Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Actually, according to Nabbbss, it does seem to go up faster during the daytime hours in the USA than at late night.
Not my post. It's Nabbbss doing us the service of tracking it. I think it's good to have a record of it, since the chart on Fb doesn't let us see it to that detail, and for that long.
Nah, that's not it. Here's why.
Those rumors have been around for months. Their timing is way off from the timing of this run.
Also, there are no signs of promotion. I've searched and haven't found any. If you've found any, please explain.
The new likes have actually varied up and down quite a bit, and follows a kind of bell curve after each new stimulus to the likes. Seems more like natural, real organic growth to me.
For some reason I don't see it changing to the .org style. It still looks the same to me. I tried a reload not from cache. Maybe I'm doing it wrong and still getting my cache.
How do we really know that what DA reports is actually true when he PR's about things and then changes his mind on those same things.
That's all mostly old news. DA has been getting better at keeping quiet until things are more certain, although we still have a couple of examples from this year where he spoke too soon.
He's still improving.
You were probably looking at one of the development sites, vivavuva.ORG or vivavuva.NET.
The "production" site is vivavuva.com. It SHOULD have a working 1-800 number, but I haven't confirmed that.
In the next day or two, I expect that you'll see most of the stuff on vivavuva.org move over to vivavuva.com.
No, I cancelled the Alexa Pro trial once I figured out how to use the programmatic interface.
I've written a script which I run each night and it spits out the numbers for me, ready to copy and paste to my spreadsheet, so it takes me just a minute each night now.
It only costs me a few pennies per year, too.
It also gives me DAILY and WEEKLY numbers for each stat, too, as well as the monthly and quarterly averages, which is really nice to see the ups and downs and trends more quickly.
Update on weekly Alexa traffic through Nov 1st. Fall surge continues for OL and WOL. OL is a little better than last year, and WOL is far better than last Fall, so far.
The numbers below are for:
world rank (in thousands),
reach % (in 100,000ths of a %), and
pageview % (in millionths of a %).
The lower the rank number, the better, the higher the reach and pageviews, the better.
Vivavuva.com started to surge in the last 2 days.
Rank, Reach, Pageview%
For OL:
Q3(-9/30): 147.5, 82, 62
10/01-07: 148.6, 87, 57
10/08-14: 123k , 110, 61
10/15-21: 192k , 80, 25
10/22-28: 98k , 128, 113
10/29-01: 96k , 140, 99 (4 days)
For WOL:
Q3(-9/30): 245k, 54.5, 23.5
10/01-07: 203k, 80, 23
10/08-14: 209k, 80, 23
10/15-21: 201k, 80, 21
10/22-28: 130k, 105, 57
10/29-01: 105k, 133, 56 (4 days)
For VV.com:
Q3(-9/30): 290k, 40, 28
10/01-07: 326k, 42, 21
10/08-14: 680k, 20, 8
10/15-21: 1089k, 18, 2
10/22-28: 495k, 30, 7
10/29-01: ??? , 30, 13 (4 days)
Wow, model Rachel Wu the hyper-achiever. Like you said, Army Medic and EMT, but also self-taught at HTML/CSS/graphic design, developed several websites, psychology degree, academic honors, frequent public speaker, partner at talent management company, and wants to become a congresswoman or senator.
I have a feeling these models will be much better in interviews than your average Victoria's Secret model.
Oh, sorry!
Sometimes I can't tell when someone is joking, given the huge range of claims being made for and against the company.
I didn't actually project when the 10K will come out. As far as I know, it could be anywhere from 1 week from now to 8 weeks from now. I haven't heard when it's LIKELY.
My only point was that if it does come out in late December, it won't be late. 90 days would be Dec 29th, if I'm counting right, so "by Dec 29" would be on time.
I agree with most of your post, but I don't believe it's true that anyone can put products on QCI.
Also, there were additional reasons given for the delay in BB stores (going for more permanent space, and the 'identical product' thing), although I wouldn't blame anyone for doubting those reasons.
Because the fiscal year for MDIN is from October to September, so it isn't Q3 that we just finished, but Q4 instead.
If it were Q3 being reported, you would be right that it would be due by Nov 15.
Since it's Q4, and the full annual report, it's not due until end December.
Chugit, I appeciate your consistent enthusiasm but this statement seems a bit over the top:
Making over 12 MILLION IN Revenue IN 2 Quarters with only selling products on Amazon sites and MEDGEN website is the start of what is about to happen.
You raise good points, but they're all OLD points, and any damage from them was priced into the stock a couple months ago.
1) MDIN said they would have $23 million in revenues by year-end September 30th and be in over 20 major retailers with sales from some at $2-$3 million individually.
If MDIN reports $300,000 in revenues sometime in December on the Annual report I would be surprised.
2) Is Amazon selling 100 bottles of Snorenz a day or 5-10? At 150 bottles per day every day including weekends and holidays revenues would be still less than $600,000 per year for Snorenz.
Is it acceptable to not be in any major retailers and miss revenue projections by 95% but Amazon and a catalog makes up for it?
I would say that because this is such a fast growing business, the stock would have to be extremely undervalued (like 1/3 of what it should be), for it to make more sense to take capital away from growing the business and put it into a buyback.
Right now I think it's undervalued, but not by enough to justify a buyback.
If Danny knows that a huge Q4 (say, > 2 Million) will definitely happen, then maybe he should be buying back now, but I don't think even he can predict how well VivaVuva will do. So I think it makes sense to wait and see. If VV takes off and the stock price doesn't, then I can see a buyback being justified, but we don't know that yet.
There's a difference between "overvalued" and "no longer extremely undervalued". There's a large area of ground in the middle.
I think it's slightly undervalued right now, and if Q4 and VivaVuva do as well as I (and many) think, then it would have to move up a lot to avoid going back to "extremely undervalued".
I did follow the thread back. I was a part of the thread.
No amount of re-reading the thread is going to change my mind that the JC Penny CEO case you brought up is in no way similar to DA and BRAV.
1) I do not believe the PR is what brought the stock down. I believe it was over-inflated expectations on the part of investors which came back down to earth when Q1 results were announced.
2) There is nothing wrong with a CEO taking a salary as long as it's a reasonable amount, and I believe the amount he's taking is reasonable. You'd rather have him starve and lose his home and have to sleep in the office?
3) He should only buy back when the PPS is at a level where it makes sense. When he said he would buy back, the PPS was at a level where it made sense. Now it is not. You can criticize him for not buying back when he had the chance, but it was only a slim window of time before the PPS took off. It certainly makes no sense for him to buy back now, at this PPS.
Go back and read the post I was replying to. It was clearly talking about links to online storefronts which recently started selling Snorenz (and were recently pointed out here). Of course that can't include Walgreens because they're not selling it yet.
Go to some of those storefronts whose links were posted here today. You'll see that many of them even say they're part of an Amazon reseller program.
We know that Walgreens will NOT be part of such a thing. They'll be having their own inventory and selling directly themselves.
Now I am completely lost as to what you're getting at. Sponges?
I still have no idea how this is in any way comparable to DA's situation. You'll have to explain it to me a little better.
Stagnant? The PPS is up about 200% this year. Many shareholders are doing very well, and will again. Most stocks that go up big do not do it with a steady, consistent uptrend. They jump up a lot, then pull back, get quiet, then jump up a lot again. That's just how stocks work. Look back over stock market history and you'll learn that.
And as for Danny getting 40k salary, what do you think is fair for a CEO who works super-hard, does a lot of SEO and other things himself, has been the driving force behind the profitability of the company, and deferred his salary before things were profitable? I know people paid a lot more for doing a lot less. No scandal here, unless you want to make the case that DA is UNDERpaid.
But it seems that DA is more along the line of the JC Penney guy they just canned for trying to re-invent what JC Penney was. Look where that got him and he even came over from Apple. Should we also compare that scenario?
Glad you like my fable.
Except that it's not a fable.
I have the full list of trades from the last couple of weeks to prove the correlation between below-the-bid self-selling and time spent in the trips.
Of course not. It's not a real company. Just a penny scam shell.
dilute down phase? Ha!
We've suggested before to analyze the volume. A good analysis makes it clear that volume is much too low to be dilution.
I suppose most people did the suggested volume analysis because most others have stopped claiming dilution.
I think you have it backwards. It takes heavy manipulation to keep it down in the trips. Once the "under the bid" self-selling stopped, it bounced quickly back out of the trips.
Your "everyone" must mean everyone in some small group of cynics.
Everyone in the real world knows that MDIN is for real.
Just like when product was sent to walmart in January and it would DEFINITLY, OBVIOUSLY, 100% SURELY be in stores by last June but...never made it, now we have online links to stores who aren't selling it.
Nick told some people where to look for the cheap PPC ads he paid for. For product that isn't even in those stores
I didn't understand the rest of your post about the billboard and a man and a woman.
Could you explain what they said in the 6abc report that had to do with Snorenz?
Seriously?
The reverse splits were all years ago, under old management, long before last year's restart of the business.
There have been no reverse splits since they resumed operations under Nick.
You read the PR wrong. They did not say the TV ads would start on Nov 1st.
Here is the exact quote from the PR:
"it will officially launch VivaVuva.com during the first week of November with the airing of its national television commercial to begin following the official consumer launch."
So the launch will be sometime between Nov 1st and Nov 7th, and the ads will begin AFTER that. How much later is unclear.
I guess I should have let the beard grow out sooner.
I'll bet that after the parade later this week, lots of those beards are gonna get trimmed or shaved.
Again, why would Merck even CARE about taking on MDIN? Completely different market, and too small of a reward for them. They're not even competitors.
Of course, they might be interested in buying out the lactose intolerance product / patent rights as they move toward FDA approval, but only that product.
Why would a billion dollar drug maker want to sell a product that goes for $10 a bottle? They wouldn't. It's too small time for them. Not worth their trouble.
They get huge margins on their drugs, and they know how to do that business, which is a very different business model than MDIN's products. Completely different distribution channels. Completely different relationships needed. It just wouldn't make sense for a huge company like that to go through the expense of learning how to do MDIN's niche, for such a relatively small reward.
The good news for us is that we only need a couple million in sales to see the stock price skyrocket. We don't need billion dollar mega-sales.
It's actually over 500 per day, at which rate we'll get to to 100,000 by the end of February.