Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
30 years ago?! Lmao. He got 60 days of supervised release. Not exactly a "CON" by no means. That's hilarious
And btw; hate to say it. But the whole "payoloa" thing was very common and still is today. No song gets played on the radio without the station or DJ getting some kind or form of Paylola
And FYI. Despite that non issue from about 30 years ago- he's worked with almost all the Major Record Companies as VP of promotions. The guy is connected/networked to some of the biggest names out there.
That's why Russ Regan is an advisor
And again. The Levy thing implies that any actor/actress that worked with or for Levy in a movie is some kind of criminal.
The entertainment industry is not the cleanest as everyone knows.
Some of the biggest players running the music game today made their $$$ dealing crack to little kids and gangbangers. Probably even murderers
That's not condoning the situation but it's 1000% irrelevant to even bring it up and just used as negative sensationalism
I'm here for the future of the company and what the company doing in the background. And what's to come on the table in the coming days, weeks, months and years. I don't look back to something 30 years.
That's like bringing up Mark Cuban being indicted for Insider Trading Every single opportunity can when talking about any company he's in
LMAO now the CEO is ex con? Really? That's a new one
LMAO- the short interest is up 60%++ and as much as 60k shares have been repeatedly borrowed. That's the factual information that shareholders need to know and looking for.
60k shares borrowed is 200-300% today's volume alone.
And only shares in the tradable float can be borrowed FYI. They can't be borrowed out of the OS unless something else is being implied and done that is illegal? Hmmmm
Lot Of Attention on SMCE Tonight! LMAOOOOOI
FALSE- it's not a "non issue" In fact it's a huge issue. 30k is as much as 200% the volume on many occasions and that 30k is 60% higher than the previous numbers and that 30k is only the number that wasn't covered on settlement date.
60k is what was being repeatedly borrowed at Interactive Brokers
False - the short interest is as much as 100-300% the current volume.
If the stock trades 30k shares for the day and 60k is being borrowed to short. That's 200% interest of the day's volume
Using the OS as the % is false.
LMAO! The float is less than 4m shares. Minuscule for this price range. Thanks for pointing that out
That's why will trade multidollar in the near future
Insignificant is false - 60k shares being borrowed repeatedly per Interactive Brokers (triple today's volume FYI) and 60%++ increase from the last short report is very significant. And FYI, using the OS is incorrect % to use. It would be the float.
But that is also data that's not important bc the % used against the current average volume is what matters.
Actually that's 1000% false. Because if any negative connotation is being made about SMCE for getting this distribution deal for the 7.3 IMDb movie, then every single component of the movie including all the actors is also part of that.
Why would only SMCE be negatively singled out? Makes absolutely zero sense. They been hired by the Movie to distribute. They weren't hired by Levy LMAO!! He's in prison.
A flop implies bad reviews and ratings Veronica Fox
Should've Been Romeo has a 7.3 rating and good reviews and 7 time Emmy winner Ed Asner
I'm discussing how stocks go up and down and considered certain "names".. However SMCE caters to both companies like Apple (Apple Music/iTunes) and Netflix as the distributer of digital content to them.
I would compare SMCE more to a company like INgrooves
SMCE is a pipeline distributers... Music and now film.
Myk Myk, SMCE has been awarded as the Exclusive Distributor to 7.3 IMDb rated movie with an all star cast including 7 time Emmy winner Ed Asner.
Levy is in jail. He has nothing to do with SMCE. Just like the rest of the cast and crew. SMCE was awarded the movie buy other people associated to the movie. Saying that there's some kind of "suspicious" connection is saying there's a "suspicious" connection to Ed Asner and Levy.
Flop? 7.3 IMBd rated movie is not a flop Myk Myk. In fact it's better rated and better casted than moves in the theatre now. A movie not making the theaters being considered a "flop" is a common misconception..
I'm a avid user of Netflix and have been for years. A large % of the most popular, trending now etc etc were never in the theaters. The entire movie and music industry has completely changed and companies like SMCE are adapting to that change.
What most don't understand and realize is that a majority of movies made never go to theaters. Does that mean it's a flop. Absolutely not. In fact it's very common. Most independent movies never make it. But they have great reviews and are well received when watched and rate.. But not every movie has Jurassic Park budget to spend on worldwide marketing, previews etc etc. $$$$$.
That's why Netflix does so well, bc movies like Should've been Romeo with an all star cast and great reviews and ratings get distributed to Netflix. It allows an awesome opportunity for movie buffs to see great movies.
Netflix stock was considers weak and driven down when hit $60's but what is it now? $600+++
Stocks and companies experiences fluctuations in share price. SMCE has huge amount of room to go up with their business model.
SMCE has relationships with people in the movie. Levy is in jail. They didn't get the deal because of Levy! Is he doing deals during his recess break!?? LMAO. No, but guess who else was a producer and writer
Paul Ben Victor
Are you stating that the actors and crew of this 7.3 IMDb rated movie with Ed Asner (7 time Emmy winner ) is corrupt bc they are in the movie.
If any negative association is being made to SMCE then it's also implied to the entire Cast/Crew
Can't have it both ways.
As I said and not being denied, disputed or successfully counteracted ONCE in this discussion. LMAO
BTW:
This is the SMCE board. I don't speak for other stocks or the entire OTC. I'm only stating factual information about the significant shorts at SMCE.
"Shares consistently borrowed to short at IB and 60%+ increase in shorting over just 2 week period (Finra) Yep, I agree 1000% shorts have been significantly involved"
Shares consistently borrowed to short at IB and 60%+ increase in shorting over just 2 week period. Yep, I agree 1000% shorts have been significantly involved and evidence of significant wash trading being recorded on daily basis. That's the only way to create the illusion of selling
LMAO- is that why interactive brokers shows as much as 60k shares borrowed at a time on multiple occasions. If there's no "shorty" then why are shares being borrowed.
And why does Finra show a 60%+ increase in shorting in just a 2 week period.
Some odd reason, this never gets answered it gets diverted into something else
It's literally a verifiable, undeniable indisputable fact that there's been a significant short in SMCE for quite a while. Absolutely nothing to do with management.
In fact. Management just got an Exclusive Distribution Deal for a 7.3 IMBd rating with a solid cast including the legend 7 time Emmy winner Ed Asner.
Can't blame management for sure
incorrect Veronica Fox!!! We take screen shots of how much is being borrowed every single day. That's indisputable undeniable verifiable proof. There's no way to deny that info is there.
This conversation is going no where because Finra and IB is backing up my statements.
LMAO x's Infinity. Now it's who cares. Interesting.
FALSE: Before the latest Finra Short Report - all we heard night and day was that there was "no shorting" "no significant shorting" blah blah. In fact it was very defensive.
But in fact during that whole period there was a very significant amount of shorting while these statements were being made.
Why? Because as much as 60k shares were being borrowed at Interactive Brokers. Hmmmm if there's no shorting or significant shorting- then why were share being borrowed? Shares are borrowed for only one reason! TO SHORT!!!
And 60k shares is very significant considering it's almost triple the volume today and has been double the volume or half the volume on many occasions.
In fact the latest Finra report shows that 30k shares were shorted (that's only what's not covered as that date mind you)
That's as much as 100% or double triple the volume on occasions.
The fact is. And it's indisputable, verifiable information that there's been an ongoing short in SMCE for quite some time and shares have been borrowed for as much as 60k shares.
The truth is. Majority of the shareholders that own most the shares here aren't ihub ppl and hardly read this board. LMFAO
But for the small % that do, they need to know for a 100% fact that SMCE has been shorted significantly
Veronica Fox, I was the first one to bring up the Finra Short Numbers on this board.
It's been out since about mid last week FYI. And I was waiting to see if it was posted since its 60%+ higher. But it never was. But I did last night. And boy it stirred up a storm lol.
This statement states that no shorting exist-
"The fact is the same thing could be done by a long trader to give the illusion of some shorting conspiracy when in fact none exist. "
Incorrect, the latest Finra report showing a 60%+ increase in shorting since the last report was not posted.
I was the one that brought the new info to the table.
However this number only reflects what wasn't successfully covered by 5/29. On 5/29 we had 104k volume and during the days leading up to that timeframe- interactive brokers was showing as much as 60k shares being borrowed on numerous occasions
Is not a "conspiracy" Veronica Fox. It's an absolute undeniable verifiable fact that there has been significant short interest at SMCE for quite some time.
LMAO!!!
No shorts exists? really!??? Is that why the last Finra Report showed over 60% rise in shorting
Making a claim that no shorting exists is an absolute false statement and ZERO fact/evidence to back up that info. Finra shows us otherwise
LMAO - Veronica, let's not kid ourselves. We know exactly what "game" is and has been played here on L2 by Shorts and Wash Trading for quite a while.
We all watching, recording and taking notes of every single thing going on. Nobody is selling down here with this amount of shares. We know everyone that's been absorbing or buying and nobody is selling down here.
Yes, bhonda was sitting on the bid at .20 for 2500 shares as etrade and 5k shares got sold at .20 but (he was the only one on the bid) "interestingly" he got 0 of those shares which means someone coordinated a "wash trade" to sell 5k AON to the hidden AON 5k bid.
And later in those same shares were put up at .20 to make the offer look weaker/lower
It's about as verifiable as can absolutely be Veronica Fox
15k shares wash traded disguised as sells.
Good info. Thank you
exactly - so what!?? LMAO
Why is he brought up at all? The PR is about the company having exclusive distribution rights to a piece of art called:
"Should've been Romeo"....With an accredited Cast and 7.3 IMDb rating
If SMCE (the Distributor) is in any minute way being implicated as anything remotely negative bc of one guy - then the entire cast and crew is also being implicated- it doesn't work both ways Veronica Fox
A list of all those "Connections" including but not limited to:
Emmy Award Winner (7 Emmys by Ed Asner alone)
TV Show Host
Box Office Hits like the Avengers ( just out )
Writers/Directors
TV Show Casts
HBO show Cast
& the list goes on & on & on
-----—
Paul Ben-Victor ... Joey
Edward Asner . Charlie
B.J. Britt ... T.J.
Jordenn Thompson Billie
Carol Kane Ruth
Michael Rapaport Danny
Kelly Osbourne Nicole
Howard Rosenman .. Henry
Renée Taylor .. Tillie
Natasha Henstridge ... Nadia
Mary McCormack Ellen
Tina Majorino Alice
Costas Mandylor Mason
Vincent Ventresca Matt
Theo Alexander ... Milton
Eric André Buzz (as Eric Andre)
Garrett Brawith Pickle
Alexandra Choi Party Goer
Josh Cowdery Jaffe
Emi Eliza Emi Eliza ... Dippette
Alan Gray ... Artist on Bus
Evan Handler Stewart
Nichole Hiltz Anna
Steve Hytner Rick
Kim Kendall Julie
Elizabeth Ann Koshak Talent Agent
Art Kulik Party guy
David C. Levy Limo Driver / Bus Driver
Sophia Lin .. DJ
Chad Lindberg Gordon
Scott McCray Weens
Christian J. Meoli Eddie
Shea Parker Young Mr. Dippy
Michael Anthony Rawlins Bouncer (as Michael Rawlins)
Dave Rodriguez ... Sahlima
Lexie Bright
Lorna Scott Shiela
Gregory Segal Pilot Producer
Craig Shoemaker Izzy
Manel Souza Young Man (as Mannie Sousa)
Kelly Stables Sara
Brett Taylor Bobby F.
Alanna Ubach Pilar
Danielle Vasinova Dip Ette
Matt Winston Tom
Veronica, Should've Been Romeo is comprised of a large number of components as can be seen below. Levy is just one of at least 50.. Many of these actors/actresses are accredited, Won Awards (Ed Asner has won 7 Emmy's!)
Written TV shows/movies, and we see many of the below in their own TV show, Movies playing now at the theatre. in the news, etc etc..
These are Connections and Networking for SMCE. 6 Degrees of Separation.
And SMCE is now the Exclusive Distributer for this movie. A huge accomplishment for the company and shows they are absolutely the real deal and doing exactly what they said going to do.. No one gives 2 cents about one bad apple Levy whatsoever.. The public, these actors, SMCE care about this beautiful piece of art getting the attention it deserves on Cable, Satellite, Netflix, Pay Per View..
SMCE, has been awarded the privilege to get this movie the attention it deserves by being the "pipeline"
If SMCE is in anyway being associated badly to Levy, then that implies that every single one of the people below also falls in that Category, including 7 time Emmy Award Winner Ed Asner
Paul Ben-Victor ... Joey
Edward Asner . Charlie
B.J. Britt ... T.J.
Jordenn Thompson Billie
Carol Kane Ruth
Michael Rapaport Danny
Kelly Osbourne Nicole
Howard Rosenman .. Henry
Renée Taylor .. Tillie
Natasha Henstridge ... Nadia
Mary McCormack Ellen
Tina Majorino Alice
Costas Mandylor Mason
Vincent Ventresca Matt
Theo Alexander ... Milton
Eric André Buzz (as Eric Andre)
Garrett Brawith Pickle
Alexandra Choi Party Goer
Josh Cowdery Jaffe
Emi Eliza Emi Eliza ... Dippette
Alan Gray ... Artist on Bus
Evan Handler Stewart
Nichole Hiltz Anna
Steve Hytner Rick
Kim Kendall Julie
Elizabeth Ann Koshak Talent Agent
Art Kulik Party guy
David C. Levy Limo Driver / Bus Driver
Sophia Lin .. DJ
Chad Lindberg Gordon
Scott McCray Weens
Christian J. Meoli Eddie
Shea Parker Young Mr. Dippy
Michael Anthony Rawlins Bouncer (as Michael Rawlins)
Dave Rodriguez ... Sahlima
Lexie Bright
Lorna Scott Shiela
Gregory Segal Pilot Producer
Craig Shoemaker Izzy
Manel Souza Young Man (as Mannie Sousa)
Kelly Stables Sara
Brett Taylor Bobby F.
Alanna Ubach Pilar
Danielle Vasinova Dip Ette
Matt Winston Tom
Yep, absolutely 10000% right - CONNECTIONS!
http://m.imdb.com/title/tt1717210/fullcredits/cast?ref_=m_tt_cl_sc
That's only what wasn't covered as that day Veronica Fox. Finra only reports twice a month. And 30k short on the current volume we have is huge %
With the volume being 104k that day. The short number was more likely 50/60k
And by the way, that was a 60%+ increase since the last report.
Lmao - it wasn't a flop Myk, not all movies go to the theatre FYI. In fact. Most never do. And most the time it's all about the $$$ and distribution..
If it was a flop, it wouldn't have multiple great reviews and a 7.3 IMDb rating. And FYI. That's better rating than A LOT of these big movie box office hits
As far as attacking the company. The company is doing exactly what they said going to do since the beginning.
Wash trading can do that - there's a great forum post out there by someone explaining exactly how it's done and manipulates a stock down
I'll dig it up later. But it literally textbook to what we are seeing on SMCE
Oh ya!? Then why were 30k shares shorted showing up on the last finra report
Yes wash trading can make sells look factual. Thanks for pointing that out.
Hey Honda- did you get any of those shares at .20 on that first 5k sell?
How come you got skipped? Oh bc a wash AON trade was made to fill another culprit. Then they used that same 5k shares to place up later in the day at .20
It's not rocket science to figure out what's going on
That's very interesting isn't it..
Between all the wash trading (fake selling) and Shorting. Wouldn't take much buying pressure to crush all the BS occurring.
Interesting how the word "Teens" was thrown around so much today and was made sure to get washed to .19
Agreed, that's awesome. We have bottomed out and the HOY is $1.40
Investors love that kind of stuff
Oh and FYI - the last short report showed 30k shares shorted (as of that date) very significant number.
Funny, bc for quite a while we were being severely misled as if no shorting was going on here LMAO
I agree 1000000%, wash trading it to .19 so that the appearance of it going to teens is not real selling or anything. It's simply an illusion of washing trades.
Of course it's needed so that people here know the truth. Nobody is selling shares. Lmao. It's wash trading.
When you have someone sitting at bid at .20 and 5k of sells go through at .20 and none of those shares go to that person. That's an AON wash trade to make it appear as if "all this selling" is occurring when it's really not.
Have a great night.