After having had a great successfu marketing carreer for 35 years in 2 multinationals (one being a leader in its industry, the other one being a startup type international operation competing the previous one) I did retire 23 years ago and am not looking for any kind of job, that's for sure. This being said, as competent as she is in her domaine, if she doesn't have the smarts to recruit the appropriate ressources competent in discipline she doesn't have, the you an I and her we will lose all we have left in this failing company because she is to proud and selfish to accept that she cannot succeed on her own whatever the offering she has.

I have seen company succeed first hand and also saw some going bancrup or selling out even if they had a superior product. Our CEO stubbornly keep trying to do it all by herself and if she doesn't open her mind, we all will have missed a real great opportunity. At my age, it will not mean much but many (her included) will suffer from this crazy behavior.

BOL to all!

Glad to read that you ''do not need any credibility'' ... You at least have succeeded trying to getting there.

As for MULN ... you found out after the fact (reporting historic facts of the past again) or did you find out the hard way (probably losing big again) ?

Talking about credibility, why would anyone believe anything you say or suggest (excluding your continuous copy/paste of the financials evebody can read). As per your multiple months of disparaging Leon and trying to prove his falure, the company is still very much alive, the creditors keep letting him go and regular quaterly reporting proves that the only serious problem Shawn has is the debt.

May I suggest that you cetainly cannot make anyone believe you have any credibility since most of your forecasts never materialized. Everyone following this board however knows you have a hidden agenda and , your saying that you do that to protect potencial byers is (to be polite) a terrible joke.

I also want to help potencial futur shareholders by saying that this sub-sub-sub penny stock is an opportunity to bet money one can afford to lose without much pain but it would be considering bothe the risk and the upward opportunity considering the general evolution of the company and other potential opportunities such as acquiring serious investors (more than 6,000,000,000 authorized shares available and/or public fundings from government considering the business we are in.

I had a great confidence in this business when I bought in very early at about current pps ($0.38 t0 $0.47 CDN in December 2019). I then sold and bought doing a little trading. At my peak I had 20,000 shares but over the last year (last 6 months in particular, drastically reduced my position). I overall did not lose any significant money but lost confidence. I shall buy back in if the woman wakes up or someone comes to help her.

I'm not bashing but have been in business for 35 years before retiring 20 years ago and here is what my 'bashing (???) is all about: Here are the 3 best ideas I can offer her (not really new ones):
1- Change half her BOD replacing some scientific specialists fby experimented business people
2- Recruit a marketing VP from a firm she wants to compete againts
3- (After that is done) develop an advertizing plan addressing the market instead of the shareholders.

Considering she most likely will not do that, starting to let the market know that she could take into consideration buyouts proposals.

She will most likely do nothing of the above, being convince that good products can only succeed, given time.

I always daid she is a great R&D type scientific person who created a fantatic product line. I bet she believes that everything will go as dreamed for when FDA issues its approval but if she keeps dreaming of a product only oriented strategy, she may not fail (she doesn't have that much debt if any) but will be boughtout at a pretty much lower price later.

By the way, the way she procrastinate waiting for success coming her way, competitors will also developped competitive offering and her window of opportunity will go away.

'January 2020' ... wow! this is news to all ...

Yes I'm sure people going by do look at your posts to make a serious analysis of the history of GRST before 'they invest their rent money' (LOL).

As for 0 trade, do you mean nobody is selling and escaping notwithstanding your preaching (LOL) ... They have shares, they know the company, they most likely read your bashing a million times and they still do not sell ???

Could it be that they know what they are doing and cannot care less reading your profound analysises?

You're never out of words, even if you have to ressussitate old stuff you repeat at nauseam. Notwithstanding all you contuous biases analysises, you know as much as we all do ... the history ... and as less as we all do ... What shawn is really working at (anything between screwing us all to maling us all real good ... unless he fails and or bancrupt.

Bashing is an art and you are one of the best (not a compliment) I ever saw.

My theoric scenario of an/some investor(s) joining with Shawn is as reasonnable as those (you keep forecasting for months and years (dilutions and splits among others) that nevr happenned fore more than 12 months.

Government fundings are also available ...

Whatever, ... For the moment still is a risky bet behind wich is an operating, reporting company. You can imagine whatever disaster ahead but yo know as much as any of us notwithstanding your efforts to bash a stock you presumably do not hold (and/or try to buy at low price).

The reason we trade at ,0006 (market cap of less ths $2,400,000) is the debt. What would the market cap become if suddenly the debt was almost $5,000,000 less ??? Could it then be (conservatively (8,000,000,000 at $0012) Somewhat les than $10,000,000 (multiplier of much less than 2).

Hypothetical scenario but if you add to that a minimal government funding (aluded to earlier) the investo(s) of that less than $5,000,000 would be in great shape.

Q. The current plan, to sell more than 4 billion shares priced at .0012 ... Is that all Shawn works toward?

A. Cost of addictions in USA: Over $532 billion a year.

Context: The President’s FY2022 $41.0 billion investment for national drug program agencies is a $669.9 million increase over the FY 2021 enacted level. The largest increases in funding are for critical public health interventions like treatment and prevention services.

Anyone believes thay Shawn is not working that source of funding in addition to his offering?

Q. The current plan, to sell more than 4 billion shares priced at .0012 ... Is that all Shawn works toward?

A. Cost of addictions in USA: Over $532 billion a year.

Context: The President’s FY2022 $41.0 billion investment for national drug program agencies is a $669.9 million increase over the FY 2021 enacted level. The largest increases in funding are for critical public health interventions like treatment and prevention services.

Anyone believes thay Shawn is not working that source of funding in addition to his offering?

''The current plan, to sell more than 4 billion shares priced at .0012.''

That's almost $5,000,000 ... If the proceeds are used to eliminat that much of the debt, how would thhhhe market react? What would then the capitalisation become? ... ?

Not only do large investors stay away from this stock but now small investors are dropping out. The woman has proven and stlill does she is an incompetent CEO who left her previous job not understanding that her management was doing the right thing to be successful, even with a product having nothing really special. She then went creating a great product, not understanding that having a good product is not the most important success factor it's not even the most important one.

She prefer to fail and lose face to accepting she is not doing what has to be done.

Happy to have seriously reduced my position and sorry not to have done it somewhat more.

I wonder if the woman will endup figuring out she badly need help ... If she is not outright stupid she should figure out that she is doing a mess of the company. Two and one half years ago this stock traded above $4 and it is now barely 10% of that. Is there no limit to the stobborness of someone obviously needding help. What is it she doesn't get?

She adds products and shelves but even with an outstanding product she does not accept that she is badly failing. Some bright people in their own domaine are sometime outright stupid and too proud to ask for help.

I bet she sit on her hands waiting for FDA and if successful she will believe she has the solution to her misery, without seeing that she will only see a short live growth of her business, going back rapidly to her stupid belief that product is the only CSF leading to succees. Many failed being that incompetent dreamers.

What are all these board members and directors doing? are they also that naive (to be polite)?

I have 2 gambling stocks (toys to fil time) that I do not consider investments and i am not really a trader. Grst in particular is interesting considering the content of our board.

Thanks anyhow for your suggestion and if i need help i shall ask you (LOL)

''due diligence is much more important trading the OTC'' DD in view of trading is like imagining what the next carde will be playing black jack. However if you want to lose your time doing DD on such a stock (Market cap of $2,000,000 an pps of $0',0006 it's up to you but if you're not been paid to plug all these post, ...

At least this time, you end your post by asking the question instead of subjectively give an anwer showing what you wish presented as fact.
This being said, i'm more and more convince you are being paid by the post (but what do I know?)

'Real due diligence' ... You are kidding? DD is fundamental for anyone wanting to INVEST in a seriously established company.

Pretending to do serious DD looking at a stock having a pps of 1/100 of one penny and a MC of more or less $2M is either 1- totally incompetent (to be polite), or 2- supporting his day trading ,3-paidto post herein or worst even, all of the above.

''Friend'' (I do not assume i am aimed at)

''I don't make things up here'' (You effectively know the past and whatever official info the company did report).

The net proceeds of $2.3 million (Any honest analys not having an hidden agenda would have stop right there. However someons wanting to create FUD would add the second part of the sebtece : ''will cost them $19.5 million over 20 years'' )

The following sentence however effectively proves that these people (kowing what they are working toward) still have faith ... ''The deal required the signature of Shawn Leon personally, ...'' and they signed.

Shawn and his close ones may be wrong but at least they prove they honestly believe that they can succeed.

That's why I accept the RISK i keep refering to, instead of following the biased posts of some in here.

As I said multiple times and maintain it, this is a high risk bet but the company duly reports, keep doing business and Shawn hasn't given up. One doesn't have to claim to be a competent analyst to discuss the recent financials to say that. As opposite to some in here, I do not pretend to know more than anyone, However some, obviously work to support a strategy requiring others to believe that the situation is less than rosy (or even a bancrupcy in the making).

OK. I will keep looking at our site but will try not to answer Bubae ... unless he plugs new false information OTHER THAN THE ONE HE WROTE FOR YEARS PRETENDING TO HAVE BEEN WRITE ALL ALONG, notwithstanding that the company still progresses, still operates and still reports duly. Our self defined analyst has been wrong for years and that is a FACT ... at least up to now. Why would that change?

Reading crazy Bubea reminds me of another person repeating the same garbage so often that he ends up believng it.

If this man was so smart and apparently competent, what does he do bashing full time a sub-sub-sub penny stock instead of creating his own busines ???

Whatever this presumptuous 'assumed analyst' concludes out of anything normally and legally filed by the company is garbage and after having forecasted disaster for years (must be terrible to be so frustrated) he keeps being wrong since THE COMPANY IS STILL PROGRESSING and its CEO keeps working at it.

Having no respect for a person such as Bubea, I however have pitty for someone obviously having no life.

more than $19 million over 20 years

There you go again with your totally ridiculous analysist. A morgage of $100,000 is not a debt of millions over 20 years ...

Good at being a monday morning coach but I bet you never did manage anything other than your unjustified pride in forecasting disasters. What a pitty.

She is a lab scientific person totally incompetent relative to building a great company notwithstading the product quality. Stobborn as she is, she may thro the company under ground and became a harvard business case in the mba program ... How deep will she go before they acquire help and i do not mean getting more scientific people as her guides and BOD member. Is there someone somewhere able to get to her and explain her she is on a financial suicide track.

I hope FDA comes out with a positive resuld (may very well be) but if the woman doesn't wake up thereafter, she's done. I sold more than half my position earlier this year and I now regret not having sold more.

Oh my God ... Don't tell me ... You mean that the company has debts ... What would we do without you and your bright enlighten analysises of what did happen years ago, not accounting for your positive wishful thinking relative to your wish regarding the future ... You're one of a kind and still write if you thought anyone cares about your

According to you, Shawn is rich enough to endorse a multimillion deal and stupid enough to do it, knowing he will lose his bet.
I believe he is confident enough to place a very large bet even if he understands there is a risk.
I much prefer betting (reasonnably) with such a man than listenning to presumptuous analists only knowing the past.

Now your back at analysing the past trying to look smart and competent. it's better than discussing future with crazy argumentation relative to a morgage.

I did, I do, and know that Leon reactivated a company starting with a huge liability (debt). I also know that notwithstanding that situation he did built something out of the ashes of the previous operations andprogressed somewhat over the years since. I also know that the final outcome is far from being successful but it may also be.
Contrary to some I do not presume reading future in cards and accept the risk involved not assuming 'it's clear as day' ... one way or another. Neighter do you.

Not going to discuss politic in here but why am I not surprised by your opinion relative to the US current political situation? You obviously like negativeness, whatever the topic you look at and what the thruth is (Crazy Donald did lose fair and square). EOD

'$8.5 million deal worth mote than $19 million over 20 years'

Oups, a new approch to negativism, trying to scare people away (LOL). Since when does someone look at his morgage as worth the some of his monthly payments after 20 yars.

For once our infamous analyst looks ahead instead of the past and he succeed once again to make a fool of himdelf.

You seriously think I could go reading PR's going back 5 years (2018) to realise this is a risky bet that may become a final loss (I'm far from being over exposed) or results in a great return. Sorry but I have a life and for as much as I know, whatever the reading you refer to, this company still operates an reports (even if late).

I easily can understand why someone would not buy shares but if he does it based on the comments of our infamous analyst, even if he ends up being right it will be for the wrong reason.

Hard to believe anyone will act based on your garbage. You sound like a politician I consider more dishonest than others.

Another stupid post demonstrating you only post BS (You do not even have my address ...) LMHO!

Just in case you want to know you do not live in my head but I really have you my ...
As for correct content, monday morning coaches are always right ... It however proves they do not even know what they talk about.
As for your 'no credibility' comment, I cannot believe you think you have any yoursel ???

The guy is a BSer supporting his hidden agenda. GRST is yet to be a serious investment (if ever) but believing the posts of that man is really not serious.

3 possibilities:
- He is paid to do it
- He loss his shirt in the past with it
- He need attention, being a lonesome frustrated individual.

Whatever tha case, he knows the history of this company and has no clue what Leon is doing ... or not.

GRST is a sub-sub-sub-penny one should only play leftover money with, hoping Leon will effectively succeed but accepting that right now, with what we know, the probability of losing one's bet is serious.

One should be realisitic where our infamous analist is whisful. For the moment, being working on my pc a lot (producing a video covering our recent trip to US, posting in here is an interesting way to relax.

Enjoy the ride

'Wouldn't a 7/10th O/S ownership hand that person the controls?'

May be not if Leon is one of those creating the required funds.

This being said this is a theorical scenario as good as any other one assumed in here since no one in here knows what Leon is effectively up to.

THE ISSUE right now is thye debt (our infamous analyst will agree) and another theory would be to obtain government grant out of the existing funds addressing the addiction our customers try to cure.

'He has a lot of work to do at this point."

Granted but he obviously is doing it.