Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I agree. In the meantime, people will just day trade for a quick profit.
Stocks go up and down all the time...the question is...how long do you have to wait. If it's less than 3 months, than I wouldn't invest in this stock. I'm not saying it will go up in three months, but you saw this stock go from .0015 to .0025 back to .0015 in a matter of a few days. Who says it won't do that again. The opportunity is that as more news comes out, the momentum will go up. Too many people day trading this stock, so it will require patience.
This is where you and I may differ on views. It may be that way now, but I believe it will climb in time and with good news.
Well, the only reason why it can't hold on to its gains is because there are people willing to sell for quick hits and day trade it. If people didn't sell their shares, it would hold onto it's gains.
Great question. Some would argue that it's factual, so it's not biased.
Agreed, it's BS. It should be news order, not something that is two months old with a negative personal spin.
You missed the run in January then. It went from .0019 to .007 in approximately a week. Granted one time doesn't signal a good trend, but what news was released at that time to warrant it. The only thing I found was the IR court case. Imagine what could happen when something with bigger comes out?
In my opinion, it's an exciting time for SVFC, it's just a question of can we keep the positive news flowing.
I see, that makes sense.
Boy, that was a quick change in heart. In a 4 minute time span you go from "buy today for tomorrow's pay day" to "I can't take anymore, I'm out"? :)
I'm expecting SVFC to miss the quarterly filing again, but isn't it due?
I think the issue with this site is the posts. They appear to be attempt to manipulate the stock price. Whether it's old data just repeated daily or the hype of this stock is going to explode any day now.
Bottom line is the potential for the technology is being tested, international patents have been filed, and waiting to be granted, revenue is practically nothing, debt is being converted to shares or sold off. That being said, I think it explains the stock price at these levels.
In my opinion, there is only one question any current investor or potential investor needs to ask themselves. Is this company going to be successful in achieving their vision. If the answer is yes, then buy and hold, if the answer is no, then sell or short.
Hope you are correct on the payoff.
Heck, if they converted at .002, then they are already down on their conversion. :)
Does anyone have anything that would be considered new information on SVFC? Essentially, all we are seeing is the same old information being repeated multiple times...good or bad. Has anyone heard anything regarding the CFO or if they will file the 2nd quarter timely?
I think the safe bet is to look at what you think the company would be worth in 1-3 years and divide by the number of outstanding shares. It's hard to determine what it will be worth, however, if they are able to prove the process is effective in treating their target areas, It would think it would be penny land, hopefully much more. However, anytime they increase or decrease outstanding shares, it will change.
Just my opinion.
Your point is valid...we are down, and more than longs like to hear. However, it's not 75% in 4 days.
So what you are saying is that 4 days ago this stock was at The stock was at .0072? Even at todays low of .0013, that would put the stock over .005, and I don't think we were there.
Sorry BBW, I misread your post. You stated the change was 13 mil in 1st quarter.
Revenue is not $0.00. I'll give you that through the first quarter, It's minimal at best, but we don't know what the revenue is in the 2nd quarter yet.
So you are saying that the debt/deficit increase 48.9 million in 3 months? Or should I say the 1st quarter filing stated that?
Define near term. Let's be honest...no one can state that as fact.
I think everyone would agree that their current financial statements show significant losses over the years. The question is...will they continue to operate and make money in the future. It's going to be a tough task, but if you believe they will get patents and obtain licensing agreements, then revenue will follow. No one knows the answer to this question (for certain), but I am hedging (hoping) that they will.
They Re Hot!
There's the discount.
The reality is that the only way IR makes more than the 91K is if the shares are issued at a discount or if the price goes up. For example, let's assuming the number of shares were issued at yesterday's closing price. If they were selling today, with the pps dropping, they wouldn't have made 91K.
I agree.
Trust me, I get it. I struggle with that amount right now as well. The issue is...if he is successful in the IND he's working on, then how many times do you think he or other institutions will utilize the process. At $2,500 each time, that's 200 hundred to cover the annual cost. The key to this is...do we believe that Dr. Andrews can do it? If so, do you think it will open the door to over 200 procedures a year? I don't have the answers (as at this point, no one does), but I'm really hoping it does.
As it sits now, you are correct. Once they can start charging $2,500 for each crack, then I hope 40K a month won't be too much.
you are correct, but it is predominately derivative related.
Here's is my take. All the posts about converting debt to shares at below market prices is unfortunate and frankly plays into those who short the stock. Those shares will probably sell off to make sure they can lock in their initial investment, which they have every right to do. As long as we can weather the fluctuations, then you should ask yourself the question did you invest in the company to make a quick profit, or are you investing for where this stock will be in the future? Bottom line, removing debt from the balance sheet is a good thing for longevity. Just my own opinion though.
So to be clear, you are saying that there is a new lawsuit that I will find on this site?
So if I understand your statement correctly, you have someone telling you this information (which you trust) and there is nothing published yet on the new lawsuits?
Sarah R Young is the Director of Quality Assurance at SVFC. Are you implying that she is suing her employer?
I didn't find anything when I googled it, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it isn't happening. I'll stand behind by post from yesterday...where is the link to support your comment.
I have a free account, and I can receive PM's, but I cannot send them.
Bold prediction, but hope you are right.
Agree. These days of the small movements aren't a big concern for me. I have seen this stock go from .002 to .007 very quickly. I would much prefer a stable climb, but we may have to wait until there is relevant news like a patent granted or international revenue. Until then, I'll let the day swindlers do their thing. Hopefully they are good at it as a bad move in the stock could burn someone.
Agreed, but how much of that loss was from derivatives. I know the answer, but just making the point...it's all in how one looks at the numbers. Hypothetically, If there was a one-time lawsuit won at it awarded 10million, that doesn't define revenue going forward. Might not be a perfect example, but I think people will understand the point.
No I find it funny how many times I've read that same post in the last two days. The sky is falling.