Qui est avec moi?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I can't vouch for anyone's authenticity save mine own.
I am frequently accused of negativity, but I view my stance more as a counterbalance to the outlandish claims of grandeur. Having waited too long for this stock to appreciate, I tend to lean toward the side of the naysayers because, IMO, the share price and the inability of the company to produce a marketable product to date, parallels more closely their point of view.
I think any opposing point of view is necessary and thought-provoking in all discussions. If this board were left solely to the proponents, all we'd have is a cozy little Mutual Admiration Society on our hands.
We don't really want that, do we?
But not ours?
This is a rhetorical question, I hope...
Bad news = negativity.
Negativity = loss of faith of the True Believers.
Loss of faith of the True Believers = coming down to Reality.
Coming down to Reality = ... well, that's just not gonna happen.
That's Horse-and-Buggy thinking. Don't be so negative!!!
Your missive appears to indicate you believe there exists only remunerated nay-sayers and none on the yay-sayers side.
Methinks thou doth protest too much.
Perhaps, but thinking a thing does not make it so (except in the minds of the Believers, where anything goes).
Just now beginning?
Thank you for your reply. You've just confirmed something for me. Have a great weekend!
I didn't ask you, Nano, but since you responded...
How about something more concrete? Not something as vague and abstract as an emotion or outlook?
Weedster, same question applies to you...
I am curious....
Is there anything, that the company may or may not do or accomplish, that would cause your unwavering faith in NNVC to waver?
Anything at all?
FZ, I am curious....
Is there anything, that the company may or may not do or accomplish, that would cause your unwavering faith in NNVC to waver?
Anything at all?
Damn! You know how we judges hate having our decisions reversed on appeal.
I will have to review this new evidence as I don't want to risk a mistrial. I declare a 2 day recess.
Question: How many die from influenza each year?
Question: How many die from Ebola each year?
Question: Where should the priority be, given the number of deaths attributed to each virus?
Ebola will run it's course. The flu will not. IMO.
I can count my successes on one hand...
... the hand of a 257,236 fingered Andorian Mud Sloth, that is.
Ba-dum! Thank you. Thank you very much.
Ah, thank you for the clarification.
Looking back on my calculations, I notice I was using Dr. Hasslein's Rose Colored Glasses theorem of share price validation constructs to check Nano's work.
My bad.
Flucide Samples shipped to BASi.
OK, so why we're all standing around, debating and cajoling each other, was it ever confirmed that BASi actually received the samples? Is there a tracking number in the house, or did they ship it like the Hope Diamond was once shipped, by Parcel Post?
I could just see the next excuse: Flucide samples lost on way to BASi.
Please don't misunderstand me.
I really believe that you believe. And that's what's important here, now isn't it?
Once again, I am disappointed with the direction the price of this stock is taking. I'm not short this stock, but trying to capitalize on my trading shares in the last few weeks has been a dreary affair, met with no success.
The claims of rapid share price ascension have not come to fruition, leaving me wondering if these claims were somewhat exaggerated.
How much longer must I wait? Soon? Around the corner? Whilst standing on the brink?
Apparently, that FOX News discussion of Ebola didn't do too much to rally share price. In fact, it seems to have had an adverse effect.
Or am I reading too much into this?
Exactly. I/we thought I/we was/were perfectly clear on that point.
Grazie!
I would say I possess the perfect balance of optimism and pessimism. You know, yin and yang type of thing. Sorta like that episode of Star Trek where Captain Kirk was split into two personas in the transporter: one soft, docile and unable to make decisions; the other decisive and aggressive. The one could not exist without the other.
Yeah, that kind of thing. You could say I'm a Captain Kirk type of person.
Isn't that sort of late for a conference? Definitely past my bedtime.