Qui est avec moi?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
$4.00
What by the end of this year?
Oh, the vulgarity! That's really the question we are all asking, isn't it?
I don't make predictions, but I like to comment on those who do.
:) FFS. How long can it take?
Well, I'm assumed to be Rawnoc, New Money, and PT, all rolled into one. Which means I'm fully hedged -- I'm both long and short the stock.
That's too soon.
Think by the end of this year?
No doubt. It's taking forever and a day.
Larson,
I urge you to read about Leonard Nimoy's frustrations with being stereotyped as Spock, a fictional character, half Human and half Vulcan, in a mid-1960's science fiction television show called Star Trek.
I feel the same way, so often accused of being Rawnoc. I am not Rawnoc.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Am_Not_Spock
But to answer your main question....
My point is that Apparition was calling Rawnoc/me out and showing that NNVC was up 14% over some dartboard-picked time-frame.
I was merely picking my own dartboard-picked time frame and coming to a completely different conclusion.
What's your point - I can look at a chart and figure this out - tell me where we are going to be in one year - can you answer that - or is back to Dr. Seymour bike
You want me to make a prediction? Is that going to help you just as ALL the other predictions have helped anyone?
Really?
What's your point - I can look at a chart and figure this out - tell me where we are going to be in one year - can you answer that - or is back to Dr. Seymour bike -
Down $3.00 (46%) from 52 week high. Disappointing.
** sigh **
Let us hope the inevitable SP decline today is not as precipitous as this morning's rise...
Let us hope the inevitable SP decline today is not as precipitous as this morning's rise...
The manipulation is crazy.
~3,000 shares traded before the fall back to $3.60. Meh.
check out the after hours trading , interesting
I'm not the only one who needs a little validation. Here's a little blast from the past: All I want is just one deal with cold hard cash involved - one validation from someone in the pharma business. I hope to see it any day now. Japan, US, UK - makes no never mind - just one. I thought BMS was it. Could still be.
nanopatent Member Level Thursday, 09/25/08 04:30:05 PM
Re: pschae post# 15606
Post # of 101844
Light my fire!
I can switch sides as quickly as the next guy.
Show me some revenue. Show me some steady, consistent and lasting SP appreciation. Show me some non-paid-for reporting. Show me that the science works in provable, non-disputable ways. Show me some money.
Hey, I'll be the biggest NNVC supporter out here. I'll put all y'all to shame.
I'm not in this for the benefit of humanity (gasp!). I can become a missionary in Africa if I want that. I'm here for the money (gasp!).
Until I see it, it's all speculation and pipe dreams.
Oh, and I don't exclude myself from this classification. I rushed into this stock years ago, but now, not so much.
Yes, and those same longs have been "bragging" about their frequent, continual and recent purchases over the years, months and weeks.
I can consider that as rushing in.
most longs have been here for awhile
I feel like Clark Kent must've felt when he took off his glasses and everyone recognized him as Superman.
I've been exposed for the non-Rawnoc that I am.
(comparing-myself-to-Superman analogy intentional)
That is why you are not Ranock.
How can you be so sure?
Nanopatent knows more than all of us.
Agree...at the cusp is when the timid become unsteady s-u.
Ebola was mentioned here. NNVC's share price should climb because of it. After all, any mention of Ebola is a direct link to NNVC's success.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/fox-news-host-proposes-ebola-quarantine-centers-for-every-city-in-the-us/
Exerpt:
Fox News contributor and former actress Stacey Dash on Monday called on the federal government to establish facilities in every U.S. city where suspected Ebola [Ebola mention = direct correlation to NNVC's success] patients could be quarantined.
On the Monday edition of Outnumbered, host Harris Faulkner noted that the “government is really letting us down” because no one had been appointed to fill the role of surgeon general, and the CDC director was forced to do two jobs.
“I don’t care what party you are, you’ve got to get your stuff together,” she said. “We need a surgeon general. We need a pinpoint person. Look, from both sides of the political aisle this weekend, they started saying, where is this person?”
In fact, President Barack Obama had nominated Dr. Vivek Murthy for the post earlier this year, but Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) blocked the appointment because the nominee had considered guns to be a threat to public health.
Fox News host Andrea Tantaros suggested that Republicans would approve former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani as surgeon general.
“If you live in New York City and know Rudy, he put together and extensive set of doomsday plans for this city,” she explained. “So that when 9/11 happened, he knew exactly how to respond… And not just a terrorist attack, but a chemical attack. I mean, Rudy was prepared for everything. He anticipated every situation and what could go wrong. He was always ahead of the curve.”
But Dash, who was co-hosting Outnumbered, proposed a different solution to the Ebola [Ebola mention = direct correlation to NNVC's success] crisis.
“I think they should set up special centers for just Ebola [Ebola mention = direct correlation to NNVC's success] in each state,” she said. “They shouldn’t be letting people go into regular hospitals, where it could be spread.”
“I just think that for this specific disease, we should have a special facility with specially trained people,” Dash later added. “In each city. That way it’s not spread, and when the person walks in, they know what they’re looking for, they know if they find it, they know how to contain it. And they know how not to infect themselves.”
Comedian Paul Mecurio, who was also on the panel, weighed in to note that the movie “Outbreak” had been released in 1995 so the CDC should have had time to prepare.
“There’s a really bad health protocol throughout the United States right now, it’s called going to the hospital,” he insisted. “Like, going to the hospital is not a good thing in this country.”
“I think I would be very careful about saying hospitals were not the place to go in this country,” co-host Sandra Smith advised.
And given the high compensation that Drs. Diwan and Seymour are taking it's obvious that their own attitude is, "Show me the money now!".
Come on, FZ.
You know whenever you do the play-by-play of the climbing share price, it tanks the next day. Don't jinx it.
OU LA LA!!!!!!!!!
What's happening to our scam stock ?
NanoViricides, Inc. (NNVC)
$ 3.58 ? 0.16 (4.68%)
Volume: 168,989
ok, ok, I'd like to see money too. But, I think you get what I'm saying.
But stockholders complaining that they are not getting rich fast enough, or at all smile, adds no information that management could use to improve things.
2006 Show me the money! (next year)
2007 Show me the money! (next year)
2008 Show me the money! (next year)
2009 Show me the money! (next year)
2010 Show me the money! (next year)
2011 Show me the money! (next year)
2012 Show me the money! (next year)
2013 Show me the money! (next year)
2014 Show me the money! (next year)
Sorry for being so childish.
Uh, many proponents here.
Criticism? Who said they shouldn't listen to criticism?
Perhaps, but I really do get the feeling that there are many blind-faith followers of NNVC.
The company doesn't have to prove anything, it doesn't have to produce anything, it doesn't have to earn anything, it doesn't have to answer to anyone and yet, the followers keep following - no questions asked.
Eat your heart out, Bernie Madoff!
If they were to feel guilty about it it would diminish my confidence in their ability to get the job done.
Yes, public corporations shouldn't listen to any criticism from any of their shareholders. It would definitely distract them from the objectives.
So, then, what's the real distraction?
You're right. It is having the completely opposite effect.
This is disappointing. I thought the louder we shouted at management the faster things would go.
you can not change the fact that there is a drug that has huge potential.
JG, you were challenged to get yourself on National TV. C'mon now, that shouldn't be too difficult. NNVC did it.
I don't know what challenge you thought I was offering you that you declined.
Thanks, FZ!
Based on your criteria, I am much more successful than I have typically imagined myself as being.
Personally, I would feel extremely guilty about drawing a salary of hundreds of thousands of dollars each year for something I had not yet delivered on.
Typically, but not always (government workers and tenured educators, for example), compensation is based on performance. Shouldn't the Good Doctors consider reducing their compensation until they actually prove the science by delivering a product that generates revenue?
Here are some real success from this year:
I think all of the critics (myself included) would absolutely love being wrong, but so far I haven't seen anything (other than wild, rampant speculation about the science and the intentions of the Good Doctors to save the world) to indicate otherwise. It's up to NNVC to prove them all wrong. Time's-a-wastin'.
"Soon" is not quick enough. We, and all of the millions of people suffering from the ills that NNVC has been claiming to be able to help for the last 10 years, need to see results. Now.
Yes and a lot of people cannot stand that.
They cannot stand that NNVC has a chance to save lives, and in addition, to become a financial power.
Those people hate the idea of being wrong.
My apologies.
That entry in my quantum log was omitted but, upon review, I now see the Great Linguine Rebellion of 2030 did play a part in the Columbus Day reinstatement.
Sadly, no. That holiday is retracted in 2025 by President Ryan.
It's Columbus Day, Oct. 10, 2044.