Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ben, let's hope your best part won this one in the end
We're not kids here. You lose or make dough. That's it. You lose this focus and give in to silly emotions , you only screw yourself.
YOU also means everybody else.
We're faceless weak hands thinking high of ourselves. I think ego must be completely annihilated in this , including posts. The only thing that must remain is respect. It must be enforced which is not (!).. and is possible. Disrespect is not tolerable, and works against general interest. Posts that attack others shall be deleted ASAP.
I for one quit contributing in places where there's no respect. It is not a threat but a reality.
CSCO RB is an example. I warned them (vaguely because I don't post there much anymore!) in 2 occasions (2 times) of impeding serious drops. Last one was 3 days ago. Of course, I was not taken seriously, to ... their peril. Last time I even gave them an (unbelievable at the time) price target... for next open/day - while in a full morning strong rally ! RB don't delete posts and time stamps, so proof is there.
I don't think their idiotic attitude helped them..
I don't dare to say I'm good because I also have my screw ups.
But I do make progress. If respect is gone, and/or disrespect is permitted ... I'll be talking like Greenspan if any.
Maybe even post to contrary and help the MM specialist as a 'pay back' would be a good idea! hmm, I really like this one.
the ball is in your side
...
about CIEN, I didn't mean anything. Just curious if you bailed out already. I had a hunch you got married to it like with NT.
Don't be angry on me as I didn't move the price.
I also bought a stock on a fkng bottom ... that just kept falling.. After a certain limit I said, "Fvck you" to the stock. I'll buy you back when you show me buying interest. I didn't stick around with shares to find out how far can it go down. And believe me I had patience (took a loss).
It is hard on nerves. After I sold, next day it gained 5% @&%$#.
But - I knew (from charting) that it was just manipulated to attract more suckers. I watched it as it gave back all and them some.. Patience is really hard to have. Ask my nails..
cheers
so tele's personal attack was tasteful & appropriate..
Ben, you disappointed, and then .. confirmed it
1) I wrote you 2 posts and you ignored me (2221,2237). You took it not just personally and subjectively, but in a wrong, wait, bad manner !
That was the big disappointment and confirmation (when 2nd post was ignored). I thought of you differently.
I am an idiot.
2) tele attacked me here (2238). So what? The post is left. No corrective action. So much for your integrity.. Laughable.
This was the confirmation of the confirmation.
But hey, when sage posted a funny post with 2 pics ... it got deleted..
bye
Ben, good point, but in spite of all , I don't think NT got to the/a capitulation point (like October 2002).
I still feel that it's not over yet. I think even $2 will be challenged. Especially I think , if it either slips with 'bellow radar' speed (CDN commission) which would be 6-8¢ , or big increments (you'd know those..).
But the real 'enemy' is a fast drop, the kind of your example.
Do you happen to know a site where I can find Earning Releases dates/time/estimate for Canadian companies? Best if will be in a list format, like what's for the week.
cheers
p.s. a reasonable LOD would be 3.45 (violated !), or if worse then 2.3 .
Hi Ben, I think justleftnt is right in regard to
another sucker punch waiting around the corner.
My feeling is based on 'chatter'. It suggests a big one..
... but, on the bullish side (?) it suggests that the big one will be inflicted in a forced manner. This translate in violently and brutally screwing longs while specialist will accumulate..
One thing's for sure = fasten your seat belt..
Well, the chart also leaves room ... for such sour candy.
---
Do you (still) own CIEN ?
My my. Terrible price action if one is long.
cheers
sage, I found that being a pig.. is human
In trading it's bad as it takes away profits and makes us feel fools. Only having and following trading rules can save one from this. But hey, it adds to the fun ... if you can afford it.
Take for example NT. I saw this morning the 3.87 - 3.9 as a great place to either short or go to cash (((TOP of day))).
My knowledge told me so. I could have been definitely wrong, but the odds were stacked up in 'my' favor.
Since I didn't participate in the last (sucker but good) rally I didn't have what to sell. I didn't alarmed the board either since people here are very bullish and won't mind a few ¢ drop (15¢ actually from that top -4% !!)
Will it drop more? We'll see. But why sweat as a pig? Max, if will rise, I'd just buy back where I left.
I didn't short because I had to watch it and I couldn't as I had to leave for a while to take the kids some place.
---------
are those intraday charts real time or just delayed?
---------
I never (yet) traded QQQ but I watch it closely and plan to trade it. I appreciate any and all advises. Still, I have to incorporate my past experience (pain related) to entry exit.
How do you relate $CPC to $VXN ?
FWIW (my read), QQQ is now in a critical period. If it can't hold the ground (I think it won't), chances are that it will hit 33 , or even 32.5. (Nasdaq 1800 or lower) Well, it can even slide to 30 before (elections) bounce/rally...... when this (nowadays levels) will be a top.
---------
GWB is ok, but not the best. People like to joke on leaders (bushisantichrist). It's always funny.
He is not the enemy that created problems. He made mistakes, and I'm sure he learned a lot in 4 years. He may be better in 2nd term (if elected).
Life will go on.
cheers
nt4life, try to be objective ! for your good
did NT situation got rosy, and I stay bearish?
or
is the same bad , and keep on coming while you live on denial?
I DID (of course) got burned by NT. MANY TIMES!
My stance is NOT because of that.
My balance with NT is positive. My big loss with NT regards potential.
re new elements: I try hard to gain an edge ... and you can imagine how easy it is...
It is NOT, but hey, I just keep at it. It is a never ending process.
A picture's worth 1000 words. That's why I like charts. Now and then I 'see' something, or I get burned and try to learn.
The last thing learned that I was talking about is actually a new twist in interpretation of same old same old. Basically a speculation - but seems to have decent odds.
Under certain pressure a certain move should be expected. The deviation that occurred from this 'thing' in NT in January 2003 was big (and had 3 occurrences). It was only after a long volume cycle in order to reveal (and confirm) the pump and dump entrapment (nevermind the bad 'news').
Sorry but some things I can't really explain. This one even still needs to go through a confirmation process. The chart that I was looking at was a regular 9 month daily. Nothing special other than smoothing some of the volatility.
I even didn't care about NT. I was actually studying pressure and price movement on other stocks (about 20) when I realized certain connections under certain conditions. I remembered (of course) NT with it's pump and dump action, and recent drop, and out of curiosity I looked at it.
And THAT was the NEUTRAL conclusion that came out (from previous post). I was so excited that I posted it inside 10 min of looking at it.
Again, it's my personal speculation and interpretation of factors. I have no hard proof of anything.
And I was a fool on occasions ... like so many others.
However, I'm anxious to see how this will play out. Will we go to $22 ... $2.2 ... $.22 ?
cheers
p.s. you cared about fundamentals as I remember
(chart is a reflection isn't it)
sorry for bearishness
sad that can be done
with the new elements I learned, chart tells me that smart money (whoever they are/were) knew about NT sorry state some time prior to the end of December 2003 (and the entrapping rally ensued thereafter). Horrific.
In spite that the same (new) elements support a bottoming for short term in this zone, the implication of prior read may be that price will NOT rise anymore to our expectations.
This would confirm my whatever fundamentals I understand(and posted).
Price may (need) go through a long period of consolidation, but, since money still has to be made (milked from us) , I expect volatility.
cheers
yes gy, they could've said how sales are doin
at least somethin
(actually they just did say .... margins aren't great and ... costs high still = not enough revenue = BAD BAD BAD )
People can't grasp the idea that ... maybe they can't release PRs without ... blood letting. Sometimes it just stinks.
Personal experience LOL.
Owens may be (or not) a good person , straight sexually ... or even lovin John, but will that matter?
nope
Right now it's notin but a musical chairs trading stock..
live on hopes and $ dreams, die on PRs and live the money to the specialist ..
enjoy the emotions
cheers
here's a bone .. ONNN a cindarella ?
http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/ticker/article.asp?Symbol=US:ONNN&Feed=BW&Date=20040728&...
the chart is much like NT...
(from 9 in March) now 3.21 ... up 15% in AH (+0.49) (after reporting - pls read carefully!! )
could be very interesting for trading
cheers
hi Chicago, you bring in some fresh air
It seems you like emotions (NT). We expect a report these days (27th ?). Then ... August (to me it feels like Halloween in August).
Markets are not much stronger either. Not much help there. If it wouldn't be for the elections I'd be even more bearish.
I think we're just ahead of some rolling coasting in NT.
At least that's what I feel.
I'm concerned about 2004 results (numbers). This is really gonna matter.
cheers
hello Ben, here's a cool link for markets pulse
I like it
http://www.marketvolume.com/content/products/mktsum/mktsum_adv_dcln.asp
You might want to add it to the list of links
cheers
sage, sorry. You should've taken at least half off the table once you feel good...
If it rises more you'll make less... but hey... if it plunges you got protection. Even if were to drop back to little bellow your buy price ... you'll still have a profit !
That's a good thing.
Especially with this yo-yo speculative play.
It's always a next time...
I came to realize that the specialist handling NT is a good Tech person ..... and messes around with the TA to get a better edge...
It is difficult to trade NT isn't it? And even it seems crazy in the moves at times...
Many times it just goes against expectations. Bad news ... it rallies ... you buy ... and then it plunges.
That guy is strong and smart. It likes to fool with us so we don't get bored..
2.40? Who knows, I didn't 'calculate' that, but IMS it looks that some distribution was taking place recently.
I actually had a dream in which I woke up to a panic falling NT to 2, got excited, but decided to wait a little for better lower price. It then felt bellow 1.8 ... 1.4 ... 1.1, wow, I said wow, good I waited, but NOW I gotta fill up. For some reason I held off ... and it got to 0.08 .
Well, it was a dream. I won't go to say it was a prophecy cause I have no clue, but it really was an emotional ride.
cheers
I was wondering, do you have 3 and/or 7 min charts (1-5 days)
report is just in line with my reading (#2178)
...and previous others
'investors' may yet be creamed... and then nortelled
it's a sad story
it was a good company
I hate FD and the gang (still there !!!!!!!)
cheers
in chart support is just bellow making this a decent buy... but (NT) it's a speculative play ! ....
mr.chart BS -it's good it held and closed above 4.37
but not so good that it touched it
in fact, on the week ... NT gained 2 ¢ ... not bad ...
But hey, a gain is a gain.
Simon says a substantial/sustained move should commence, starting probably in the next 2-10 days
The thing is ... Simon is not sure yet if North or South ...
Next PR due on 27? Then ... August with (hopefully) a finale.
I think the move will be against expectations. The specialist crook must profit, hence the little guy crowd must be once again Fkd.
How else?
Just remember: speculative stock !!!
Analysts talking about it say they either sold most, hold little, or NOT having ANY NT .
Not even in their own personal portfolio (in case you'd argue that they're restricted to hold speculative stocks).
I'm not saying it's gonna do it, but this can close for trading (to amplify emotions), while PR is dropped on us !
cheers
back to work
Ben, Patty eh?
100 billion a year ... yeah right..
They all struggle and probably continue to for a long time.
If 5 billion is real then she got the lion share...
"industry forecasts peg the service provider router and switch market at under $9B in 2007/2008. "
http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/ticker/article.asp?Feed=Bcom&Date=20040714&ID=3884416&S....
if it was so rosy FD didn't have to facke around desperately for numbers.
That's a logical fact.
One needs no further info...
For the love of money, don't kid yourselves ...
(((((( hello )))))) , the rating is speculative ...............
is anything lower? LOL
cheers
taking on the bad bullies with $1 trillion muscle
SEC Proposes New Oversight on Hedge Funds
By MARCY GORDON, AP Business Writer
WASHINGTON - Federal regulators on Wednesday proposed new oversight for hedge funds, investment pools for the wealthy that are growing but have traditionally had scant federal scrutiny.
The vote was 3-2, marking the second time in less than a month the Securities and Exchange Commission (news - web sites) split over a significant regulatory move. In both instances, SEC Chairman William Donaldson and the two Democratic commissioners opted for stricter regulation while the two other Republican members opposed it.
On June 23, the panel voted in the same fashion to mandate that mutual fund boards have chairmen who are independent from the companies managing the funds — an action that will force an estimated 80 percent of U.S. mutual funds, or some 3,700 funds, to replace their chairmen.
This time, the SEC approved a proposed new rule ordering most hedge fund managers to register with the agency. If formally adopted after a 60-day public comment period, the rule would open the funds' books to SEC examiners and make them subject to an array of regulations including accounting and disclosure requirements.
The agency could, for example, conduct inspection "sweeps" of groups of hedge funds, something it now lacks legal authority to do.
The high-risk, potentially high-return funds have an estimated $750 billion to $1 trillion in assets and are growing, and oversight is needed to head off potential blowups that could hurt ordinary investors, SEC officials say.
"Small investors are increasingly being exposed to the risks of hedge fund investing," Paul Roye, head of the SEC's investment fund division, said before the vote at a public meeting. He said the agency "needs to detect and prevent fraud at an earlier stage, and prevent these fraudulent activities from damaging markets and harming average investors.
"In most of the hedge fund fraud cases we have seen, the (SEC's) involvement began long after investors' assets were gone," he said.
Donaldson said some 40 hedge funds are believed to have been involved in the scandal engulfing the $7 trillion mutual fund industry.
The two Republican commissioners, Paul Atkins and Cynthia Glassman, expressed opposition to the proposal. But the two Democrats on the panel supported it along with Donaldson.
"I fear that we are setting off down the road of regulatory overreaction," Atkins said at the meeting. "Fraud deterrence is a laudable goal, but so is avoiding regulatory overreach."
Tighter regulation of the funds also is strenuously opposed by other policy-makers, notably Federal Reserve (news - web sites) Chairman Alan Greenspan (news - web sites), who maintains that it would hinder the flexibility of financial markets.
Still, a number of hedge fund managers — representing some 40 percent of those in the United States — have voluntarily registered with the SEC, many of them in recent months since Donaldson and other officials began discussing the issue.
Greenspan and Donaldson are among the members of the President's Working Group on Financial Markets, which discussed the new SEC proposal at its meeting Wednesday. The group, which meets occasionally, was established after the October 1987 stock market crash.
Critics of stricter oversight say institutional investors and sophisticated, wealthy individuals are aware of the risks and don't need the protection of federal regulators.
"Any resort to governmental regulation has to be carefully considered to ensure that the benefits afforded outweigh the burdens created," said John G. Gaine, president of the Managed Funds Association, whose members include hedge fund managers.
The SEC says it has seen an increase in fraud among the 5,700 or so hedge funds in the United States, and has brought 40 enforcement cases in the last five years, able to act only after investors have lost money.
One hedge fund, Canary Capital Partners, is at the center of the scandal involving trading abuses in the mutual fund industry. Regulators have accused Canary of securing special trading privileges at several big-name mutual fund companies, including Bank of America, Banc One, Janus and Strong.
Hedge funds traditionally have been investment outlets for the wealthy and for sophisticated investors. But to attract smaller investors, funds of hedge funds — which invest in several hedge funds rather than individual securities — have sprung up since 2002 and offered lower minimum entry requirements than conventional hedge funds, such as a $25,000 investment compared with $1 million in assets.
Beyond being lured into a hedge fund, ordinary investors also passively participate in them through their pension funds and 401(k) retirement plans — which are increasingly putting billions into hedge funds.
Like mutual funds, hedge funds pool investors' money to try to earn the highest return possible. But hedge funds can use techniques that are off-limits to mutual fund managers, such as shorting stocks, essentially betting they will fall, and using derivatives — complex financial instruments used to hedge against risk.
8^ )
option B it can dip to 4.40 LOD (or is it LOL)
a quite impressive wealth give back to specialist crook
;^ )
likely LOD 4.50 4.53
longs don't want it to close bellow 4.6 , and definitely not bellow this
;^)
FWIW I see weakness. I wait in cash (NT-wise)
It's just intraday weakness, but can develop ... : (
4.70 (resistance developing)
I save the sweating :^ '
cheers
chart BS (fundamental BS still unknown)
in spite of yesterday big rise the chart is edgy
NT needs to close around unchanged or better for an important element to live...
Then another (lagging) element must come along so we can say "bullish"
cheers
Place your bets, hands off the money, rolling, 00.. awww...$@!&
... the "house" thanks you.......
Mr. Owens said he is "increasingly focused" on controlling costs and improving Nortel's cash balance.
"It has become clear that we will need to put into place an improved cost structure," Mr. Owens said in a statement.
He provided no further details, and some analysts worried about what the statement meant.
Analyst Brantley Thompson of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said that "the lack of clarity on costs remains a concern." He rates Nortel stock "outperform" but said "the risk is now even higher," suggesting the stock could fall 31 % in a negative scenario and rise 26 % in a more positive outcome.
........
geez
he is "increasingly focused" on controlling costs = we are in trouble (contracts, revenue down....on and on.... beyond what is known)
Owens had anything but a happy face ...
The most he offered was hopes and dreams ...
Dream on Mr. NT gambler/lover...
NO company cares about costs when prosper. It's just a cost of prosperity.
Fact - the stock went up big.
Fact - no one can honestly say why (even after intense head scratching)
my opinion - the specialist crook run a show.
Shorts got killed... in spite of bad news and bad markets! They got accustomed that after bad news , a drop (and fat profit) surely follows. They forgot about specialists ... hehehe
- if NT is indeed doing bad (that's what I think) ... 3 is going to be TOO HIGH.
Then split (to keep it 'up'), dilution (to get more money - from the little bag holders guys), and on and on ..... until BK, or good NEW management
cheers
Our money is on the table. Roll the dice again , man.
Awwww , and I had such a good(/f) feeling about it ...
Now I need to bring more money (to NT specialists). I need to break even... I need the money ... LOL
Gytheon, read my post again - carefully
It was NOT directed to you (messenger)
It was a comment on the PR (deceit)
You posted freely (your right),
I commented freely on the article (my right)
What seems to be the problem?
Oh, is it that only hype and positive comments are allowed , and only positive paragraphs should be read?
That's it, right?
cheers
p.s. Carry on with articles. Comments should be welcomed and the board should be alive.
That's Bullshit re: strong 2004
How can it be "it forecast stronger 2004 sales growth"
when ......
..... 5 billion contract and main customer run off with LUcent
One must use controlled substances to believe that NT bullshit.
Now don't get me wrong, I would like the company to perform and do well (and so my RRSP), but .... reality is telling different things than the Nortel's clowns and liars.
The way I see it, 'they' didn't care being caught red handed lying and cheating. They continue ...
For this company to succeed the whole BOD MUST go.
I think speculative is the right rating. Maybe upgraded to super-speculative, LOL.
cheers
well, this important ? (besides work going away..)
"This reduction in 2003 net earnings identified to date
SUBSTANTIALLY impacts the Company's continuing operations,
rather than discontinued operations, resulting in the
elimination of substantially all of the net earnings from
continuing operations for the full year 2003;"
"SUBSTANTIALLY impacts continuing operations"
LOSING main customer AND contract (THIS alone is a killer)
........ to LU(ser)
mess , uncertainty ... ... ... ... ... ... .......
NT up 10% !?!?!?!?!
geesh
Did I miss something?
:/
(speculative play by specialists)
more firings and layoffs I'd say
....... anyway the work goes to LU ......
- today it was/is a retail-shorts open killing season (by our friends - the specialists)
I'm impressed by the effort and (their) power.
- something opposite to what's going on over to RHAT
cheers
I think the 13 (tomorrow) is a PR due
Anyone knows the time ????????
...the chart suggest 'bad news/PR'?
That's what I'd think.
It looks and smells like distribution for the past week.
It ('they') try and suggest that 4.25 is a support ;)
Can't buy it just yet
Enough gambling ... I'm too bad at that ...
cheers
I guess he didn't want to appear in the same day with Lay and Martha... it would be one too many things in common...
Better yet, he didn't want to appear ...... period
Another bullschit gone by...
cheers
I think I just heard something about 5:30 EST
That's after extended trading hours I guess
Why so ???????
hmmm
Just another manipulative blabbing. I don't expect hard solid good news. I got used to the bullchit...
Will the little guy and late buyers be creamed ? Or buyers dried up and new buyers need to be attracted with a little hype?
I expect less fooling with the truth. Am I too naive?
cheers
regarding NT that is traded in both
US and Canadian Exchanges, I hate when only one is closed for holiday. I'd like either both closed or open. It just screws up the charts.
On To it looks bullish in almost all my short term signals, while in NY just some of the signals look bullish. Now which one is it?
Well, the daily charts look bad on both as it is.
Apparently the NT submarine Admiral will give an interview on ROBTV on Thursday? Again a rumor fantasy bounce? Something else I can't see. The facts aren't helping...
Well, the missing indicators are quite important. The indexes still look down...
CNXT -43% plunge (telecom chips) guided down...
CSCO also weak... Sector alert ?
Bottom line:
No easy money
cheers
sage, you have few good points on the volume mystery bubble
I also think that the world poured capital, and still do. Hopefully they'll continue.
NT? Well, it's nothing but a gamble game. As for "buying just before they release the audited 2003 results will be a good idea"... I won't be able to stand it. Even mighty CSCO fvcked up on me. Here we talk about NT , where the specialists lead on the blind (aka the little guys).
Assume PPS goes to 3.05 just before, and you pile up. Then if the PR hit the fan .... "they" may drop it 20% to 2.4 in a flash.
Oh my, I can imagine the volume...
Who's the pig that can get slaughtered? Well, a pig is any person (including pros) that has a decent/max profit and wants more /last penny (pushing the luck), usually while getting blind to sell signals.
No pun intended.
NOBODY escapes/escaped being a pig. That's how I found out too LOL. I try to quit being one.
cheers
sage, I appreciate your input
And humor is always good
Look at the volume on those charts. Along the years you can see that participation increased quite dramatically. You can say that it went wild.
Will it rise even more (volume)? Is it possible?
We're in the middle I'd say. The markets are looking both ways.
If we rise we may rise another "2003" shot, which would be cool, or fall half or all the gain of "2003". Whatever action will be I'd say is reserved for 2005. Banning a crash, the rest of this year we range and bounce around.
I sold my NT this AM a little bellow the HOD. Decided to wait in cash a little. It looks overbought, rates change, etc.
Simon says pigs can get slaughtered.
Thanks for the charts
cheers
want to SEE manipulation?
stock AND chart manipulation
take a look at today DELL intraday chart.
(also look over a 10 day for better view if you want)
In the LAST MINUTE it shoot up about 60 cents !
... and "closed" there ($36.02).
Nobody is playing games, right?
Don't kid yourselves.
cheers
sage, just like you said -
- playing around
I believed on December 31st 2003 that some/all of the indexes will finish the year 2004 in red. That's what I was thinking looking to the charts.
That feeling stayed the same ! (that'd be my guess in a contest of sort)
Of course, in the mean time we can/should ride the waves.
I think 2005 will be more volatile, and 2006 a rider.
-------
I appreciate your advises. And thanks for the charts.
Here's my take on 'belief': it doesn't matter what you (or me) believe, or how you put it "believe in what you CHOSE to believe in".
It ONLY matters what the market believes (MManipulators included).
That's the paying boss !!!
You may believe some news to be good and the market to rally, but then ..... the market dive in a hurry...
What, are you now going to follow your belief and stay long, or forget it the personal belief and go with the flow?
If you are smart and right, and the masses are stupid and wrong, guess what, you must follow the stupid and wrong to stay right (profitable).
cheers
NT gambling house for MM specialists
I made a rule that I don't touch such
I missed the rise from 3 and then what is nothing but the rumor rally.
Well, no touchy ... but on June 16 sharp (on close) the chart told me that something changed, and higher price will come as a result of 'something'. I scratched my head. Good news? nah, can't be. But then again... something must be. What the hell will be? It must be SOON too LOL. Hmmm
Then there .......... Chambers "innocent"(?) remarks !!!!!! .............. the following day !!!
Well, then we all know it. - The rumor rally (and rising H/E).
The chart while a laggard, often times it tips the 'hand'.
If NT 'floats' here... even higher price is in the cards.
Bought a little few days back. Not much. Just to kill the rally.
I have the luck of a stock killer.
It did put a break on it didn't it, LOL.
If I won't like the chart I'll exit ASAP. No much of a thinking on exit of NT.
Right now it 'rests'.....probably waiting for me to exit...
I don't have much of a position, so I'll take my time.
I nimble lately (swing/daytrade) with BGO (hate the volume), CSCO, AMD, BBD.b (dog but is likely bottoming out !!), MU
Eyeballed few others. I'm still studying and fixing toys so my time (and confidence) is scarce. Now the kids are home for a while... and that is not helping my concentration.
Happy trading
cheers
sage, I aint no permabull or bear
try to be an objective tin man (no caring) - it is very hard as I like this.
I saw people gaining fortunes
and then
I saw some of them desperate, no even eating, drinking, loughing no more
saw them first hand
daily
for a looooooooong time (many years)
I became a big turkey
paying attention to "un-important" things
sorry for scaring you
unintended
cheers
deja vu 2000?
institutional ownership down?
Now just 27% (and dropping?)..
.. it was way more wasn't it ?
hmm
3.9 - 4.1 zone looked as a selling(-distribution?) ground for I'd say last 2 months..
Like I said, I expect this to plunge hard at least one more time. Probably after some nasty PR...again..
I didn't forget about downtown to $2, and I don't find it funny.
That's me
cheers
Ben, be more careful - that's a mixed up of alias
- or rather you forgot to switch and got red handed
Now I have to figure out which one is it the other one you
cheers