiger, a former broker residing in Colorado; Heartland Capital ("Heartland"), a California-based investment firm; Scott Cameron, the owner of Heartland, residing in British Columbia, Canada; Roger H. Chlowitz, David Weiss, and Bruce M. Millstein, all of whom are California residents and former employees of Heartland; and certain foreign entities that were either involved in, or received proceeds from, the fraudulent scheme.
The Commission's Complaint alleges that from December 1999 through June 2000, the Defendants engaged in a market-manipulation scheme which drove WAMX's stock price from $1.375 per share to an all-time high of $19.50 per share. The complaint alleges that as a result of this scheme, WAMX's market capitalization grew from $250,000 to over $185 million, allowing Durante and his cohorts to dump 6.9 million WAMX shares into the market for profits of over $24 million. In addition, the complaint alleges the following:
In late 1999, Durante, DeTrano, Cushing, and Chimenti devised a scheme to raise capital for WAMX by manipulating the public market for WAMX stock. To further the scheme, DeTrano transferred millions of WAMX shares to Durante-controlled nominee accounts at Union Securities, Ltd., a Canadian brokerage firm. Durante then instructed Koenig, his broker for these accounts, to execute a series of manipulative public trades to create artificial price increases in WAMX stock.
DeTrano, Cushing, and Chimenti made false public statements through press releases, SEC filings, and Internet publications concerning, among other things: approximately $6.9 million in funding that WAMX had supposedly raised "from a private Investment Group"; WAMX's ability to legally operate an ATS; and the purportedly "extensive experience" of Cushing and Chimenti in the investment banking industry. In fact: WAMX had only received a fraction of the financing it had reported, all of which came from the Durante's fraudulent stock sales; WAMX had never obtained regulatory approval to operate its ATS; and Cushing's and Chimenti's so-called investment banking experience consisted of their employment at several notorious boiler rooms in the United States and Austria. Cushing neglected to disclose that he faced arrest in Austria as a result of his fraudulent securities activities there. In addition, WAMX filed a Form 8-K in March 2000 containing an audit opinion rendered by Eisenstein, who claimed to be a CPA. Eisenstein, a convicted embezzler and tax accountant for Cushing and Chimenti, was never a CPA and rendered this false opinion without performing an actual audit.
Durante also entered into a series of manipulative transactions known as "Block Deals" with Peeper and Peeper's stockbroker, Geiger. The Block Deals involved pre-arranged public market purchases of large blocks of WAMX stock in a manner that disguised the fact that Peeper was actually receiving secret discounts of 50% or higher from Durante. The Block Deals misled investors into believing that there was a highly liquid market for WAMX shares at artificially inflated prices. Peeper resold these shares during the course of the scheme for profits of around $6 million.
Durante hired Heartland, an unregistered broker-dealer controlled by Cameron, to solicit investors to purchase WAMX shares in exchange for undisclosed commissions of approximately 25%. Heartland's employees, Chlowitz, Weiss, and Millstein, failed to disclose these commissions to investors and, in some cases, falsely told investors that they were not being charged commissions.
The Commission's complaint charges all of the defendants with violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"), Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. In addition, the complaint charges several of the defendants with other violations, including Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act, Sections 13(a), 13(d), 15(a), and 16(a) of the Exchange Act, and Rules 13a-1, 13a-11, 13a-13, 13d-1, and 16a-3 thereunder. The Commission seeks injunctions prohibiting future violations of the securities laws, disgorgement, and civil penalties. The Commission is also seeking an order barring Cushing and Chimenti from serving as an officer or director of any public company. Finally, the Commission is seeking disgorgement from several entities that have been charged as relief defendants, including Exchange Bank & Trust, a purported offshore bank that received approximately $19.6 million in ill-gotten proceeds.
In addition to the Commission's civil action against DeTrano, Cushing, and Chimenti, these individuals were arrested on June 14, 2000 for their role in the WAMX scheme by the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York ("USAO"). The Commission suspended trading in WAMX securities on the same day. Koenig was arrested in September 2001 for his role in the fraud. The Commission acknowledges the valuable assistance of the USAO, the FBI, NASD Regulation, Inc., and the British Columbia Securities Commission in connection with this matter.
See Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 42937.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr17178.htm
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Good morning everyone
I'm baaaaaaack! Anyone see that the SEC sued ATS company Wamex for fraud? They touted a system which didn't exist, kinda like what astn did.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Muel, I've been making money
I let hdi dip to 36 again, bought more, rode it to 46 then sold it. All in a week or so. I made money. That was just one play.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
It's been three days, let me out!
Hey, can I get conjugal visits in here? I wish I smoked. Maybe I could trade cigarettes for favors
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Why are you stalking me, muel?
p.s. Your posts on astn are total bull. Insiders bought a few shares for a few pennies. Big deal. With possible delisting and positive dilution coming up, the stock has not found its bottom yet.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Let me out of here already!
I've been here three days. There are companies I need to harass. Let me out!
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
buzz off yourself, joe
you and your tout site are trying to con investors into sinking their money into this hole. If npct products could do what paul said, they wouldn't have to borrow toxic funds.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
semantics, ceo doesn't meet projections
he doesn't keep promises to shareholders. npct is not profitable. there is no real revenue. If this product was so great, they'd be able to sell it, license it. Why aren't they? Also why are the insiders selling at such cheap prices right before the big launch?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
there is no revenue, no viable product
he can say that it works but until someone believes it and buys a lot of the product and uses it, it is not viable.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
a projection is a promise
paul doesn't meet his projections. He doesn't keep his promises.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
pauls unkept promises
from silicon investor. lots more where this came from.
To:Chris J who wrote (623)
From: Bill Pearson Saturday, Mar 10, 2001 12:06 PM
View Replies (1) / Respond to of 645
I believe it was 1998 when Paul Metzinger told me (and I paraphrase), face to face, at a meeting in San Diego, "give me a year as CEO, I'm building a legitimate business here - if it's not viable in 12 months then the shareholders have a right to be upset with me (Paul M) and push to have me replaced"..... well, that was three years ago. I sold a yr later and haven't looked back except to marvel at Paul's ability to keep a handful of investors "hooked" into the "story".
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
The ceo doesn't keep his promises
Look at the promises he made to intercell shareholders. He didn't keep those promises. Why would he keep promises here?
sara, if you want to invest by just believing every word that dribbles out of a ceo's mouth, please do. Just be sure to keep your day job. PR's and company news is meant to entice, not inform the investor.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Nas didn't say astn would stay listed
Nas didn't say they would waive the minimum net assets requirement. It's not in the press release. astn does not meet 3 requirements, not just two.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
.27 new all time low
opened at .29 Lowest open ever also. The street has spoken.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Wrong, bop
ASTN didn't meet THREE requirements. Minimum net assets, float and minimum bid. I don't see a waiver for minimum bid there. Someone did call and ask the company and they said their hearing was still on. Keep in mind, this is their SECOND appeal hearing, not their first. They didn't meet all three requirements a while BEFORE the tragedy. They were named one of the weakest stocks on naz as per thestreet.com Heck, maybe naz should relist companies they tossed off ten years ago because of the tragedy.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
sara, go to RB npct
I've never seen so many posts for such a small company. Look at all the stock promoters. Look at the DD list. It's just stock promoters websites.
If this technology was so great after a few annual open houses and a zillion stock promoters sending the news to all the media, people would be beating down their door. They're been promoting the technology for YEARS and still no takers.
Again, big deal they release news about renting booth space at a tech event. Even I could do that. Heck, I was at an animal event couple weeks ago and they GAVE ME the booth space and all we had were rescue cats for adoption. I didn't even have to pay for booth space.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Plenty of hypsters here
There are enough people here hyping up the company, namely the company itself and paid stock promoters, investor relations and media relations. What is missing and needed is the negative side. The positive stuff is coming out of ceo wazoo. You can't make a good investment decision just looking al the positive spin. The more positive spin, the worse things are. These boards are not fan clubs or cheerleading squads. They are places ot debate the pros and cons of our investments.
Has the technology been proven? If it can do what they say it can do, which is revolutionize the entire tech industry, why aren't people beating down their doors? Why is the stock languishing on the otcbb?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!