Qui est avec moi?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I know the day is young, but I'm just not seeing the share price increase that has been predicted/promised with such fervent zeal.
I'm beginning to think a PR referencing attendance of another obscure conference or an invitation to speak at a luncheon would have had a more positive influence on price than the ones we've seen earlier this week.
No, I'm not that maniacal. I'll just issue a blanket statement now: any uptick will be due to manipulation.
That should cover it.
Not particularly. I would be much happier if the share price rose in a manner directly proportional to the news (maybe it is...??). A few cents here and there just doesn't do it for me. I want to see the $10 nano is predicting.
I predicted $3.17 on 9/25/2014...
I just never told anyone about it.
Most times when I type 'LOL' I mean it figuratively. This one is a literal LOL!
Exactly my question...
You're missing the point: ANY article that mentions 'Ebola' is proof positive that NNVC will be able to capitalize on the Ebola goldmine.
Nor substance.
In NNVC's case, past performance is an indication of future [non]returns.
AZ, you're only in the red if you sell at a loss, n'est–ce pas?
While the action today is disheartening, I'm not fully convinced SP won't recover somewhat. Perhaps some non-substantial PRs will breathe a little life back into the price and you can exit in the green..
Yes, the fall has nothing to do with NNVC's deficiencies at all.
I'm actually a little in the green on this. I dumped my long position when we were around $4.90/$1.40 (my avg. cost was $4.02/$1.15) and have gained a little more from trading the $0.25 to $0.50 swings.
Unfortunately, of late, there have been fewer peaks and more valleys, making trading more difficult and risky.
Yes... in a building containing only circular hallways.
I don't think you should assume that Seymour is peddling misinformation. I think it's more a case of a lack of information...
The day is still young, my friend.
Could someone please explain to me why the share price is falling when there are so many positive advancements being made?
1) Ebolacide2 - Soon!
2) Flucide - Just around the corner!!
I was certain we'd be at either $57 or $100 by tomorrow.
Ummmm, the day is still young, my friend....
That's it! That's the spirit! Keep that positive attitude!
Remember, making money on this stock is a secondary consideration. It's the humanitarian aspect of sinking cash into it that should be primary on anyone's list of priorities.
C'mon now, let's not stretch it too far. $2.99 is hardly $2.00. Although, the prediction is much closer than $100.
It will be soon, very soon. One must have patience with matters of such import.
P.S. I think they use FedEx.
Hmmmmmm, perhaps they don't know as much as we think they do...
Rejoice! Plummeting share price has enabled us to buy MORE shares at discount prices!!
Yes, I think many will. Much more realistic than the speculative upside rantings so rampant on this board, particularly given past and current performance.
Sorry, I don't see the connection between this and NNVC...
Sorry, I don't see the connection between this article and NNVC...
Excuse my poor choice of words. You corroborate my findings.
Please refer to posts #99843 and #99844. Although I know nano-p is just baiting me, these predictions are as prevalent and far more off the mark than any of Rawnoc's predictions.
Again, thank you.
Thank you for supporting my position!