Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
OT: Tom DeLay indictment
Its probably just one of those youthful indiscretions that just inexplicably happens to so many conservatives. Nothing a good swift kick from Jesse Helms couldn't solve if he could find his cane.
-Alt
High Def market will be a tough sell
I think the likely scenario will be that smart consumers will wait until a single format surfaces. Those that are not savvy will be very disappointed when they purchase a HD-DVD or Blu-Ray disc and find that it may or may not play on their equipment. This will keep the existing DVD format around alot longer.
As for the consumer, baffled shoppers would most likely stick with "normal" DVDs until a single format was established.
-Alt
Semi-OT: Same olde Windoze Song and Dance
Looks like a new variant of the bagle worm is getting through via email crippling anti-virus and antispyware software. Expect more PC to Mac switchers as virii, worms and malware start wreaking havoc over the next couple of months.
-Alt
AAPL trading at 25.93 on inet and ecn ? Is this a mistake ? A stock split ?
-Alt
OT: Zagman is just baiting us.
I hope he never finds himself ever needing assistance due to acts of god or mother nature. He better have some Big A** Bootstraps.
-Alt
OT:MSFT has a design philosophy ?
Seems to me that Microsoft does what is most expedient.
Microsoft is truly a reflection of what is systemically wrong with America; rather than resolving issues we use bandaids, when open heart surgery is needed.
Here comes the rant:
We create entitlement programs like farm subsidizes that never get re-evaluated. We bail out industries whose CEO's then leech the profits for Golden Parachutes for themselves and their friends. We have economic, energy and health policies that do not address the realitys of the average American citizen but serves the corporate elite that are greedy for more and more profit and less overhead.
America needs real leaders that serve all of its people that are willing to shake-up the status quo to attain Win-Win propositions that every american can live with .... not the meaningless rhetoric and pandering that goes on every election season.
-Alt
AAPL, Rita and Energy prices
Sold 200 more shares of AAPL to lock in some additional profits. Economic news doesn't look good.
Unemployment numbers are back to the 2003 levels and Rita hasn't even hit yet.
Energy stocks are on a Bull run so expect even if the refiineries don't get hit by Rita their will be gouging at the pump.
On a cheerier note Apple is still holding up very well in the down draft.
RE: Hurricane Rita
Hey Tex I hope your getting out of harms way because it looks like Katrina was just the warm-up act for hurricane Rita.
Best Always
-Alt
more AAPL Speculation
Hey Blue a few more gadgets like the iPod plus fresh new intel Powerbooks and Apple will be able to grow revenues enough to sustain tremendous growth over then next decade.
-Alt
Thanks Keyser that puts things in perspective.
I'm staying long and buying more on dips.
-Alt
Re: iPod Nano
Damn thats alot of devices.
Does anybody know what kind of profit margin the 4GB Nano ipod delivers to Apples bottom line ?
-Alt
Apple Intel x86 + PowerPC = Larger Market Share
The timing for the Intel transition was well thought out. The iPod revenue should cover any significant shortfall of PowerPC cpu sales. The average consumer doesn't fully appreciate how difficult it is to make such a transition. The Rosetta software will keep the PowerPC code base viable for many years too come. I would purchase a PowerPC Motorola G4 laptop today if it had a dual core CPU to replace my aging 400 mhz G4 Ti Powerbook.
-Alt
That and the feds just up the interest rate another quarter of a point.
-Alt
;-}
Enough AAPL happy talk
The end is ...... nigh.
Apple Death Knell #47: Longhorn Will Spell Apple's Doom
by Bryan Chaffin - September 20th, 2005
It's time, once again, for a visit from Rob Enderle, for he has trod into the Land of Logical Fallacies and pronounced Apple's doom. Mr. Enderle's latest kick is that Microsoft's next operating system, Longhorn, will be the end of Apple when it ships in another year or so. That makes Apple Death Knell #47, his 7th!
What always makes deconstructing Mr. Enderle's criticisms of Apple both easy and boring is that he relies on some of the most absurd ideas and theories to back up his claims.
For instance, according to Mr. Enderle, asserted that "Historically staid companies like Gateway, HP, Acer, and even Dell are much more aggressive on design today, often surpassing Apple, which was preeminent in this area in the 90s. While this design parity clearly hasn't impacted the iPod market yet it is incredibly evident in the PC space."
In the 1990s, Apple's design was better than the Wintel world, to be sure, but that's like saying a Ford Escort is better looking than a Yugo. While true, is that really a position a sane person would want to defend? Apple was known for having better looking hardware in that decade, but today, the company is known the world over as the leader in industrial design.
Indeed, the idea that Wintel industrial design is even in the same ballpark as Apple's is, to be kind and gentle, laughable and delusional. In a previous sentence, Mr. Enderle does mention outstanding companies like Voodoo and Alienware -- two companies I personally think make very cool looking PC cases -- but the funny thing about both companies is that neither completes on price, and both serve specialized markets willing to pay a premium for performance and cool industrial design.
To those keeping score at home, that also describes Apple.
But those other "staid" companies? They couldn't design their way out of a wet paper bag, and they don't pretend to even try. They're in a commodity business, and they know it. It's Mr. Enderle's usual misdirection and fact-through-assertion that he so often employs to justify his positions.
Respond?
My next favorite gag from Mr. Enderle's never ending Bag O' Tricks is the idea that Apple has time to respond to Longhorn:
"Glass," he opines, "is the user interface enhancement that appears to improve on what Apple currently has with Tiger. Granted, Tiger is shipping and Vista isn't, which gives Apple time to respond. Still, this is the closest to Apple's capability we have ever seen from Microsoft and for those of us who simply cannot use Apple machines this will be very well received."
So, let me get this straight: Making it a given that "Glass" is a better user interface than Apple's Tiger (another laughable assertion), the fact that Tiger is shipping now gives Apple the chance to respond to a product that is, at best, 12 months out?
That makes sense only in upside down world, and I don't mean our friends Down Under. It's Microsoft that has time to respond to Apple, and the best it can do so far in Mr. Enderle's own words is to "appear to improve" on Tiger. Microsoft is playing catchup to Apple in every way, shape and form.
Market Share
Mr. Enderle asserts that the market moved away from the Mac "years ago." While true -- Apple did lose market share for many years -- the fact is that the Mac has gained enormous market share in the last 18 months. During that time, Apple's unit sales have risen dramatically faster than the market as a whole, which makes Mr. Enderle's point merely more misdirection and obfuscation.
There's more in the full piece, including a look at some of Longhorn's new features for those interested, but I'll close out with Mr. Enderle's conclusion:
"If Apple and the Linux community can't make the hard decisions needed to address this competitive threat the negative impact on both of them will cover a broad range and will be unavoidable."
[And]
"This suggests that 2006, at least after August, will be great time for buyers and sellers of PC hardware and that has to be a good thing for everyone -- except Apple."
Puhlease.
http://www.macobserver.com/columns/thebackpage/2005/20050920.shtml
Maybe AAPL is being perceived as mainstream rather than niche ?
I think the engineering and business clout AAPL is demonstrating with the iPod Nano has really gotten the attention of some serious investors. Those people who never gave Apple a second look because of the lack of intel support are having an epiphany. Apple is now starting to make sense as a mainstream hardware and software vendor.
-Alt
AAPL Market Share according to AppleInsider
Apple’s US market share now stands at 4.5%, with its world-wide market share at 3%.
http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?%20id=1279
-Alt
AAPL up another 1.6 %.
What's driving the stock price up now ?
Are Big institutional investors driving this stock price up now ?
-Alt
OT: do a ditty .... dumb ditty doo.
Thanks, Linda I've still got most of my AAPL's. Its hard to part with them ... but I should lighten up over the next few weeks. I'm never good at selling or determining when a stock has reached its peak selling price. AAPL is now selling at a premium but the larger market is now bidding it up into the stratosphere. I don't think this can go on indefintley !!!
BR, -Alt
ahh me matey's buy a shiny nano boy'oh so Captin Steve-O can plunder more loot from the sinking SS Microsloth on its way to the bottom of the Devil's triangle .... neva to be heard from again.
Yo Ho and a bottle of ...... rrrr ..... Apple Jack ..... yo ho into the 50's we go ....go .... yo Ho.
-Alt ...... MicroCrap wants a Cracker and Ballmer needs a new Toupee
bootz the only thing where missing is the locust.
Market seems to like the nano sales AAPL is up about $1.30 a share.
Fi its breaking above 52.30 cents. Irrational exuberance yeah think ?
-Alt
Yeah its feels fallish in New England.eom
Sold 100 sharesod AAPL at 52.00.eom
AAPL testing $52.00 ? .eom
AAPL Speculation
I remain bullish on AAPL over the next Two quarters. If Fuel prices continue to increase it will impact consumer spending for the majority of American households. AAPL however is in a very good position to weather this economic problem because its perceived to be a premium brand the Top 10 percent of American households will continue to buy the latest and greatest AAPL gadgets because the impact from additional Fuel costs will be considered negligible.
Little Johnny wants a iPOd Nano an Xbox360 and by god he's gonna get 'em.
-Alt
OT: Now that's energy In-depends-ence.
-Alt
OT: Energy Independence
Its Government in Partnership with Business and the American people that is required to make any of this happen.
Our country has been blessed with incredible natural resources but we have to be good stewards and thats where conservation needs to come in.
The answer is not just the use of ethanol we need a manhattan project to investigate the feasability of all the alternatives in depth to determine what can work. It could be a combination of various alternatives and strategies I suspect. Last I new we are capable of chewing gum, riding a bike and listening to our iPods so we could work on a multi-pronged energy independence strategy.
The reason I point to corn is because as Americans we currently subsidize the corn crop. Any workable alternative energy program in the US has to be a Win-Win situation for everyone involved so we need to address how businesses can derive a profit from this as well.
Ultimately it requires leaders to get the ball rolling.
-Alt
OT: A Call for Energy Independence
If we had the right leadership to establish as a goal, Energy Independence we could accomplish this within 20 years. If we focused on requiring electric hybrid automoblies that could run both ethanol, and petro the impact would be astounding. Then Archer Daniel Midland could stop selling corn as an additive to practically every processed food we eat in this country and put it to better use as a fuel to power the country. IMHO,the price of doing nothing now if we wait until petro gets to $10.00 a gallon will be a diminished economy and a period of very high inflation. The benefits of such a move would resolve alot of our pressing problems.
-Alt
iPod Nano has broad appeal
The Nano has really taken off at the company I work. I spoke to two users that already have theirs ... Incidentally they are both windows users. I think the nano has some really broad appeal. The 4 GB black nano does seems to be outselling the 2 Gb by a wide margin. I've also been getting some interesting and positive nods from colleagues I typically have my iPod Shuffle in plain sight. I'm known as the Mac guy in the company even though I spend most of my time servicing and repairing Windows boxes.
-Alt
OT: Brazil's Homegrown Fuel Solution
I find this story to be astounding. As American's we crow about how advanced we are yet south of the border Brazil is a few years away from energy indepence. We could grow sugar beets and use the corn we already subsidize to switch to ethanol. If we could improve the extraction process beyond 14% we would have a ready made fuel supply.
We should lobby our congressman and Senators to get into alternative fuels ASAP.
-Alt
Homegrown Fuel Supply Helps Brazil Breathe Easy
By Marla Dickerson, Times Staff Writer
SAO PAULO, Brazil — While Americans fume at high gasoline prices, Carolina Rossini is the essence of Brazilian cool at the pump.
Like tens of thousands of her countrymen, she is running her zippy red Fiat on pure ethanol extracted from Brazilian sugar cane. On a recent morning in Brazil's largest city, the clear liquid was selling for less than half the price of gasoline, a sweet deal for the 26-year-old lawyer.
"You save money and you don't pollute as much," said Rossini, who paid about $18 to fill her nearly empty tank. "And it's a good thing that the product is made here."
Three decades after the first oil shock rocked its economy, Brazil has nearly shaken its dependence on foreign oil. More vulnerable than even the United States when the 1973 Middle East oil embargo sent gas prices soaring, Brazil vowed to kick its import habit. Now the country that once relied on outsiders to supply 80% of its crude is projected to be self-sufficient within a few years.
Developing its own oil reserves was crucial to Brazil's long-term strategy. Its domestic petroleum production has increased sevenfold since 1980. But the Western Hemisphere's second-largest economy also has embraced renewable energy with a vengeance.
Today about 40% of all the fuel that Brazilians pump into their vehicles is ethanol, known here as alcohol, compared with about 3% in the United States. No other nation is using ethanol on such a vast scale. The change wasn't easy or cheap. But 30 years later, Brazil is reaping the return on its investment in energy security while the U.S. writes checks for $50-a-barrel foreign oil.
"Brazil showed it can be done, but it takes commitment and leadership," said Roland Hwang, vehicles policy director for the Natural Resources Defense Council in San Francisco. In the U.S. "we're paying the highest prices at the pump since 1981, and we are sending over $100 billion overseas a year to import oil instead of keeping that money in the United States…. Clearly Brazil has something to teach us."
Much of Brazil's ethanol usage stems from a government mandate requiring all gasoline to contain 25% alcohol. Vehicles that ran solely on ethanol fell out of favor here in the 1990s because of an alcohol shortage that pushed drivers back to gas-powered cars. But thanks to a new generation of vehicles that can run on gasoline, ethanol or any combination of those two fuels, more motorists like Rossini are filling up with 100% alcohol again to beat high gas prices.
The exploding popularity of these so-called flex-fuel vehicles is reverberating across Brazil's farming sector. Private investors are channeling billions of dollars into sugar and alcohol production, creating much-needed jobs in the countryside. Environmentalists support the expansion of this clean, renewable fuel that has helped improve air quality in Brazil's cities. Consumers are tickled to have a choice at the filling station.
Officials from other nations are flocking to Brazil to examine its methods. Most will find Brazil's sugar-fuel strategy impossible to replicate. Few countries possess the acreage and climate needed to produce sugar cane in gargantuan quantities, much less the infrastructure to get it to the pump.
Still, some Brazilians said their government's commitment to ditching imports and to jump-starting homegrown energy industries were the real keys to Brazil's success.
"It's a combination of strong public policy and the free market," said Mauricio Tolmasquim, president of a federal energy research agency based in Rio de Janeiro. "That's the Brazilian secret."
Brazil's fortunes have been tied to sugar since the Portuguese conquerors found that their tropical colony boasted ideal conditions for cultivating the tall, grassy plant. Brazilians produce and eat more cane sugar than any people on the planet, so the notion of using it to power their vehicles was a natural. After all, Henry Ford once viewed ethanol, which can be made from corn, barley and other crops, as a strong contender to fuel the Model T.
But the discovery of cheap, abundant petroleum changed everything. Like much of the rest of the world, Brazil guzzled imported crude until the 1970s oil shocks put its economy over a barrel. So totally reliant was Brazil on foreign oil that surging prices wreaked havoc on its balance of trade. That led to massive borrowing, huge deficits and, eventually, hyperinflation and a devaluation of its currency.
Thus the Brazilian government, then a military dictatorship, launched efforts in the mid-1970s to wean the nation off imports. Those efforts included its National Alcohol Program, known as Proalcool.
"To become less dependent was a matter of life and death," said Jose Goldemberg, secretary of the environment for the state of Sao Paulo.
With the help of public subsidies and tax breaks, farmers planted more sugar cane, investors built distilleries to convert the crop to ethanol and automakers designed cars to run on 100% alcohol. The government financed a mammoth distribution network to get the fuel to gas stations and kept alcohol prices low to entice consumers. It worked. By the mid-1980s, virtually all new cars sold in Brazil ran exclusively on ethanol.
But a 1989 shortage coupled with low gas prices soured many on the renewable fuel. Sales of alcohol-only cars tumbled in the 1990s, and the government gradually withdrew its subsidies and lifted price controls on ethanol. Demand stalled.
Some critics at the time chalked it up to the inevitable consequences of government meddling. But today many laud Brazil's Proalcool program for creating a viable domestic market for ethanol, and for spawning an industry with tremendous export potential that now employs more than 1 million Brazilians.
Meanwhile, ethanol remains little more than a boutique fuel in the United States. Although the U.S. is the world's second-largest ethanol maker, producing 3.4 billion gallons last year compared with around 4 billion gallons for Brazil, ethanol's main use is as a gasoline oxygenate to boost air quality rather than as a serious replacement for foreign oil. However, high gas prices have some farm belt legislators pushing Congress to mandate greater use of domestic corn-based ethanol in the nation's fuel supply to reduce oil consumption.
Virtually all cars sold in the U.S. since the early 1980s can run on gasoline containing as much as 10% ethanol. In addition, there are an estimated 5 million flex-fuel vehicles already on U.S. roads that can burn a mixture as high as 85% ethanol. But big logistical and political hurdles remain. Only a few hundred of the nation's approximately 169,000 retail gas stations are equipped to sell so-called E85 fuel. Nationwide distribution would require station owners to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in special tanks and pumps.
Although U.S. ethanol makers say they could easily double their output to meet any increase in demand, experts say that's still a drop in the bucket compared with the tens of billions of gallons that would be needed annually to displace meaningful amounts of oil. The U.S. industry is loath to give up tariffs that protect it from cheaper alcohol from Brazil.
Meanwhile, some environmentalists say feedstock such as grasses and municipal waste offer much more promise than corn. But huge investments in research are needed to get the costs down for this so-called cellulosic ethanol.
What most can agree on is that Brazil is an example of what might have been if America had seriously committed itself 30 years ago to renewable energy.
"If we would have spent one-hundredth of the money that we have spent to send tanks around the world to protect our oil supplies … we would already be using cellulosic ethanol," said Michael Bryan, chief executive of BBI International, a Colorado-based bio-fuels consulting company.
Although public support was crucial in getting Brazil's program up and running, the private sector is now driving growth with flex-fuel cars.
At Volkswagen's sprawling Anchieta plant near Sao Paulo, the gleaming Fox and Polo models inching down the assembly line look just like regular cars. The only immediate clue that they are revolutionizing the Brazilian auto market is the TotalFlex logos on their back windshields.
The company was the first to unveil dual-fuel vehicles in Brazil in March 2003. The technology has proven to be such a hit with consumers that in a little more than two years the company has shifted nearly 90% of its domestic production to flex-fuel capability.
"It was a big bang in the market," Volkswagen spokeswoman Junia Nogueira de Sa said.
Equipped with a single fuel system, these vehicles employ sensors that allow the engine to adjust to gasoline and alcohol in any combination. Flex-fuel vehicles don't cost any more than regular gasoline-powered models. The only visible difference under the hood is a tiny auxiliary fuel tank that holds a bit of gasoline to aid starting on cold days, a common problem with the old alcohol-only models.
Today, a half dozen carmakers, including General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co., offer dual-fuel versions of their vehicles in Brazil, and more are on the way. Consumers bought around 48,000 of the vehicles the first year they were available in 2003, representing about 4% of total car sales. That figure quickly jumped to 328,000 cars, or 22% of the total volume, in 2004, and last month nearly half of the new cars sold were flex vehicles. Analysts predict that dual-fuel technology will easily dominate the market within a few years.
Cars aren't the only things being powered by ethanol in Brazil. Small planes such as crop-dusters are converting to alcohol. And Brazil's electrical grid, which experienced a severe shortage in 2001 because of a drought in its vital hydroelectric sector, is getting a charge from sugar.
In contrast to U.S. corn-based ethanol, which requires substantial amounts of fossil fuel to plant, harvest and distill, Brazil's industry uses crushed sugar cane stalks known as bagasse to feed the steam boilers that power its mills and distilleries. The process is environmentally friendly and so efficient that these centers are generating more energy than they can use. Ethanol producers are supplying Brazil's grid with more than 600 megawatts of electricity. The near-term potential is at least 10 times that.
Near the city of Ribeirao Preto in northeastern Sao Paulo state, the harvest is underway in Brazil's richest sugar-cane-producing region. Trucks lumbering under mounds of fresh-cut cane creep into Jardest Sugar & Alcohol. The vast milling and distilling complex, owned by Brazilian sugar trading giant Crystalsev, will run 24 hours a day nonstop until the season ends in December. The air is fetid with char from the fires that are clearing the fields of debris and vermin in preparation for the arrival of teams of scythe-wielding cutters. A lush emerald sea of cane rolls toward the horizon in every direction.
And there is a lot more where that came from. Brazil has about 13.5 million acres planted with sugar cane. More than 200 million dormant acres lie ready to cultivate.
"Oil is running out. The world needs more clean, renewable fuel," Crystalsev executive Maurilio Biagi Filho said. "And we are going to be there to supply it."
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ethanol15jun15,0,3313642.story?track=tothtml
AAPL: iPod nano sales off to slow start
By AppleInsider Staff
First week sales of Apple's new shockingly thin iPod nano have fallen short of expectations, with most Apple retail stores having sold only one-fourth of their initial inventory of the players, AppleInsider has learned
A couple of Apple retail stores in California, which last week received over 1400 iPod nanos, said they sold only a couple of hundred units by Saturday. This despite favorable reviews from both analysts and the media.
"Our checks indicate good, but not great initial sales of iPod nano," said Shaw Wu, an analyst for American Technology Research. "This may be surprising given the consensus view from both the investment community and technology reviewers that the iPod nano would be a big success."
According to the analyst, many Apple stores who were contacted reported selling only 200-500 of their initial 1800-2500 iPod nano allocation. Additionally, Wu confirms earlier reports that the black iPod nano is greatly outselling the white models.
"[The] black-colored ones are outselling the white ones by a great deal," Wu wrote in a research note released to clients on Tuesday. "5 to 1 and in some cases as high as 8 to 1." Coincidentally, these sales ratios completely contrast Apple's initial production ratios of the nano, which reports suggest were 1 black nano for every 5 to 8 white nanos.
At the same time that sales of the nano appear to be lacking, demand for the now discontinued iPod mini continues to be strong, according to Wu. He notes that the price cuts applied to the mini just prior to the release of the nano have since been retracted.
"We believe iPod nano is a great product and evolutionary step combining the best elements of iPod shuffle, iPod mini, and iPod photo, but we believe Apple may need to make some changes to ensure its success as a high-volume product," Wu added.
The analyst speculates that the iPod maker may need to slash the price of the nano by $50 if sales continue to under-impress.
http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=1270
I don't find this of any big concern because discretionary consumer spending is restrained due to higher prices at the pump which ultimately will effect everything we purchase. Its way to early to gauge the success of this product because a great many people are going to be cautious about splurging on some new device without first understanding whether its a good value or not. And their talking basically one week of sales.
Come holiday season iPod Nano will sell extremely well.
-Alt
Thanks Fi thats good news; now if only they would deliver enough product. eom
AAPL holding up very well today .... now in positive territory.eom
Hi Fi .... how are APPLE Mac CPU sales
holding up from your vantage point?
-Alt
Can Apple Shares Stay Fruitful?
By Amey Stone
Business Week Online 09/12/05 5:00 AM PT
"I'm happy with [Apple] doing what they're doing, but I'm hopeful that they will make a big splash in the cell phone arena," said Paul McEntire, chairman of Skye Investment Advisors. "They are so good at designing products that are user-friendly and have sex appeal."
Few stocks this year come with the bragging rights of Apple Computer (Nasdaq: AAPL) . In the past year, it has skyrocketed from US$17 to $51 -- a 200 percent gain.
Fueled by the success of the iPod digital music player, sales for the 2005 fiscal year, ending in September, are likely to come in at $3.9 billion, about 70 percent higher than last year, according to analysts' consensus estimates from Thomson Financial. Even better: Earnings per share for that time are expected to have grown nearly 300 percent -- from 36 cents a share to $1.42.
Can They Top the iPod?
Given that remarkable growth, it's tempting to rush out and buy Apple stock. But its current popularity with investors may give good reason to hesitate. Apple's stock may have appreciated too much, making it expensive. The current price-earnings ratio is 32, vs. just 20 for the average computer maker. While that doesn't constitute a reason to sell, it does suggest it may be late to get in now.
Many money managers who don't already own Apple are steering clear at this point. "I can't say it's not a great company, but what do you do for an encore?" says Brent Wilsey, president of Wilsey Asset Management in San Diego. "I wish I had seen that they would have such tremendous growth in earnings," he says, "but they are not going to have anything like that going forward."
Wilsey sees competition in the iPod market increasing and earnings growth inevitably slowing. In its fiscal third quarter, one-third of Apple's revenues -- $1.1 billion -- came from the sale of 6.2 million iPods. It sold 860,000 in the same quarter the year before, for year-over-year unit sales growth of better than 600 percent. In the third quarter of 2004, iPod-derived revenues totaled just $249,000. Meanwhile, overall revenues this quarter reached $3.5 billion, up from $2 billion in the same quarter a year ago.
But due to more competition and tough comparisons with this year, Megan Graham-Hackett, an analyst with Standard & Poor's, predicts only 14 percent revenue growth in 2006 -- that's better than other computer makers but far slower than Apple's recent past. She rates the stock a hold.
Wall Street analysts tracked by Thomson Financial expect 17 percent revenue growth and just 14 percent earnings-per-share growth in 2006. Most of them recommend that investors buy Apple shares, but their median price target is $50, just barely percent above the current price, according to data from Thomson. That isn't much room for upside.
Wilsey worries that if Apple misses analysts' earnings estimates -- which many hiked after its third-quarter report on Aug. 14 beat their estimates for the seventh consecutive quarter -- the stock will get slammed. "It's just so hard to follow up on the kind of growth we've seen," he says.
more here:
http://www.macnewsworld.com/rsstory/46040.html
AAPL iPod MP3 Market
I believe iPod Nano is going to solidfy AAPL's place in this market but at what point does the MP3 player market reach a saturation point ?
Will Mac CPU sales disappoint this quarter ?
-Alt
AAPL Speculation
AAPL reconsolidating between 50.50 - 51.20 a share and gathering strength for another Bull run beyond 52.00 a share.
-Alt
damn, you just invented the nano boat anchor.
Glue a CREAF Zen to the back of the nano.